NSSM-70 -- HAITI

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
LOC-HAK-7-2-39-9
Release Decision: 
RIFLIM
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
January 11, 2017
Document Release Date: 
December 1, 2010
Sequence Number: 
39
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
July 23, 1970
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon LOC-HAK-7-2-39-9.pdf83.48 KB
Body: 
No Objection to Declassification in Full 2010/12/01 : LOC-HAK-7-2-39-9 sT MEMORANDUM FOR ism Eke scretsry of w The Sacretary of Defense The Secretary of the Treasury Dtroctor, Ge*tral Intelligence Agatcy Chairnixe Jra1* Chief 4 of staff Director. Otf1ce of Emergency Pla*p t*g SUSSL' T: 1 $M-7O -- Haiti t woadd appreciate recsivtag by .R est 3 your ag,acy' a views .sd Position an the Issues rased is the caper on Haiti j:;ru ec,d in r.sposse to S$lyt-70. This will per- aa tt more ezpeditious staffing of the paper to the Pane ? i - dent. A. XT5STI'IGEFI. Hoeisry R i. Luger Qfties of Marsgenlerleett sad Eudcrt VPVaky/vmr 7-16-70 NSC review completed. Sim r... No Objection to Declassification in Full 2010/12/01 : LOC-HAK-7-2-39-9 No Objection to Declassification in Full 2010/12/01 : LOC-HAK-7-2-39-9 1P 4P SECRE'1 MEMORANDUM FOR D. ELSSIM1R rROUt Vim P. Vaky SUBJECT: MSU-70 -- HAITI ACTION 17, 1970 Its short--comings, we do have an operational nerd to got agency views on the Haiti paper and make as Judgmast on th rn. The asked In ISM-70 relate to the kind of posture we mod. Wv and how we should relate to the Duvalier regime Answers to those questions are relevant to (a) the shaping of the J I - 71 AID program which must be compl.t.d by the end of August, (b) the US position in the Inter-America-,n Bank on a number of pro- ject* pending before the Bank for decision; and (c) the US position with regard to (lAS technical assistance programs which the Organization will have to decide in the aeezt few months. The matter to hardly of world-fig importance, and I do not sea the need for an NSC meeting. Considering the crowded .bhedulo, there is no need for a Review Group meting. I recommend we ask the agencies their position on the paper and the issues raised in it, and than staff a memo to the President as we did i* the Peia.naaraaae Canal questiou. The further quo stion of what we should do !: r Duvalier would flow logically from our conclusions about the present paper's issues, visa., what fit poster* we should take toward Duvalier and the suaces- sion issvee. Theetareforo, once we get views an this paper and reach conclusions we will be it% a better position to prepare and consider possible contingency policies for a post-Davaati.r period. RECQMMENVATION That you Olga the mono at Tab A asking sgea tes for their view an the N 170 paper. Col. IceMWdy T VPVaky:jrr 7-17-70 No Objection to Declassification in Full 2010/12/01 : LOC-HAK-7-2-39-9