MIDDLE EASTERN OIL EXPORTERS: LIVING WITH LESS REVENUE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
37
Document Creation Date: 
December 27, 2016
Document Release Date: 
April 7, 2011
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
July 1, 1987
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1.pdf1.69 MB
Body: 
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Directorate of Intelligence Middle Eastern Oil Exporters: Living With Less Revenue Secret NESA 87-10033 July 1987 Copy 3 91 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 :5X1 Intelligence Directorate of Secret Middle Eastern Oil Exporters: Living With Less Revenue An Intelligence Assessment This paper was prepared by of Near Eastern and South'Asian Analysis' with the Directorate of Operations. Division, NESA Comments and queries are welcome and may be addressed to the Chief, Issues and Applications Secret NESA 87-10033 July 1987 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Secret Key Judgments Information available as of 1 June 1987 was used in this report. Middle Eastern Oil Exporters: Living With Less Revenue 25X1 groups, especially the military. The oil-exporting states of the Middle East will find it increasingly difficult to cope with the pressures resulting from low oil revenues over the next two years. We project a 7-percent decline in their combined GDP this year and another 1 percent next year, even if oil prices stay at about $18 per barrel. The most serious challenge will come as governments try to distribute cutbacks equitably while accommodating the demands of key interest Soviet intentions. The recession and its effects will encourage leaders of the Middle Eastern oil-exporting states to put distance between themselves and the United States. Indeed, some leaders will attempt to shore up their political positions by blaming their problems on the United States. The economical- ly hardest pressed states will increase demands for US economic and financial aid. Although Moscow will try to exploit tensions between the United States and the Middle Eastern oil exporters, its gains over the next two years are likely to be limited because most of these states are wary of poorer elements of society. The size of the population, accumulated savings, and the strength of the political system and security services will determine the impact of the recession on the individual countries. The countries facing the biggest challenge are Algeria, Egypt, and Tunisia, all of which have large populations, high current expenditures, and limited financial reserves. The Gulf states, and Saudi Arabia in particular, have small populations relative to their savings and thus are better equipped to maintain spending, but they still must work to defuse growing tensions between the richer and successfully co-opted or repressed religious groups. The oil price decline is only one of many threats to stability in the area, but the strains of trying to live with less revenue will encourage regime- destabilizing activities in many of the countries. The lingering recession provides a breeding ground for Islamic fundamentalism. Many disadvan- taged Middle Easterners find the fundamentalist message persuasive and are inclined to blame Western influence for social injustice and disparities between rich and poor. The threat is most acute in Egypt, where fundamentalist groups are relatively well organized and social and econom- ic conditions are bleak. Islamic fundamentalism is also gaining adherents in the Persian Gulf states, but the leaders of these states have either iii Secret NESA 87-10033 July 1987 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Secret Regimes will rely primarily on nonviolent repressive measures to prevent dissatisfaction with the recession from developing into open unrest. If unrest does break out-as is likely in some states-the governments will quickly use their large security and military services to contain it. Most governments-especially Egypt in the wake of last year's police riots-will try to shield the military and security forces from serious financial cutbacks to insure their loyalty. Area rulers will draw on their financial re- serves as long as necessary to continue this policy, and the poorer states will cut the security forces proportionately less than other sectors. In all states in the region, government officials and disgruntled citizens will scrutinize bloated bureaucracies and wasteful spending practices more closely than before. Governments will send home some expatriate workers and encourage their own populations to develop skills appropriate to domestic needs. But economic reforms such as diversification and stimula- tion of private enterprise will founder in most countries because business- men and governments do not have sufficient capital or are unwilling to risk promoting new projects. The preoccupation of most oil-exporting states with their economic and other domestic problems will tend to make their foreign policies less assertive. Foreign aid disbursements by the richer Gulf states will be reduced, even to other Arab states such as Syria, Jordan, and perhaps Iraq. Competition for declining funds will strain relations between donors and recipients. Assistance to states outside the Arab or Islamic worlds will be cut even more. In the unlikely case that oil prices drop to about $10 per barrel and remain there for a.prolonged period, the problems of the Middle Eastern oil exporters would intensify significantly. At $10 per barrel, GDP would fall by 25 percent this year and by another 15 percent in 1988. The Gulf states could cope better than the North African states with such a drop because they have smaller populations and greater financial and oil resources. Still, Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Secret all of the countries would be required to make wrenching cuts, in some cases reaching regime-threatening proportions. The economic difficulties that these countries face would diminish only moderately under a more optimistic, but also unlikely, scenario in which oil prices stabilize at about $25 per barrel during the next two years. Real GDP would increase by 5 percent this year and by 3 percent in 1988. Ex- treme spending cuts would be avoided, but concern about another price decline probably would discourage new initiatives in economic develop- ment. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Scope Note This assessment examines the methods the Middle Eastern net oil export- ers-Algeria, Bahrain, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Tunisia, and the United Arab Emirates-are using to cope with reduced revenues and the threat of social and political instability. It also looks at related economic, political, and social developments over the next two years and how these states will deal with them. The assessment assumes that oil prices and production will remain near OPEC's targets established in December 1986 but explores alternative scenarios. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Secret Key Judgments Scope Note The Foreign Payments Problem 6 Sending Expatriates Home 8 Borrowing Supplements Savings 9 Social and Political Impact of Austerity Measures 11 Employment Tensions 11 Maintaining Stability 12 Protecting the Military and Security Services 13 Emphasizing Pragmatic Foreign Relations 15 Impact on Checkbook Diplomacy 15 Coping With Reality High Absorbers Implications for the United States Econometric Methodology Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Secret Figure 1 Middle Eastern Oil-Exporting Countries Bound ary representation is not necessarily authoritative. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Middle Eastern Oil Exporters: Living With Less Revenue The Middle Eastern oil-exporting countries reaped an unprecedented revenue bonanza from the dramatic oil price hikes of 1973 and 1979 and quickly began developing their economies.' They undertook major industrial projects; expanded roads, ports, and com- munications; implemented social welfare programs to provide education, health care, and basic necessities for their citizens at subsidized prices; and embarked on ambitious military modernization programs. All of these efforts were overwhelmingly dependent on oil income. The golden days of the oil boom have faded-at least temporarily-and these states are being forced to adjust to significantly lower oil revenues and a poten- tially troubling recession. After peaking at $34 a barrel in 1981, oil prices declined to an average of about $15 per barrel in 1986. With inflation and the fall of the dollar, in which oil prices are denominated, the purchasing power of a barrel of oil sold by these states is only about 40 percent of what it was in 1981. Economic prospects for the Middle Eastern oil export- ers hinge largely on the OPEC agreement reached in December 1986 that set production quotas and fixed prices at an average of $18 per barrel. Even if prices are maintained at OPEC-mandated levels, the pro- ducing countries in aggregate are unlikely to experi- ence any economic growth over the next two years. According to our econometric model, overall GDP will decline by about 7 percent this year, decline by another 1 percent next year, and will slightly recover in 1989. We believe these countries will do little more regarding economic development than try to limit the impact of the continuing recession. Even those ' The Middle Eastern oil-exporting countries include Algeria, Bahrain, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Tunisia, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). countries with substantial financial reserves will con- tinue to fear renewed instability in the oil market and will be reluctant to initiate costly development pro- grams, perhaps even postponing projects already un- der way. Efforts To Boost Revenues We believe that many of the governments will attempt to increase revenues by raising tax rates and compli- ance, but these policies are unlikely to affect the revenue picture substantially. Many of their 1987 budgets include fees for social services and utilities, taxes on luxury items, excise taxes on tobacco and alcohol products, tolls, and increased tariffs. Accord- ing to US Embassy sources, Tunis is considering a tax hike for higher income brackets and tighter adminis- trative policies to make tax avoidance more difficult. Even countries that do not have income taxes, such as Saudi Arabia, are considering levying them, accord- ing to US Embassy reporting. We believe, however, that fears of domestic unrest will deter these states from implementing effective measures to increase substantially domestic tax revenues. We expect, con- sequently, that oil will continue to provide an average of roughly two-thirds-as low as 20 percent for Tunisia and as high as 90 percent for the UAE-of aggregate government revenues. Cuts in Spending Despite slashes in government spending by about 20 percent during the last three years, the governments are likely to make additional spending cuts even if oil prices remain at $18 per barrel. Our model projects that government spending this year will fall 5 percent from the 1986 level and at best remain constant next year. Many of these states probably will try to trim the sizable budget and current account deficits they have experienced over the last few years. Although the biggest cuts have already been made, they have also been the easiest. Future cuts, even small ones, are likely to be more painful. 25X1 25X1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Figure 2 Middle Eastern Oil Exporters: Improvements in Health, Education, and Welfare,-- 1970 and 1986 Life Expectancy Years Algeria Bahrain Egypt Iran Iraq Kuwait Libya Oman Qatar Saudi Arabia Tunisia U.A.E. 1970 1986 Literacy Rate Per Capita Incomeb Percent Thousand US $ 8 Estimates based on available data. b Figures for Persian Gulf countries include large expatriate populations which skews actual figure for native per capita income downward. Spending on defense and security personnel and pro- grams that promote a specific government objective or protect critical interest groups will probably follow past trends and be spared or cut proportionately less than the overall budget. In Saudi Arabia, for exam- ple, the 1987 budget increases spending for manpower and education programs to support Riyadh's Saudiza= tion efforts and includes new funding for Islamic universities and more services in Mecca and Medina to appeal to religious groups. Most states will probably avoid significant cuts or move cautiously in changing existing subsidies or services. In Tunisia, for example, concern that the bloody 1984 food riots would be repeated delayed the Bourguiba government's cut in subsidies until mid- 1986 when rapidly deteriorating economic conditions forced the implementation of reforms. Similar qualms have prompted Egyptian President Mubarak to pur- sue a highly cautious and gradualist approach to Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Figure 3 Middle Eastern Oil Exporters: Declining Oil Revenues Aggregate Oil Revenues, 1980-87 Purchasing Power of One Barrel of Oil,e Billion US $ 1970-87 Index: 1970=100 Oil Revenues,c d 1980 and 1985 Billion US $ Algeria Bahrain Egypt I ran Iraq Kuwait Libya Oman Qatar Saudi Arabia Tunisia U.A.E. 1980 1985 W a See appendix I for methodology. C Oil revenues accruing to the government. b Estimated, based on $18 per barrel and the d Source: International Financial Statistics. OPEC assigned production quota. 313112687 25X1 3 Secret Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Secret Figure 4 Middle Eastern Oil Exporters: Aggregate Real GDP Growth, 1980-88 -30 1980 81 82 83 84 85 86 87a 87b 87c 88a 88b 88? a Assumes oil at $18 per barrel. b Assumes oil at $10 barrel. c Assumes oil at $25 per barrel. raising prices. The price of bread was raised by first doubling both its size and price and then slowly trimming the size of the loaf. We believe he will retract any increases at the first sign of trouble. An attempt by President Sadat to raise food prices in 1977 resulted in widespread rioting and an immediate retraction of the cost increases. Operating, maintenance, and administrative expendi- tures are likely to suffer the biggest cuts. We expect most states will try to make reductions evenly from nearly all civilian categories in their 1987 budgets and to follow a similar pattern in 1988. With most major development projects already scaled back or dropped, the governments are now attempting to spread the cuts broadly to avoid creating additional economic disparities. The governments will try to spare wages, but we believe the middle class-especially techno- crats, civil servants, and small businessmen-will be Figure 5 Middle Eastern Oil Exporters: Oil Exports as a Share of Government Revenue, 1985 Algeria Bahrain Egypt Iran Iraq Kuwait Libya Oman Qatar Saudi Arabia Tunisia U.A.E. hurt disproportionately. Those governments that elect or are forced to cut benefits will try to mask the impact of the measures. In Libya, for example, the government trimmed the salaries of government work- ers by reducing the number of pay periods in a year, delaying checks, and forcing employees to deposit funds in government accounts with limited withdrawals. The business community is likely to continue to bear most directly the negative impact of the economic recession because governments have canceled develop- ment projects, cut contractors' profit margins, de- manded that companies finance projects without gov- ernment assistance, and delayed payments. US Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Figure 6 Middle Eastern Oil Exporters: Cuts in Government Spendingab Current 1982 Capital 1982 Current 1985 Capital 1985 Algeria Bahrain Egypt Iran Iraq Kuwait Libya Oman Qatar Saudi Arabia Tunisia U.A.E.? Current and Capital Government Spending, 1982 and 1985 Billion US $ Algeria Bahrain Egypt Iran Iraq Kuwait Libya Oman Qatar Saudi Arabia Tunisia U.A.E. 1982 1985 Military Spending as a Share of Total Spending, 1982 and 1985 Percent ii 4 Aggregate Government Spending, 1980-88 Billion US $ a Actual spending during fiscal year. b Source: CIA estimates. c Federal spending. Individual emirates fund capital projects outside the context of the federal budget, but defense expenditures are generally covered by federal spending. dEstimate based on CIA model and $18 per barrel of oil. 9 Y1 25X1 313115687 25X1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Secret Embassies in the Gulf states report that a sharp increase in bankruptcies of private firms, including some of the largest in the UAE, has led to consider- able grumbling among businessmen. Although we believe that resentment of government economic poli- cies by this group will increase significantly, the business communities' close identification with, and sometimes membership in, the countries' ruling estab- lishments will limit exploitation by opponents of the regimes. Economic Reform As the economic recession has settled into the region, the Middle Eastern oil exporters have been forced to reevaluate their economic policies. Many of the coun- tries have started to streamline their institutions and look more pragmatically at their economic pro- grams-actions that please traditionalists who are concerned with the rapid pace and direction of devel- opment. In Saudi Arabia the government is consider- ing eliminating several agencies charged with specific oil market functions, according to Embassy reporting. Although corruption and wasteful spending persist, the actions of officials are being more carefully scrutinized by the public. Last fall Oman fired the influential Minister of Housing because of growing public criticism of his corruption and mismanage- Figure 7 Middle Eastern Oil Exporters: Oil and Gas Exports as a Share of Total Exports, 1986 Algeria Bahrain Egypt Iran Iraq Kuwait Libya Oman Qatar Saudi Arabia Tunisia U.A.E. ment, according to US Embassy sources. Many of the Middle Eastern oil exporters are looking to privatization and diversification to make their economies more efficient and less vulnerable to oil market fluctuations. But liquidity problems facing private companies even in relatively wealthy states such as Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and the UAE will probably make it difficult for the private sector to become a major force in stimulating growth. Press reports indicate that economic sectors considered for diversification include agriculture, minerals, fishing, light industry, and finance. The governments have taken little action on these proposals because of reduced revenues. Many of the states, however, are beginning to consider changing or implementing legal and commercial codes to attract and maintain com- mercial ties to the West to promote diversification, The Foreign Payments Problem We expect the Middle Eastern oil exporters to contin- ue to face substantial, but diminishing, current ac- count deficits. Oil revenues probably will increase once again if, as we expect, OPEC members limit production and world demand grows. Our model shows an increase of nearly 18 percent in aggregate export revenues for this year over the 1986 level of about $86 billion, with another 4 percent increase in according to Embassy reporting. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Secret Figure 8 Middle Eastern Oil Exporters: Foreign Payments Problems Current Account Balance, 1980-88 Billion US $ Imports and Export Trends, 1980-88 Billion US $ -40 1980 81 82 83 84 85 86 87b 88b 0 1980 Current Account Balance by Country, 1980 and 1985 Billion US $ Algeria Bahrain Egypt Iran Iraq Kuwait Libya Oman Qatar Saudi Arabia Tunisia U.A.E. 1980 1985 a Excludes most imports of military equipment. b Estimate based on CIA model and $18 per barrel of oil. Algeria Bahrain Egypt Iran Iraq Kuwait Libya Oman Qatar Saudi Arabia Tunisia U.A.E. 85 87b 88b Imports Trends by Country,s 1982 and 1986 Billion US $ 1982 1986 313117 76725X1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Secret 1988. Increased revenue combined with spending cuts should reduce this year's aggregate current account deficit by about $9 billion from the 1986 level of $26 billion, assuming an average price of $18 per barrel. All of the oil states will almost certainly try to reduce the outflow of foreign exchange. They already have made deep cuts in imports, including capital goods, consumer goods, and luxury items, and some have adopted rationing to control the distribution of basic commodities. To further discourage imports, several countries, including Tunisia, Libya, and Oman, deval- ued their currencies by more than 10 percent last year. Other states probably will reluctantly consider similar action this year. With an increase in oil revenues this year, some states might increase imports slightly, but we would expect most to loosen import restrictions only cautiously. Moreover, we expect the impact of past import restrictions to have a lagged effect and impair economic growth during the next few years, even if oil prices remain near $18 per Figure 9 Arabian Peninsula: Composition of Labor Force, 1986 Saudi Arabia Kuwait U.A.E. Oman Bahrain Qatar Additional measures to cut imports to offset persisting current account deficits could easily cause or worsen shortages, inflationary pressures, and an increase in illegal commercial activity. Increased tariffs and other restrictive measures on imports have already raised the prices of consumer and durable goods such as chocolate, coffee, appliances, electronic equipment, and apparel in the last few years. Several countries, including Libya, Iran, and Iraq, are witnessing substantial growth of black markets and smuggling Active black markets in these countries make some commod- ities virtually unavailable on the legitimate market, In Libyan cities, for example, many foods cost four to five times the price they did a year ago. Food and most other basic commodities are rationed. With the exception of Iraq, most countries tolerate this illegal activity because it relieves pressure on the government to supply goods, the governments can do little to control it, and many officials benefit from it through bribes and kickbacks. Sending Expatriates Home The lack of new development projects and an interest in saving foreign exchange will almost certainly prompt the Gulf states to pare the most expensive segments of their large expatriate labor forces. On the basis of Embassy and press reporting, we estimate that foreign workers make up about 80 percent of the labor force in several of the smaller Gulf states. Although only a small percentage of the region's total foreign work force is likely to return home any time soon, many of those who leave either will not be replaced or will be replaced by cheaper labor from South or East Asia. Their departure will offer few new employment opportunities for indigenous work- ers. Although the labor-importing states would like to indigenize their work forces, the departure of large numbers of expatriates would hurt their economies because most nationals do not have the training, experience, or management skills equal to that of the expatriates they replace. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Secret Even a limited repatriation of additional workers would have a negative effect on the economies and societies of the labor-supplying states. Cairo has depended heavily on remittances from Egyptians working in other oil-exporting countries. Remittances from all workers abroad are Egypt's largest source of foreign exchange. According to Embassy reporting, Egypt may have lost as much as $2 billion during the past year as a result of lost jobs and of curbs on the re- patriation of earnings in countries such as Iraq. According to our analysis, Egyptians working abroad comprised approximately 20 percent of the country's working-age population. In one Egyptian village, as many as 80 percent of the men had been working in the Gulf states, and most are returning home, accord- ing to press reports. Embassy reporting indicate the expulsion from Libya last year of about 32,000 Tunisian workers and their families cost Tunisia about $140 million in remit- tances, trade, and additional outlays for social ser- vices. Despite some cuts in civilian expatriate labor, we believe the Gulf states will continue to rely on foreign military personnel to compensate for endemic short- ages of skilled technicians and tactical advisers in military-related jobs. We believe, however, that the efficiency of the armed forces in these countries will decline as some expatriates leave and others are replaced with less expensive and less qualified person- nel from poorer countries. Our analysis shows that about 60,000 foreign military personnel currently serve in the oil-exporting states, mostly in the Gulf. expatriates play critical roles in managing Saudi Arabia's military logistic system and in maintaining US, French, and British military equipment. most of the smaller Gulf states could not operate and maintain their air forces and navies without foreign personnel. Expatriates also support local security services in the Gulf states. Borrowing Supplements Savings The broad range of monetary and fiscal policies undertaken by the oil-exporting countries has been insufficient to cover their growing deficits, and most of the countries will almost certainly continue to draw on foreign assets or to borrow on the international Figure 10 Middle Eastern Oil Exporters: Foreign Military Personnel, 1986 Algeria Egypta Libya Tunisia Iran a Iraq Bahrain Kuwait Oman Qatar Saudi Arabia U.A.E.b t a Probably less than 200. b Does not include 13,600 Omani troops. 313119687 25X1 capital markets. Since the early 1980s Iraq has drawn down its reserves by nearly $20 billion and Saudi Arabia by about $40 billion to $2 billion and $105 billion, respectively. The drawdowns have permitted some of the oil- exporting countries, particularly those in the Arabian Peninsula, to continue funding their generous social welfare programs and to avoid deep cuts that would negatively affect their citizens. Although drawing on them to cover current financial shortfalls has pro- voked concern among some government officials be- cause of the commitment of several of these govern- ments to save a portion of their oil revenues for future 25X1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Secret Figure 11 Middle Eastern Oil Exporters: International Financial Assets, 8 Yearend 1981 and 1986 Billion as $ Figure 12 Middle Eastern Oil Exporters: Debt Service Ratios, 1980 and 1985 Algeria Bahrain b Egyptb Iran Iraq Kuwait Libya c Oman Qatar Saudi Arabia Tunisia b U.A.E. 1981 1986 a CIA estimate. b Foreign exchange and gold holdings. e Includes holdings in Arab Banking Corporation. generations, those states with generous reserves prob- ably will draw them down further to avoid politically difficult decisions. Many of these states will probably try to balance drawdowns with domestic and interna- tional borrowing, but in some cases-Saudi Arabia in particular-this alternative is limited because influen- tial religious groups believe that the government should abide by the Islamic prohibition against paying Algeria Bahrain Egypt Iran Iraq Kuwait Libya Oman Qatar Saudi Arabia Tunisia U.A.E. 1980 1985 a Debt service ratio is the percentage of export earnings used to make principal and interest payments on the foreign debt. International financial institutions consider a ratio of 25 percent or more to be high. The North African countries, except for Libya, have borrowed heavily to cover their deficits and almost certainly will continue to do so. Borrowing by Egypt and Algeria has increased their already high debt- service ratios to over 50 percent each-more than twice the rate that international financial institutions consider dangerous. The IMF and other international Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Secret organizations helped Tunisia obtain additional aid and have rescheduled Egypt's debt. Iraq also has increased its borrowing substantially since 1983 and is continually trying to reschedule its debts. Baghdad faces less immediate pressure than the North African oil exporters, however, because nearly two-thirds of its debt-$30 billion-is owed to Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, which have supported the Iraqi war effort and almost certainly will not demand prompt repay- ment. The oil price decline is only one of many threats to stability in the Middle Eastern oil-exporting coun- tries, and thus it is difficult to analyze precisely its political and social impact. Reduced revenues compli- cate the ability of these governments to cope with a host of problems, including ethnic tensions, political corruption, demands for greater political participa- tion, border disputes, and interstate disputes. Some of the economic policies implemented to adjust to re- duced oil revenues will increase the risk of unrest, particularly as social spending dries up, standards of living decline, unemployment grows, and popular expectations of a better life go unmet. Indeed, we believe the greatest danger of this particular economic crisis is its tendency to aggravate a broad range of social and political problems simultaneously in states that no longer have large surplus funds to ease these tensions. Employment Tensions The rapidly growing populations of these states and the lack of matched skills to the needs of their economies make employment prospects relatively poor for the unemployed and for new entrants to the labor force. The diminished demand for labor in both the public and private sectors caused by the oil price decline, moreover, is closing an important safety valve for social tensions. increasing number of disgrun- tled unemployed workers are contributing to growing delinquency, crime, and drug abuse. Employment prospects for growing numbers of Arab youth are dimmer than for the previous generation. The Growing Demographic Burden Demographic factors will severely complicate the region's ability to cope with lower income-particu- larly in the North African states, where populations are larger than those of the Gulf states and per capita oil income is substantially less: ? Annual rates of population growth are high throughout the region. Kuwait's population, for example, is growing at 3.5 percent. Egypt's popula- tion of 51 million-the largest in the Middle East-is growing at 2.7 percent annually, a rate that adds another million mouths to feed approxi- mately every seven months. ? Well over half the people in the region are under 25, and, although population growth rates may decline slightly before the end of this century, we do not expect a significant slowdown in growth for at least several decades. ? The growing concentration of people in urban areas-more than 60 percent of the population in 1985 compared to 45 percent in 1970-increases the potential for large groups to assemble in protest against reduced subsidies for food or other services. ? Feeding the growing population will become more burdensome. Egypt, Libya, and Algeria, for exam- ple, must import at least 60 percent of their total food requirements.a Dwindling oil income will make it increasingly difficult to maintain adequate supplies of low-cost food. ? Housing shortages are acute, particularly in the large cities of North Africa. The US Embassy in Algiers lists the lack of adequate housing as Alger- ia's most pressing social problem. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 secret Reductions in public-sector expenditures will contrib- ute to the increased inability of these countries to provide jobs for the large number of people who will be entering the job market. Unemployment and un- deremployment are already a problem-topping 30 percent in Tunisia and Algeria and reaching nearly 60 percent in some urban areas. Reduced revenues led the UAE to declare last year that it would hire no new employees and prompted the Egyptian Government to implement new hiring restrictions for college gradu- Youth in the wealthier Gulf states could improve their employment prospects, but only by accepting less prestigious positions or pursuing more practical courses of study. These governments are encouraging local students to select technical and scientific train- ing to compete for jobs now largely filled by expatri- ates. Despite this encouragement, we doubt that many of these students will shift their educational focus, believing that the boom days will return after a temporary lull in the economy and that they will find high-paying jobs regardless of their area of study. Popular dissatisfaction with a proposal to establish a trade school in Kuwait contributed to the ouster of the Minister of Education last year, according to US We believe the fundamentalist threat will be most acute in Egypt and Tunisia, where Islamic groups have shown themselves to be relatively disciplined, organized, and, in some cases, well financed. Radical, violence-prone sects are difficult to uproot. Although Egyptian security authorities claim to have them under control, we believe that extremists of the sort who murdered President Sadat in 1981 have not been completely neutralized by government security forces. The confrontation between the government and Is- lamic fundamentalists in Tunisia has become more violent this year in response to the government's campaign to eliminate all independent political activity. We believe that the threat from Islamic fundamental- ists is not so serious in most Gulf states because their societies are conservative and their more prosperous governments appear to have blended appeasement with repression of religious groups. States with large or regionally concentrated Shia populations-Iraq, Bahrain, Kuwait, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia-are particularly concerned about potential unrest and have begun to burnish their Islamic credentials through stricter enforcement of Islamic laws. Embassy sources. Pressure From Islamic Fundamentalists We believe that deteriorating economic and social conditions will provide an increasingly fertile breeding ground for discontent that could be exploited by religious groups. Islamic fundamentalism will contin- ue to be especially attractive because it focuses on the conditions that disadvantaged Middle Easterners hold responsible for their economic plight-social injustice brought about by misguided policies; profligate spend- ing and extravagant lifestyles by ruling families; growing disparities between rich and poor resulting from corruption; and increasing Western influences that are undermining traditional Islamic values. Pop- ular discontent with these perceived injustices will almost certainly grow during a prolonged recession.' The threat of antiregime violence by fundamentalists takes a different form in Iran-the only country governed by fundamentalists. Discontent is growing because of chronic shortages of consumer goods and high unemployment and inflation. In addition, clerical rivalries kept under control by Khomeini could pose a serious threat to the stability of the regime after his Maintaining Stability We believe the oil states will be able to maintain public order despite the hardships austerity is likely to produce. We see little prospect of violent regime changes stemming from economic problems during 25X1 25X1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Secret the next two years. Nonetheless, some domestic unrest is likely, especially in the poorer North African states, as various interest groups compete to enhance their positions and their share of the national income while governments are vulnerable. Regimes will rely primarily on nonviolent repressive measures to prevent dissatisfaction from developing into open unrest. We anticipate continued tight con- trol over the news media, close monitoring of the population by security services, and restrictions on most political groups, particularly those the regimes believe constitute a threat to their rule. Surveillance, censorship, and heavyhanded security measures are all likely to increase as the recession deepens: Protecting the Military and Security Services 25X1 The need to protect social services and welfare pro- grams almost certainly will require cuts in military budgets for most countries in the region. The Middle Eastern oil-exporting states will focus cuts on the least sensitive items-spare parts, new equipment, facili- ties, training, and maintenance-to protect the sala- ries and benefits of military personnel. Iran and Iraq, however, will continue to give military budgets a high priority, at least until their war ends. We believe Libya is also an exception. press accounts indicate Qadhafi has attempted to continue buying advanced equipment while reducing personnel costs. He has frozen most promotions and ended generous commissary, housing, and travel privi- ? Last year Kuwait abolished its parliament because it was too critical of government policies. It has also begun censoring its freewheeling press and is con- templating nationalizing three newspapers, accord- ing to US officials. ? In Tunisia a growing crackdown on Islamic funda- mentalist groups is being extended to other opposi- tion elements, according to the US Embassy in Tunis. The campaign is contributing to a sense of political alienation outside ruling party circles that could provoke further unrest as power slips from the hands of the aging Bourguiba. ? Oman already has ordered all natives and foreign residents to carry identification cards to aid the internal security service, according to press reports. If unrest does break out-as is likely in some of the Middle Eastern oil-exporting states-we believe the governments will quickly use their large security and military services to contain it. Although these services vary considerably in their ability both to detect embryonic dissident groups and to contain outbreaks of unrest, we believe they are capable of maintaining order, at least in the short term. None except Egypt, however, has had recent experience in putting down large-scale riots, and we believe the loyalty of these services would be severely tested if they became engaged in sustained street campaigns, such as those that occurred in Iran in 1979. leges. Except for Libya, we expect such policies to help ensure the military's loyalty to the regime, but they are almost certain to undermine the military's opera- tional readiness and capabilities, particularly as train- ing and maintenance are further reduced. Regional self-defense and military cooperation are likely to suffer as funds for joint military exercises are diverted elsewhere. The annual military exercises planned by the Gulf Cooperation Council have been postponed or scaled down since October 1984, in part because many of the participants are looking for ways to save money These countries will probably try to meet military threats through cooperation agreements with more experienced mili- tary establishments such as those of Morocco anc25X1 Pakistan, or they will rely on the US security um- brella. i In the Gulf states, policies to protect military person- nel from major cuts have muted much of the dissatis- faction that might have developed from lower spend- ing for defense. In some cases, restrictions on the hiring of expatriates have opened more opportunities for native military personnel. In addition, cutbacks in purchases of equipment are not likely to be a severe problem, because most of these countries cannot operate all of the equipment already in their inven- tories or about to be delivered. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Secret Declining Arms Purchases Cuts in military spending are most obvious in the stated production policies. Embassy reporting indi- cates that the oil used in barter arrangements is generally produced in excess of OPEC quotas, thus adding to world supplies and putting downward pres- sure on prices. In Saudi Arabia the Ministry of Defense, not the Ministry of Petroleum, has the authority to decide on barter arrangements for arms sales, according to US Embassy reporting. Falling oil prices have complicated these agreements, since the terms usually have to be renegotiated to reflect the price change reduction in foreign arms purchases. the value of Middle East- ern oil-exporting countries' arms purchase agree- ments peaked in 1980 at more than $32 billion, just before the price of oil reached its highest levels. Actual deliveries of weapons peaked four years later at about $23 billion, reflecting the timelags inherent in arms deliveries. Both agreements and deliveries subsequently have declined. Although orders re- bounded in 1984 and 1985, this was largely on the strength of two large deals involving Saudi Arabia. Deliveries have not reflected the upswing in contracts and are not likely to do so. We believe most custom- ers will stretch out deliveries or cancel some con- tracts because of decreasing revenues and the need to conserve cash. Faced with lower revenues, some oil exporters have bartered oil for arms In late 1984 the United Arab Emirates ordered 18 Mirage 2000 fighters from France and agreed to pay with a combination of cash and oil. Saudi Arabia's 1985 purchase of Tornado fighter-bombers from the United Kingdom called for oil as payment for part of Oil barter, while conserving cash, probably is adding to the woes of oil exporters and often conflicts with Shielding military personnel from additional austerity may prove to be difficult for the poorer states of North Africa, given the risk of coup plotting by discontented military officers. Egyptian leaders-who depended heavily on the Army to restore order after the 1986 police mutiny-probably will require that disproportionate cuts be made in the civilian sector to continue providing military officers with relatively generous benefits and comfortable living standards. Even so, it will be difficult to avoid some lowering of these standards and, thus, of military morale.1 Reduced oil income is straining relations with arms suppliers because of the oil exporters' inability to pay for arms deliveries: ? Iraq's largest Western suppliers, Italy and France, are becoming reluctant to grant more arms credits to Baghdad, which has already fallen behind in its payments. ? Oman has postponed until at least 1992 the pur- chase of eight Tornados from the United Kingdom, 25X1 effectively canceling 25X1 25X1 Grumbling in the ranks may be even more ominous in Algeria, where President Bendjedid has been criti- cized by Army leaders for cuts in the military pro- curement budget and elimination of some pay incen- tives and medical benefits. As part of an effort to Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Secret Figure 13 Middle Eastern Oil Exporters: Arms Agreements and Deliveries, 1975-85 I ~ I ~ I 0 1975 reporting quash dissent and protect his position, Bendjedid moved last year to reestablish his control over the military by firing his chief of staff and reorganizing his Presidential Guard, according to defense attache Emphasizing Pragmatic Foreign Relations We do not believe that economic problems have greatly changed regional alliances of oil exporters, although they have encouraged more nationalistic policies. We believe that pressing internal problems will reinforce the proclivity to focus on internal issues rather than regional and international issues. Pan- Arabism is no longer seen as a practical solution to the region's problems because of inter-Arab bickering and the failure to defeat Israel, although Arab leaders still give lipservice to the idea of Arab unity. We believe that interest in the Palestinian issue among other Arabs has waned, even though they still strongly believe that an injustice has been perpetrated on the Palestinians.F___1 25X1 Efforts to increase oil prices have led to renewed cooperation among the Middle Eastern oil-exporting states. OPEC-to which all the Middle Eastern ex- porters except Bahrain, Oman, Egypt, and Tunisia belong-has held frequent conferences to discuss prices, and these gatherings have provided a setting where ranking officials of member countries could meet informally and discuss political issues. We be- lieve that the relative success of the December 1986 OPEC accord has been one of the factors leading to Riyadh's reevaluation of its relations with Tehran and Baghdad. Despite their generally strained relations, Iran's and Saudi Arabia's interests converge on the need to bring oil pricing and production discipline to OPEC. Iraq's refusal to agree to the terms of the OPEC accord has put the Saudis in the awkward position of defending what other members consider to be Iraqi cheating.) 25X1 Impact on Checkbook Diplomacy Lower oil revenues have reduced the scope of econom- ic aid as a foreign policy tool. For more than a decade Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the UAE, and Qatar have used foreign aid to foster regional consensus, support the Arabs against Israel, promote their influence over both moderate and radical regimes, and secure pro- tection from terrorism and more powerful neighbors. Most of the foreign aid has gone to Arab states opposing Israel-Syria, Jordan, and, until 1979, Egypt. Gulf state donors, which have large Palestin- ian communities, also pledged to give $300 million annually to the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) as part of the 1978 Baghdad Agreement- signed following the Camp David agreement to help Syria, Jordan, and the PLO finance their struggle against Israel. Last year, however, only Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and the UAE made payment o the PLO. Since the Iran-Iraq war began, the Gulf states have also provided Iraq with cash, aid in kind, and loans. 25X1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Secret Foreign assistance to non-Arab recipients-never a priority of the donor states' overall aid package-is, nonetheless, significant to mostly Islamic African and South and East Asian recipients. In return, the Gulf states seek support for Arab positions in international forums and reductions in ties to Israel. This funding has been reduced as the Gulf states marshal their funds for pressing needs closer to home. According to US Embassy reporting, Kuwait, for example, plans to avoid additional financial commitments to African Islamic republic in Iraq. We expect the donors to take a harder look at their aid disbursements, particularly as the 10-year Bagh- dad Agreement approaches expiration in the fall of 1988. Gulf lenders almost certainly will use declining foreign reserves and austerity measures at home to justify reductions in foreign aid to Syria, Jordan, and possibly Iraq, despite their concern over the reaction of these recipients. We believe that both Iraq and Syria will retain considerable leverage in seeking financial aid. Cash aid to Iraq will probably depend on the level of fighting in the Iran-Iraq war, Iraqi oil production, and the Gulf states' assessment of Bagh- dad's ability to prevent Iran from establishing an Egypt is likely to receive increased aid from the Gulf states in recognition of its mounting economic trou- bles and its strategic significance. Iranian advances in the war against Iraq convinced the donor states of their need for a strong, moderate, and supportive Egypt. They are likely to continue courting Cairo with a view toward securing Egyptian assurances of mili- tary support in the event of a major Iranian threat to the Gulf states. The Gulf states pledged as much as $2 billion to Cairo in the last year to help relieve Egypt's economic problems As they increase aid levels to Egypt, however, the Gulf states risk complicating their relations with other recipients by obliging them to make do with less. Resentment of Egypt by these recipients is likely to increase as Cairo regains a share of Gulf aid money. Iraq almost certainly fears that Egypt will soak up Saudi aid money that Baghdad hopes to use for postwar reconstruction. states because of its own economic problems. Coping With Reality Most of the leaders of the oil-exporting states will probably try to muddle through the period of low economic growth we expect during the next two years Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Secret Figure 15 Middle Eastern Oil Exporters: Relative Indicators of High and Low Absorbers, 1986 High absorbers War-torn economics Low absorbers Algeria Egypt Tunisia Iran Iraq Bahrain Kuwait Libya Oman Qatar Saudi Arabia U.A.E. Population Million ^ a Excludes nonrecoverable loans. b Includes Reserve Fund for Future Generations. 313124687 25X1 Proved Oil Reserves,a Yearend 1986 Billion barrels Recoverable Financial Assets,a Yearend 1986 Billion US $ 150 200 0 30 60 90 and avoid having to grapple with fundamental dilem- mas plaguing their countries. As the low oil prices persist, however, resorting to quick fixes will become increasingly difficult. Countries with large popula- tions and high current expenditures-the high absorb- ers-probably are the most vunerable. Most of the countries with the highest dependence on oil revenues, ironically, are not those seriously threatened. Many of the countries highly dependent on oil revenues are low absorbers-they have small populations relative to their revenue-and can supplement current income with accumulated savings. High Absorbers With few financial reserves to fall back on and large populations to care for, high absorbers-especially Algeria, Egypt, and Tunisia-will face particularly tough choices over future cuts. Restoring financial stability will probably require additional belt-tighten- ing, which many political leaders will find unpalat- able. Political inaction is likely to result as govern- ment infighting about policy and the allocation of scarce resources increases. These states are likely to require more foreign aid and loans and may resort to debt rescheduling to meet financial requirements even if they come to grips with the need for additional economic reforms. 25X1 25X1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Secret The situation in Tunisia is complicated by a political vacuum at the top, according to US Embassy report- ing, where President Bour- guiba is increasingly resorting to heavyhanded tactics to shore up his authority. This trend-aggravated by economic austerity-could foster links among the opposition groups, secular and religious, who have not been able to forge a common political front. Leaders in the high-absorbing countries are likely to proceed slowly and carefully with further economic reforms for fear that harsh austerity measures would provoke unrest long before they produced economic benefits. Algeria and Tunisia have implemented some impressive reforms, but more must be done before they can cover their requirements for foreign ex- change. Only Algerian President Bendjedid appears willing to try to mobilize public support for austerity. Through media blitzes and regional meetings and conferences, Algiers has, with considerable success, urged the people to reduce imports and eliminate resource waste. Even so, economically inspired rioting by students took place in Constantine last November, and minor disturbances occurred in several other wealthy ruling elites is likely to increase during the next few years. Reporting from US Embassies in the region indicates a growing resistance to both, especial- ly among small businessmen and recent university graduates, who have had to reduce their spending and lower their expectations. Libya does not fit the low-absorber pattern because its population already is suffering from a precipitous drop in living standards. In our view, Libya has sustained far greater damage and incurred a greater risk of instability from Qadhafi's policies than it has from the decline in world oil prices. Qadhafi has been unwilling to draw on foreign reserves to ameliorate consumer dissatisfaction and, instead, is forcing the population to make sacrifices to continue his foreign adventurism, such as the incursion into Chad. Unlike the leaders of most of the other Middle Eastern oil- exporting countries, he appears oblivious to public opinion, even within the military. Qadhafi's commit- ment to his revolutionary goals will probably lead him to demand even greater sacrifices from the Libyan people, adding further strains to the society and economy. cities, including the capital. Low Absorbers With their far greater wealth and smaller populations, we believe that the Gulf states have enough funds remaining in their budgets to insulate most of their populations from the impact of cutbacks, at least until the end of the decade. They will probably be able to stave off painful economic choices by drawing on their sizable recoverable financial assets. As of the end of 1986 this accounted for $70 billion in Kuwait, $60 billion in Saudi Arabia, and $35 billion in the UAE. Although their leaders almost certainly recognize the longer term danger of such a policy, reporting from Embassy sources indicates they believe their economic problems will be eased by the early 1990s when, according to energy experts, oil demand and prices will increase. Nonetheless, the Gulf states will have to defuse growing tensions between society's rich and poor to maintain domestic stability while accommodating key religious, military, and business groups. Intolerance of corruption and the extravagant lifestyles of the War-torn Iran and Iraq face considerable hardships from low oil prices, but the impact of the conflict remains the overwhelming determinant of stability in these two countries. In Iraq the government has become concerned about popular resentment toward corrupt members of President Saddam Husayn's ex- tended family, according to the US Embassy in Baghdad. In Iran, corruption is widespread, but gov- ernment leaders live unostentatiously and the disad- vantaged classes appear to believe they are getting their fair share of national wealth. What if Oil Prices Fall? The problems facing the Middle Eastern oil-exporting countries would intensify dramatically under the un- likely scenario that oil prices were to fall to $10 per barrel and remain at that level during the next few years. Under this assumption, our model indicates Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Secret Impact of the Iran-Iraq War Decreased oil revenues are playing an increasingly important role in the political stability and military strategies of both Iran and Iraq. Low oil prices have contributed to policy disputes within the ruling Bath Party in Baghdad, and the low prices, compounded by Iraqi air attacks on Iranian economic targets, have contributed to increased strife among competingfac- tions in Tehran. We do not believe that lower oil revenues will, by themselves, threaten the stability of either Iran or Iraq, but they will greatly contribute to popular dissatisfaction over the war and the regimes' management of it. We believe Iran and Iraq will concentrate on economic recovery after the fighting stops rather than renewing efforts to subvert the Gulf monarchies. Iran's economy is in shambles, and the urban poor, in particular, suffered a precipitous decline in living standards in 1986. We believe that Iran must show progress in the war to justify the enormous human and economic cost to its populace. At the same time, reduced revenues hamper its ability to continue ma- jor ground offensives, let alone finance an arms buildup to threaten Iraq's superiority in advanced weapon systems. Iraq, wearied by the war, was forced in 1986 to abandon the last traces of its "guns-and-butter" policy and to slash nonmilitary spending. The Iraqi people have endured reductions of consumer subsi- dies, tax increases, expanded rationing, and short- ages of consumer items, including foodstuffs. They, like the Iranians, have held up reasonably well but can anticipate little improvement, even after Iraq opens a new oil pipeline through Turkey this summer. that real GDP for all the Middle Eastern oil-exporting countries would fall by 25 percent this year and by another 15 percent in 1988. Export revenues would decline substantially, contributing to an aggregate reduction in spending of 23 percent this year and 11 percent next year, assuming past spending patterns. The states would be forced to implement additional severe cutbacks, and the economic problems of many of them would reach regime-threatening proportions. What if Oil Prices Increase? 25X1 Our model indicates that the economic difficulties these countries face would lessen only moderately under the most optimistic-but also unlikely scenario-that oil prices stabilize at $25 per barrel during the next two years. The lingering effects of austerity measures taken over the past few years would continue to hamper growth. Under this as- sumption, aggregate real GDP growth for these coun- tries would increase by 5 percent this year and by 3 percent in 1988. The overall current account balance would improve from a deficit of $26 billion in 1986 to a surplus of $26 billion this year. The countries could avoid making extreme spending cuts, but, as in the $18-per-barrel scenario, some of them would still not have sufficient resources to ease significantly their economic troubles. A continuation of the modest economic reforms undertaken, however, would allow some economic growth and forestall a major erosion of benefits needed to placate their local populations. Implications for the United States 25X1 25X1 Although the United States is a major oil producer, it is also the world's largest oil importer, and, on balance, the decline in oil prices has helped the domestic US economy. We believe, however, the impact of continuing low oil prices on US relations with the region will be largely negative. US economic Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Secret The United States: Economic Implications of Low Oil Prices The United States has reaped significant economic benefits from low oil prices. Lower oil prices in 1986 saved the United States more than $20 billion and contributed to the lowest level of inflation in 25 years. The domestic oil industry, however, fell into a severe depression. Exploration and development bud- gets of domestic oil companies were slashed, and high-cost oil wells were shut down. Oil production fell by 300,000 barrels per day (b/d) from 1985 levels. US energy experts predict that domestic production will decline an additional 400,000 b/d in 1987 if oil prices stay around $18 per barrel. With depressed domestic production, the United States once again faces a growing dependence on the Middle East, with its large oil reserves and excess oil producing capacity. US imports of crude oil from these countries in 1986 were almost twice the average of the previous two years and accounted for 20 percent of US crude oil imports. The continued volatility of the region will in the foreseeable future pose a potential threat to the flow of oil. The Iran- Iraq war, a probable power struggle in post-Khomeini Iran, the Arab-Israeli conflict, political instability, and the US-Soviet competition for influence in the region could all affect access to Middle Eastern oil. and strategic interests would be seriously damaged if political instability in the Middle East worsened significantly-an unlikely prospect at present-and led to curbed oil output and restricted Western access to oil, or caused the collapse of friendly regimes and installed a new crop of anti-Western leaders. Pro- longed political turmoil in Egypt, for example, could produce an anti-US regime interested in abrogating the Camp David accords. A rise in fundamentalism espoused by alienated youth would encourage some states to move away from the United States and reject Some of the oil states will probably attempt to focus blame for their economic problems on the United States to shore up their political positions. Arab governments historically have paid a price in populari- ty for close relations with Washington because the United States is perceived to support Israel at the expense of Arab interests. As political pressure mounts, we believe these states will publicly dissociate themselves from policies closely identified with the United States to avoid criticism from neighbors and constituents. Opponents of regimes with pro-US poli- cies are likely to blame the United States for austerity measures and some of the accompanying repression. External threats, conversely, probably will encourage the oil states, except Libya and Iran, to quietly reinforce security ties to the United States, regardless of their economic circumstances and threats of do- mestic instability. The Gulf states, for example, al- ready are looking to the United States for assurances of protection against a spillover of the Iran-Iraq war, even though they are likely to shun overt cooperation with the US military or a US military presence on their soil. Recent requests from Kuwait to the United States to provide protection for Kuwaiti tankers in the Gulf reinforces the US role as a guarantor of the sovereignty of these states. We expect the harder pressed oil states to increase requests for US economic and financial aid, including softer loan terms and a rescheduling of official debts. These states will view US largess as a measure of Washington's commitment to their needs and as an indicator of US reliability as an ally. The North African countries, except Libya, will press Washing- ton for generous economic and military assistance by playing on their existing close relationship with the United States (Egypt) or by emphasizing their impor- tance for regional stability (Algeria and Tunisia). Curbs on spending by the major oil exporters caused by lower oil revenues are likely to cut deeply into US exports of merchandise and, to a lesser extent, arms to 25X1 25X1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Secret the Middle East. US exports to the region in 1986 fell almost 16 percent, to $8 billion. Much of this drop was in sales to Saudi Arabia, which dropped from $4.4 billion in 1985 to $3.4 billion last year. Nonethe- less, we believe Washington will retain a large per- centage of the Middle Eastern market. With oil prices denominated in dollars, the oil-exporting countries in the region will probably find the United States a more attractive supplier of needed imports than countries with stronger currencies. Moscow almost certainly will seek ways to exploit any weakening in ties between the United States and the oil states and is likely to benefit marginally from US setbacks in the Middle East. Still, Embassy reporting indicates Moscow has few resources in most of the region's oil-exporting countries to fully capitalize on US problems. Local Communist parties are illegal and, like other leftist groupings, weak. Moreover, growing Islamic fundamentalism opposes Commu- nism and is wary of secular leftists. The gains that the Soviets make in the Middle East during the next two years are likely to result more from external political pressures faced by the states and their desire to project a nonaligned image than from their economic troubles. Like the United States, the USSR's financial con- cerns, in part related to lower prices for its oil exports, will prompt it to be selective in the countries it targets Reverse Blank 21 for assistance.' Moscow is likely to focus financial and military assistance where it perceives its interests are most threatened, such as in preventing an Iranian victory over Iraq, or where it believes minimal assis- tance would yield some influence. Nonetheless, Mos- cow will make financial sacrifices only in highly selective cases. We believe substantial Soviet conces- sions on Egypt's military debt in March were granted 25X1 not only to strengthen ties to Cairo but also to undercut US influence. The Soviets probably will project an image of cooper- ation with OPEC, but their oil export policy will continue to be set to meet Moscow's economic needs and hard currency requirements. Last August, Soviet officials met with the Iranians and, after last Decem- ber's OPEC meeting, with the Saudis. According to press reports, Soviet spokesmen indicated to represen- tatives of both countries that they would consider a reduction in oil exports. Cuts in exports made earlier this year, however, resulted from fluctuations in Sovi- et oil production and domestic consumption rather than from Soviet support for OPEC. Still, the Soviets probably hope that contacts with the Middle Eastern oil producers and the common interest in higher oil prices will encourage Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, and Qatar to establish diplomatic relations with them as Oman and the UAE did in 1985. `The value of Soviet oil exports, Moscow's most important hard currency earner, declined by 50 percent from 1983 to roughly $7 billion in 1986, and the value of Soviet arms deliveries to the Middle Eastern oil exporters declined from $7.3 billion in 1982 to Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Secret Appendix A Econometric Methodology future developments. Econometric models have become conventional tools for analyzing and forecasting economic activity. In a system of equations, a model combines a theoretical representation of economic interactions, a statistical analysis of the key relationships, and assumptions about external events. The solution of the system of equations produces conditional estimates of the future and can be used to estimate an economic indicator's sensitivity to alternative sets of assumptions about ing power of each barrel of oil. Three models were used in this project. The first is a model of the world oil market, which examines the linkages among oil demand, supply, and price. The second model relates the world oil price to the.Middle Eastern oil producers' export revenues, import de- mand, government budget balances, and GDP. The third model determines the effect of changes in the values of key international currencies on the purchas- country. Data for some of the countries in the model are difficult to obtain in a timely fashion and often contain anomalies. To correct this problem, each data series was compared among all of the modeled coun- tries and was adjusted where obvious inaccuracies were present. Only aggregate values for the total group of countries were used, thus reducing the distorting effect of data problems in any particular The World Oil Market Our model of the world oil market equates the quantities demanded and supplied to determine the equilibrium market price. The demand function con- sists of an income effect and short-run and long-run price effects. The supply function is based on current projections of world energy supplies, adjusted for expected withholdings of oil, and on short-run and long-run price effects. The values for the elasticities in these equations are the generally accepted estimates that have been econometrically derived in energy studies during the past decade. The quantities sup- plied and demanded are then equalized in a market- clearing equation. To complete the model, a feedback equation is included that relates world income nega- tively to increases in the price of oil in the short and long runs. This model was used in two different ways for the purposes of this project. First, price paths were im- posed on the model, forcing it to calculate the amount of oil that would have to be withheld from the market to achieve the given price. Second, expectations about world income and oil supplies were imposed to deter- 25X1 mine the expected price path under various scenarios. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Secret Macroeconomic Effects The macroeconomic model of the Middle Eastern oil- exporting countries relates the world price of oil to several key economic variables. Export revenue in dollars is modeled as a logarithmic function of the market price of oil. GDP in current dollars is assumed to be a function of current and past values of the price of oil, with a geometrically declining lag structure. Two behavioral equations are included in the model: the historic impact of changes in oil-export revenues on the demand for imports, working through foreign exchange constraints; and the impact of changes in oil exports on the level of government spending, through the government budget constraint as affected by the price of oil. Regression analysis of data from 1970 through 1985 was used to obtain the values of the elasticities. Identities are included in the model to calculate effects on the current account balance and the government budget balance. produce a real purchasing power series. The Purchasing Power of Oil A simple spreadsheet model was constructed to esti- mate the impact of exchange-rate changes on the purchasing power of a barrel of oil priced in dollars. The current pattern of sources of import flows is used as a weighting system to determine the effect of a change in any particular currency's value on the oil exporters' purchasing power. The results are deflated by the price levels in the exporting countries to and multiplied by the current dollar price of oil. To calculate the real purchasing power of a barrel of Middle Eastern oil, the exchange rate for each trading partner is first adjusted for inflation. Next, changes in these real exchange rates are weighted by each coun- try's share of sales to the Middle Eastern oil export- ers. These values are then converted to a 1970 base ed for dollar inflation. The methodology can be summarized as follows: ? Obtain dollar exchange rates of trade partners. ? Deflate exchange rates by domestic inflation rates. ? Convert real exchange rates to a 1970-based index. ? Weight deflated exchange rates by market share. ? Multiply this series by the dollar price of oil adjust- 25X1 25X1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Iq Next 2 Page(s) In Document Denied 25X1 25X1 25X1 25X1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1 Secret Secret Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/07/18: CIA-RDP88T00096R000600780001-1