CLAIM AGAINST (Sanitized)

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP84-00709R000400070252-3
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
June 5, 2001
Sequence Number: 
252
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
November 12, 1948
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP84-00709R000400070252-3.pdf190.67 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2001/09/03 : CIA-RDP84-00709R000400 QGC Has Reviewed Aset, Chief p Fiscal Division Office of the General Comsel 52-3 12 NI5vember 1!;48 1. Your memorandum of 4 November 1948 forWarded the file on Covernment Bill of Ladint No. Y4-027 and requested advice on the appropriate attion to be taken. Thers is no need to repeat the meets Which are clearle presented in your memorandum: 2. The 11111111111111111111.1011Wis apparently unaware that a Government Bill of Lading erather than their repealer commercial shipping receipt used. Hence they have attempted to apply their Stand- ard Limitation of Liability. Reserving the questien of whether such a limitation could be applicable to the Government even if accepted, the carrier here Fa t; ne recourse to a provision not contained Within the boundaries of the agreement. To forestall a possible argument that eondition No. 2 of the Govern- ment Bill of Lading woeld incorporate the terms Of the carrier's standard comeercial form unless speel- fically excepted (as In Condition No, ), attention is eirected to the decision of the Comptroller Gen- eral in 19 Comp. Gen, 537. Re cited the judiciat confliet that existed in regard to the sovereign authority of the Government an the power of its agents to restrict or bargen away certain advant- ages demanded by public policy. Among these advant- ages was the freedom of the Government from the usual time limitations for filing claims. The Standard Government B111 of Lading now contains a provision (Condition No, 7 that in case of loan, damage, or- shrinkare in transit, the reles and tandttions govern- ing eoirrerelal shipment shall not .apply sts to the period within which notice shall be giver et claim made, . or eult instituted. Ever In the absence of thia proe vision, however, the Comptroller felt that the Goverree sent was not subject to the useal:commereialhlitaite- tions, and the deletion of the condition esould mt being the limItatftons into operation, lkthe present . situation, the reeson is even more compelning for pre- serving the Government's freedom from a commereial restriction leach wouli limit the liability of. the STATINTL STAT INTL STATINTL Approved For Release 2001/09/03 : CIA-Reff$ 1109/03 : CIA-R0P84-00709R000 Approved For Release 200 4111070252-3 Carrier without regard to liquidated dosages. The contracting officer has not agreed to such limitation by using the commercial form and it is not felt that the Government la subjected to the restriction by implication. 3. The above opinion is provided pmimarlly for your referenca in event the carric-r raises the arrument suggested. Since he is apparent17 under the impression that the usual commercial express receipt was used, it is suggested that you call his attention to the fact that a Government Bill of Lading was employed, and that it contained no limitation of damages... In the meantime, it appears prraper to con- tinue to withhold from current unpaid carrier bills an amount sufficient to cover the damage, or, of course, accept a payment In the amount of the total damages. General Counsel: STATINTL STATINTL Approved For Release 200110/03 : CIA-R0P84-00709R000400070252-3