DI QUESTIONS ABOUT IBM 3270 ATS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90G00993R000100140021-8
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
14
Document Creation Date: 
December 23, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 6, 2012
Sequence Number: 
21
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 11, 1986
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90G00993R000100140021-8.pdf550.54 KB
Body: 
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP90G00993R000100140021-8 25X1 LONFIDENTI ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET SUBJECT: (Optioned) -Director of Information Technology 1D00, liqi. EXTENSION Np-2. 17 April 1986 1. E)(1:1IR IOW/ARON .binars INMALS 2. 3. 5. 6. COMMENTS (NOtotbor cotottoK-. ,-)Strir ifom %M? to whom. Mow ? km woos Niro* Oloot Mtmit comm.810.) 7. I. Enclosed are copies of two memos, one responding to the other. This exchange with the DI may be of interest to you. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 25X1 25X1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release_2012/09/06 : CIA-RDP90G00993R000100140021-8 Declassified in Part- Sanitized Copy Approved forRelease2012/09/06 : CIA-RDP90G00993R000100140021-8 CONFIDENTIAL 011-0283-86 1 1 APR 1986 MEMORANDUM FOR: Associate Deputy Director for Intelligence VIA: Deputy Director for Administration FROM: William F. Donnelly Director of Information Technology SUBJECT: DI Questions About IBM 3270 ATs REFERENCE: Your Memo, dtd 27 Mar 86, Same Subject (DDI #01602-86) 1. Your memo about workstations was exceptionally thorough. To provide a framework to address your concerns, I wish to restate the Agency's overall strategy in this area. The complexity of the topic, the incredibly dynamic nature of the marketplace, conflicting requirements of OIT customers, and technical debates between OIT and DI staffs have, I'm afraid, contributed to confusion over this subject. We believe our strategy is a prudent and reasonable path, and I am confident it will act as a guideline for you in making your decisions in the workstation area. 2. What is our strategy? It has several elements. We intend to provide in each workstation both word processing and data processing capabilities, along with mainframe connectivity. A new network architecture and associated communications protocol will provide high data rates, high reliability, and universal connectivity. The New Building Communications Project Office (NBCPO) was responsible for the choice of network architecture. They selected a modern, highly capable Private Branch Exchange (PBX) in June 1984. 3. Our choice of a protocol is IBM's modern variant of the one most used in the mainframe world. It is the so-called IBM 3270 protocol that is supported by almost all commercially-available IBM-compatible mainframe software, plug-compatible front end processors and controllers from many CONFIDENTIAL 25X1 25X1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP90G00993R000100140021-8 25X1 25X1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP90G00993R000100140021-8 CONFIDENTIAL SUBJECT: DI Questions About IBM 3270 ATs vendors, and, most importantly, almost all workstations work with this protocol. Among the many reasons for its rather routine use is that it provides both high data rates (1 megabit per second) and high reliability (3270 compatible front end processors run very sophisticated diagnostic software). Our, selection of the 3270 protocol is, in fact, low risk, highly functional, and very conservative from our perspective, and will definitely allow us to improve system reliability as our customers see it. 4. The workstation issue is more complicated. The 3270 protocol is the de facto IBM standard protocol. Our "legacy" is an older asynchronous protocol, supported by our front end processors/controllers (COMTENs), our terminals (Delta Datas), and our applications and systems software (specifically CAM--the Conversational Access Method, a communications software module through which most existing mainframe software in our environment "talks" to Delta Data terminals). How can we deal with the "legacy" and move into the future 3270 world? 5. Our direction involves "bridging" from the Delta Data CAM world under which most of our current applications run to the new 3270 world where we intend to provide our new applications. The best "bridging" solution is the IBM 3270 AT, a sophisticated product that provides the internal software whereby we will be able to run portions of CAM "under" the 3270 protocol. This is an excellent solution, and we have a major effort underway to provide the necessary software (loosely known as the software portion of "NEWS") to support it. We, too, know that the 3270 AT has some deficiencies. Although the cost of this machine recently has dropped, in all probability it will continue to be a relatively expensive machine in the near term. We have considered this in our planning. We are cognizant of the preference some of our customers have for the less complicated standard IBM AT or compatible equipment. We pointed this out at the Agency Contract Review Board meeting in January and committed to the Board and later to the Information Systems Board that we would competitively procure IBM-compatible, 3270-capable PCs that would meet customer requirements and competition responsibilities at a more competitive price. Our goal is a full workstation cost (hard-disk based, excluding software and network communications costs) for under $4,000. 2 CONFIDENTIAL Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP90G00993R000100140021-8 25X1 25X1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP90G00993R000100140021-8 CONFIDENTIAL SUBJECT: DI Questions About IBM 3270 ATs 6. We will begin to procure new workstations competitively within the next year and a half (our target for contract award is September 1987.) These workstations will, of necessity, be IBM AT-compatible and capable of 3270 emulation in some manner. In order to avoid being trapped at any point in PC technology or pricing, part of the contract will involve periodic review of both functionality and cost. In the June/July 1986 timeframe, we will begin an internal software development effort that will permit an AT-compatible device to support CAM ("Generic NEWS"). Generic NEWS is targeted to be available in the spring of 1987. The new workstation will therefore handle our software "legacy." It will, of course, be fully supported by OIT. The competitive procurement will guarantee favorable pricing and perhaps open some configuration options not available in IBM brand PCs. 7. This leaves us with the question, "What to do now?" As a short-term solution, I strongly recommend the procurement of the IBM 3270 AT. This is the only equipment for which we currently can guarantee full integration into the Agency network both now and in the future. By this summer, the NEWS software will be available. By January 1987, we also will have available a PC-based word processing capability that can communicate with the host. As the PBX becomes operational in late 1986, we will begin the phased connection of these devices to our mainframe network (including SAFE). We expect, based on proprietary information, that the current 3270 AT will be functionally compatible with IBM's future PC product line.. 8. We understand DI interest in the IBM AT. To choose that model now would make you dependent for integration in the Agency network (and use of SAFE Delivery 2) on Generic NEWS. This has risk and cost implications (board changes will be required). Use of available "clones" now would be even riskier, in terms of the ability of Generic NEWS to "play" with the clone. Furthermore, fragmentation of our workstation inventory over many types of clones is, potentially, a difficult support problem, both from the hardware and software side. Based on the results of our planned competitive buy (September 1987), we expect to support one or more clones. Predicting which ones is impossible at this time. We cannot recommend a clone solution to your problem. Apparent cost advantages may well be ephemeral. 3 CONFIDENTIAL Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP90G00993R000100140021-8 25X1 25X1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP90G00993R000100140021-8 CONFIDENTIAL SUBJECT: DI Questions About IBM 3270 ATs 9. We therefore believe that to minimize your risk, the IBM 3270 AT is the preferred path. Our technical personnel will work with yours to select appropriate configurations. In addition, we are prepared to address your current SAFE connectivity problem head-on. You currently have about 200 unallocated COMTEN ports. We are prepared to provide you Delta Data 8260/7260s so that you may use those ports to extend SAFE Delivery 2 and Host-based Word Processing to a larger audience now. We understand that you are willing to tolerate some reduction in performance to achieve greater connectivity. Given our current capacity, that is a risk -- especially if AIM use increases moderately. If you choose this option, we will obtain these terminals by "swapping" selected Delta Datas from Agency-wide customers (primarily from OIT "volunteers") for 3270 ATs that you purchase. When NEWS software is finally implemented, we can swap again. I am aware that even with this accommodation, you still will require some kind of workstation for nearly 400 more people. The IBM 3270 AT is the short term answer. Connection to the mainframe must await the operation of the secure PBX, but until then these devices would provide standalone word processing and computing capabilities for your staff. 10. As the PBX becomes operational, we will work with your staff to identify the proper phasing-in of DI personnel to SAFE Delivery 2 using available 3270 ATs and NEWS software. We will enhance DI connectivity in an expeditious and orderly fashion. 11. Now, I would like to ask for your help. In the Gramm-Rudman environment, we will be scrambling for funding for consulting, development, and technical support. We need the technical expertise in your Directorate for advice, consulting, testing and evaluation. I believe we must work at improving the communication between our staffs. I would like a few of my key technical officers involved with network architecture, the NEWS project, and workstation evaluation to brief your staff 25X1 and answer their technical questions and concerns. LbAl Chief, Network Systems Engineering Group, would p eased to arrange the necessary presentations and participate in subsequent regularly scheduled technical exchanges. 4 CONFIDENTIAL be more Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP90G00993R000100140021-8 25X1 25X1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP90G00993R000100140021-8 .. CONFIDENTIAL ? SUBJECT: DI Questions About IBM 3270 ATs 12. Finally, to develop and implement the Agency information systems network we both desire, I need the commitment of your managers. We have to move from a confrontational environment at the working level to one of mutual cooperation. We must get on with the difficult job ahead. DDA/OIT/MD/rjw/bd (4/11/86) Distribution: Original 1 - Addressee 1 - DDA 1 - D/OIT 1 - MD Chrono 1 - MD Subject 2 - OIT/Registry 5 U William F. Donnelly CONFIDENTIAL Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP90G00993R000100140021-8 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012(09/06: CIA-RDP90G00993R000100140021-8 Central Intelligence Agency Office of the Deputy Director for Intelligence 27 March 1986 NOTE TO: Dir!or, Information Technology While I was preparing this memo to you yesterday, Dick Kerr walked into my office. When he discovered what I was up to, he asked that I send him a copy of this memo for his information. I have sent a drop copy to Dick at the same time I forward this to you. I hope this causes no problems at your end. Joh . Helgerson Ass iate Deputy Director r Intelligence Attachment: DDI #01602-86, dtd 27 Mar 1986 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP90G00993R000100140021-8 STAT Declassified in Part - Sanitized CopY-A-p-p-r:Oved-fOt7i4-elease 2012/09/06: oN-RUP90G00993R000100140021-8 ,? DDI #01602-86 OIT/TRIS 27 March 1986 LOGGED MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Information Technology FROM: John L. Helgerson Associate Deputy Director for Intelligence SUBJECT: DI Questions About IBM 3270 ATs 1. The DI has a near-term requirement to purchase as many as 400 computer workstations for personnel who currently have no access to computing at their desks. We understand OIT's recommendation that we purchase IBM 3270 ATs. We are also aware that there is a vigorous and competitive market (both in cost and performance terms) in PC compatibles or clones. We are attempting to derive a Directorate strategy to go with the IBM or a clone, and would appreciate your views on the issues raised below. 2. We understand that IBM 3270 ATs, as configured for NEWS, cost between $7,000 and $8,000 without applications software. Is this a hard figure or can it be brought down in time to get more for our remaining '86 dollars? We believe that we could purchase IBM-compatible machines from other vendors of equal or superior performance for around $4,000, and basic, low-cost PCs (a less attractive option) for under $2,000. The cost savings accruing from buying "clones" thus is at least $1.2 million and could be as much as $2.4 million. I am still unclear about whether and why it is really necessary to endure the extra cost of the IBM equipment. If these savings were available to us, we would hope to provide additional funds to OIT to use on the AIM project, where performance is stretched beyond the limit and where neither of us has significant other funds available. 3. As DI officers understand your plans, full SAFE Delivery 2 compatibility will not be available for the IBM machine until a) the "Virtual CAM Terminal" program is finished, b) a PC-based word processor is integrated with it and AIM and SAFE, c) modifications are made to SAFE and other host-based applications important to the DI to make them operate with the Virtual CAM terminal, and d) IBM PCs can actually be connected to your computers as 3270 devices in significant numbers. Are we correct that those are the necessary steps? If so, when do we ADMINISTRATIVE INTERNAL LSE ONLY Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP90G00993R000100140021-8 ATUTATTCTDATTUU TMTVDMAT TTCV AVIV Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP90G00993R000100140021-8 ' SUBJECT: DI Questions About IBM 3270 ATs realistically expect all this to be accomplished? What fallback positions do we have if the Virtual CAM Terminal program is delayed or if it proves difficult to convert our existing mainframe applications to work with it? 4. I understand that your motivation for selecting the IBM 3270 AT is to be in the"mainstream" of the commercial world, and I support this goal fully. Yet as my staffers look at the commercial PC situation, they see the 3270 AT as a costly, specialized, hybrid device that has found uncertain commercial acceptance. Instead, the PC marketplace seems to be evolving a mainstream composed of PC clones connected to local area networks. Do you believe our Agency can be confident that if we embrace the 3270 AT, we will not find ourselves outside the mainstream instead of inside it? 5. We recognize that resources will have to be diverted to the job of converting our current Delta Data-based applications to work with the 3270 AT. What opportunity costs are we incurring? Are there alternatives that do not require conversion of existing applications? 6. One possible DI strategy for dealing with an uncertain future is to avoid overcommitting ourselves. For the decision at hand, this would imply these objectives: -- Minimize the initial investment in PCs, spending money instead on such things as central services upon which our dependence is unambiguous and unlikely to change. -- Buy relatively basic equipment that can be upgraded as necessary. 7. We are aware that DIA has decided to purchase Zenith PC compatibles to be its SAFE terminals. We presume you will devise and implement a scheme to make SAFE work with the DIA PCs. Would it be in the best interest of all if a common solution could be found? Should we go the DIA route and buy the Zenith? What would be the impact on OIT if we did? What would DI users lose with the Zenith that they would have with the 3270? 8. We have examined your NEWS initiative for FY '88 in an attempt to understand the marginal costs associated with converting from asynchronous to 3270 host connection. This conversion would be required if the DI were to buy 3270 ATs and exploit them as such. In the case of additional asynchronous connections and neglecting continuing payments on any COMTENs that we do not already fully own, we calculate the marginal cost of the additional connections the DI requires to be essentially -2- ADMINISTRATIVE - INTERNAL USE ONLY Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP90G00993R000100140021-8 ATIMTVTQTPATTUF - TMTVRNAT. TTQR nmuir Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP90G00993R000100140021-8 ' ? SUBJECT: DI Questions About IBM 3270 ATs zero. This is because the new PBX can be used as a port contender; indeed, we understand that using it this way is part of your strategy for the move to the new building. What is the marginal cost for 3270 connections? Our estimate, based on the figures in the NEWS initiative, is $2,000 per device, implying an additional cost of for the 3270 AT option compared with PC compatibles. This is a big expenditure, even if it does not have to be paid by us in the DI. 9. I have put these questions on paper to get myself better informed and to help us in the DI weigh the various considerations involved in this important decision. If your office could clarify these points, it would bolster my confidence that we are indeed making the right decision to go with the 3270, or, perhaps, that we should explore more completely whether there are less expensive options available to us. Whatever we do, I want to be sure OIT and the DI have a common understanding of where we are going and why as we decide how to spend our scarce resources. 10. Thanks for your help. Joh . Helgerson As iate Deputy Director r Intelligence -3- ADMINISTRATIVE - INTERNAL USE ONLY Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP90G00993R000100140021-8 STAT STAT ATIMTMTCTRATTUF - TMTVPMAT HCF ANTT.V Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP90G00993R000100140021-8 ? SUBJECT: DI Questions About IBM 3270 ATs ADDI/JLHelgerson: Distribution: Orig - Adse 1 - DDA 1 - DDI Registry 1 - C/DDI/ASG 1 - ADDI Chrono (27Mar86) -4- ADMINISTRATIVE - INTERNAL USE ONLY Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP90G00993R000100140021-8 STAT Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP90G00993R000100140021-8 ? CONFIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM FOR: 7 April OIT Workstation Working 1986 Group 25X1 FROM: SUBJECT: Meeting on Response to DDI Memo on W/S 25X1 There will be a meeting on Tuesday, 8 April in office 25X1 25X1 (2D00) from 1500 on to discuss a response to the recent DDI memo on workstation policy. I have sent via AIM a summary of the DDI's questions. I have sent via hardcopy the actual memo (in the mail Monday AM). Please be prepared to discuss 1) overall workstation policy; 2) specific responses to the DDI's questions. The D/OIT wants a coherent response signed on 11 April(Friday.) The time is very short to set the policy which is key to the responses. This process is far from ideal but we must get moving on this. I am attaching a strawman cover letter to an attachment which presumably will contain detailed answers (to be developed.) You will probably have violent reaction to this strawman. The fact that it exists gives it a certain probability of becoming our real policy. If this offends you---bring your counteroffer. Bring a cover letter explaining a coherent policy and an attachment with specific answers to the DDI's questions. Thanks for your cooperation. (Weapons will be checked and body searches of participants are authorized.) The time has come. We need to get together on this one or else suffer rather unpleasant bureaucratic consequences. That's the NEWS from Lake Woebegone.... Att: a/s Distribution: CONFIDENTIAL Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP90G00993R000100140021-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP90G00993R000100140021-8 CONFIDENTIAL Administrative-Internal Use Only Administrative-Internal Use Only MEMORANDUM FOR: FROM: SUBJECT: 7 April 1986 Meeting on Response to DDI Memo on W/S Draft Workstation Strategy I expect to bring up the following points at the meeting tomorrow: o Why are we targetting "under $5000" when it is possible to get a comparable piece of gear for "under $3000". o Why are we insisting on Zenith? It is one thing to suggest that we have to make sure that SAFE will run with Zeniths, but it is also very reasonable to expect that "generic NEWS" and/or the 8260 emulation will run on the Zeniths plus a great number of other comparable devices. Why are we going to the trouble of creating a competitive situation and then avoiding a competition? o Is there no room for asynch in our future? Does everyone need the coax? Isn't it more expensive to hook up coax? pc boards, etc)? Doesn't the PBX support asynch? Won't we already have 5000+ Delta Datas using asynch? o What are we suggesting that they run on the machines that they buy in the interrim period? TEFT? 8260 Emulation? Generic News? o What are we telling them to do with their DD-dependent code, such as the "EZ" packages? Shouldn't they start to convert that stuff now? To what? CONFIDENTIAL Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP90G00993R000100140021-8 25X1 25X1 25X1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP90G00993R000100140021-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/06: CIA-RDP90G00993R000100140021-8 25X1