BUREACRACY AND FREEDOM

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP74-00297R000301040070-0
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 27, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 7, 2013
Sequence Number: 
70
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
June 27, 1952
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP74-00297R000301040070-0.pdf104.83 KB
Body: 
STAT Declassified in Part- Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/08/07: CIA-RDP74-00297R000301040070-0 Bureacracy I Arid,Freedom By Marquis Childs Case Of Lattimore FROM THE arbitrary power Weigr Hines Page School of of the bureaucrat to the knock International Relations at Johns on the 'door at midnight .by the Hopkins University in Baiti- secret police is a shorter dis- more, he .is an expert on the tance than We have been leci1Far East, specializing% in Mon- to believe. Furthermore, there golia, Sinkiang and other little- are steps along this way which known parts of Asia. Everything I, ? once taken are hard to retrace. It is a sign of danger when the bureaucrat entrenches him- self behind powers ' which are f not subject to appeal. His natu- ral tendency is to try to ,enlarge What he calls administrative law. Thus he is shielded from the right of appeal and judicial { review. In the newest development In the case of Prof. Owen Lat- timore we 'are seeing how arbi- trary this power. can be. Lat- ' timore has never been charged with any crime. He has repeat- edly under ,oath before ? at least two congressional committees < denied the accusations, made with the privilege of immunity ; on the Senate floor, of being a Communist agent or 'a pro-Com- munist. Yet the bureaucracy in the State Department oh the basis of a wholly unevaluated report put his name on a passport ,"watch list" to prevent his leav- ing the country. This report, ; gathered by the Central In- telligence Agency, has now been established by the thorough,re- , porting of Alfred Friendly of The Washington Post to have been wholly without foundation. The CIA is, incidentally, re- quired by law to leave internal security to the FBI, which has sole responsibility. Supposedly, the action against Lattimore was a routine 'one taken on a fairly low level. But since his name has been 'so much in the news, word of, the action was bouhd to leak. Jn this fash- ion, serious harm has been done to a private citizen already sub- jected to a prolonged trial and Senate inquisition. 6-44 AT TIMES Lattimore has seemed to be the victim of a plan calculated to bring about his destruction. Director of the , he has written has been.combed over by the McCarran Commit- tee in an effort to show a bias motivated by pro-CommUnism. Nowt ?Lattirnore's views may have been muddled, woolly, naive. Or they may have been souhd. That, is a matter of opinion. But nothing has ever been turned up to show that he was motivated by anything other than honest conviction based on fact plus the inevitable -con- comitant of prejudices in each human mind. If Lattimore ctn be destroyed for one set of views, then at an- other time and in another politi- tical clitnate, those who hold quite different views can be brought down for what they believe. This weakensconsider- ably the "Core of individual free- dom, an, ideal despised, scorned, stamped out under Communist totalitarianism, which holds that any means is histified to the eng. of the theoretically perfect state. UNFORTUNATELY, among us are some who seem to have accepted the same doctrine. Ex- Communists have carried over Into anti-Communism their con- spiratorial technique , with its disregard for the individual. , It is, abovg all, the fate of the individual?thegoul Of the in- dividual and its sanctity?that is directly at stake. Unlesi we' overcome our fears 'and sus- picions and divisions to under- stand this, we shall destroy the heritage that is central to the Jiidat-o - Greek -'Christian tradi- tion. ? ? While this dwarfs eVery other consideration, there is another aspect to this latest development in, the Lattimore case. When the matter of, the passport "watch list" came to light, Pro- fessor Lattimore, in fienying.he contemplated any trip t said that he a considered ar?lo.freriol gp tof the UniversitP 'of New 4 Delhi in India. to 'lecture ,there for a ,year. That offer came ,a year age, prompted, it is under- stood, 'by Prime Minister Nehru, who.has a high regard ftir Latti- More's knowledge. r . Recently, tentative overtures were mpde to Nehru, suggesting thaehe, along with other Asian neutrals, might be Willing ? to arbitrate the prisoner, repatria- tion on which the Korean truce negotiations have been stuck. There have been hints from New Delhi that the Indian Prime Minister might ,be willing to undertake such an assignment, '1 This latest demonstration of the United States' ? panicky fears, its arbitrary action against.', a scholar, is not likely ;to induce Nehru to attempt such a difficult arbitration. ? - One of the good reasons for the President's veto of the Mc- Carran-Walter immigratien bill was that it gave more arbitrary power to the bureaucrats by ex- panding the field of administra- tive law both in the Justice and State Departments: "Down that steep course is the end of in- dividual freedom. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/08/07 : CIA-RDP74-00297R000301040070-0