WHITE HOUSE RECOUNTING OF IRAN AFFAIR ABSOLVES REAGAN BUT RAISES QUESTIONS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00965R000605050011-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 23, 2016
Document Release Date: 
February 19, 2013
Sequence Number: 
11
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
December 22, 1986
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00965R000605050011-7.pdf213.89 KB
Body: 
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/02/19 CIA-RDP90-00965R000605050011-7 WALL STREET JOURNAL ARTICLE APPEARED 22 December 1986 k) ON White House Recounting of Iran Affair Absolves Reagan but Raises Questions j By JOHN WALCOTT /40-1F,A Staff Re rterv (}f THE W AI I. S rREET JOURNAL WASHINGTON?A comprehensive writ- ten account of the Iran arms .affair, pre- pared by the White House after the scandal broke, absolves President Reagan of any responsibility for Israeli arms sales to Iran last year, or for the diversion of profits from the sales, administration officials said. But the officials said that although White House Chief of Staff Donald Regan. Central Intelligence Agency Director Wil- liam. Casey and other top officials have used the chronology as a basis for much of their testimony on the affair, the document contradicts the sworn testimony of some participants. omits crucial parts Of the story. and may contain errors of fact. Some congressional investigators ques- tion the accuracy of the White House ac- count and are looking into how it was pre- pared. Meanwhile, a memo that investigators found in Lt. Col. Oliver North's files sug- gests that as early as 1985. the former Na- tional Security Council aide considered the thu of diverting funds from the arms sales to help the Nicaraguan insurgents, accord- ing to law enforcement officials. The issue of when the subject first came up in memos or discussions by Lt. Col. North is significant, law enforcement offi- cials said, because it can help explain who else in the administration may have known about the issue, and whether Israeli gov- ernment officials or arms dealers also may hive suspected or known about such ef- forts to funnel money to the insurgents. known as the Contras. White House Chronology The White House (tronology was pro- duced when former National Security Ad- viser ,John Poindexter and Messrs. Casey and. Regan ordered CIA officials and Lt.. Col. North to write it last month, soon after an article about the Iran arms sales ap- peared in a Beirut magazine, administra- tion sources said. The document was in- tended to prepare administration officials for briefing Congress on the arms sales. Administration sources familiar with the chronology said it claims the U.S. gov- ernment demanded the return of Hawk missiles shipped to Iran by the Israelis in November 1985 because the missiles had been shipped without Mr. Reagan' s ap- proval. Others familiar with the transaction. however, have said the missiles were re- jected by the Iranians because they were outdated models and that the incident con- vinced U.S. officials to stop selling arms to - Iran through two Israeli middlemen. Yaa- cov Nimrod' and Al Schwimmer. Moreover, intelligence sources and oth- ers with knowledge of the November ship- ment said it was made with direct help from the White House and the CIA. When the Israeli plane carrying the missiles was detained i o Lisbon. Portugal, these sources said. lsraeh officials called Robert McFar- lane. then President Reag,an's national se-- curity adviser. at the U.S.-Soviet summit meeting in Geneva. Mr. McFarlane. the sources said. con- tacted Lt. Col. North. and told him to se- cure CIA help in releasing the shipment and delivering it to Iran. Lt. Col. North contacted a now-retired CIA official re- sponsible for managing covert operations. The official, after calling Mr. Casey in China, helped arrange a charter airplane and customs clearance for the Iranian- bound missiles, intelligence sources said. The chronology also asserts that Presi- dent Reagan "did not approve" Israeli sales of American-made arms to Iran in 1985. However. Mr. McFarlane has testi- fied under oath that Mr. Reagan approved the sales in advance. .Mr. McFarlane's version received sup- port from lawmakers yesterday. On NBC- TV's "Meet the Press," Sen. William Co- hen (R., Me.) said he believes that Mr. McFarlane. whom he said he knows well, "would not act outside of channels." Mr. Cohen. an Intelligence Committee member who was appointed to the Senate select panel investigating the affair, added that "if the president were to tell him spe- cifically this plan is to be vetoed. he (McFarlane) would not go to the Israelis and say the green light is on." Direct Sales to Iran On the same program. Sen. Sam Nunn ID.. Ga.) said the president. "has not got- ten on top of the facts. and he may or may not have forgotten some of them." The White House chronology also sug- gests that the administration reversed an earlier decision and decided to sell U.S. arms directly to Iran after a January 1986 visit from Arnirarn Nir, Israeli Prime Min- ister Shimon Peres's adviser on terrorism. According to sources, the chronology claims that Mr. Nir proposed a renewed ef- fort to build relations with moderates in Iran after meeting with an Iranian arms dealer, Manucher Ghorbanifar. and a Saudi Arabian financier. Adnan Kha- shoggi. But other administration officials said President Reagan was the driving force behind the decision. The officials said the administration's hopes that Israeli arms STAT sales in September and November of 1985 I would help bring all the hostages home in 1 time for Christmas were dashed, and Mr. I Reagan himself delivered the disappoint- ing news to the hostages' families in a series. of emotional meetings in the White House. The meetings. the sofficials said. were attended by Lt. Col. NoYth and other White House aides. Separately. discovery of the earlier memo suggesting that funds had been di- verted to the Contras prompted Justice De- partment officials to begin a full-scale in- vestigation of the matter late last month. Law enforcement officials said the memo. uncovered by Assistant Attorney General William Bradford Reynolds, wasn't signed or dated. Memo Believed Written in '85 These officials say the Federal Bureau of Investigation now suspects that the memo was written sometime in 1985. be- fore President Reagan signed a formal na- tional security directive last January au- thorizing weapons sales to Iran. FBI Direc- tor William Webster has said the memo alerted investigators early on to "some- thing that might not have been in the pur- view" of that presidential directive, but he has declined to elaborate. The FBI has interviewed U.S. officials about the origin of the memo and also in- tends to ask certain Israelis about its con- tents. according to law enforcement offi- cials. Israeli officials repeatedly have de- nied that they either knew or suspected that money from the arms deals was in- tended to flow to the Contras. Mr. Meese, who discussed the memo in closed-door testimony before the House In- , telligence Committee on Friday, told re- porters afterward that Lt. Col. North as- sured him last month that President Rea- gan didn't know about any diversion of funds to the Contras. In recent days. administration officials , have acknowledged that even though there 1 was only modest political pressure on President Reagan to free the hostages, the issue was a major concern in the presi? dent's Mideast policy. North Spoke of Hostage Dilemma Lt. Col. North had publicly acknow- ledged the effect of the hostage issue on U.S. policy in fall '1985. at a seminar on ter- rorism at the State Department's Foreign Service Institute. According to sources who were present, the former NSC aide con- ceded that it was becoming difficult for the administration to stick to its hard-nosed policy of not paying ransom for hostages or negotiating with terrorists in the face of the emotional demands of the hostages' families. Following the meetings with hostages' families, administration sources said. Mr. Reagan directed Mr. Regan and Vice Adm. Poindexter to redouble their efforts to free the hostages. Lt. Col. North. on instruc- Continued nariaccifiprl in Part - Sanitized Com/ Approved for Release 2013/02/19 CIA-RDP90-00965R000605050011-7 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/02/19: CIA-RDP90-00965R000605050011-7 tions from Mr. Poindexter and with the support of Messrs. Regan and Casey, then contacted Mr. Nir, who had provided help to Vice President Bush's task force on ter- rorism. Indeed, intelligence sources said the ad- ministration's efforts to locate and free the hostages were far more extensive than was .previously known. Despite the protests of some hostage families that the administra- tion wasn't doing much for their relatives, the White House and the. CIA had in place a secret campaign by late 1985 to find the hostages and to win their release. the sources said. The CIA established a Hostage Rescue Locating Force under the national intelli- gence officer for counterterrorism. Charles. Allen. The force attempted to infiltrate agents into terrorist groups. paid infor- mants for data on the whereabouts of the hostages, and analyzed technical intelli- gence that might help locate the hostages, track their movements, and identify their captors. The force prepared highly -classi- fied weekly reports on the current wherea- bouts of the hostages and their apparent physical condition, intelligence sources said. Extremely Frustrating Task The task was extremely frustrating, the sources said, because the small terrorist cells in Lebanon proved extremely difficult to infiltrate and reliable information very hard to procure. One problem the CIA encountered, ad- ministration officials said. is that some ter- - ? r? _ _11 rorist groups- in Lebanon demanded that new recruits participate in assassinations in order to prove their good faith. On at least one occasion, the officials said, the CIA withdrew an agent that had infiltrated a terrorist group to avoid violating the ad- ministration policy against assassina- tions. Separately, congressional investigators continued delving into Mr. Meese's role in !ate October in ordering a temporary halt in, the FBI's investigation of Miami-based Southern Air Transport, a cargo airline suspected of carrying arms to Iran and the Contras. Both the Justice Department and the FBI. according to law enforcement-of- ficials, prepared internal documents spell- ing out how the probe was halted and then resumed, About a week after Mr. Meese, through one of his top aides, requested and ob- tained such a delay by the FBI on national security grounds. senior bureau officials asked Associate Attorney General Stephen Trott if they could resume the probe, offi- cials familiar with the discussions said. Congressional investigators want to de- termine whether Mr. Meese or his aides contacted Vice Adm. Poindexter or other NSC officials before the decision was made to resume the investigation, and what may have been discussed. On ABC-TVs's "This Week With David Brinkley" yesterday. Rep. Dante Fascell D.. Fla, l. who will serve on the House se- lect panel investigating the scandal, said the committee doesn't want to prolong the probe, but it won't rush "just to get it over with." However. Rep. Richard Cheney IR.. Wyo.) said the panel should move "as rap- idly as possible." On the same program. Sen. Daniel In- ouye ID., Hawaii), chairman of the Senate select panel, said that "if it takes a grant of immunity to get." important questions answered, such a request would be consid- ered at a later date. Over the weekend, House Speaker-elect Jim Wright ID,. Texas) said on .John McLaughlin's "One on One" television show that rather than giving any former officials immunity, President Reagan might prompt them to testify by promising them a presidential pardon. Rep. Cheney yesterday called the suggestion -prema- ture" and ? probably "a bad political move." Rep. Fascell said the idea "was not a wise course to follow." Separately, Vice President Bush con- ceded that he is "no longer the front-run- ner" for the 198S Republican presidential nomination, according to news reports yes- terday. In an interview with reporters who accompanied him over the weekend to Iowa. Mr. Bush was asked if he. felt a sense of personal failure in not knowing about the diversion of money to the Con- tras. He responded that "I would be per- fectly glad to accep- whatever my share of responsibility is." r.nnv Approved for Release 2013/02/19: CIA-RDP90-00965R000605050011-7