SENATORS LOAD UP STATE DEPARTMENT MEASURE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP89T00234R000300330017-1
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
December 27, 2016
Document Release Date: 
January 3, 2013
Sequence Number: 
17
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
October 17, 1987
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP89T00234R000300330017-1.pdf481.9 KB
Body: 
Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/01/03: CIA-RDP89T00234R000300330017-1 0 Foreign Policy Senators Load Up State Department Measure For members of Congress, few things are more irresistible than a chance to play secretary of state for a day. Senators had that chance for four days early in October, and 40 of them took advantage of it, offering a host of amendments to a routine bill author- izing funds for the State Department and related agencies. Before passing the bill (HR 1777) 85-8 on Oct. 8, the Senate staked out a position on virtually every foreign pol- icy issue facing the United States, as well as some matters over which Washington has little influence. (Vote 315, Weekly Report p. 2490) With the annual foreign aid au- thorizations bill stalled and the yearly defense bill in deep political trouble, senators turned to the State Depart- ment measure to vent their views on foreign policy. Most of the 86 amend- ments added to the bill were non-bind- ing measures that merely stated the "sense of the Senate." A few, however, would force changes in U.S. policy or would require the administration to break longstanding agreements with other countries. The Senate debated the bill on Oct. 2, 6, 7 and 8. Moments before the Senate fin- ished the bill, Daniel J. Evans, R- Wash., took the floor to complain that his colleagues were "trivializing" an important piece of legislation. "We seem to create amendments ... by reading yesterday's headlines so that. we can write today's amendments so that we can garner tomorrow's headlines," Evans said. No one rose to defend the Sen- ate's actions, although Foreign Rela- tions Committee Chairman Claiborne Pell, D-R.I., responded that "we have to work in an imperfect world." The bill now goes to a House-Sen- ate conference, where many of the Senate amendments likely will fall by the wayside. But the Senate's most prolific sponsor of amendments, Jesse Helms, R-N.C., will be seated at the conference table by virtue of his status as ranking minority member of the Foreign Relations Committee. The House passed its version of the State Department bill on June 23, after adopting only a handful of amendments. (Weekly Report p. 1385; Senate bill, Weekly Report p. 1387) The Senate authorized $3.6 billion in fiscal 1988 for operations by the State Department, United States In- formation Agency and the Board for International Broadcasting, which runs Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty. The House authorized $3.9 billion in fiscal 1988 and $4.6 billion in 1989. President Reagan had requested $4.25 billion in fiscal 1988 for those agencies. State Department officials and ad- ministration supporters complained that the cuts mandated by the Senate bill will damage Washington's ability to carry out foreign policy. Hours be- fore the Senate passed the bill, State Department officials released plans to eliminate some 1,300 jobs, nearly 8 per- cent of its total Foreign Service and Civil Service positions. Specific cuts in- clude the closing of two dozen small embassies and consulates. Pell said he agreed that the State Department faces damaging cutbacks, but noted that under the Gramm-Rud- man-Hollings deficit-control law Con- gress had to make "tough choices." In writing the bill, Pell said, the commit- tee gave priority to ongoing State De- "We seem to create amendments ... by reading yesterday's head- lines so that we can write today's amendments so that we can garner tomorrow's headlines." -Sen. Daniel J. Evans, at right Copynyht 1987 Corp--[ Q.prhtly 4.. Rep.od..ttion proh.bned .n whok or in pen euept by etLt i 1,,, partment operations and deferred sev- eral construction programs. While cutting back on the overall State Department budget, the Senate demanded several expenditures that could restrict the department's fiscal running room even further. The Senate opposed the department plan to save money by closing overseas consulates, and it voted to create several new high- level positions, including an under sec- retary of state for security, construc- tion and foreign missions, and an ambassador-at-large for Afghanistan. Dumping on the Soviets As in the House debate three months before, much of the Senate's action on the State Department bill centered around U.S. relations with the Soviet Union. The anti-Soviet rhetoric did not appear to be dimmed by the prospect of a summit meeting this fall between Reagan and Soviet leader Mikhail S. Gorbachev. Indeed, conservatives used debate on the bill to voice their frustrations over the administration's determina- tion to sign an intermediate-range mis- sile arms-control treaty in spite of what the conservatives insisted is a long his- tory of Soviet treaty violations. The attack on the Soviet Union "We have to work in an imperfect world. " -Sen. Claiborne Pell Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/01/03: CIA-RDP89T00234R000300330017-1 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/01/03: CIA-RDP89T00234R000300330017-1 ? foreign Policy - 2 began within minutes of the opening of Senate debate on the bill on Oct. 2. Malcolm Wallop, R-Wyo., offered an amendment condemning the Soviet Union for conducting missile tests in the Pacific Ocean, and demanding a Soviet apology. Two dummy warheads landed within a few hundred miles of the Hawaiian Islands. Wallop called the Soviet tests "a deliberate provocation of the United States and a direct threat to our na- tional security." Helms, a close ally of Wallop, then offered a second-degree amend- ment that sought to undo two arms- control amendments that the Senate had attached only days before to the Defense Department authorization bill (HR 1748). Helms' amendment, in effect, would have allowed the presi- dent to proceed with all his planned strategic weapons programs - includ- ing the strategic defense initiative, or "star wars" - as long as he certified that the Soviet Union is violating pre- vious arms control treaties with the United States. (Defense bill, Weekly Report p. 2228) The Senate tabled the Helms amendment on Oct. 6 by a 52-43 vote, and then adopted a revised version of the underlying Wallop amendment 96-0. As passed, the amendment called on the administration to protest the Soviet tests and demanded that the president report to Congress on the details of the tests and the Soviet ex- planations for them. (Votes 302-303, Weekly Report p. 2488) Among other amendments di- rected at the Soviet Union and its al- lies, the Senate: ? Reaffirmed its position that the administration should abrogate exist- ing agreements under which the United States and the Soviets have been building new embassies in each other's capitals. By voice vote, the Senate adopted an amendment sponsored by Steve Symms, R.-Idaho, requiring the presi- dent to void 1969 and 1972 U.S.-Soviet accords and to begin new negotiations aimed at forcing the Soviets to build a new embassy in Washington located no more than 90 feet above sea level. U.S. intelligence officials have complained that the still-unfinished Soviet Embassy office building, lo- cated on Washington's highest hill at nearly 350 feet above sea level, will permit the interception of electronic communications from the Pentagon, State Department and other sensitive agencies. In addition, recent tests have found that the new Soviet-built U.S. Embassy in Moscow is riddled with listening devices. (Weekly Report p. 1427) The Senate already had adopted the Symms amendment as part of the defense authorization bill, but that measure may never become law. ? Required the administration to apply to Soviet-bloc diplomats in the United States the same travel restric- tions that already are applied to diplo- mats and trade officials from the So- viet Union. The most important restriction bars those diplomats from traveling more than 25 miles from their offices without obtaining permission from the State Department. The amendment was sponsored by William V. Roth Jr., Copr'WA' 1987 Ca.,O?e,uo..& Ovone.y 4,a Rp.od~, woA=d .i .+Aok o. ~ pnn ?acep b, dnonol