THE AFGHANISTAN - PAKISTAN BOUNDARY

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP08C01297R000100140004-4
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 27, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 11, 2012
Sequence Number: 
4
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
December 20, 1961
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP08C01297R000100140004-4.pdf273.06 KB
Body: 
Declassified and Approved ForRelease2012/11/16 : CIA-RDP08001297R000100140004-4 CONFIDENTIAL - NOFORN DEPARTMENT OF STATE BUREAU OF INTELLIGENCE AND RESEARCH Research Memorandum RFX-13, December 20, 1961 AFGHANISTAN - PAKISTAN BOtrARY The recent break in diplomatic relations between Afghanistan and Pakistan results primarily from the political status of the Pathan tribes in Pakistan While Afghanistan claims that it desires only to see an independent "Pushtunistan" and has no intention to annex territory, Pakistani observers feel that the statements serve as a mask for Afghan irredentism. Thus, while not basic to the "Pushtunistan" issue, the boundary does enter into the problem. ? The intent of this brief paper is to clarify several misunderstandings about the boundary and to put it in its proper perspective. - Most observers refer to the boundary as the "Durand Line" and imply that it stems directly from the Anglo-Afghan Kabul Agreement of November 12, 1893. The Kabul Agreement stated: It 0 ? 0 (1) The eastern and southern frontier of His Highness's dominions, from the Wakhan to the Persian border, shall follow the line shown on the map attached to this agreement. 11 00 ? (4) The frontier line will hereafter be laid down in detail and demarcated wherever this may be practicable and desirable by Joint British and Afghan Commissioners, whose object will be to arrive by mutnal understanding at a boundary which shall adhere with the greatest possible exactness to the line shown in the map attached to this agreement, having due regard to the existing local rights of villages adjoining the frontier ..." The line was demarcated in places and surveyed in others by mixed commissions in 1894, 1895, and 1896. Their agreements have been published in Aitcheson's C 1 ecti n if T eat a ent d Sa d b tw en Ind' And its neighboring countries, (India Ministry of External Affairs, 1929. The British Foreign Office has made availablelAhe (Durand) Kabul Agreement maps with the request that they be held confidentially and for the internal use of the U.S. only. The boundary shown on these documentary maps has been plotted in red on the annexed? map. Since-geographic inaccuracies were found which could not be reconciled with current information. the boundary has been designated thereon as "apparent boundary between British CONFIDENTIAL NOFORN Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/11/16: CIA-RDP08001297R000100140004-4 Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/11/16: CIA-RDP08001297R000100140004-4 CONFIDENTIAL ??? NOFORN - 2 - India and Afghanistan according to the treaty of 1893.n Th present boundary is shown in black. It is evident that the present bound is considerably different from the original "Durand Line." Sir Thomas Holdick, the famous Indian boundary surveyor, in his book Ihe Indian Borderland (London Methuen, 1901), made the following statements concerning the ultimate boundary: "It is, however, defined by a line which at one point is at least seventy miles south of the position assigned to it by the Kabul Agreement. Concession was the ruling spirit of the demarcation." P. 239 "No part of the boundary defined south of the Hindu Kush was the actual boundary of the agreement..." p. 269 While a comparison of the maps does not wholly support the latter statement, there are enough indications to sustain it as an "enthusiastic generalization." The Afghanistan - Pakistan boundary, although it may defy geograp#y, strategy, and ethnograilhy? is a product of negotiation and comproMise. An examination of the Durand maps, however, has raised a question. The southern boundary of the Waltham has apparently never been delimited east of the red line shown on the attached map. The final agreement extending the Afghan - Russian boundary east of Lake Victoria did not occur until 1895, two years after the Kabul Agreement and after the completion of the attendant field surveys. To date, no trace of an agreement has been found for the extension of the Afghan boundary to the China tripoint. 2/ London Despatch 3206, April 22, 1960, "Transmittal of Naps attached to British treaties with Afghanistan of 1893 and 1921." CONFIDENTIAL a/ The 19th century boundary was modified in 1919-22 and again in 1932. These changes were very slight and are barely discernible at the scale of the attached map. CONFIDENTIAL - NOFORN Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/11/16: CIA-RDP08001297R000100140004-4 Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/11/16: CIA-RDP08001297R000100140004-4 CONFIDENTIAL -32--- 0.(w4 60 AFGHANISTAN-PAKISTAN BOUNDARY Present boundary Apparent boundary between British India and Afghanistan according to the treaty of 1893. (Shown only where different from the present boundary) Area gained by Afghanistan International boundary ? National capital 0 50 100 Miles . I 0 50 100 Kilometers CONFIDENTIAL I.Vamak,ar Herat Qala Shaharak A F GH ANI T1 A N Ghazni ? 68 72 oSta I Ina bad ????..1 U. S. S. R. Sra Nizhniy Pyandzh ...CHINA Faizabad 7,0' Sarhad-i-Wakha _. Qizil Qala Mazar-i- ? _ ,-? ? . ,. M _Isgaro Sharif * i t Zebako . ------- Shahr-i t -- ?Baghlan Muman0 t .P.' Chitral %........... :. Khorog "MM.. ? Shibarghan Maimana Bir 0 -36- Gilgit JAMMU 5 ??????,.. AND Barman* OCharikar ChIgha Sara' fc(-thtil Dargai 0 - KABUL ? Farah / % Vaia-i-Kang Daryficheh bre Srshru Zahedanc Lashkari Bazar (Lashkar Gah) Q- -Hazar Qadam,:, Tor F,olam 01_77.-Kotal 0 Peshawar RAWALPINDI COp,t0 ? ? 0 .Gcarde7 MatUno Zargnun 0Shahr 0 Ur- ..?? I KASHMIR ? (STATUS IN DISPUTE) 0 Bannu Kalat-i-Ghilzat0 \A/a2- Khwa 0 "aN'c Maruf 0 ? -32- Lahore Fort Sandeman Darweshan Spin Bald,-,k _ P A K IS IN 9-` 0 Qat o _ Dalbandin 64 r"*. Boundaries and names are not necessarily 68 those recognized by th? U.S. Goyemm oMultan 72 INDIA 35486 10-61 CONFIDENTIAL Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/11/16: CIA-RDP08001297R000100140004-4