SUGGESTIONS FOR FIRST INTERIM REPORT
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP90-00530R000100010005-0
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
K
Document Page Count:
2
Document Creation Date:
December 23, 2016
Document Release Date:
February 22, 2013
Sequence Number:
5
Case Number:
Publication Date:
May 27, 1988
Content Type:
MISC
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
CIA-RDP90-00530R000100010005-0.pdf | 74.64 KB |
Body:
ppr?-AT 12.
Declassified in ParisTnitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/02/22 : CIA-RDP90-00530R000100010005-0
April 14 Discussion with IC Staff
STAT
Topic:
Suggestions for first interim report
Participants: Wortman,
noted they had looked at the draft from the perspective of
the DCI, and considering others' views. The SSG members had thought
the report bland, lacking in specificity. However, their bosses
saidthis was fine for this point in the process. went on to
add that the draft was not impressive enough and lacked a message.
suggestions for change were supplemented by the attached
paper which pulled together SSG comments.
Verbal suggestions were that, since the purpose of the interim
reports was to let the committee know NAPA's opinions on personnel
changes that did not need to be delayed, why not move this up
front? He also suggested that some of the information we termed
'tentative conclusions' was really more observations. Wortman
thought these were both good points and agreed to the reformatting
and retitling. also asked that, since there had been a
great deal of emphasis on getting the NAPA project the space and
security clearances needed, the report might note this had been
done. Wortman said it had been done efficiently, and would be
appropriate to include as a status report item.
Equal Employment Data
A bigger concern to the IC staff -- especially General Counsel
was that reference to the EEO data might lead to requests for
discovery in class action suits against the agencies. Now, the data
is collected separately, and there is no public reference to
community-wide data in this area. Since the NAPA report will be
very public, this could ?rovide outsiders "insight beyond what they
now have access to." emphasized that the request was not
that we modify what we do, only that the language in the May report
not be so specific. suggested that it could be revised to say
that NAPA would "analyze each agency's EEO profile" without saying
the precise steps for doing this. This was acceptable.
Other points discussed
If NAPA could get the report to ICS so they could get it to the DCI
on April 25, this would provide him more time to look at it, if he
desired. This better coincides with his visits to ICS. Agreed.
Wortman noted that he wanted to look at/discuss some budget issues
in terms of mission. Don and Bill Miller will
discuss this with Miller's clearance needs to get to ICS.
-- ata gross level,
125 - 5/27/88
STAT STAT STAT
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/02/22 : CIA-RDP90-00530R000100010005-0
STAT
STAT
STAT
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/02/22 :
CIA-RDP90-00530R000100010005-0
. 04
,
0 Next 5 Page(s) In Document Denied
4
t ?*
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/02/22 :
CIA-RDP90-00530R000100010005-0