COMMENTS ON CORNING REAR-VIEW SCREEN PROPOSAL

Document Type: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010055-4
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 28, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 6, 2012
Sequence Number: 
55
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
March 9, 1965
Content Type: 
MISC
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010055-4.pdf143.45 KB
Body: 
Declassified in Pa rt - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873AO01900010055-4 { 0 W-1I el iC2Z -1 / 7 L~ - 4 * -, -0~ Declassified in Pa rt - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010055-4 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010055-4 C0NNENTS ON CORNING REAR-VIII SCREEN PROPOSAL This looks like a sound proposal to do a needed job, but at a rather inflated price. I notice that the bulk of the cost (83 per cent, to be exact) idabsorbed by personnel. Judging from the resumes we are getting high-poi4er people for the money,` but their power does not lie in the direction of optics; e rather, I should think, in microwaves, elctronics, magnetics, and the like. I notice that the first nine months of'the contract will be devoted to. bringing an. engineer up to speed on the literature and theory. of optical diffusdrs. Surely we can find a company with a qualified optics man already on the payroll. Their description of the lab facilities doesn't impress me much, either. They have obviously been trying to get a glass-rod laser going with modulation and interferometry experiments and now find themselves with unused lab space (as well as-people) on their hands, and would lute us to play WPA. They also. seem to be stuck with a.gross of spectroscopic plates wkich they'd like to use up before the expiration date. To sum up, I don't think we s4oi4d buy this., but rather look around for a company with a capability already in being. Dan L. STAT Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010055-4 Declassified in Part - Sanitized C py Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010055-4 I believe this is a well-written proposal - wish all such proposals werte as well organized and clearly written. I disagree with Dants comments about cost.. On the basis of CPFF, and assuming: Overhead at 150%, G&A at 15% and a fee of 10%, this works out to about a total labor (real) cost of approximately for the 15-month period.STAT If they used the caliber of people they vend, they will lose money - and we will gain some probably useful work. I do agree with both Dan and Hank. This work should hake been done long ago - and why are Othey proposing EE'J to work and be educated ? For an optics firm they appear to be suffering from lack of qualified optical people. They appear to be trying to save some of their people from being laid-off - why else put EE's in optics, unless you belong to the University-of STAT 9 March 1965 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP79B00873A001900010055-4