MEMORANDUM FOR THE DIRECTOR

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP74-00297R000200030043-3
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
18
Document Creation Date: 
December 27, 2016
Document Release Date: 
November 8, 2013
Sequence Number: 
43
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
August 12, 1958
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP74-00297R000200030043-3.pdf1.51 MB
Body: 
STAT Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release @ 50-Yr 2013/11/08: CIA-RDP74-00297R000200030043-3 * "10 STAT 12 August 1958 MEMORANDUM FOR THE DIRECTOR 1. This memorandum is for information only. 2. You are seeing Hanson Baldwin at 12 noon on Thursday, August 14, 1958. Attached hereto is a memorandum briefly simmarizing 15 columns by Baldwin since July 1, 1958. , 3. He was critical of the slowness and alleged inefficiency in getting troops to Lebanon. He was critical of the President for committing troops to Lebanon without broad enough consultation with his military advisers. He main- tains the movement into Lebanon of U.S. troops strengthened Nasser but he does declare that it may have encouraged Turkey and Pakistan. In his July 16 column he mentions that "intelligence" officials in Washington and the U.N. never did believe that outside intervention was massive in a physical way but that after the Iraqi coup it could become so. 4. Baldwin still has good sources of information in the highest echelons of the Defense Department but he has lost many of his contacts who are Naval Academy graduates of his time, who have now retired or have left Washington. It is my opinion that Hanson has to dig harder every time he comes to Washington to get news. It is also of interest to note that he now no longer makes his own Washington appointments but they are made for him by the Washington office (Mrs. Jones or Mrs. Ihnat). I assume that Scotty Reston insisted on this. cc: DDCI (w/o attach.) ' STANLEY J. GROGAN ( 1 Assistant to the Directd. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release @ 50-Yr 2013/11/08: CIA-RDP74-00297R000200030043-3 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release @ 50-Yr 2013/11/08: CIA-RDP74-00297R000200030043-3 12 August 1958 MEMCRANDUM FCR THE DIRECT: 1. This memorandum is for information only. 2. Hanson Baldwin's fifteen columns since July 1 deal with military matters, mainly new U.S. weapons and tactics (July it, 8, 11, 28, August 11); and various aspects of the Iraq-Lebanon crisis (July 16, 18, 21, 24, 27, 31, August 1, 5, 6). There is also a discussion (July 13) of difficulties being encountered at the scientific disarmament conference in Geneva. 3. The military discussions concern missiles seen at the Army's White Sands July 1-2 demonstration, of which Baldwin was somewhat critical (July It); the development of the Tactical Air Command at Langley Field (July 8); joint U.S ? -C anadian air defense plans (July 11); new, powerful radar stations being built in Greenland and the Aleutians (July 28); launching of the Triton, biggest and fastest atomic submarine, whose capabilities are described in some detail (August 11). 14. Baldwin is cridsical of the Lebanon landings on such grounds as: (a) the U.S. military system did not demonstrate as mach speed and efficiency as is needed for this type of military maneuver (e.g., July 27); (b) under the circumstances it was not possible to see how the action taken could end the crisis or when the crisis might end (e.g., July 16); (c) the President undertook the commitment without broad enough consultation with his militazy advisers (e.g., July 24); (d) the move probably strengthened rather than weakened Nasser (e.g., July 16). On the other hand, Baldwin seems to feel that the Lebanon action, by demonstrating that ',peace at any price is not our policy,? may have had a good effect in encouraging our allies in the Middle East, particularly Turkey and Pakistan (e.g., July 31). Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release @ 50-Yr 2013/11/08: CIA-RDP74-00297R000200030043-3 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release @ 50-Yr 2013/11/08: CIA-RDP74-00297R000200030043-3 STAT 5. The only reference to "intelligence" in these columns appears on July 16: "Outside intervention, which intelligence officers in Washington and the United Nations believe was never 'massive' in, a physical sense, email noW -- after the Iraq coup -- become so." cc: DDOI w/o attachments STANLEY J. (ROGAN L/ Assistant to the Director Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release @ 50-Yr 2013/11/08: CIA-RDP74-00297R000200030043-3 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release @ 50-Yr 2013/11/08: CIA-RDP74-00297R000200030043-3 irORKATINIES .11 Superlative Submarine. Launching .of Triton on Aug. 19 to Add Biggest: Fastest Undersea Craft to Fleet By HANSON .W. BALDWIN The world's largest eubmarinel T lie pointed out in other scheduled to be launched next week at Groton, Conn., will bel'7..-es ?**wnr that the reactirr a three . decked submersiblemr ler nuejear submarines cruiser, which will displacei "On were be:3 improved steadily. about 1,000 tons submorged. first nuclear corr. e Nautilus" he said, "was The Triton, newest of the isa bit to Olivet about 42,000, tines, fa e to be lion's nuclear- powered &bask- redesilei. But on her new core she' th first po- -we with two reactors and is the ??ilt., tritvel tout 60 per ce.nt greater distance. We have .made suet% tiemendous improve, !events right now and we are .carry tremendou't still doing so, that between the radar antennas and first fueling and the second otherelectronic and .futling, we have increased the communications equipment to unitising radius about SO per provide early warning of im- pending enemy air or surface attacks. Her radar is opera-, lions), of course, only when she is surfaced. Since shoat of her useful work will be dare on the suffice, she is dialgried; unlike some of her predicessers, to be faster on the surface' than when ,sunmersed. The Triton's two reactors will R:ve her. a to', speed that will yet on record, will be able toi approsch the up speed of a car-1 break the thirty-one-day recor4.1.. tier task force or a surface of complete submergeneolteld More important.. the -dikeLip- rieet Sitrfaved she will rob- some of her nuclear priodersa, merit of naleleir reactors and at News Analysis first nuclear-pow- ered radar picket submarine. She will omit, and we may go even further than that with future cores" 117,411 KIM Zang* ? Therefore the Triton's cruis- ing range without refueling will. probably be 'at least 112,000 miles: It mems probable, too, that her 145-man crew, probab- ly the largeet submarine crow IP ? ,biy make twenty-five tothirty) eon. Reports that Admire knot: submerged her speed will titterer verified In recent Con he tonaidar&bly Imo?possibly greseloral Leetleseny showe4 seventeen or elithteien knots. that "the Navris developing Her great buil fono is vat machine to make oxygen from radar is proceeding so fal#41Y. that It may be possible In the .. future to "packets" a radar picket submarine With Oa same capabilities as Moot- 'et the , ? streamlined Nor high speed un- sea water." In the future this Tnton in a considerabTY smalleri der water Also. the protuber- would make possible almost in- h II- 'ances for holusIng the radar definite submergence. ' Seven.' floperlitteas when io.thmerged prevent the However, the Triton's prin. .clears :IA lines possible tr. rip,' reason for existence, as t 1 ITerinT::tnn claims imperia- 1 smaiter au:marines. an electronic sentinel for the pecd, length, displace- The rtiton will displace about ? mon( and other vital statisUcs 'i iy,41 ...nes when surfaced and wi: ..! about 447 tett long P twered by Ilial"r Reactor eet or for the North American ? , ompued woh ether large continent, requires attrition ktibmarines of the past. The cruising. Herhuge bulk requires T, itorc, 5.00 toot, surfaced, two reactors, hulloed of one, toi provide e horsepower n.000 tons submerged Ind 441; .o keep up with surface 'ft>ot le-i2th compare as follows : ' P Triton will be powered by . toe same general type of pre s ,.with. other noge submerrtbles: :L,rized water resetor that haiL,11).?dis- Ruer bet ome standard for all Navy' ability to submerge. t h ships. The reactors will differ nod to cruise totally suernerredNatne Launetieff luck.tesigth very considerably i's'for Prrinda may enable" I g? Nle" feet however, from the one in the 1 tair " ler to lye is Aram veer,.no.t.? 8- rr ??? 1143 nuclear-powered rubmai in*. ? lurvivo- Naut:lu .the wortd's first,'surritc? radar picket ship roust is-u4ren(iijrati441 2t24-. rim= lam ? sCapt..treil For &tittered. ? Displacereut Surfeeed shout. 3.400 lone ? 2.710 4.000' 3.700 2,510 4,1001' The Triton's reactota. likt all' She could approsch, for In- ? those for submarines, will use enriched uranium. They are de- signated as submarine advanced reactors. According to recent Congres- sional testimony by Rear' Ad- miral Hyman G. Rickovor, the rPactorn have been designed' go that -we can repave individual fuel elements and, perhaps. re- place them b a (ship) tender stance, a dangerousl' "sentine position off any menu toast misnpletely submerged, surface to Utilise her radar, and then a ?'merge again if danger ap- proached. The Triton, Hie first of _her kin I, may remain unique, lbe i:, e c t rem ely expensive. tooting mot* than SIP0.000.000. Alan, her great sin, essential o that the Triton) does not Ito house two nuclear .reaetors have to return to a Navy )aid and. Oar extensive rachsr *quip.' for that purpose." . . .ment, is a disadvantage to al AdmIral Rickover said, how..stibmstine A large submersible ever, that the life of the -1'.'..proviees a better sonar tag, t ? actor core is long enough sodIrs 00.r, she will probably b.s that 't probably could lest lot no sir -? 61:; ler the water 'r .4 an entire w 1ar." . __ ..... , c.i1sIt.r lb.y less mimeo, - than p i;.ler submarines la The ? I Aeon le th. aliplitli grain of nuclear-powered sub-, the nation's aosidreetiea pcto. marinas. A total of thirty-threw -I- has hem authorised as follows: In ComnslasSaaar Nautilus In aimed ausioar pnootype 0Aoavi.tilt . Igh speed nuslear prototype skste , ret "-production" ataaslt type I stfnil?d. ltIplar ta type . . sk . P414 %neck type with edeleeklieed Allmon* hull 4wurtlflall ik SA 110 ? uses typo- sesairsirm (I) creek t Triton (20. )* It S et II) To be Iattairli Aug. 15; 09 Ts be latuiebed Aug. II. ? ? ? V.-7, . . - !mile mulimatines and eleven Ja vto ,Under Constrortion ce appro- submarines, five Regulus-guided p. red for are ntv-fime soh- . ). 1.1.:1 tyclit?it.v. The. nclamie wine fast attack submarines jvith Po:. ? 4 .t..c. r. li?.tic uilisile streamlined hulls. _ neclassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release @ 50-Yr 2013/11/08: CIA-RDP74-00297R000200030043-3 1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release @ 50-Yr 2013/11/08: CIA-RDP74-00297R000200030043-3 Piz W, 11.1JAN II MUM , x.' . ? The Middle East?II ? Access to Military Bases Is Called A Key U. S. Interest in the Region . _ ? By MANSON W. BALDWIN ? The.gtorraphic and strategic probably live long _pnough in ., interests of the United Statesitime of ..var to atecitrifilish its ---,- require access for its forces to!mission. Without this support air bases and facilities in Tur- 1th. eastern Mediterranean ' ',re), . Cyprus, Greece and Libya.,noght v. ell become a closed This may not be strictly *tares', The elimmation of United "vital" interest; that is oneiStaterr bases in the area would " without which the United States!P"MahlY mean the..end of the . ,ft- .4- IIAP of the eastern Mediter- annot his as a nation. But In,tsfean by United States mili- ?? s. itne context of the Middle Esst:tary power, . . and its importance to the West, In addition to this major 111- .,a re rong Turkey, supported britterest. the air base at Dhahran !airfields available for Americanlin Saudi Arabia is important to. ? use in Turkey, Cyprus, Greecelthe United States as a staging !rind Libya, is well-nigh India- and mil.tary air transport fa- pensable. " Turkey is the right flank of,-'lltsh'ere are, then. only a few - ! thp North Atlantic Alliance. really i ital American interests ? ? She is the strongest militarylin the Middle East?the proven- power * the Middle East. Sheition of the domination?of the ? lies Nuarely athwart the route'.01..-a by cAnirminism; continued of any 'Soviet drive from the Recess to the oil and communi- Black Sea to the Mediterranean :cations of the area: continued . and flanks any Soviet push', lit ilizat ion of. the eastern Medi- 'through Iran or Iraq toward the tertanean, which ?means access ;Persian Gulf. Its 400,000-man to bases in Turkey, Cyprus, !army represents a fattor that Greece and Libya. . 'Moscow's planners must lieu-, In a physical .and geographic ltralize. But Turkey. without econorn- sense the:4e are really all ilat. ic and military aid from thexaiteft states hart political, erco- ? Van he termed vital, though the. United States and support inlroeniv and moral commitments1 the air and at sea, in time ofithat inevitahty will influence Ps? war, can never realize her stra-:actions in the area. But an ex-. egic potential. With Turkey R?'arrirnAtton of its vital interests. A strong ally, and with United stwilld help to e?tAbliqh a rteriesi ,States access to other bases ther?r r.:. iitir-... f;,t. any Middle eastern alediterianean becomes 'Eastern pi,i,,?\.: in fact it should' , a gates ?av to southei n RIIS51A, p1 OV ill.. izoneral guide lines' ?outflaaking the eater n Emu- for the rn,,ner formulatiOn of ? :pearl Con,nuinis4t couatries. ,urt: nil iiolir y t With such land-based support! . - ?? 'the l?nred States Sixth Vevt Thor ho ft. second of fire nr- 'in the Mediterranean croilil.treIes on the lif.drilf gnat criala.r . Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release @ 50-Yr 2013/11/08: CIA-RDP74-M797Rnnn9nnn2nnAQ Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release @ 50-Yr 2013/11/08: CIA-RDP74-00297R000200030043-3 Mat.sakv.La.L,1 The Middle East ?I Lull in Tension Provides Opportunity For U.S. t?efine Its Aims in Area I BY HANSON W. BAUM IN . ? The de lion in Lebanon and,munmatione between' three con- ? the recognition by Western Gov..tinents Soviet domination df , el rents;li of the revolutionary he Middle Fast would imply resime le Iraq have provided a elortio- ,ii 1,1!?.? temeolary measnre of stabileyl elThe ftilfilletent of a cen- ,?rt the Middle ElAt, a rt. gion ',orie,-01(1 Ruesian dream -- the that is ineerent.ly unstable. Hot e?quisit,..11 of a , warm-watei I - it is a lull, not an end, we ha ..? poi! and Russ-in debouchmentl ? ,,ipes.ed through Ole eye of the t a the 1 ei .an kiulf-Red Sea-; storm but mote. winds ...ill blee . A I 3 bia 11 :??.a meg... ...1011e-,740:r"..L' The decrease. In ? !Tile ,,it fyinril'it=3AP-WielIn- ,1 ? tension and te? .1,:i ri - i., ,:a-nt. Neves delay in tne mo- cle ..-e? ? eie rot of the East-I I? .'. 1 . i IleAO area. i ; Andrii, poei ,,,:rilit. , on. ,' n ? f.? en-c JO"' Li.-- cc "n+ 1..1 ,,r 1 he Suez Canall " United States an- .?.d the ',' Ater gateways. Opel, iother opportunity to dein., line.. 1, 11 All folds. so important: more precisely and length!. -0 i tti rna?ional rommerce. l ? 'than it has done before, it fl?'??e?loi of the oil of thel e, -"vital" strategic objectives 01 iNIet.11C Ea q 1 interests in the area. . 1..As Comunimist . foothold till 4. ' The United States has many' A fie. fi, and probable eventual intelests, and it itasmaoe many Cure 'list political and (Leo.' ;military, political, economic and nmu;( ,e.cluest of Africa's un- .0mA' commitments or ohne... 0?.\'..1-ipert resour es and isola- tions not all of them wise in :len of Wel?lera EuroPe- ?t he Middle East. Rut most ot? %reran lo Oil Needed ? them are not "vital,? that is . of such great strategic Minor:- Tie- eecond vital objective of ttence that their pi.a?rvation the United States in the Middle . 'ant protection is e.ssential to Ea''t 15 tong-teirn - ipeactiMel ! the continte life or well-beingillIce's t.i the oil and to the ? ? ? -of the United States. icon!ii unications (Suez Canal.i . A definition of what is really,PIPc 'Pe'. poi ts and airports) of ' ? :of primary strategic impor- the area. Neither the oil nor lance to the United States the , enommirations are vital -should be a necessary preface to 1h' it 'at III time Of war, as .4., the formillation of a middle mId Via: II and the Sties Eastern policy, to any state. en -.s demonstrated. The Unitest$ . ment of the United States' long- States coied. indeed, live and term objectives, and to any con- remain a great nation without ? .. sideration of short-term mea5. the ,-,1 of the Middle East and . ures. Iwithont utilizing- its communl- tationn crossroads . ? . Objectives Discussed 1-- Ellt the nation:. at Steal -Weittra strategic Interests nr F-un'PP? BrIta,1 ln particular. 1woill be materially weakened objectives, considered lb the broadest long-term geopolitical economb a Ile hv dents! of ac- !terms, can and nearly alwai-''''''' t'' t" ",' of tlw area and; ;do include military and v,,,,..hy in, , ?,f the revenues in tdent, 'graphic Interests. economic po. to t. ? e ,p1oltation of the ? !Utica' and sornetire?s psyt he. 1,eel,.,,.... resin yes. logical consideratiode. .1 .y ? tins ca 4sing a TIVII Anl . t I Viewed in these broad terms mice i ..-e and major .loss (.ti ;the first and lot emost vital oil i e. et .1, to the West, ste-Iil. 'objective of the United States ae nationalization, would ale.' in the Middle East is a 110K i. heed- it. though by no meansk tiye one, the denial of the a ,-, I. c nopio. the Western European? - to i?ommurvism. In pm:tie:it ,t re - e, (mon. y,, and would thus influ-i . ? levy letins this meanx the-:.? er.e.? Europe's military strength. i things: ia 1 that none of ti., Clre,Ine of the Suez Canal count i tea of the lirea from To, .ind of I ire corn mercial airports' i key to Pakistan and southweid in the Mile East to Vextern to Egypt and Saudi Arabi i ' vat ft.., or the imposition M shall be Commenist Natell.tp. .-.1 ? hi .:h. tolls. would, in the , lb, that there shall be no sc. same ....y. Adversely affect., ieiet-owned and operated mil- We.,tern European economies' ,tarY bases or facilities tenter and might force a diversion toi the area; ? ;1 that the go. vo longer routes of sea and air Union nhall.not 'physically cnr. 'raffle from Europe to the Far. quer and rule the area. ? - Front a strategic point if This, ehile kiddie Eastern; .view actual Soviet phyeica: oil ard communiretions canme domination of the area, that Is, be erined directly vital to the. a capability by the Soviet Un " eted States. they are prob.. .- ton of utilizing the Middle Fa,' ; i . vita:, from .a long-term? ? ? foe its own purposes and a u. a ?. it of eiew. to the 'United . 'nisi of the Vi est'x arceex to r at s' &hes V ?Vestern. except on Soviet terms, reot.I I ii pe . ? 'mean communiet romemet cc ? . ? h s i, ma. 'ad Stat'ent be diastro.us. For it wow,- v-,u?ca. if tl a geog rat e ? nee,ie or he ^0 ' I , ?-.1 Eu 'i.', ati nsesmi'e ...