COMMENTS ON COMPUTER SECURITY SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE UNTIED STATES INTELLIGENCE BOARD SECURITY COMMITTEE, IBSEC-CSS-
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP89B01354R000200320013-1
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
C
Document Page Count:
3
Document Creation Date:
December 27, 2016
Document Release Date:
March 21, 2013
Sequence Number:
13
Case Number:
Publication Date:
December 4, 1970
Content Type:
MISC
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 109.54 KB |
Body:
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/03/21 : CIA-RDP89B01354R000200320013-1
I ite4
'4 December 1970
SUBJECT: Comments on Computer Security Subcommittee of the
Page 1-
I.
United States Intelligence Board Security Cpmmittee,
IBSEC-CSS-
Purpose:
Change "prescribes' to "provide" since the paper is to
assist rather than require.
II'. Scope:
It is suggested that the meaning of "special handling
controls" be made clear.
. Security Analysis
Change "accumulate" to "identification".
Delete "conceptual approaches and".
Place period after "system" in 4th line.
Delete "and applying these as they pertain".
Add "Determine how these security features are
applied" to the software, system.
-7-n /7.
2nd' line "not". dependent)upon softWare",
,
erolatipn of "software" i this context?
. ,
Exc r,
? ;
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/03/21: CIA-RDP89B01354R000200320013-1
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/03/21 : CIA-RDP89B01354R000200320013-1
C_
Page 4
C-O-N-F-I-D-E-N-T-I-A-L
-2-
Security labels
This appears to be a minimum requirement as in
DCII) L/16. This per should contain guidance on how to determine
that a security requirement satisfied, NOT a restatement of the
requirement.
c. System Supervisor
In addition to access control7guidance for determining
that the supervisor is adequate should be included.
Page
Page 6
3.
1,4-)
? (3)// Se4)
I don't think you mean this.
? same comment as for tyage
a.
, above.
(1) "and/or remote terminals". This is a more
stringent requirement than currently USIB approved procedure. Also,
it does not agree with 3.a. (2), page 7.
(2) Rewrite first sentence to say clearly what
should be done to test or analyze a personnel security control.
C-O-N-F-I-D-E-N-T-I-A-L
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/03/21 : CIA-RDP89B01354R000200320013-1
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/03/21 : CIA-RDP89B01354R000200320013-1
Page 7
b.
up or down?
C-0-N-F-I-D-E-N-T-I-A-L
-3-
(3) This paragraph is not clear to me. (Are you
c. Similar comments to page 2.a., above. This
requirement is less than cqptained in paragraph d. page 8 of
DCID 1/16.
o7
. CkINA.,-41;Le,
"cf---dde
? Ou\A
Ap--vvA)
adtAai
2Ke/
STAT
STAT
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/03/21.: CIA7RDP89B01354R000200320013-1