A CITIZEN'S VIEWS ON VIETNAM

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP11M01338R000400340046-3
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 27, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 6, 2013
Sequence Number: 
46
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
February 10, 1966
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP11M01338R000400340046-3.pdf318.51 KB
Body: 
Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/09/06: CIA-RDP11M01338R000400340046-3 A690 CONGRESSIONA for the majority of teenagers (already several teachers have 'announced open support of the campaign, according to Thomas) indi- cates that something, beyond ignoring the normally quiet, "average" teenager should result. ' Excise Taxes To Eliminate Junkyards EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. JOHN P. SAYLOR OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, February 10, 1966 Mr. SAYLOR. Mr. Speaker, in testify- ing before the Senate Committee on In- terior and Insular Affairs, prior *to his confirmation as Director of the Bureau of Mines last week, Dr. Walter R. Hibbard, Jr., noted that very promising progress Is being made on the Bureau's research project for the use of automobile scrap In modern steelmaking. In view.of the numercius steps that are in the making to contend with the auto junkyard prob'- lem, I feel that every Member of Con- gress should familiarize himself, with all facets of the subject. The Highway Beautification Act of 1965 provides that the establishment and use and maintenance of junkyards in areas adjacent to the Interstate System and the primary system should be con- trolled-in order to protect the public in- vestment in such highways, to promote the safety and recreational value of pub- lic travel, and to preserve natural beauty. Among the provisions are Federal par- ticipation in junkyard removal, land- scaping and screening, as well as a re- duction in federal highway funds to states which fail to provide effective con- trols. Also during the last session of Con- gress, I proposed that 1 percent of the auto excise tax be used by the Federal Government to dispose of auto junk- yards, with as much as half of the in- come to be put into research to deter- - mine whether the junked cars have fur- ther economic use. Numerous recom- mendations have come from the general public as well as from interested busi- nesses in response to this suggestion, and meanwhile considerable development toward economic disposal of scrapped cars has taken place. I have received correspondence from representatives of the scrap industry who are convinced ? that research thus far clearly indicates that the time is near when through proper crushing and incineration old cars can be dismantled and the steel salvaged profitably. Meanwhile Secre- tary of the Interior Stewart L. Udall has invited universities, nonprofit organiza- tions, business firms, and individual citi- zens to submit constructive recommen- dations and proposals to the Bureau of Mines for expanded research on disposal of scrap autos and other solid mineral wastes. The Bureau's own scrap-auto research' is described as follows: Bureau research on the scrap-auto prob- lem is directed toward overcoming presently known economic and technological barriers :ECORD ? APPENDIX ?such as chao teel making and auto- mobile manufi: practices?that have caused once-si:: rkets for these dis- carded cars to sa Out of the Bureau's research have cr? two promising metal- lurgical processor.. .th of which are sched- uled for early tea., in large-scale 'demon- stration plants. One process inv..---es the conversion of all the iron and s in auto body scrap to a high-grade iron ? . for which there is a ready market. W this process the scrap can be used as a rcductant for low-grade, nonmagnetic taconite that is abundant in the United States. This is done by care- fully controlled roasting of the scrap and the taconite in a rotating kiln, which con- verts both the iron in the taconite and the iron and steel in the scrap to magnetic iron oxide. After roasting, any unconverted scrap is screened for recycling, and the iron oxides are concentrated by magnetic separation into a high-grade form of iron oxide. All nonferrous materials in the scrap, as well as the gangue in the taconite, are rejected in the process. By changing the roasting con- ditions, the process can be made to operate without taconite. In this variation iron in the scrap is obtained as an oxide, which can be separated magnetically from non- ferrous contaminating elements in the scrap, In the other process being developed by the Bureau, cylindrical shaped bales made from cannibalized automobiles, less engines and transmissions, will be run through a rotary kiln at a temperature high enough to burn the combustible materials and melt the nonferrous metal parts. The kiln gases will be cleaned to prevent air pollution. Re- sulting clean scrap, upon discharge from the kiln, will be compacted to any desired density for steelmaking charges. After the technique for burning and separating non- ferrous metals from baled automobile hulls is developed in a pilot plant, a larger demon- stration plant including a modern electric steelmaking furnace with necessary acces- sories will be built for demonstrating the economic feasibility of the thermal treat- ment technique. The objective is to show that many types of steel can be produced from thermally treated automobile scrap only, and that almost any type of steel can be economically produced from thermally treated scrap and directly reduced iron ore. Mr. Speaker, as these efforts continue, the number of junked cars to blight suburbs and countryside rises annually. More than 5 million were dumped onto the heaps last year. The president of General Motors predicted on January 17. that the average annual demand for cars and trucks in -the United States could exceed 11 million by 1970, thus blazing the way for bigger and bigger junkyards. While the unsightly cars are piled higher, adjacent land tracts?whether they are business, residential, or farm areas?suffer correspondingly. Regard- less of how attractive your own plot of ground may be, its beauty is quickly marred if a neighbor is unconcerned about the trash in his yard. In our par- ticular region of Pennsylvania, the Penn- sylvania Electric Co., has long practiced beautifying to the fullest possible extent the properties on which its facilities are located, including the rights-of-way for power lines. Trees are planted and care- fully nurtured, and the company takes pride in helping to keep our State beau- tiful. Responsible mining companies needed no laws to insist upon reclamation of stripped properties. For years they have - February 10, 1966 been turning earth from which coal has been extracted through surface opera- tions into attractive forest, farm, and recreational areas. These operations by the utilities and coal companies have been carried out at their own expense, without cost to Federal or State government. By the same token, it would seem reasonable for auto manufacturers and consumers to provide the means for proper disposal of cars that are no longer usable, and the use of a portion of the excise tax would appear to be the least injurious or objectionable means of absorbing the cost.' The Bureau of Mines projects are com- mendable and should receive high priori- ty, but once a satisfactory method of economic disposal of auto bodies is de- veloped, the Federal Government should retire from this activity and permit com- mercial growth of the industry. I am hopeful that such plans will be achieved prior to July 1, 1970, in order that it will not be necessary for Federal and State governments to finance removal and screening of auto junkyards, as provided in the Highway Beautification Act of 1965. ? Newspaper 'Columnist Joe Crump has observed: Making junked automobiles commercially profitable is a sure way to remove them from- the scene. With a portion of the excise tax avail- able in support of the junked car dis- posal program, there is all the more rea- son to assume that research can and will' make it a profitable undertaking. While some development engineers are confident that small disposal plants? even portable facilities?can dispose of junked cars economically, the concensus would appear to favor?at least in the early stages?large centers to which the steel shells would be hauled from points within a wide periphery. In the latter _ event, I would hope that automobile transportation firms will be ready to as- sume a role in the operation without delay. Stackback and piggyback rail- road cars as well as the two-deck auto- carrying trucks that move from assem- bly centers with new vehicles snuggled closely together should quickly be con- verted for hauling remnants from 'scat- tered junkyards to points where giant incinerators have been established. - We are obviously making headway in our battle to eliminate the ghastly auto junkyard. Let us give it a boost by ap- plying 1 percent of the excise tax to this crusade. A Citizen's Views on Vietnam EXTENSION OF HON. MOR OF AR K. 'MAI)) IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, February 10, 1966 Mr. UDALL. Mr. Speaker, I know that we all receive a great deal of mail these days on Vietnam. This, to me, Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/09/06: CIA-RDP11M01338R000400340046-3 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/09/06: CIA-RDP11M01338R000400340046-3 Febnatry 10,1966 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD ? APPENDIX Indicates a great concern and uneasiness throughout the land. My own mail re- flects the obvious differences in opinion and comes from people in all walks of life. The expression and understanding of the writers varies greatly but recently I received a letter from a constituent which so cogently states some of the un- derlying questions in people's Minds, that, with the permission of the House, I would .insert it in the RECORD. We have all heard from many sources the arguments for and against our policy in Vietnam; and while I do not agree with all the writer's views, his letter is, I believe, an eloquent effort by a citizen to reason things out for himself. SIERRA VISTA, ARIZ., February 1,1966. DEAR Sin: I, as an American citizen and veteran, deplore the ambiguous, indecisive, vicious policies of the administration in re- gard to Vietnam. If our objective is to merely stem Com- munist aggression, why are we unable to en- list wider allied support? If we wish to be the power in Asia, won't it be necessary to "acquire territories and bases?" If we are striving for a military victory, why did we engage in a bombing pause or throw ourselves on the mercy of the United Nations? If we desire peace through the United Nations, why are we bombing North Viet- nam? If the problem is so complex, why do the alternatives of policy, to bomb or not to bomb, sound so simple? We stand in violation of the Geneva ac- cords and the United Nations' Charter, yet we claim to be prepared to wage a 6-year war to the tune of half a million American men. Along with an ineffective buildup of strength and a relatively ineffective bomb- ing of North Vietnam, we are to assume that Red China and the Soviet Union will stay out of the conflict in the field. To disagree with our current policy is not to endorse the righteousness of either the Vietcong or North Vietnam. It is rather to realize that the time for sending living, pro- ductive citizens to die for an ambiguous and strange point of honor has passed us by. And this conflict does hinge on a strange point of honor. Senator JOHN STENNIS has said it was a mistake to enter this conflict, but now that we are committed we cannot back down or withdraw. The commit your policy and your sons to a stubborn position such as this is strange indeed. History will label it not only strange but vicious. I suspect that since the war is a reality (undeclared and unconstitutionally execut- ed) your mail is divided 10 to 1 in favor of our policy. However, sir, if on the eve of our now vast commitment it had been put to a vote, I wonder if our President would have enjoyed such odds. Finally, I resent this administration's muz- zling of debate. Let me remind you, sir, a conference with 21 congressional leaders is not debate, any more than a public state- ment announcing the resumption of bomb- ing is debate after this bombing has already occurred. When you read the opinions of your con- stituents into the CONGRESSIONAL RECORD; I would feel far lass helpless if you could ex- press mine in the halls of what was once a vital forum for debating and forming pol- icy?the Congress of the United States of America. Sincerely yours, TIMOTHY W. GARGIULO. The New GI Bill of Rights SPEECH OF ? HON. JOHN W. WYDLER OF NEW YORK IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Monday, February 7, 1966 Mr. WYDLER. Mr. Speaker, I have repeatedly urged, supported and voted for the new GI bill of rights?H.R. 12410. This bill authorizes a program of edu- cation and training for veterans of mili- tary service discharged after January 31, 1955. The serviceman has met his responsi- bilities to the Nation. It is the Nation's responsibility to prepare the serviceman returning from service to take his place in civilian life. I only regret that the benefits of this bill do not come up to those of the Korean war bill. I supported such in- creased benefits. The administration opposed them and made clear that any attempt to raise benefits would end chances for Presidential approval of the legislation. " ANALYSIS Education: Provides a permanent program of educational assistance for individuals serv- ing in the Armed Forces, discharged after January 31, 1955. College-level and below- college-level training in trade, vocational, and technical' schools is provided. Part-time training is permitted. Eligibility accrues at the rate of 1 month of training for 1 month of service, not to exceed 36 months. Persons serving on active duty for training do not accrue eligibility. The education and train- ing allowances provided are as follows: Type of program No de- pendents 1 de- pendent 2 or more depend. cots Institutional: ' Full time Three-quarter time_ Half time Cooperative $100 ? 75 50 80 $125 95 65 100 $150 115 75 120 Fees and tuition are paid for less than half- time . training. Education must be com- pleted within 8 years from the date of dis- charge or 8 years from the effective date of the act, whichever is later. Training is provided for active-duty members of the Armed Forces who have served at least 2 years, a portion of which occurred after Jan- uary 31, 1955. These active-duty members may receive payments for fees and tuition. Administrative provisions of the GI bill for veterans of tiie Korean conflict and the war orphans' training program are applicable to this proposed program. Schools will be ap- proved by State approval agencies of the various States, and these agencies will be re- sponsible for extending supervision to ap- proved schools. Guaranteed and direct home loans: Bene- fits of both the guaranteed and the direct home loan programs are extended to vet- erans discharged after January 31, 1955. The guarantee of a loan by a private lender in the amount of $7,500 is extended to this group and, in areas established as direct loan areas where guaranteed financing has not generally been available, a maximum direct loan of $17,500 is authorized. The Admin- istrator of Veterans' Affairs is authorized to regulate interest rates, consistent with the ceiling established for Department of Hous- A691 ing and Urban Affairs. A fund is established for the Administrator to offset losses under this program, by requiring the veteran to pay 0.05 percent of his loan at Closing. Non-service-connected medical care: At the present time, veterans serving after Jan- uary 31, 1955, are eligible for medical care in Veterans' Administration facilities only for service-connected disabilities. This group is made eligible under the provisions of this bill for treatment of non-service- connected disabilities on the same basis as war veterans. Eligibility for treatment of non-service-connected disabilities is based on availability of a bed and the signing of a statement of inability to pay for treatment .. elsewhere, as is required of veterans of earlier conflicts. Preference in Federal employment: Pref- erence in employment in Federal service is extended to the group of veterans discharged after January 31, 1955, on the same basis as is currently applicable to war veterans. This benefit is not extended to those on active duty for training. Presumption of service connection of chronic and tropical diseases: This presump- tion of service connection of numerous chronic and tropical diseases, as listed in section 301, title 38, United States Code, now applicable to war veterans, is extended to those veterans with service after January ? 31, 1955. Burial flags: The bill will permit the Vet- erans' Administration to furnish a flag for draping the casket of deceased veterans of service after January 31,-1955, as is now pro- vided war veterans. Job counseling and job placement assist- ance: Places veterans discharged after Janu- ary 31, 1955, on the same basis as veterans of earlier conflicts for assistance through the Department of Labor in job placement and counseling. Soldiers' and sailors' civil relief: Amends the Soldiers' and Sailors' Civil Relief Act by increasing protection for individuals who are renting homes when called to service from $80 monthly rental to $150 monthly rental. Recommendations of the Governor's Con- ference on Natural Beauty and Natural Resources EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. JOHN BRADEMAS OF INDIANA IN THE HOUSE OF' REPRESENTATIVES Wednesday, February 2, 1966 Mr. BRADEMAS. Mr. Speaker, under unanimous consent I insert in the RECORD the text of a letter to me dated January 31, 1966, from the Honorable Roger D. Branigin, Governor of the State of In- diana, setting forth the recommenda- tions of the recent Governor's Confer- ence on Natural Beauty and Natural Re- sources. Governor Branigin's letter follows: STATE OF INDIANA, DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, Indianapolis, January 31, 1966. Hon. JOHN PELADEMAS, House of Representatives, Washington, D.C. DEAR Sia: We had a very enthusiastic re- spouse to the Governor's Conference on Nat- ural Beauty and Natural Resources, and now must see that every recommendation from Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/09/06: CIA-RDP11M01338R000400340046-3