LETTER TO JAMES F. COLLINS (SANITIZED)

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90M01264R000100050024-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
December 27, 2016
Document Release Date: 
November 7, 2012
Sequence Number: 
24
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
February 5, 1988
Content Type: 
LETTER
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90M01264R000100050024-7.pdf129.09 KB
Body: 
~tT ^ t 1 71.A Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/11/07: CIA-RDP90MO1264R000100050024-7 i mLeII ncc Aprnc)y 1 _ ,g If S February 1988 OCA 88-0369 Mr. James F. Collins Director of Intelligence Policy The White House Washington, D.C. Dear Mr. Collins: Enclosed for your information is a letter'that our General Counsel recently sent to Mike O'Neil concerning which types of activities require Presidential Findings under the Eughes/Ryan Amendment, and which do not. If you have any questions on the letter, please give me a Sincerely, Legislation Division Office of Congressional Affairs Distribution: Original - Addressee I - D/OCA 1 - OCA/Registry "1`- 0CA/Leg/Subject=F=ile C=ongress Tonal Oversight UNGLA PA 1988) FROM ENCLOSURES A'. A 1% 6` 4 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/11/07: CIA-RDP90M01264R000100050024-7 F14111, L Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/11/07: CIA-RDP90M01264R000100050024-7 centrai mtem cnce , cncy !. = 5 February 1988 OCA 88-0370 Mr. Sven Holmes Staff Director Select Committee on intelligence United States Senate Washington, D.C, 20510 Dear Mr. Holmes: Enclosed for your information is a letter that our General Counsel recently sent to Mike O'Neil concerning which types of. activities require Presidential Findings under the Hughes/Ryan Amendment, and which do not. If you have any questions on the letter, please give me a Sincerely, Legislation Division Office of Congressional Affairs Distribution: Original - Addressee 1 - D/OCA 1 - OCA Registry 1 - DMP/Signer 4l - OCA/Leg/Subject: Congressional Oversight OCA/Leg Jpap--(5 February 1988) UNCLASSIFIED WHEN SEPARATED FROM ENCLOSURES f I I Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/11/07: CIA-RDP90M01264R000100050024-7 erf Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/11/07: CIA-RDP90M01264R000100050024-7 k-..) Central Intelligence Agency 5 February 1988 OCA 88-0371 Ms. Mary Lawton Counsel for Office of Intelligence Policy and Review Department of Justice Washington, D.C. 20530 Dear Ms. Lawton: Enclosed for your information is a letter that our General Counsel recently sent to Mike O'Neil concerning which types of activities require Presidential Findings under the Hughes/Ryan Amendment, and which do not. If you have any questions on the letter, please give me a Sincerely, Legislation Division Office of Congressional Affairs Distribution: Original - Addressee 1 - D/OCA 1 - OCA/Registry DNI1?/Signer OCA/Leg/Subj: Congressional Oversight OCA/Leg ap(5 February 1988)- UNCLASSIFIED WHEN SEPARATED FROM ENCLOSURES Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/11/07: CIA-RDP90M01264R000100050024-7 stt;nr I Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/11/07: CIA-RDP90M01264R000100050024-7 Michael J. O'Neil, Esq. Chief Counsel Perranent Select Committee on Intelligence House of representatives Washington, D. C. 20515 February 1, 198E Dear Mike: During a meeting on 25 January 1986 with Administration officials, including a member of my staff, you requested further inforrration about the CIA's interpretation of the Hughes-Ryan Amendment, .22 U.S.C. ? 2422. Specifically, you asked for the CIA's analysis concerning which types of activities require Presidential Findings under the Hughes-Ryan Amendment, and which do not. As you know, the Hughes-Ryan Amendment provides: No funds appropriated under the authority of this or any other Act may be expended by or on behalf of the Central Intelligence Agency for operations in foreign countries, other than activities intended solely for obtaining necessary intelligence, unless and until the President finds that each such operation is important to the national security of the United States. Each such operation shall be considered a significant anticipated intelligence activity for the purpose of section 501 of the rational Security Act of 1947. 22 U.S.C. t 2422. Thus, the statute requires a Presidential Finding for: (1) an "operation", (2) that occurs in a foreign country, (3) that is conducted by the Cu., (4) that expends funds during the process, and (5) that is not intended solely for obtaining necessary intel_licence. STATK1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/11/07: CIA-RDP90M01264R000100050024-7