ANTI-APARTHEID ACT OF 1986--VETO MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP87B00858R000600890005-8
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
16
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
April 25, 2011
Sequence Number: 
5
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
September 29, 1986
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP87B00858R000600890005-8.pdf2.66 MB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2011/04/25: CIA-RDP87B00858R000600890005-8 H 8648 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - HOUSE September 29, 1986 There was no objection. The SPEAKER pro tempore. With- out objection the Senate amendment to the title of H.R. 4378 is agreed to. There was no objection. A motion to reconsider was laid on the table. GENERAL LEAVE Mr. VENTO. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days within which to revise and extend their re- marks on the legislation just consid- ered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the gentleman from Minnesota? There was no objection. COMMUNICATION FROM THE CLERK OF THE HOUSE The SPEAKER laid before the House the following communication from the Clerk of the House of Repre- sentatives: WASHINGTON, DC, September 29, 1986. Hon. THOMAS P. O'NEILL, JR., The Speaker, House of Representatives, Washington, DC. DEAR MR. SPEAKER: Pursuant to the per- mission granted in Clause 5, Rule III of the Rules of the U.S. House of Representatives, I have the honor to transmit sealed enve- lopes received from the White House as fol- lows: (1) At 5:30 p.m. on Friday, September 26, 1986 and said to contain a message from the President in accordance with the Impound- ment Control Act of 1974; and (2) At 5:30 p.m. on Friday, September 26, 1986 and said to contain H.R. 3247, an Act to amend the Native American Programs Act of 1974 to authorize appropriations for fiscal years 1987 through 1990, and a veto message thereon; and (3) At 9:25 p.m. on 'Friday, September 26, 1986 and said to contain H.R. 4868, an Act to prohibit loans to, other investments in, and certain other activities with respect to, South Africa, and for other purposes, and a veto message thereon. With kind regards, I am, Sincerely, BENJAMIN J. GUTHRIE. Clerk, House oJRepresentatives. ANTI-APARTHEID ACT OF 1986- VETO MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES The SPEAKER laid before the House the following veto message from the President of the United States. To the House of Representatives: I am returning herewith without my approval H.R. 4868, the Comprehen- sive Anti-Apartheid Act of 1986. Title III of this bill would seriously impede the prospects for a peaceful end to apartheid and the establishment of a free and open society for all in South Africa. This Administration has no quarrel with the declared purpose of this measure. Indeed, we share that pur- pose: To send a clear signal to the South African Government that the American people view with abhorrence its codified system of racial segrega- tion. Apartheid is an affront to human rights and human dignity. Normal and friendly relations cannot exist be- tween the United States and South Africa until it becomes a dead policy. Americans are of one mind and one heart on this issue. But while we vigorously support the purpose of this legislation, declaring economic warfare against the people of South Africa would be destructive not only of their efforts to peacefully end apartheid, but also of the opportu- nity to replace it with a free society. The sweeping and punitive sanctions adopted by the Congress are targeted directly at the labor intensive indus- tries upon which the victimized peo- ples of South Africa depend for their very survival. Black workers-the first victims of apartheid-would become the first victims of American sanc- tions. Banning the import of sugar, for ex- ample, would threaten the livelihood of 23,000 black farmers. Banning the import of natural resources is a sanc- tion targeted directly at the mining in- dustries of South Africa, upon which more than half a million black labor- ers depend for their livelihood. By prohibiting the importation of food and agricultural products, the measure would invite retaliation by South Africa, which since June has purchased over 160,000 tons of wheat from the United States. Denying basic foodstuffs to South Africa-much of which go to feed the black popula- tion-will only lead to privation, unrest, and violence. It will not ad- vance the goals of peaceful change. Are we truly helping the black people of South Africa-the lifelong victims of apartheid-when we throw them out of work and leave them and their families jobless and hungry in those segregated townships? Or are we simply assuming a moral posture at the expense of the people in whose name we presume to act? This, then, is the first and foremost reason I cannot support this legisla- tion. Punitive economic sanctions would contribute directly and measur- ably to the misery of people who al- ready have suffered enough. Using America's power to deepen the eco- nomic crisis in this tortured country is not the way to reconciliation and peace. Black South Africans recognize that they would pay with their lives for the deprivation, chaos, and vio- lence that would follow an economic collapse. That is why millions of blacks and numerous black leaders in South Africa are as firm in their oppo- sition to sanctions as in their abhor- rence of apartheid. The imposition of punitive sanctions would also deliver a devastating blow to the neighboring states in southern Africa that depend on Pretoria for transportation, energy, markets, and food. An estimated million-and-a-half foreign workers, legal and illegal, now live in South Africa. The number of people, women and children especially, outside South Africa who are depend- ent upon the remittances of these workers for their survival has been es- timated to be over five million. Do we truly wish to be directly responsible for increased suffering, and perhaps starvation, in southern Africa? Do we truly wish our action to be the ration- al Pretoria invokes for expelling these workers? Do we truly wish to trigger a cycle of economic sanctions and counter-sanctions that end up crip- pling the economy of South Africa and devastating the economies of the frontline states? What sense does it make to send aid to those impover- ished countries with one hand while squeezing their economies with the other? Disrupting the South African econo- my and creating more unemployment will only fuel the tragic cycle of vio- lence and repression that has gripped that troubled country. Black unem- ployment in South Africa in some areas is over 50 percent-and adding to it will create more anger, more vio- lence, and more competition among blacks struggling to survive. It will not improve prospects for negotiations. Another feature of the bill would re- quire Administration to publicly iden- tify within six months any and all na- tions that have chosen not to join us in observing the U.N. arms embargo against South Africa, "with a view to terminating United States military as- sistance to those countries." But the United States will not revert to a single-minded policy of isolationism, with its vast and unforeseen effects on our international security relation- ships, that would be dictated by the unilateral decisions of our allies. No single issue, no matter how important, can be allowed to override in this way all other considerations in our foreign policy. Our military relationships must continue to be based upon a com- prehensive assessement of our nation- al defense needs and the security of the West. Not only does this legislation con- tain sweeping punitive sanctions that would injure most the very people we seek to help, the legislation discards our economic leverage, constricts our diplomatic freedom, and ties the hands of the President of the United States in dealing with a gathering crisis in a critical subcontinent where the Soviet Bloc-with its mounting in- vestment of men and arms-clearly sees historic opportunity. Therefore, I am also vetoing the bill because it con- tains provisions that infringe on the President's constitutional prerogative to articulate the foreign policy of the United States. There are, however, several features of the measure that the Administra- tion supports. Title II of the bill, for example, mandates affirmative meas- Approved For Release 2011/04/25: CIA-RDP87B00858R000600890005-8 Approved For Release 2011/04/25: CIA-RDP87B00858R000600890005-8 September 29, 1986 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - HOUSE chairman of the subcommittee for just a second. As the gentleman knows, the House passed unanimously three bills related to monuments to be constructed. One was the Korean veterans bill memori- alizing the veterans of the Korean war conflict. The second bill was for women who served in the military, and the third bill was for black members of the battalion that served in the Re- voluntionary War. - I notice in the gentleman's substi- tute that these three bills which we passed unanimously and the substitute amendment which I agree with were not in the substitute as the gentleman made mention in the original House Bill. I wonder if the gentleman for the record would like to comment on that. Mr. VENTO. Mr. Speaker, will the gentleman from California yield? Mr. LAGOMARSINO. Further re- serving the right to object, Mr. Speak- er, I yield to the gentleman from Min- nesota. Mr. VENTO. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentlewoman for her assistance again and would just point out that this in no way indicates our support or lack of support. I do support all three of those memorials. I think as the measure left the House, there was concern as to how the effects of this legislation would work with these three memorials that were in fact passed by the House. This, if anything, I think, will facili- tate the passage of these measures, be- cause the Senate looks to this law as the basic law upon which we will de- termine the sites, the locations for me- morials in the future; so those meas- ures are now awaiting action from the Senate, which I hope, with the gentle- woman that the other body will act. So I think that in no way does this legislation limit or mitigate against the enactment. In fact, I think it en- hances the opportunity for action on those, because we will have a predict- able path, a predictable policy, as to how the sites would be selected for those particular memorials. As the gentleman knows and the other Members here, some of those will go in that core area, in area one, the area that has a great number of memorials today because of the impor- tance of those particular memorials. Ms. OAKAR. Mr. Speaker, will the gentleman yield further? Mr. LAGOMARSINO. Further re- serving the right to object, Mr. Speak- er, I yield to the gentlewoman from Ohio. Ms. OAKAR. Mr. Speaker, I would just say, I thank the gentleman for that explanation, which I think is very, very important for our record. I would just hope that since we have been so cooperative with the Senate, I know they have marked up these three bills, they are ready to go to the floor of the Senate. I would hope that they would, in acknowledgement of the cooperation that has been given to the Senate, I certainly hope that they will pass out those bills. It would be terrible after all the work that has been done on passage on the House side and all the work that the commit- tees of the Senate have gone through if in our bargaining with the Senate they did not pass these three bills that they said they were going to pass. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman for yielding. I am very, very pleased with the consideration that we have worked out. ^ 1740 Mr. FRENZEL. Mr. Speaker, will the gentleman yield? Mr. LAGOMARSINO. Mr. Speaker, further reserving the right to object, I yield to the gentleman from Minneso- ta. (Mr. FRENZEL asked and was given permission to revise and extend his re- marks.) Mr. FRENZEL. Mr. Speaker, I want to corroborate the statement of the gentlewoman from Ohio [MS. DAKAR] that our committee, which has some little piece of the jurisdiction, is very grateful to the gentleman from Min- nesota [Mr. VENTO] and the gentleman from California [Mr. LAGOMARSINO] for working out a formula that we can all agree to. I also would like to say to the gentle- man from Minnesota, in echoing the statements of the gentlewoman who is the chairwoman of the Libraries and Memorials Task Force, that the three bills to which she referred-the black patriots, the women heroes, and the Korean veterans-have had an awful lot of work on them, and we would look to the gentleman for help in seeing that those bills are passed and that those memorials are placed in spots that are appropriate. We know that we will get the full cooperation of the gentleman from Minnesota. (Mr. LAGOMARSINO asked and was given permission to revise and extend his remarks.)- Mr. LAGOMARSINO. Mr. Speaker, further reserving the right to object, I rise in support of H.R. 4378, to govern the establishment of commemorative works within the National Capital region of the National Park Service. The House originally passed this bill in May in response to concerns regard- ing the increasing pressures of com- peting uses on park lands in the Dis- trict of Columbia, particularly the Mall area. These lands support a wide variety of activities including national celebrations, recreational use, and public demonstrations. In addition, there are currently 108 commemora- tive works, including such well-known memorials as the Lincoln and Jeffer- son, and the Washington Monument, occupying Park Service lands. Many other commemorative works are cur- rently in the planning process. In an effort to resolve this problem, H.R. 4378 includes strict standards for the placement of commemorative works on Park Service and other Fed- H 8647 eral lands in the District of Columbia, particularly in several key areas in- cluding the Mall, the Ellipse and the Washington Monument Grounds. It also includes standards to ensure that future commemorative works are structurally sound and durable. The other body recently amended and approved this legislation. The bill before us today seeks to slightly modify the Senate-passed version. In- stead of only allowing-a study to deter- mine the feasibility of establishing a site for the placement of temporary commemorative works, this bill goes one step further by allowing the Sec- retary of the Interior to establish such a site following transmittal of the study. However, I might point out that rigid requirements must be met before any temporary work could be placed at the site. In addition, the Senate-passed ver- sion requires that not only must a de- termination be made by the appropri- ate Federal agency that the work to be placed in the central monumental core, known as area I, is of preeminent historical and lasting significance to the Nation, but Congress must ap- prove the determination within 90 days or it is deemed disapproved. The bill before us today would extend the time period from 90 to 150 days. While we feel that it should be very arduous to place new commemorative works in area I, we believe it is important to extend the approval period an addi- tional 2 months to compensate for congressional recesses, adjournments, and so forth. Even with this change, it will still be extremely difficult to locate new commemorative works in this critical area, and well it should be. That is clearly the primary purpose of this legislation. I might also point out that this bill directs the appropriate authorizing committees to seek the views and rec- ommendations of the National Capital Memorial Commission in authorizing commemorative works. However, I would like to clarify that this language is not intended to be interpreted as meaning that any recommendations provided by the Commission would be binding on the Congress. I believe the months of hard work and negotiation on H.R. 4378 have produced a fine bill which achieves our major goal-to limit the prolifera- tion of insignificant works on Federal lands in the D.C. area. This bill will still permit the commemoration of worthy individuals and events in our Nation's history, while establishing a good balance of uses for the public lands in our Nation's Capital. There- fore, I urge all of my colleagues to ap- prove the amended version of H.R. 4378 before us today. Mr. Speaker, I withdraw my reserva- tion of objection. The SPEAKER pro tempore. (Mr. MONTGOMERY). Is there objection to the initial request of the gentleman from Minnesota? Approved For Release 2011/04/25: CIA-RDP87B00858R000600890005-8 Approved For Release 2011/04/25: CIA-RDP87B00858R000600890005-8 September 29, 1986 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - HOUSE ures to eliminate apartheid and pro- vide assistance to its victims, including support for black participation in busi- ness enterprises as owners, managers, and professionals. It authorizes the President to take steps for the purpose of assisting firms to fight apartheid and extend equal opportunity to blacks in investment, management, and employment. The bill also con- tains a number of other useful and re- alistic provisions, such as those calling upon the African National Congress (ANC) to reexamine its Communist ties mandating a report on the activi- ties of the Communist Party in South Africa and the extent to which it has infiltrated South African political or- ganizations. Still other portions of the bill call upon the ANC to condemn the practice of "necklacing" and terrorism and to state affirmatively that it will support a free and democratic post- apartheid South Africa. These provi- sions, as well as many others in the bill, reflect the agreement of the Con- gress and the Administration on im- portant aspects of an overall anti- apartheid policy. The Administration has been-and remains-prepared to work with the Congress to devise measures that manifest the American people's united opposition to apartheid-without in- juring its victims. We remain ready to work with the Congress in framing measures that-like the 1962 U.S. em- bargo of military sales and the careful- ly targeted sanctions of my own Exec- utive order of 1985-keep the United States at arms distance from the South African regime, while keeping America's beneficient influence at work bringing about constructive change within that troubled society and nation. It remains my hope that the United States can work with its European allies to fashion a flexible and coordi- nated policy-consistent with their recent actions-for constructive change inside South Africa. I believe we should support their measures with similar executive actions of our own, and I will work with the Congress toward that goal. It remains my hope that, once again, Republicans and Democrats can come together on the common ground that, after all, we both share: An unyielding opposition both to the unacceptable doctrine of apartheid as well as the unacceptable alternative of Marxist tyranny- backed by the firm determination that the future of South Africa and south- ern Africa will belong to the free. To achieve that, we must stay and build, not cut and run. That American should recoil at what their television screens bring them from South Africa-the violence, the repression, the terror-speaks well of us as a people. But the historic crisis in South Africa is not one from which the leading nation of the West can turn its back and walk away. For the outcome of that crisis has too great a bearing upon the future of Africa, the future of NATO, the future of the West. Throughout the postwar era, we Americans have succeeded when we left our partisan differences at the water's edge-and persevered; as we did in the rebuilding of Europe and Japan, as we are doing today in El Sal- vador. We have failed when we permit- ted our exasperation and anger and impatience at present conditions to persuade us to forfeit the future to the enemies of freedom. Let us not forget our purpose. It is not to damage or destroy an economy, but to help the black majority of South Africa and southern Africa enjoy a greater ?hare of the material blessings and bot Pities their labor has helped to produce-as they secure as well their legitimate political rights. That is why sweeping punitive sanc- tions are the wrong course to follow, and increased American and Western investment-by firms that are break- ing down apartheid by providing equal opportunity for the victims of official discrimination-is the right course to pursue. Our goal is a democratic system in which the rights of majorities, minori- ties, and individuals are protected by a bill of rights and firm constitutional guarantees. RONALD REAGAN. THE WHITE HOUSE, September 26, 1986. Mr. FASCELL (during the reading). Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that the message be considered as read and printed in the RECORD. The SPEAKER. In the opinion of the Chair, that would be setting a precedent, and the Chair believes we should read the message. Mr. FASCELL. Mr. Speaker, I with- draw my request. The Clerk concluded the reading of the veto message. 0 1750 The SPEAKER. The objections of the President will be spread at large upon the Journal, and the message and bill will be printed as a House doc- ument. The question is, Will the House, on reconsideration, pass the bill, the ob- jections of the President to the con- trary notwithstanding? The gentleman from Florida [Mr. FASCELLI is recognized for 1 hour. Mr. FASCELL. Mr. Speaker, I yield 30 minutes to the distinguished gentle- man from Michigan [Mr. BROOM- FIELD], the ranking minority member on the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and pending that, Mr. Speaker, I yield myself 2 minutes. (Mr. FASCELL asked and was given permission to revise and extend his re- marks.) Mr. FASCELL. Mr. Speaker, today the House casts a very significant vote. Those of you who listened to the veto message from the President did not hear anything new or different, and nothing has changed in South Africa since the time Congress first acted on H 8649 this bill. As a matter of fact, I think it is fair to say the situation continues to get worse. I shall let others talk about the moral, political imperatives which make it necessary to take this legisla- tive and resulting economic action. But suffice it to say, we need to ex- press very clearly once again our feel- ings as Americans and as the institu- tion representing the American people. We must express the feelings that we have with regard to apartheid; that we want to separate ourselves in every possible way from the actions of the South African Government and in support of principles that are demo- cratic and not repressive. The President can, of course, at any time issue an executive order. It does not have to be issued now. One would have to take into consideration the reasons issuing it at this time; and the reasons I think are quite obvious. We do disagree, but this bill has been through the political process. It is overwhelmingly supported by both parties. So when you look at it in the cold light of day, it concerns the ques- tion of votes in the other body. That is the only difference that exists today, and that is, in my judgment and with- out being disrespectful in any way, the reason for this new executive order. We, the President and the Congress, have come closer and closer on this issue every time it has come up. But I think the time has come and the time is today, to vote yes on this bill and send a clear and unified message on a bipartisan basis. Mr. BROOMFIELD. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may con- sume. (Mr. BROOMFIELD asked and was given permission to revise and extend his remarks.) Mr. BROOMFIELD. Mr. Speaker, all Americans stand united in their condemnation of apartheid and the human toll that results from this ghastly system of institutionalized racism. The President spoke for all of us when he stated in his veto message Friday that "normal and friendly rela- tions cannot exist between the United States and South Africa until it become a dead policy." The United States is on the side of change in South Africa and against those who would maintain the status quo in that country. That is not to say that we are on the side of violence or those who advocate it. It is my belief that constructive change in South Africa will come about not from the barrel of a gun or from the destruction of the South Af- rican economy. The economy is the most effective force for change in South Africa that exists today. We should strengthen it, not weaken it. We should help to build a future for blacks throughout southern Africa. Approved For Release 2011/04/25: CIA-RDP87B00858R000600890005-8 Approved For Release 2011/04/25: CIA-RDP87B00858R000600890005-8 H 8650 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - HOUSE We should not contribute to the de- struction of the major vehicle for their liberation. I do not consider this position to be dishonorable, as some in South Africa and here in the Congress seem to imply. Archbishop Tutu has characterized President Reagan's as position "racist", apparently because the two men do not agree on the best way for the United States to encourage con- structive change in South Africa. I object to this kind of name-calling. It is not only inflammatory, but does not contribute to a peaceful resolution of the South Africa tragedy. In fact, the archbishop owes the President an apology. Many prominent anti-apartheid ac- tivists in South Africa disagree with the economic sanctions approach. Chief Buthelezi and Helen Suzman surely cannot be accused of racism, and yet opposition to economic sanc- tions is their position. In instituting economic sanctions against South Africa-and in effect, all of southern Africa-the Congress would be ensuring the need for dra- matically higher levels of foreign aid to most countries in the region. In an era when foreign aid is targeted for deep cuts, can we afford this? I do not think so. The United States needs to effective- ly support the forces for peaceful, con- structive change in South Africa. This can best be accomplished through joining with our allies in western Europe and with Canada and Japan in whatever actions we take. For maximum effect, the western in- dustrialized democracies must speak in one clear voice when addressing South Africa. To balkanize our policy re- sponse to South Africa reduces the impact we can have on the situation there. As the President stated in his re- marks Friday, "It remains my hope that the United States can work with its European allies to fashion a flexi- ble and coordinated policy-consistent with their recent actions-for con- structive change inside South Africa. I believe we should support their meas- ures with similar executive actions of our own, and I will work with Con- gress toward that goal." In my judgment, the administration has been dragging its feet. It should have more vigorously pursued this joint approach long ago. However, I believe the President is sincere in his desire to do so now, and he has my support in his efforts. Mr. Speaker, the escalating violence in South Africa offers no solutions to the plight of blacks in that country. Similarly, doing violence to the econo- my of South Africa destroys the best change the country has for rapid change and an end to the system of apartheid. The vote we will soon have to make today poses a dilemma. On the one hand, we are frustrated by the slow pace of change in South Africa, by the continuing injustice of the apartheid system. On the other hand, this bill is not a solution to the problem. I again quote from the President's remarks: Let us not forget our purpose. It is not to damage or destroy any economy, but to help the black majority of South Africa and southern Africa enjoy a greater share of the material blessings and bounties their labor has helped to produce-as they secure as well their legitimate political rights. That is why sweeping punitive sanctions are the wrong course to follow, and in- creased American and western investment- by firms that are breaking down apartheid by providing equal opportunity for the vic- tims of official discrimination-is the right course to pursue. Our goal is a democratic system in which the rights of majorities, minorities, and indi- viduals are protected by a Bill of Rights and firm constitutional guarantees. In a letter to the minority leader, Mr. MICHEL, and myself, the President today outlined the contents of a new executive order he will soon sign which will encompass measures re- cently adopted by many of our allies. I believe this joint approach has a great deal of merit and a copy of the letter follows my remarks. A few minutes ago, I talked to the President's national security advisor, Admiral Poindexter, who emphasized the importance at this difficult time of sustaining the President's authority. He also emphasized that the President is committed to assisting responsibly in resolving southern Africa's tragic dilemma. Mr. Speaker, I urge my collegues to vote no on this measure and sustain the President's veto. THE WHITE HOUSE, Washington, September 29, 1986. Hon. ROBERT H. MICHEL, Republican Leader, House of Representa- tives, Washington, DC DEAR BOB: I understand and share the very strong feelings and sense of frustration in the Congress and in our Nation about apartheid, an unconscionable system that we all reject. The ongoing tragedy in South Africa tests our resolve as well as our pa- tience. None of us wants to aggravate that tragedy. In the last several months, the South Af- rican Government, instead of moving fur- ther down the once promising path of reform and dialogue, has turned to internal repression. We all know that South Africa's real problem traces to the perpetuation of apartheid. And we know that the solution to this problem can only be found in lifting the present State of Emergency, repealing all racially discriminatory laws, releasing politi- cal prisoners, and unbanning political par- ties-necessary steps opening the way for negotiations aimed at creating a new,' demo- cratic order for all South Africans. The South African Government holds the key to the opening of such negotiations. Emerging from discussion among South Africans, we want to see a democratic system in which the rights of majorities, minorities, and indi- viduals are protected by a bill of rights and firm constitutional guarantees. We will be actively pursuing diplomatic opportunities and approaches in an effort to start a move- ment toward negotiations in South Africa. September 29, .1986 I outlined in my message to the House of Representatives on Friday my reasons for vetoing the Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid Act of 1986, principally my opposition to pu- nitive sanctions that harm, the victims of apartheid and my desire to' work in concert with our Allies. I also indicated in that mes- sage that I am prepared to sign an expanded Executive order that strongly signals our re- jection of apartheid and our desire to active- ly promote rapid positive change in South Africa. I am prepared to expand the range of restrictions and other measures that will characterize our relations with South Africa. There would be strong sanctions in my new order, sanctions that I earnestly wish were unnecessary. These sanctions, di- rected at the enforcers not the victims of apartheid, encompass measures recently adopted by many of our Allies, as well as many elements of the original Senate Com- mittee version of the bill. They are incon- testably necessary in today's circumstances. My intention is to make it plain to South Africa's leaders that we cannot conduct business-as-usual with a government that mistakes the silence of racial repression for the consent of the governed. My new Executive order will, therefore, reaffirm and incorporate the measures I im- posed last year (i.e. bans on loans to the South African Government and its agencies, all exports of computers to apartheid-en- forcing entities and the military and police, all nuclear exports except those related to health, safety, and IAEA programs, imports of South African weapons, the import of Krugerrands, and a requirement for all U.S. firms to apply fair labor standards based on the Sullivan principles). The Executive order will also add: A ban on new investments other than those in black-owned firms or companies ap- plying the fair labor standards of the Sulli- van principles; A ban on the imports from South Africa of iron and steel; A ban on bank accounts for the South Af- rican Government and its agencies; A requirement to-identify countries taking unfair advantage of U.S. measures against South Africa with a view to restricting their exports to the United States by the amount necessary to compensate for the loss to U.S. companies; A requirement to report and make recom- mendations on means of reducing U.S. de- pendence on strategic minerals from south- ern Africa; A requirement to provide at least $25 mil- lion in assistance for scholarships, educa- tion, community development, and legal aid to disadvantaged South Africans with a pro- hibition on such assistance to any group or individual who has been engaged in gross violations of internationally recognzed human rights; The imposition of severe criminal and civil penalties under several statutes for viola- tion of the provisions of my Executive order; A requirement to consult with Allies in order to coordinate policies and programs toward South Africa; A requirement to report on whether any of these prohibitions has had the effect of increasing U.S. or allied dependence on the Soviet bloc for strategic or other critical ma- terials, with a view to appropriate modifica- tions of U.S. measures under my Executive order should such dependency have been in- creased; And a clear statement that the Executive order constitutes a complete and compre- hensive statement of U.S. policy toward South Africa, with the intent of preempting Approved For Release 2011/04/25: CIA-RDP87B00858R000600890005-8 H 6768 Approved For Release 2011/04/25: CIA-RDP87B00858R000600890005--{8nX C C,- CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - HOUSE September 12, 1986 ^ 1055 GENERAL LEAVE Mr. WHEAT. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks on the resolution just adopted. The SPEAKER pro tempore. (Mr. DANIEL). Is there objection to the re- quest of the gentleman from Missouri? There was no objection. PERSONAL EXPLANATION Mr. ECKERT of New York. M Speaker, I was surprised to learn thi morning that the RECORD lists me as not voting on final passage of the Om- nibus Drug Act of 1986 last evening. That is not accurate. It must be a me- chanical mishap. I was present in the Chamber, cast a vote in the affirmative and voted not only on final passage but on all bills yesterday. I would like the RECORD to reflect my statement, and I ask unani- mous consent that these remarks be recorded in the permanent RECORD im- mediately following that vote on final passage of H.R. 5484. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the gentleman from New York? There was no objection. PERSONAL EXPLANATION Mr. HORTON. Mr. Speaker, last night during final passage of the om- nibus drug bill of 1986, I was standing next to the gentleman from New York, Mr. FRED ECKERT, when the vote was taken. I saw the gentleman take his voting card out and cast his vote on final passage. I know from my personal conversa- tion during the vote that he had voted 'yes.' I learned this morning that the RECORD showed that he had not voted. That is not accurate; he was present; he did vote; I was a witness to that. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous con- sent that my remarks be recorded in the permanent RECORD immediately following the vote on the Omnibus Drug Act of 1986. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the gentleman from New York? There was no objection. PERMISSION FOR SUBCOMMIT- TEE ON FISHERIES AND WILD- LIFE CONSERVATION AND THE ENVIRONMENT AND SUBCOM- MITTEE ON MERCHANT MARINE OF THE COMMITTEE ON MERCHANT MARINE AND FISHERIES TO SIT ON WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 17, 1986, DURING THE 5-MINUTE RULE Mr. BOSCO. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that the Commit- tee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries' Subcommittee on Fisheries and Wild- life Conservation and the Environ- ment, in conjunction with the Sub- committe on Merchant Marine, and by itself, have permission to sit during the consideration of legislation under the 5-minute rule on Wednesday, Sep- tember 17, 1986. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the gentleman from California? There was no objection. ANTI-APARTHEID ACT OF 1986 Mr. FASCELL. Mr. Speaker, pursu- ant to House Resolution 548, I move to take from the Speaker's table the bill (H.R. 4868) to prohibit loans to, other investments in, and certain other ac- tivities with respect to, South Africa, and for other purposes, with a Senate amendment thereto, and concur in the Senate amendment. The Clerk read the title of the bill. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursu- ant to House Resolution 548, the Senate amendment is considered as having been read. The text of the Senate amendment is as follows: Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert: SHORT TITLE Section 1. This Act may be cited as the "Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid Act of 1986". TABLE OF CONTENTS Sec. 2. The table of contents of this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title. Sec. 2. Table of contents. Sec. 3. Definitions. Sec. 4. Purpose. TITLE I-POLICY OF THE UNITED STATES WITH RESPECT TO ENDING APARTHEID Sec. 101. Policy toward the Government of South Africa. Sec. 102. Policy toward the African National Congress, etc. Sec. 103. Policy toward the victims of apart- heid. Sec. 104. Policy toward other countries in Southern Africa. Sec. 105. Policy toward "frontline" states. Sec. 106. Policy toward a negotiated settle- ment. Sec. 107. Policy toward international coop- eration on measures to end apartheid. Sec. 108. Policy toward necklacing. Sec. 109. United States Ambassador to meet with Nelson Mandela. Sec. 110. Policy toward the recruitment and training of black South Afri- cans by United States employ- ers. TITLE II-MEASURES TO ASSIST VICTIMS OF APARTHEID Sec. 201. Scholarships for the victims of apartheid. the United States. Sec. 207. Employment practices of United States nationals in South Africa. Sec. 208. Code of Conduct. Sec. 209. Prohibition on assistance. Sec. 210. Use of the African Emergency Re- serve. Sec. 211. Prohibition on assistance to any person or group engaging in "necklacing". Sec. 212. Participation of South Africa in agricultural export credit and promotion programs. TITLE III-MEASURES BY THE UNITED STATES TO UNDERMINE APARTHEID Sec. 301. Prohibition on the importation of krugerrands. Sec. 302. Prohibition on the importation of military articles. Sec. 303. Prohibition on the importation of products from parastatal orga- nizations. Sec. 304. Prohibition on computer exports to South Africa. Sec. 305. Prohibition on loans to the Gov- ernment of South Africa. Sec. 306. Prohibition on air transportation with South Africa. Sec. 307. Prohibitions on nuclear trade with South Africa. Sec. 308. Government of South Africa bank accounts. Sec. 309. Prohibition on importation of ura- nium and coal from South Africa. Sec. 310. Prohibition on new investment in South Africa. Sec. 311. Termination of certain provisions. Sec. 312. Policy toward violence or terror- ism. Sec. 313. Termination of tax treaty and pro- tocol. Sec. 314. Prohibition on United States Gov- ernment procurement from South Africa. Sec. 315. Prohibition on the promotion of United States tourism in South Africa. Sec. 316. Prohibition on United States Gov- ernment assistance to, invest- ment in, or subsidy for trade with, South Africa. Sec. 317. Prohibition on sale or export of items on Munition List. Sec. 318. Munitions list sales, notification. Sec. 319. Prohibition on importation of South African agricultural products and food. Sec. 320. Prohibition on importation of iron and steel. Sec. 321. Prohibition on exports of crude oil and petroleum products. Sec. 322. Prohibition on cooperation with the armed forces of South Africa. Sec. 323. Prohibition on sugar imports. TITLE IV-MULTILATERAL MEASURES TO UNDERMINE APARTHEID Sec. 401. Negotiating authority. Sec. 402. Limitation on imports from other countries. Sec. 403. Private right of action. TITLE V-FUTURE POLICY TOWARD SOUTH AFRICA Sec. 202. Human rights fund. Sec. 501. Additional measures. Sec. 203. Expanding participation in the Sec. 502. Lifting of prohibitions. South African economy. Sec. 503. Study of health conditions in the Sec. 204. Export-Import Bank of the United "homelands" areas of South States. Africa Sec. 205. Labor practices of the United Sec. 504. Reports on South African imports. States Government in South Sec. 505. Study and report on the economy Africa of southern Africa. Sec. 206. Welfare and protection of the vic- Sec. 506. Report on relations between other tims of apartheid employed by industrialized democracies and Approved For Release 2011/04/25: CIA-RDP87B00858R000600890005-8 Approved For Release 2011/04/25: CIA-RDP87B00858R000600890005-8 September 12, 1986 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - HOUSE should not preempt the rights of States like the State of California to determine where to invest $13 billion of their pension or public funds. It is not the jurisdictional purpose of this bill to intrude or intervene in the internal affairs or a State or local government. Mr. Speaker, there is a deepening crisis in South Africa and it is time to respond to the unambiguous appeals of thousands of South Africa's black majority who are pleading for us to take a stronger stand. It is time to take a stand and answer the calls of thousands of Americans who urge emphatically for sanc- tions against South Africa. I believe H.R. 4868 may not go far enough, but it is a beginning and a new direction in our foreign policy in South Africa. More important- ly, it is time we demonstrated our commitment to the principles of freedom and democracy not only in South Africa, but throughout the world. The Senate bill is silent on th question of the preemption issue, but I strongly believe our rule clarifies this issue and establishes legislative history. I encourage my colleagues to support this rule. Mr. TAYLOR. Mr. Speaker, I have no further requests for time, and I yield back the balance of my time. Mr. WHEAT. Mr. Speaker, just to make it very clear what the rule actu- ally does in its second section on pre- emption, it is not the intent of the committee, it is not the intent of this body, to pass any legislation which grants any new constitutional author- ity. It is merely our intent to make it clear that this legislation does not impact upon authority that States and local governments already have. If the State of California has the right to pass legislation affecting their own funds in regard to the situation in South Africa, then they continue to have that authority. If the State of Pennsylvania has the authority, then they continue to have that authority. Mr. WALKER. Mr. Speaker, will the gentleman yield? Mr. WHEAT. No; I will not yield at this time. If the University of Mississippi system has that authority, then they will continue to have that authority, and this legislation has no impact upon the legal or constitutional au- thority of any State or local munici- pality. The gentleman has asked some very good questions about what will happen in South Africa, and admitted- ly this bill cannot guarantee peace in South Africa. This bill does not guar- antee an end to apartheid in South Africa, but it does guarantee one thing, that the rest to the world, espe- cially those suffering in South Africa, will know that this Congress witnessed the evil and would not turn away. Mr. Speaker, I have no further re- quests for time, and I move the previ- ous question on the resolution. The previous question was ordered. Mr. SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. DANIEL). The question is on the resolu- tion. The question was taken; and the Speaker pro tempore announced that the ayes appeared to have it. Mr. BROOMFIELD. Mr. Speaker, I object to the vote on the ground that a quorum is not present and make the point of order that a quorum is not present. Mr. SPEAKER pro tempore. Evi- dently a quorum is not present. The Sergeant at Arms will notify absent Members. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were-yeas 292, nays 92, not voting 47, as follows: [Roll No. 380] YEAS-292 Akaka Fish Luken Alexander Flippo Lungren Anderson Florio MacKay Andrews Fogfietta Manton Annunzio Foley Martin (IL) Anthony Ford (TN) Martin (NY) Applegate Fowler Martinez Aspin Frank Matsui AuCoin Franklin Mavroules Barnard Frenzel Mazzoli Barnes Fuqua McCain Bates Gallo McCloskey Bedell Garcia McCollum Beilenson Gaydos McCurdy Bennett Gejdenson McEwen Bereuter Gibbons McGrath Berman Glickman McHugh Bevill Gonzalez McKernan Biaggi Gordon McMillan Bliley Gradison Meyers Boehlert Gray (IL) Mica Boggs Gray (PA) Mikulski Boland Green Miller (CA) Bonior (MI) Gregg Miller (WA) Bonker Guarini Mineta Borski Gunderson Mitchell Bosco Hall (OH) Moakley Brown (CO) Hamilton Mollohan Bruce Hatcher Montgomery Bryant Hawkins Moody Bustamante Hayes Morrison (CT) Byron Hefner Morrison (WA) Carper Henry Mrazek Carr Hertel Murphy Chandler Hillis Murtha Chappell Hopkins Natcher Clay Horton Neal Clinger Howard Nelson Coats Boyer Nichols Collins Hubbard Nowak Conte Hughes Oakar Conyers Hutto Oberstar Cooper Ireland Obey Coughlin Jacobs Olin Courter Jeffords Ortiz Coyne Jenkins Panetta Daniel Jones (NC) Pease Darden Jones (TN) Penny Daschle Kanjorski Perkins Davis Kaptur Pickle de la Garza Kasich Price Dellums Kastenmeier Pursell Derrick Kemp Rahall Dicks Kennelly Rangel Dingell Kildee Ray DioGuardi Kindness Regula Dixon Kleczka Reid Donnelly Kolbe Richardson Dorgan (ND) Kolter Rinaldo Dowdy Kostmayer Roberts Downey LaFalce Robinson Duncan Lantos Rodino Durbin Latta Roe Dwyer Leach (IA) Roemer Dymally Leath (TX) Rose Dyson Lehman (CA) Rostenkowski Early Lehman (FL) Roth Eckart (OH) Leland Roukema Edgar Lent Rowland (CT) Edwards (CA) Levin (MI) Rowland (GA) English Levine (CA) Roybal Erdreich Lewis (CA) Russo Evans (IA) Lipinski Sabo Evans (IL) Lloyd Savage Fascell Long Saxton Fazio Lowry (WA) Scheuer Feighan Lujan Schneider H 6767 Schuette Stark Weber Schulze Stokes Weiss Schumer Studds Wheat Seiberling Swift Whitley Sensenbrenner Tallon Whittaker Sharp Tauke Whitten Shelby Tauzin Wilson Sikorski Thomas (GA) Wirth Sisisky Torres Wise Skelton Torricelli Wolpe Slattery Traficant Wortley Smith (FL) Traxler Wright Smith (IA) Udall Wyden Smith (NE) Valentine Wylie Smith (NJ) Vento Yates Snowe Visclosky Yatron Solarz Volkmer Young (FL) Spratt Waldon Young (MO) Staggers Walgren Zschau Stallings Watkins Stangeland Weaver NAYS-92 Archer Gingrich Porter Armey Hall, Ralph Quillen Badham Hammerschmidt Ridge Bartlett Hansen Ritter Barton Hendon Rogers Bateman Hiler Schaefer Bentley Holt Shaw Bilirakis Hunter Shumway Boulter Hyde Shuster Broomfield Johnson Siljander Burton (IN) Kramer Skeen Callahan Lagomarsino Slaughter Cheney Lewis (FL) Smith. Denny Coble Lightfoot (OR) Coleman (MO) Lott Smith, Robert Combest Lowery (CA) (NH) Craig Mack Smith. Robert Crane Madigan (OR) Dannemeyer Marlenee Solomon Daub McCandless Spence DeLay Michel Stenholm DeWine Miller (OH) Strang Dickinson Molinari Stump Dornan (CA) Monson Sundquist Dreier Moorhead Sweeney Eckert (NY) Myers Swindall Edwards (OK) Nielson Taylor Emerson Oxley Vander Jagt Fawell Packard Vucanovich Fiedler Parris Walker Fields Pashayan Wolf Gekas Petri NOT VOTING-47 Ackerman Crockett Moore Atkins Ford (MI) Owens Boner (TN) Frost Pepper Boucher Gephardt Rudd Boxer Gilman Schroeder Breaux Goodling Snyder Brooks Grotberg St Germain Brown (CA) Hartnett Stratton Burton (CA) Huckaby Synar Campbell Jones (OK) Thomas (CA) Carney Livingston Towns Chapman Loeffler Waxman Chappie Lundine Whitehurst Cobey Markey Williams Coelho McDade Young (AK) Coleman (TX) McKinney ^ 1045 Messrs. DICKINSON, GINGRICH, PACKARD, and RALPH M. HALL changed their votes from "yea" to "nay.' Mr. FRENZEL changed his vote from "nay" to "yea." So the resolution was agreed to. The result of the vote was an nounced as above recorded. A motion to reconsider was laid on the table. Approved For Release 2011/04/25: CIA-RDP87B00858R000600890005-8 Approved For Release 2011/04/25: CIA-RDP87B00858R000600890005-8 September 12, 1986 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - HOUSE H 6769 South Africa. equity security issued by the Government of (5) negotiate with representatives of all Sec. 507. Study and report on deposit ac- South Africa or a South African entity racial groups in South Africa the future po- counts of South African na- before the date of enactment of this Act, or litical system in South Africa,' and tionals in United States banks. the transfer or acquisition of such a share, 16) end military and paramilitary activi- Sec. 508. Study and report on the violation interest, or debt or equity security, if any ties aimed at neighboring states. of the international embargo such transfer or acquisition does not result (c) The United States will encourage the on sale and export of military in a payment, contribution of funds or actions set forth in subsection (b) through articles to South Africa. assets, or credit to a South African entity, a economic, political, and diplomatic meas- Sec. 509. Report on Communist activities in controlled South African entity, or the Gov- ures as set forth in this Act. The United South Africa. ernment ofSouth Africa; States will adjust its actions toward the Sec. 510. Prohibition on the Importation of (5) the term "national of the United Government of South Africa to reflect the Soviet Gold Coins. States" means- progress or lack of progress made by the Sec. 511. Economic support for disadvan- (A) a natural person who is a citizen of Government of South Africa in meeting the taged South Africans. the United States or who owes permanent al- goal set forth in subsection (a). Sec. 512. Report on the African National legiance to the United States or is an alien POLICY TOWARD THE AFRICAN NATIONAL Congress. lawfully admitted for permanent residence CONGRESS, ETC. TITLE VI-ENFORCEMENT AND in the United States, as defined by section ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS 101(?)(20) of the Immigration and National- SEC. 102. (a) United States policy toward ity Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(20)); or the African National Congress, the Pan Afri- Sec. 601. Regulatory authority. (B) a corporation, partnership, or other can Congress, and their affiliates shall be Sec. 602. Congressional priority procedures. business association which is organized designed to bring about a suspension of vio- Sec. 603. Enforcement and penalties. under the laws of the United States, any lence that will lead to the start of negotia- Sec. 604. Applicability to evasions of Act. State or territory thereof, or the District of tions designed to bring about a nonracial Sec. 605. Construction of Act. Columbia; and genuine democracy in South Africa. Sec. 606. State or local anti-apartheid laws, (6) the term "South Africa" includes- (b) The United States shall work toward enforce. (A) the Republic of South Africa; this goal by encouraging the African Nation- DEFINITIONS (B) any territory under the Administra- at Congress and the Pan African Congress, SEC. 3. As used in this Act- tion, legal or illegal, of South Africa; and and their affiliates, to- (1) the term "Code of Conduct" refers to (C) the "bantustans" or "homelands"; to (1) suspend terrorist activities so that ne- the principles set forth in section 208(a); which South African blacks are assigned on gotiations with the Government of South (2) the term "controlled South African the basis of ethnic origin, including the Africa and other groups representing black entity" means- Transkei, Bophuthatswana Ciskei, and South Africans wig o possible; (A) a corporation, partnership, or other Venda; and (2) makc known their commitment to a business association or entity organized in (7) the term "South African entity" South Africa and owned or controlled, di- means- free and democratic post-apartheid South rectly or indirectly, by a national of the (A) a corporation, partnership, or other Africa; United States: or business association or entity organized in (3) agree to enter into negotiations with (B) a branch, office, agency, or sole propri- South Africa; or the South African Government and other etorship in South Africa of a national of the (B) a branch, office, agency, or sole propri- groups representing black South Africans for United States; etorship in South Africa of a person that re- the peaceful solution of the problems of (3) the term "loan"- sides or is organized outside South Africa; South Africa; (A) means any transfer or extension of and (4) reexamine their ties to the South Afri- (8) the term "United States" includes the can Communist Party. fonds repay, credit on sue basis or guarantee on States of the United States, the District of (c) The United States will encourage the th repay, or any assumption a ayan ex of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto actions set forth in subsection (b) through the obligation of another repay Rico, and any territory or possession of the Sion oJJunds or credit, including- political and diplomatic measures. The (i) overdrafts, United States. United States will adjust its actions toward (ii) currency swaps, PURPOSE the Government of South Africa not only to (iii) the purchase of debt or equity securi- SEC. 4. The purpose of this Act is to set reflect progress or lack of progress made by ties issued by the Government of South forth a comprehensive and complete frame- the Government of South Africa in meeting Africa or a South African entity on or after work to guide the efforts of the United States the goal set forth in subsection 101(a) but the date of enactment of this Act, in helping to bring an end to apartheid in also to reflect progress or lack of progress (iv) the purchase of a loan made by an- South Africa and lead to the establishment made by the ANC and other organizations other person, of a nonracial, democratic form of govern- in meeting the goal set forth in subsection (v) the sale of financial assets subject to ment. This Act sets out United States policy (a) of this section. an agreement to repurchase, and toward the Government of South Africa, the POLICY TOWARD THE VICTIMS OF APARTHEID (vi) a renewal or refinancing whereby victims of apartheid, and the other states in SEC. 103. (a) The United States policy funds or credits are transferred or extended southern Africa. It also provides the Presi- toward the victims of apartheid is to use to the Government of South Africa or a dent with additional authority to work with the other industrial democracies to help end economic, political, diplomatic, and other South African entity, cud and apartheid and establish democracy in South effective means to achieve the removal of the (B) does al include- Africa root cause of their victimization, which is by !i) letters of normal credit it or or short-term strade trade financing, de credits; as TITLE I-POLICY OF THE UNITED the apartheid system. In anticipation of the a similar nd as a (ii) sales on open account in cases where STATES WITH RESPECT TO ENDING reemovroval of means the system l of apartheid asand a such sales are normal business practice; or APARTHEID is f of the policy of the United States to assist (iii) rescheduling of existing loans, if no POLICY TOWARD THE GOVERNMENT OF SOUTH these victims of apartheid as individuals new funds or credits are thereby extended to AFRICA and through organizations to overcome the a South African entity or the Government of SEC. 101. (a) United States policy toward handicaps imposed on them by the system of South Africa; the Government of South Africa shall be de- apartheid and to help prepare them for their 14) the term "new investment"- signed to bring about reforms in that system rightful roles as full participants in the po- (A) means- of government that will lead to the establish- litical, social, economic, and intellectual life (i) a commitment or contribution offunds ment of a nonracial democracy. of their country in the post-apartheid South or other assets, and (b) The United States will work toward Africa envisioned by this Act. (ii) a loan or other extension of credit, and this goal by encouraging the Government of (b) The United States will work toward the (B) does not include- South Africa to- (i) purposes of subsection /a) by- the reinvestment of profits generated by (1) repeal the present state of emergency providing assistance to South African a controlled South African entity into that and respect the principle of equal justice (1) prov ce t South Africdiscrimination same controlled South African entity or the under law for citizens of all races; victims (1 apasexrthe, d wi u b icinvestment of such profits in a South Afri- (2) release Nelson Mandela, Govan Mbeki, by race, of color, take advantage or educa- (ii) entity; Walter Sisulu, black trade union leaders, cal tp orientation, sex, to ke aAfrica and a- (ii) contributions of money or other assets and all political prisoners; tional opportunities leadership and where such contributions are necessary to (3) permit the free exercise by South Afri- the the United in a States post-apartheid to oprepare r South Africa; enable a controlled South African entity to cans of all races of the right to form politi- operate in an economically sound manner, cal parties, express political opinions, and (2) assisting victims of apartheid; without expanding its operations: or otherwise participate in the political proc- (3) aiding individuals or groups in South (iii) the ownership or control of a share or ess; Africa whose goals are to aid victims of interest in a South African entity or a con- (4) establish a timetable for the elimina- apartheid or foster nonviolent legal or polit- trolled South African entity or a debt or tion of apartheid laws: ical challenges to the apartheid laws; Approved For Release 2011/04/25: CIA-RDP87B00858R000600890005-8 Approved For Release 2011/04/25: CIA-RDP87B00858R000600890005-8 11 6770 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - HOUSE September 12, 1986 (4) furnishing direct financial assistance and legitimate political parties in South (b) Accordingly, the Congress urges the to those whose nonviolent activities had led Africa include several organizations that President to seek such cooperation among to their arrest or detention by the South AJ have been banned and will work for the un- all individuals, groups, and nations. rican authorities and (B/ to the families of banning of such organizations in order to those killed by terrorist acts such as "neck- permit legitimate political viewpoints to be SEC. 108. It POLICY the s se of NECKLACING lacings", represented at such negotiations. The is the sense o the Congress (5) intervening at the highest political United States also recognizes that some of that the African National take kl Congress should levels in South Africa to express the strong the organizations fighting apartheid have against condemn and teffective actions desire of the United States to see the devel- become infiltrated by Communists and that noinst as execution by fire, commonly opment in South Africa of a nonracial Communists serve on the governing boards known ?s "neckl?cing"; of any person in democratic society; of such organizations. any country. (6) supporting the rights of the victims of (2/ To this end, it is the sense of the Con- apartheid through UNITED STATES AMBASSADOR TO MEET WITH political, economic, or gress that the President the Secretary of NELSON MANDELA other sanctions in the event the Government State, or other appropriate high-level United SEC. 109. It is the sense of the Senate that of South Africa fails to make progress States officials should meet with the leaders the United States Ambassador should toward the removal of the apartheid laws of opposition organizations of South Africa, promptly make a formal request to the South and the establishment of such democracy; particularly but not limited to those organi- African Government for the United States and zations representing the black majority. (7) supporting the rights of all Africans to Furthermore, the President, in concert with the Presidentto meet with Nelson THE RECRUITMENT 1ANDdTRAIN- be free of terrorist attacks by setting a time the major allies of the United States and ING OF BLACK SOUTH AFRICANS BY UNITED limit after which the United States will other interested parties, should seek to bring STATES EMPLOYERS pursue diplomatic and political measures together opposition political leaders with SEC. 110. (a) The Congress finds that- against those promoting terrorism and leaders of the Government of South Africa (1) the policy of apartheid is abhorrent against those countries harboring such for the purpose of negotiations to achieve a and morally repugnant; groups so as to achieve the objectives of this transition to the postapartheid democracy (2) the United States believes strongly in Act. envisioned in this Act. POLICY TOWARD OTHER COUNTRIES IN SOUTHERN (b) The United States will encourage the the principles of democracy and individual AFRICA Government of South Africa and all partici- freedoms; the SEC. 104. (a) The United States policy pants to the negotiations to respect the right political (3/the United participationo States of f all cif ze policy of toward the other countries in the Southern of all South Africans to form political par- t ciecono ns; African region shall be designed to encour- ties, express political opinions, and other- (4) a free, open, and vital economy is a age democratic forms of government, full re- wise participate in the political process primary economic means for achieving for all cquali s; spect for human rights, an end to cross- without fear of retribution by either govern- and economic advancement for all citizens; border terrorism, political independence, mental or nongovernmental organizations. and and economic development. It is the sense of the Congress that a suspen- (5c the o United States is committed m a (b) The United States will work toward the sion of violence is an essential precondition policy and securing and enhancing human purposes of subsection (a) by- for the holding of negotiations. The United rights and individual dignity throughout (1) helping to secure the independence of States calls upon all parties to the co the world. Namibia and the establishment of Namibia to agree to a suspension of violence. it i zct ( It St a totes the Aloe rs opthe Congress tuth as a nonracial democracy in accordance (c) The United States will work toward the Africa are obliged o both th generally to in actively with appropriate United Nations Security achievement of agreement to suspend vio- oppose the obliged practices vy t apartheid Council resolutions; lence and begin negotiations through co- and ds e policy and engage of ap itmei t (2) supporting the removal of all foreign ordinated actions with the major Western training of a egge in recruitment military military forces from the region; allies and with the governments of the coun- and trainng black and colored South Af- encouraging the nations of the region tries in the region. ricans for management responsibilities. to settle differences through peaceful means; (d/ It is the sense of the Congress that the (4) promoting economic development TITLE II-MEASURES TO ASSIST through bilateral and multilateral economic achievement of an agreement for negates- VICTIMS OF APARTHEID through taeral a d ul t it ate opportuni- lions could be promoted if the United States SCHOLARSHIPS FOR THE VICTIMS OF APARTHEID ties in the g and its major allies, such as Great Britain, SEC. 201. (a) Section 105(b) of the Foreign productive sectors of national Canada, France, Italy, Japan, and West Assistance Act of 1961 is amended- economies, with a particular emphasis on Germany, would hold a meeting to develop a (1/ by inserting "(1) " after "(b) '; and increasing opportunities for nongovernmen- four-point plan to discuss with the Govern- (2) by adding at the end thereof the follow- tal economic activities; ment of South Africa a proposal for stages of in g encouraging, and when necessary, multilateral assistance to South new (i) Of the paragraph: strongly demanding, that all countries of the Africa za (ro priat d the amounts authorized to be J implementing- for the Government of South Africa appropriated region respect the human rights of their cite- implementing- efiscal yea to carry out this 1 section ass r zens and noncitizens residing in the coun- (1) an end to the state of emergency and 000,00 1sha c 1 be be8, and in 1989, each not less try, and especially the release of persons per- the release of the political prisoners, includ- fiscal year to finance used in esuch secuted for their political beliefs or detained ing Nelson Mandela; and fiscal year scholarships s for r the and e victim faapart- without trial; (2) the unbanning of the heid, including e other educa- (6) encouraging, and when necessary, Congress, I African National the Lioninrlf ssio teachers atend g uni- strongly demanding that all countries of the the Pan African Congress, the Banal professionals, who are attending ca. region take J Black Consciousness Movement, and all versifies and colleges in South Africa. effective action to end cross- other groups willing to suspend terrorism Amounts available to carry out this sub- border terrorism; and and to (7) providing appropriate assistance, participate in negotiations and a paragraph shall be provided in accordance wiz) toovimngtions olpri to assistance, democratic process; with the wittier at home and in other n responc , - (3) a revocation of the Group Areas Act International provisions of and Dn D802(c) of evelopment the ecurity and Development Co- and the Population Registration Act and the operation opAct Sof 198 assist regional economic cooperation and granting of universal citizenship to all "(ii) -F ds made 5. the development of interregional transporta- South Africans, including homeland resi- year for purposes soachapter ee each of such tion and other capital facilities necessary dents; and 11 of fiscal y this s for ay be used to finance part for economic growth. (4) the use of the international offices of a education Act may be usd c ru POLICY TOWARD "FRONTLINE" STATES third party as an intermediary to bring li fa equalna, and made available in n SEC. 105. It is the sense of the Congress about negotiations with the object of the es- and of s equal amount made available that the President should discuss with the tablishment of power-sharing with the black "(B)(i) under this nubparagraph. governments of the African "frontline" majority. Purposes of subpa a a amounts used for states the effects on them of disruptions in POLICY TOWARD INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION primarily responsible ponsible for a (i the agency transportation or other economic links primarily responsble for Admihirteripr this lltTOtlgh South Africa and of means of reduc- ON MEASURES TO END APARTHEID part, in collaboration with other a p ate those effects. SEC. 107. (a) The Congress finds that- poped ate departments or agencies of provided United POLICY TOWARD A NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT (1) international is a frolic- States, shall use assistance pr under uisite to to an effective anti-apartheid policy this section or chapter er 4 of part 11 II of this SEC. 106. (a)(1) United States policy will and to the suspension of terrorism in South Act to finance scholarships for students pur- seek to promote negotiations among repre- Africa; and sentatives of all citizens of South Africa to (2) the situation in South suing secondary school education p South n a future Africa coned- Africa. shall selection scholarship rb re- determine political system that lutes an emergency in international seta- eat eats shall be by y a ? nationwide panel or by y re- would permit all citizens to be full partici- tions and that action is necessary for the gional panels appointed by the United pants in the governance of their country. protection of the essential security interests States chief of diplomatic mission to South The United States recognizes that important of the United States. Africa. Approved For Release 2011/04/25: CIA-RDP87B00858R000600890005-8 Approved For Release 2011/04/25: CIA-RDP87B00858R000600890005-8 September 12, 1986 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - HOUSE H 6771 "(ii) Of the amounts authorized to be ap- housed in family accommodations near (3) for the employment services of South propriated to carry out this section and their place of employment. Africans arranged by contract, chapter 4 of part 11 of this Act for the fiscal "(2l(A) No grant under this subsection should represent the best of labor practices years 1987, 1988, and 1989, up to an aggre- may exceed $100,000. in the United States and should serve as a gate of $1,000,000 may be used in each such "(B) The average of all grants under this model for the labor practices of nationals of fiscal year for purposes of this subpara- paragraph made in any fiscal year shall not the United States in South Africa. graph. exceed $70,000. (b) The Secretary of State and any other "(C)(i) In addition to the assistance au- "(g) Of the funds made available to carry head of a department or agency of the thorized in subparagraph (A), the agency out subsection (e)(2)(A) for each fiscal year, United States carrying out activities in primarily responsible for administering this $175,000 shall be used for direct assistance South Africa shall promptly take, without part shall provide assistance for inservice to families of victims of violence such as regard to any provision of law, the neces- teacher training programs in South Africa 'necklacing' and other such inhumane acts. sary steps to ensure that the labor practices through such nongovernmental organiza- An additional $175,000 shall be made avail- applied to the employment services de- tions as TOPS or teachers' unions. able to black groups in South Africa which scribed in paragraphs (1) through (3) of sub- "(ii) Of the amounts authorized to be ap- are actively working toward a multi-racial section (a) are governed by the Code of Con- propriated to carry out this section and solution to the sharing of political power in duct. Nothing in this section shall be con- chapter 4 of part II of this Act, up to an ag- that country through nonviolent, construe- strued to grant any employee of the United gregate of $500,000 for the fiscal year 1987 tive means.": States the right to strike. and up to an aggregate of $1,000,000 for the EXPANDING PARTICIPATION IN THE SOUTH WELFARE AND PROTECTION OF VICTIMS OF fiscal year 1988 may be used for purposes of AFRICAN ECONOMY APARTHEID BY THE UNITED STATES this subparagraph, subject to standard pro- SEC. 203. (a) The Congress declares that- SEC. 206. (a) The Secretary of State shall ceduresforProject review and approval.': (1) the denial under the apartheid laws of (b) The Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 is acquire, through lease or purchase, residen- amended by inserting after section 116 the South Africa of the rights of South African tial properties in the Republic of South following new section: blacks and other nonwhites to have the op- Africa that shall be made available, at rents "SEC. 117. ASSISTANCE FOR DISADVANTAGED portunity to participate equitably in the that are equitable, to assist victims of apart- SOUTH AFRICANS.-In providing assistance South African economy as managers or heid who are employees of the United States under this chapter or under chapter 4 of owners of, or professionals in, business en- Government in obtaining adequate housing. part II of this Act for disadvantaged South terprises, and Such properties shall be acquired only in Africans, priority shall be given to working (2) the policy of confining South African neighborhoods which would be open to occu- with and through South African nongovern- blacks and other nonwhites to the status of pancy by other employees of the United mental organizations whose leadership and employees in minority-dominated business- States Government in South Africa, staff are selected on a nonracial basis, and es, (b) There are authorized to be appropri- which have the support of the disadvan- is an affront to the values of a free society. ated $10,000,000 for the fiscal year 1987 to taged communities being served. The meas- (b) The Congress hereby- carry out the purposes of this section. ure of this community support shall be the (1) applauds the commitment of nationals EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES OF UNITED STATES willingness of a substantial number of dis- of the United States adhering to the Code of NATIONALS IN SOUTH AFRICA advantaged persons to participate in activi- Conduct to assure that South African blacks SEC. 207. (a) Any national of the United ties sponsored by these organizations. Such and other nonwhites are given assistance in States that employs more than 25 persons in organizations to which such assistance may gaining their rightful place in the South Af- South Africa shall take the necessary steps be provided include the Educational Oppor- rican economy; and to insure that the Code of Conduct is imple- tunities Council, the South African Institute (2) urges the United States Government to mented. of Race Relations, READ, professional assist in all appropriate ways the realiza- (b) No department or agency of the United teachers' unions, the Outreach Program of tion by South African blacks and other non- States may intercede with any foreign gov- the University of the Western Cape, the whites of their rightful place in the South ernment or foreign national regarding the Funda Center in Soweto, SACHED, UPP African economy. export marketing activities in any country Trust, TOPS, the Wilgespruit Fellowship (c) Notwithstanding any other provision of any national of the United States employ- Center (WFC), and civic and other organi- of law, the Secretary of State and any other ing more than 25 persons in South Africa zations working at the community level head of a department or agency of the that is not implementing the Code of Con- which do not receive funds from the Govern- United States carrying out activities in duct. ment of South Africa. ". South Africa shall, to the maximum extent CODE OF CONDUCT HUMAN RIGHTS FUND practicable, in procuring goods or services, SEC. 208. (a) The Code of Conduct referred SEC. 202. (a) Section 116(e)(2)(A) of the make affirmative efforts to assist business to in sections 203, 205, 207, and 603 of this Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 is amended- enterprises having more than 50 percent Act is as follows: (1) by striking out "1984 and" and insert- beneficial ownership by South African (1) desegregating the races in each employ- ing in lieu thereof "1984,"; and blacks or other nonwhite South Africans. ment facility; (2) by inserting after "1985" a comma and EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES (2) providing equal employment opportu- the following: "and $1,500,000 for the fiscal SEC. 204. Section 2(b)(9) of the Export- nity for all employees without regard to race year 1986 and for each fiscal year thereaf- Import Bank Act of 1945 is amended- or ethnic origin; ter": (1) by striking out "(9) In" and inserting (3) assuring that the pay system is applied (b) Section 116 of such Act is amended by in lieu thereof "(9)(A) Except as provided in to all employees without regard to race or adding at the end thereof the following new subparagraph (B), in"; and ethnic origin; subsection: (2) by adding at the end thereof the follow- (4) establishing a minimum wage and "(f)(1) Of the funds made available to ing.' salary structure based on the appropriate carry out subsection (e)(2)(A) for each fiscal "(B) The Bank shall take active steps to local minimum economic level which takes year, not less than $500,000 shall be used for encourage the use of its facilities to guaran- into account the needs of employees and direct legal and other assistance to political tee, insure, extend credit, or participate in their families; detainees and prisoners and their families, the extension of credit to business enter- (5) increasing by appropriate means the including the investigation of the killing of prises in South Africa that are majority number of persons in managerial, superviso- protesters and prisoners, and for support for owned by South African blacks or other non- ry, administrative, clerical, and technical actions of black-led community organiza- white South Africans. The certification re- tions to resist, through nonviolent means, jobs who are disadvantaged by the apartheid the enforcement of apartheid policies such quirement contained in clause (c) of sub- system for the purpose of significantly in- paragraph (A) shall not apply to exports to creasing their representation in such jobs, as- or purchases from business enterprises (6) taking reasonable steps to improve the "(A) removal of black populations from certain geographic areas on account of race which are majority owned by South African blacks or other nonwhite South Africans.quality of employees' lives outside the work or ethnic origin, environment with respect to housing, trans- "(B) denationalization of blacks, includ- LABOR PRACTICES OF THE UNITED STATES portation, schooling, recreation, and health; ing any distinctions between the South Afri- GOVERNMENT IN SOUTH AFRICA and can citizenships of blacks and whites, SEC. 205. (a) It is the sense of the Congress (7) implementing fair labor practices by "(C) residence restrictions based on race that the labor practices used by the United recognizing the right of all employees, re- or ethnic origin, States Government- gardless of racial or other distinctions, to "(D) restrictions on the rights of blacks to (1) for the direct hire of South Africans, self-organization and to form, join, or assist seek employment in South Africa and to live (2) for the reimbursement out of official labor organizations, freely and without pen- wherever they find employment in South residence funds of South Africans and em- alty or reprisal, and recognizing the right to Africa, and ployees of South African organizations for refrain from any such activity. "(E) restrictions which make it impossible their long-term employment services on (b) It is the sense of the Congress that in for black employees and their families to be behalf of the United States Government, and addition to the principles enumerated in Approved For Release 2011/04/25: CIA-RDP87B00858R000600890005-8 Approved For Release 2011/04/25: CIA-RDP87B00858R000600890005-8 H 6772 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD -HOUSE subsection (a), nationals of the United States subject to section 207 should seek to comply with the following principle: taking reasonable measures to extend the scope of influence on activities outside the work- place, including- (1) supporting the unrestricted rights of black businesses to locate in urban areas; (2) influencing other companies in South Africa to follow the standards of equal rights principles, (3) supporting the freedom of mobility of black workers to seek employment opportu- nities wherever they exist, and make provi- sion for adequate housing for families of em- ployees within the proximity of workers' em- ployment, and x (4) supporting the rescission of all apart- ep for those strategic minerals for which the Presi- heid laws. dent has certified to the Congress that the (c) The President may issue additional quantities essential for the economy or de- guidelines and criteria to assist persons who fense of the United States are unavailable are or may be subject to section 207 in com- from reliable and secure suppliers and plying with the principles set forth in sub- except for any article to be imported pursu- section (a) of this section. The President ant to a contract entered into before August may, upon request, give an advisory opinion 15, 1986: Provided, That no shipments may to any person who is or may be subject to be received by a national of the United this section as to whether that person is sub- States under such contract after April 1, ject to this section or would be considered to 1987. be in compliance with the principles set (b) For purposes of this section, the term forth in subsection (a). ' parastatal organization" means a corpora- (d) The President may require all nation- tion or partnership owned or controlled or ats of the United States referred to in section subsidized by the Government of South 207 to register with the United States Gov- Africa, but does not mean a corporation or ernment . partnership which previously received start- (e) Notwithstanding any other provision up assistance from the South African Indus- of law, the President may enter into con- trial Development Corporation but which is tracts with one or more private organiza- now privately owned. tions or individuals to assist in implement- PROHIBITION ON COMPUTER EXPORTS To SOUTH ing this section. AFRICA PROHIBITION ON ASSISTANCE SEC. 304. (a) No computers, computer soft- SEC. 209. No assistance may be provided ware, or goods or technology intended to under this Act to any group which main- manufacture or service computers may be tain within its ranks any individual who exported to or for use by any of the following has been found to engage in gross violations entities of the Government of South Africa., of internationally recognized human rights (1) The military. (as defined in section 502B(d)(1) of the For- (2) The police. eign Assistance Act of 1961). (3) The prison system. USE OF THE AFRICAN EMERGENCY RESERVE (4) The national security agencies. SEC. 210. Whenever the President deter- (5) ARMSCOR and its subsidiaries or the mines that such action is necessary or ap- weapons research activities of the Council propriate to meet food shortages in southern for Scientific and Industrial Research. Africa, the President is authorized to utilize (6) The administering authorities for con- the existing, authorized, and funded reserve trolling the movements of the victims of entitled the "Emergency Reserve for African apartheid. Famine Relief" to provide food assistance (7) Any apartheid enforcing agency. and transportation for that assistance. (81 Any local, regional, or homelands gov- PROHIBITION ON ASSISTANCE TO ANY PERSON OR ernment entity which performs any function GROUP ENGAGING IN "NECKLACING" of any entity described in paragraphs (1) SEC. 211. No assistance may be provided through (7). under this Act, the Foreign Assistance Act of (b)(1) Computers, computer software, and 1961, or any other provision of law to any goods or technology intended to service corn- individual, group, organization, or member puters may be exported, directly or indirect- thereof, or entity that directly or indirectly ly, to or for use by an entity of the Govern- engages in, advocates, supports, or approves ment of South Africa other than those set the practice of execution by fire, commonly forth in subsection (a) only if a system of known as "necklacing". end use verification is in effect to ensure PARTICIPATION OF SOUTH AFRICA INAGRICULTUE. that the computers involved will not be used AL EXPORT CREDIT AND PROMOTION PROGRAMS for any function of any entity set forth in SEC. 212. Notwithstanding any other pro- subsection (a). vision of this Act or any other provision of scribe The such rules Secretary and of reg gummenulations s may pre- law, the Secretary of Agriculture may permit scri as may be South Africa to participate in agricultural necessary to carry out this section. export credit and promotion programs con- PROHIBITION ON LOANS TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ducted by the Secretary at similar levels, SOUTH AFRICA and under similar terms and conditions, as SEC. 305. (a) No national of the United other countries that have traditionally pur- States may make or approve any loan or chased United States agricultural commod- other extension of credit, directly or indi- ities and the products thereof rectly, to the Government of South Africa or TITLE III-MEASURES BY THE UNITED to any corporation, partnership or other or- STATES TO UNDERMINE APARTHEID ganization which is owned or controlled by September 12, 1986 Of is available in a geographic area ac- cessible to all population groups Without - any legal or administrative restriction; or (21 a loan or extension of credit for which an agreement is entered into before the date of enactment of this Act. PROHIBITION ON AIR TRANSPORTATION WITH SOUTH AFRICA SEC. 306. (a)(ll The President shall inzme diately notify the Government of South Africa of his intention to suspend the rights of any air carrier designated by the Govern- ment of South Africa under the Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Union of South Africa Relating to Air Services Between Their Respective Territo- ries, signed May 23, 1947, to service the routes provided in the Agreement. (2) Ten days after the date of enactment of this Act, the President shall direct the Secre- tary of Transportation to revoke, the right of any air carrier designated by the Govern- ment of South Africa under the Agreement to provide service pursuant to the Agreement. (3) Ten days after the date of enactment of this Act, the President shall direct the Secre- tary of Transportation not to permit or oth- erwise designate any United States air car- rier to provide service between the United States and South Africa pursuant to the Agreement. (b)(1) The Secretary of State shall termi nate the Agreement Between the Govern- ment of the United States of America and the Government of the Union of South Africa Relating to Air Services Between Their Respective Territories, signed May 23, 1947, in accordance with the provisions of that agreement. (2) Upon termination of such agreement, the Secretary of Transportation shall pro- hibit any aircraft of a foreign air carrier owned, directly or indirectly, by the Govern- ment of South Africa or by South African nationals from engaging in air transporta- tion with respect to the United States. (3) The Secretary of Transportation shall PROHIBITION ON THE IMPORTATION OF MILITARY ARTICLES SEC. 302. No arms, ammunition, or mili- tary vehicles produced in South Africa or any manufacturing data for such articles may be imported into the United States. PROHIBITION ON TILE IMPORTATION OF PRODUCTS FROM PARASTATAL ORGANIZATIONS SEC. 303. (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no article which is grown, produced, manufactured by, marketed, or otherwise exported by a parastatal organiza- tion of South Africa may be imported into the United States, (1) except for agricultural products during the 12 month period from the date of enactment' and (2) e c t KRUGERRANDS-Y-^,+vR SEC. 301. No person, including a bank, may import into the United States any South African krugerrand or any other gold coin minted in South Africa or offered for sale by the Government of South Africa. prohibit the takeoff and landing in South Africa of any aircraft by an air carrier owned, directly or indirectly, or controlled by a national of the United States or by any corporation or other entity organized under the laws of the United States or of any State. (c) The Secretary of Transportation may provide for such exceptions from the prohv, bition contained in subsection (a) or (b) as the Secretary considers necessary to provide for emergencies in which the safety of an aircraft or its crew or passengers is threat- ened. (d) For purposes of this section, the terms "aircraft"; "air transportation", and for- eign air carrier" have the meanings given those terms in section 101 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1301). PROHIBITIONS ON NUCLEAR TRADE WITH SOUTH AFRICA SEC. 307. (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law- (1) the Nuclear Regulatory Commission shall not issue any license for the export to South Africa of production or utilization fa- cilities, any source or special nuclear mate- rial or sensitive nuclear technology, or any component parts, items, or substances which the Commission has determined, pursuant to section 109b. of the Atomic Energy Act, to ubsec cont. b ecause of their significance Lion (a) shall not apply to- for a loan or extension of credit for any o(2) theaSecretary e Of Purposes,- (1) shall not education, housing, or humanitarian bene- issue any license for the export to South fit which- Africa of any goods or technology which (A) is available to all persons on a nondis- have been determined, pursuant to section criminatory basis; or 309(cl of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Act Approved For Release 2011/04/25: CIA-RDP87B00858R000600890005-8 Approved For Release 2011/04/25: CIA-RDP87B00858R000600890005-8 September 12, 1986 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - HOUSE of 1978, to be of significance for nuclear ex- (2) uranium oxide, plosive purposes for use in, or judged by the (3) coal, or President to be likely to be diverted to, a (4) textiles, South African production or utilization fa- that is produced or manufactured in South cility; Africa may be imported into the United (3) the Secretary of Energy shall not, States. under section 57b.(2) of the Atomic Energy (b) This section shall take effect 90 days Act, authorize any person to engage. directly after the date of enactment of this Act. or indirectly, in the production of special PROHIBITION ON NEW INVESTMENT IN SOUTH nuclear material in South Africa; and AFRICA (4) no goods, technology, source or special SEC. 310. (a) No national of the United nuclear material, facilities, components, States may, directly or through another items, or substances referred to in clauses person, make any new investment in South (1) through (3) shall be approved by the Nu- Africa. clear Regulatory Commission or an execu- (b) The prohibition contained in subsec- tive branch agency for retransfer to South tion (a) shall take effect 45 days after the Africa, date of enactment of this Act unless the Secretary of State determines and certifies to the Speaker of the House of Rep- resentatives and the chairman of the Com- mittee on Foreign Relations of the Senate that the Government of South Africa is a party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, done at Washington, London, and Moscow on July 1, 1968, or oth- erwise maintains International Atomic Energy Agency safeguards on all its peaceful nuclear activities, as defined in the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Act of 1978. (b) Nothing in this section shall preclude- (1) any export, retransfer, or activity gen- erally licensed or generally authorized by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or the Department of Commerce or the Department of Energy; or (2) assistance for the purpose of develop- ing or applying International Atomic Energy Agency or United States bilateral safeguards, for International Atomic Energy Agency programs generally available to its member states, for reducing the use of highly enriched uranium in research or test reac- tors, or for other technical programs for the purpose of reducing proliferation risks, such as programs to extend the life of reactor fuel and activities envisaged by section 223 of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 or which are necessary for humanitarian rea- sons to protect the public health and safety. (c) The prohibitions contained in subsec- tion (a) shall not apply with respect to a particular export, retransfer, or activity, or a group of exports, retransfers, or activities, if the President determines that to apply the prohibitions would be seriously prejudicial to the achievement of United States nonpro- liferation objectives or would otherwise jeopardize the common defense and security of the United States and, if at least 60 days before the initial export, retransfer, or activ- ity is carried out, the President submits to the Speaker of the House of Representatives (c) The prohibition contained in this sec- tion shall not apply to a firm owned by black South Africans. TERMINATION OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS SEC. 311. (a) This title and sections 501(c) and 504(b) shall terminate if the Govern- ment of South Africa- (1) releases all persons persecuted for their political beliefs or detained unduly without trial and Nelson Mandela from prison; (2) repeals the state of emergency in effect on the date of enactment of this Act and re- leases all detainees held under such state of emergency; (3) unbans democratic political parties and permits the free exercise by South Afri- cans of all races of the right to form politi- cal parties, express political opinions, and otherwise participate in the political proc- ess; (4) repeals the Group Areas Act and the Population Registration Act and institutes no other measures with the same purposes; and (5) agrees to enter into good faith negotia- tions with truly representative members of the black majority without preconditions. (b) The President may suspend or modify any of the measures required by this title or section 501(c) or section 504(b) thirty days after he determines, and so reports to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the chairman of the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, that the Govern- ment of South Africa has- (1) taken the action- described in para- graph (1) of subsection (a), (2) taken three of the four actions listed in paragraphs (2) through (5) of subsection (a), and (3) made substantial progress toward dis- mantling the system of apartheid and estab- trade with, South Africa, including but not lishing a nonracial democracy, limited to funding for trade missions in unless the Congress enacts within such 30- South Africa and for participation in exhi- day period, in accordance with section 602 bitions and trade fairs in South Africa. and the chairman of the Committee on For- of this Act, a joint resolution disapproving PROHIBITION ON SALE OR EXPORT OF ITEMS ON eign Relations of the Senate a report setting the determination of the President under MUNITIONS LIST forth that determination, together with his this subsection. SEC. 317. (a) Except as provided in subsec- reasons therefor. therefor. (c) It is the policy of the United States to GOVERNMENT OF SOUTH AFRICA BANK ACCOUNTS support the negotiations with the represent- tion (b), no item contained on the United SEC. 308. (a) A United States depository in- atives of all communities as envisioned in States Munition List which is subject to the stitution may not accept, receive, or hold a this Act. If the South African Government jurisdiction of the United States may be ex- deposit account from the Government of agrees to enter into negotiations without ported to South Africa. South Africa or from any agency or entity preconditions, abandons unprovoked vio- (b) Subsection (a) does not apply to any owned or controlled by the Government of lence against its opponents, commits itself item which is not covered by the United Na- South Africa except for such accounts which to a free and democratic post-apartheid tions Security Council Resolution 418 of No- may be authorized by the President for dip- South Africa under a code of law; and if vember 4, 1977, and which the President de- lomatic or consular purposes. For purposes nonetheless the African National Congress, terrines is exported solely for commercial of the preceding sentence, the term "deposi- the Pan African Congress, or their affiliates, purposes and not exported for use by the tory institution" has the same meaning as or other organizations, refuse to participate; armed forces, police, or other security forces in section 19(b)(1) of the Federal Reserve or if the African National Congress, the Pan of South Africa or for other military use. Act. African Congress or other organizations- (c) The President shall prepare and submit (b) The prohibition contained in subsec- (1) refuse to abandon unprovoked violence to Congress every six months a report de- tion (a) shall take effect 45 days after the during such negotiations; and scribing any license issued pursuant to sub- date of enactment of this Act. (2) refuse to commit themselves to a free section (b). PROHIBITION ON IMPORTATION OF URANIUM AND and democratic post-apartheid South Africa MUNITIONS LIST SALES, NOTIFICATION COAL FROM SOUTH AFRICA under a code of law, SEC. 318. (a) Notwithstanding any other SEC. 309. (a) Notwithstanding any other then the United States will support negotia- provision of this Act, the President shall.' provision of law, no- tions which do not include these organiza- (i) notify the Congress of his intent to (1) uranium ore, tions. allow the export to South Africa any item H 6773 POLICY TOWARD VIOLENCE OR TERRORISM SEC. 312. (a) United States policy toward violence in South Africa. shall be designed to bring about an immediate end to such vio- lence and to promote negotiations conclud- ing with a removal of the system of apart- heid and the establishment of a non-racial democracy in South Africa. (b) The United States shall work toward this goal by diplomatic and other measures designed to isolate those who promote ter- rorist attacks on unarmed civilians or those who provide assistance to individuals or groups promoting such activities. (c) The Congress declares that the abhor- rent practice of "necklacing" and other equally inhumane acts which have been practices in South Africa by blacks against fellow blacks are an affront to all through- out the world who value the rights of indi- viduals to live in an atmosphere free from fear of violent reprisals. TERMINATION OF TAX TREATY AND PROTOCOL SEC. 313. The Secretary of State shall ter- minate immediately the following conven- tion and protocol, in accordance with its terms, the Convention Between the Govern- ment of the United States of America and the Government of the Union of South Africa for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and for Establishing Rules of Reciprocal Ad- ministrative Assistance With Respect to Taxes on Income, done at Pretoria on De- cember 13, 1946, and the protocol relating thereto. PROHIBITION ON UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT FROM SOUTH AFRICA SEC. 314. On or after the date of enactment of this Act, no department, agency or any other entity of the United States Govern- ment may enter into a contract for the pro- curement of goods or services from parasta- tal organizations except for items necessary for diplomatic and consular purposes. PROHIBITION ON THE PROMOTION OF UNITED STATES TOURISM IN SOUTH AFRICA SEC. 315. None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available by any provi- sion of law may be available to promote United States tourism in South Africa. PROHIBITION ON UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT ASSISTANCE TO, INVESTMENT IN, OR SUBSIDY FOR TRADE WITH, SOUTH AFRICA SEC. 316. None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available by any provi- sion of law may be available for any assist- Approved For Release 2011/04/25: CIA-RDP87B00858R000600890005-8 Approved For Release 2011/04/25: CIA-RDP87B00858R000600890005-8 Ii 6774 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD -- HOUSE September t2 t_4R6' h i w s on. the United States Munition List (B) by striking out the item relating to the and which is not covered by the Wnited Na- Republic of South Africa in the table: tions Security Council Resolution 418 of No- (2) Paragraph (c) of headnote 3 of subpart vember 4, 1977, and A of part 10 of schedule I of the Tariff (ii) certify that such item shalt be used Schedules of the United States is amended solely for commercial purposes and not ex- by adding at the end thereof the following Ported for use by the armed forces, police, or new subparagraph: other security forces of South Africa or for "(iii) Notwithstanding any authority other military use. given to the United States Trade Represent- (b) The Congress shall have 3ff calendar alive under paragraphs (e) and (g) of this .days of continuous session (computed as headnote- provided in section 906(b) of title 5, United "(A' the percentage allocation made to the States Code) to disapprove by joint resotu- Philippines under this paragraph may not tion of any such sale. be reduced, and' PROHIBITION ON IMPORTATION OF SOUTH "(B) no allocation may be made to the Re- AFR!CANAGRICUI.TURAL PRODUCTS AND FOOD Public of South Africa, SEC. 319. Notwithstanding any other pro- in allocating any limitation imposed under vision of law, no: any paragraph of this headnote on the quan- (I) agricultural commodity, product, by- tity of sugars, sirups, and molasses de- product of derivitive thereof scribed in items 155.20 and 155.30 which (2) article that is suitable for human con- may be entered.": sumption, that is a product of South Africa TITLE IV-MULTILATERAL MEASURES may be imported into the customs territory TO UNDERMINE APARTHEID of the United States after the date of enact- ment of this Act NEGOTIATING AUTHORITY PROHIBITION this Act ON /MPORTRTION OF IRON AND SEC- 401. (a) It is the policy of the United STEEL States to seek international cooperative SEc 320. NotwithSt rtdig any other provi- agreements with the other industrialized de- siSE 4f law, t v iron or steel produced in mocracies to bring about the complete dis- South law, may be imported in ce n mantling of apartheid: Sanctions imposed United Arica under such agreements should be both direct and official executive or legislative acts of PROHIBITION ON EXPORTS OF CRUDE OIL. AND governments: The net economic effect of PETROLEUM PRODUCTS such cooperative should be measurably SEC. 321. (a) No crude oil or refined petro- greater than the net economic effect of the leum product which is subject to the juris- measures imposed by this Act. diction of the United States or which is ex- (b)(1) Negotiations to reach international ported by a person subject to the jurisdic- cooperative arrangements with the other in- tion of the United States may be exported to dustrialized democracies and other trading South Africa. Partners of South Africa on measures to (b) Subsection (a) does not apply to any bring about the complete dismantling of export pursuant to a contract entered into apartheid should begin promptly and should before the date of enactment of this Act. be concluded not later than 180 days from PROHIBITION ON COOPERATION WITH THE ARMED the enactment of this Act. During this FORCES OF SOUTH AFRICA period; the President or, at his direction, the SEC. 322. No agency or entity of the United Secretary of State should convene an inter- States may engage in any form of coopera. national conference of the other industrial- tion, direct or indirect, with the armed ized democracies in order to reach coopera- forces of the Government of South Africa, live agreements to impose sanctions against except activities which are reasonably de- South Africa to bring about the complete signed to facilitate the collection of neces- dismantling of apartheid. sary intelligence. Each such activity shall be (2) The President shall, not less than 180 considered a significant anticipated intelli. days after the date of enactment of this Act, Bence activity for purposes of section 501 of submit to the Congress a report contain- the National Security Act of 1947. ing- PRONIBITIONS ON SUGAR IMPORTS (A) a description of United States efforts SEC. 323. (a)(1) Notwithstandin a I& to negotiate multilateral measures to brin n y o er about the complete dismantling of aparf- TITLE V-FUTURE POLICY TOWARD provision of law; no sugars, sirups, or mo- held; and SOUTHAFRICA lasses that are products of the Republic of (B) a detailed description of economic and South Africa may be imported into tho ADDITIONAL MEASURES sirups, and molasses that- assessment of the stringency with which (A) are products of the Philippines, and such measures are enforced by those coun- (B) may be imported into the United tries. States (determined without regard to this (c) If the President successfully concludes by law on the quantity of all sugars, si.rups, and molasses that may be imported into the United States during any period of time oc- curring after the date of enactment of this Act, shall be increased by the aggregate quantity of sugars, sirups, and molasses that are Products of the Republic of South Africa which may have been imported into the United States under such limitation during such period if this section did not apply to such period. (b)(1) Paragraph (c)(i) of headnote 3 of subpart A of part 10 of schedule 1 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States is amended- (4) by striking out "13.5 "in the item relat- ing to the Philippines in the table and in- serting in lieu thereof "15.8"; and containing a eopy of the. final legal text of such agreement, together with- (A) a description of any administrative action proposed to implement suc& agree- ment and an explanation as to how the pro- posed administrative action would change or affect existing law, and' (B) a statement of his reasons as to hone the agreement serves the interest of United States foreign policy and as to why the pro- Posed administrative action is required or appropriate to carry out the agreement; and (31 a: joint resolution approving such agreement has been enacted within 30 days of transmittal of such document to the Con- gress. (e) It is the sense of the Congress that the President should instruct the Permanent Representative of the United States to the United Nations to propose that the United Nations Security Council, Pursuant to Arti- cle 41 of the United Nations Charter, impose measures against South Africa of the some type as are imposed by this Act. LIMITATION ON IMPORTS FROM OTHER COUNTRIES See. 402. The President is authorized to limit the importation into the United States of any product or service of a foreign coon try to the extent to which such foreign coun- try benefits from, or otherwise takes com- mercial advantage of, any sanction or pro- hibition against any national of the United States imposed by or under this Act. PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION SEc. 403. (a) Any national of the United States who is required by this Act to termi- nate or curtail business activities in South Africa may bring a civil action for damages against any person, partnership, or corpora' lion that takes commercial advantage or otherwise benefits from such termination or curtailment. (b) The action described in subsection (a) may only be brought, without respect to the amount in controversy, in the United States district court for the District of Columbia or the Court of International Trade. Damages which may be recovered include lost profits and the cost of bringing the action, includ- ing a reasonable attorney's fee. (c) The injured party must show by a pre- ponderance of the evidence that the damages have been the direct result of defendant's action taken with the deliberate intent to injure the party. SEC. 501. (a) It shall be the policy of the United States to impose additional meas- ures against the Government of South Africa if substantial Progress has not been made within twelve months of the date of enactment of this Act in ending the system of apartheid and establishing a nonracial democracy . subsection (b)(1), he may, after such agree- (b) The President shall prepare and trans. ment enters into force with respect to the mil to the Speaker of the House of Repre- United States, adjust, modify, or otherwise sentatives and the chairman of the Commit. amend the measures imposed under any pro- tee on Foreign Relations of the Senate vision of sections 301 through 310 to con- within twelve months of the date of enact- form with such agreement. ment of this Act, and every twelve months (d) Each agreement submitted to the Con- thereafter, a report on the extent to which gress under this subsection shall enter into significant progress has been made toward force with respect to the United States if ending the system of apartheid, including- (and only if)- (1) an assessment of the extent to which (1) the President, not less than 30 days the Government of South Africa has taken before the day on which he enters into such the steps set forth in section 101(b) of this agreement, notifies the House of Representa- Act; tives and the Senate of his intention to enter (2) an analysis of any other actions taken into such an agreement, and promptly there- by the Government of South Africa in after publishes notice of such intention in ending the system of apartheid and moving the Federal Register; toward a nonracial democracy; and (2) after entering into the agreement, the (3) the progress, or lack of progress, made President transmits to the House of Repre- in reaching a negotiated settlement to the sentatives and to the Senate a document conflict in South Africa. Approved For Release 2011/04/25: CIA-RDP87B00858R000600890005-8 Approved For Release 2011/04/25: CIA-RDP87B00858R000600890005-8 September 12, 1986 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - HOUSE (c) If the President determines that signifi- cant progress has not been made by the Gov- ernment of South Africa in ending the system of apartheid and establishing a non- racial democracy, the President shall in- clude in the report required by subsection fb) a recommendation on which of the fol- lowing additional measures should be im- posed: (1) a prohibition on the importation of steel from South Africa; (2) a prohibition on military assistance to those countries that the report required by section 508 identifies as continuing to cir- cumvent the international embargo on arms and military technology to South Africa; (3) a prohibition on the importation of food, agricultural products, diamonds, and textiles from South Africa; (4) a prohibition on United States banks accepting, receiving, or holding deposit ac- counts from South African nationals; and (5) a prohibition on the importation into the United States of strategic minerals from South Africa. (d) A joint resolution which would enact part or all of the measures recommended by the President pursuant to subsection (c) shall be considered in accordance with the provisions of section 602 of this Act. LIFTING OF PROHIBITIONS SEC. 502. (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, the President may lift any prohibition contained in this Act im- posed against South Africa if the President determines, after six months from the date of the imposition of such prohibition, and so reports to Congress, that such prohibition would increase United States dependence upon any member country or observer coun- try of the Council for Mutual Economic As- sistance (C.M.E.A.) for the importation of coal or any strategic and critical material by an amount which exceeds by weight the average amounts of such imports from such country during the period 1981 through 1985. (b)(1) Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Commerce shall prepare and transmit to the Congress a report setting forth for each (3) manganese, (4) platinum group metals, (5) ferroalloys, and (6) other strategic and critical materials (within the meaning of the Strategic and Critical Materials Stock Piling Act). (b) The President shall develop a program which reduces the dependence, if any, of the United States on the importation from South Africa of the materials identified in the report submitted under subsection (a), STUDY AND REPORT ON THE ECONOMY OF SOUTHERN AFRICA SEC. 505. (a) The President shall conduct a study on the role of American assistance in southern Africa to determine what needs to be done, and what can be done to expand the trade, private investment, and transport prospects of southern Africa's landlocked nations. (b) Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the President shall prepare and transmit to the chairman of the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the chairman of the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report setting forth the findings of the study conducted under subsection (a). REPORT ON RELATIONS BETWEEN OTHER INDUS- TRIALIZED DEMOCRACIES AND SOUTH AFRICA SEC. 506. (a) Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Presi- dent shall prepare and transmit to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the chairman of the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report containing a detailed assessment of the economic and other relationships of other industrialized democracies with South Africa. Such report shall be transmitted without regard to whether or not the President successfully concluded an international agreement under section 401. (b) For purposes of this section, the phrase "economic and other relationships" includes the same types of matters as are described in sections 201, 202, 204, 205, 206, 207, sections 301 through 307, and sections 309 and 310 of this Act STUDY AND REPORT ON DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS OF SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONALS IN UNITED STATES H 6775 REPORT ON COMMUNIST ACTIVITIES IN SOUTH AFRICA SEC. 509. (a) Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Presi- dent shall prepare and transmit to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the chairman of the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the chairman of the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate an unclassified ver- sion of a report, prepared with the assist- ance of the Director of the Central Intelli- gence Agency, the Director of the Defense In- telligence Agency, the National Security Ad- visor, and other relevant United States Gov- ernment officials in the intelligence commu- nity, which shall set forth the activities of the Communist Party in South Africa, the extent to which Communists have infiltrat- ed the many black and nonwhite South Afri- can organizations engaged in the fight against the apartheid system, and the extent to which any such Communist infiltration or influence sets the policies and goals of the organizations with which they are involved. (b) At the same time the unclassified report in subsection (a) is transmitted as set forth in that subsection, a classified version of the same report shall be transmitted to the chairmen of the Select Committee on in- telligence of the Senate and of the Perma- nent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives. PROHIBITION ON THE IMPORTATION OF SOVIET GOLD COINS SEC. 510. (a) No person, including a bank, may import into the United States any gold coin minted in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics or offered for sale by the Govern- ment of the Union of Soviet Socialist Repub- lics. (b) For purposes of this section, the term "United States" includes the States of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and any ter- ritory or possession of the United States. (c) Any individual who violates this sec- tion or any regulations issued to carry out this section shall be fined not more than five times the value of the rubles involved. ECONOMIC SUPPORT FOR DISADVANTAGED SOUTH AFRICANS SEC. 511 (a) Chapter 4 of part fI of the For- eign Assistance Act of 1961 is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new section: SEC. 535. ECONOMIC SUPPORT FOR DISAD- VANTAGED SOUTH AFRicANs.-(a)(1) Up to $40,000,000 of the funds authorized to be ap- propriated to carry out this chapter for the fiscal year 1987 and each fiscal year thereaf- ter shall be available for assistance for dis- advantaged South Africans. Assistance under this section shall be provided for ac- tivities that are consistent with the objective of a majority of South Africans for an end to the apartheid system and the establishment of a society based on non-racial principles. Such activities may include scholarships, assistance to promote the participation of disadvantaged South Africans in trade unions and private enterprise, alternative education and community development pro- grams. "(2) Up to $3,000,000 of the amounts pro- vided in each fiscal year pursuant to subsec- tion (a) shall be available for training pro- grams for South Africa's trade unionists. "(b) Assistance provided pursuant to the section shall be made available notwith- standing any other provision of law and shall not be used to provide support to orga- nizations or groups which are financed or controlled by the Government of South Africa. Nothing in this subsection may be construed to prohibit programs which are country described in subsection (a)- (A) 507. (a)(1) The Secretary of the Treas- from the average amount ioo of f 1981 imports ury shall conduct a study on the feasibility fom such country during the e period e 198 of prohibiting each depository institution through ; and nd from accepting, receiving, or holding a de- (B) the e current amount of such imports from such country entering the United posit account from any South African na- States. tsonal. (2) Thirty days after transmittal of the (2) For purposes of paragraph (1), the term report required by paragraph (1) and every 'depository institution" has the same mean- thirty days thereafter, the President shall ing as in section 19(b)(1) of the Federal Re- prepare and transmit the information de- serve Act. scribed in paragraph (1)(B). (b) Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the STUDY OF HEALTH CONDITIONS IN THE Treasury shall submit to the Speaker of the "HOMELANDS" AREAS OF SOUTH AFRICA House of Representatives and the chairman SEC. 503. The Secretary of State shall con- of the Committee on Foreign Relations of duct a study to examine the state of health the Senate a report detailing the findings of conditions and to determine the extent of the study required by subsection (a). starvation and malnutrition now prevalent STUDY AND REPORT ON THE VIOLATION OF THE in the "homelands" areas of South Africa INTERNATIONAL EMBARGO ON SALE AND EXPORT and shall, not later than December 1, 1986, OF MILITARY ARTICLES TO SOUTH AFRICA prepare and transmit to the Speaker of the SEC. 508. (a) The President shall conduct a House of Representatives and the chairman study on the extent to which the interna- of the Committee on Foreign Relations of tional embargo on the sale and exports of the Senate a report setting forth the results arms and military technology to South of such study. Africa is being violated. REPORT ON SOUTH AFRICAN IMPORTS (b) Not later than 179 days after the date SEC. 504. (a) Not later than 90 days after of enactment of this Act, the President shall the date of enactment of this Act, the Presi- submit to the Speaker of the House of Repre- dent shall submit to the Speaker of the sentatives and the chairman of the Commit- House of Representatives and the chairman tee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a of the Committee on Foreign Relations of report setting forth the findings of the study the Senate a report on the extent to which required by subsection (a), including an the United States is dependent on the impor- identification of those countries engaged in tation from South Africa of- such sale or export, with a view to terminat- (1) chromium, ing United States military assistance to (2) cobalt, those countries. Approved For Release 2011/04/25: CIA-RDP87B00858R000600890005-8 Approved For Release 2011/04/25: CIA-RDP87B00858R000600890005-8 116776 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - HOUSE September 12, 1986 consistent with subsection (a) and which (D) At the conclusion of the debate on the case of any other rule of the House or award scholarships to students who choose joint resolution, the Committee of the Whole Senate, and of the right of the Committee on to attend South African-supported institu- shall rise and report the joint resolution Rules of the House of Representatives to lion.': back to the House, and the previous question report a resolution for the consideration of (b) Not later than 90 days after the date of shall be considered as ordered on the joint any measure. enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State resolution to final passage without interven- shall prepare and transmit to the Congress a ing motion ENFORCEMENT AND PENALTIES report describing the strategy of the Presi- (b)(1) The provisions of this subsection Shiau. authorities The der sectt with respell dent during the five-year period beginning apply to the consideration in the Senate of a to his 603. under section 601 shall on such date regarding the assistance of joint resolution under section 311(b), 401(d), take the necessary steps to ensure compli- black Africans pursuant to section 535 of the or 501(d). ante with the provisions of this Act and any Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 and describ- (2) A joint resolution shall upon introduc- regulations, licenses," and orders issued to ing the programs and projects to be funded lion, be referred to the Committee on For- carry nut this Act incruding estnceishinh under such section. eign Relations of the Senate. mechanisms to monitor compliance with REPORT ON THE AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS (3) A joint resolution described in this sec- this Act and such regulations, licenses, and SEC. 512. (a) Not later than 180 days after tion shall be considered in the Senate in ac- orders. the date of enactment of this Act, the Attor- cordance with procedures contained in (2) In ensuring such compliance, the Presi- ney General shall prepare and transmit to paragraphs (3) through (7) of section 8066(c) dent may- the Congress a report on actual and aof the Department of Defense Appropria- (A) require any person to keep a full record violations of the Foreign Agents and alleged lle Registra. tions Act, 1985 (as contained in Public Law of and to furnish under oath, in the form of lion Act of 1938, and the status of any roves- 98-473), except that- reports or otherwise, complete information liotion pertaining thereto, by represents- (A) references in such paragraphs to the relative to any act or transaction described tigas of governments or opposition move- Committee on Appropriations of the Senate in this Act either before, during, or after the f Africa including, but shall be deemed to be references to the Com- completion thereof, or relative to any inter- ments m not to, e limited in S Sahara members f representatives but mittee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; est in foreign property, or relative to any the African National bor of property in which a foreign country or any Congress. and (th For purposes at of Congress. any caves- (B) amendments to the joint resolution are national thereof has or has had any interest, ti (b) For necessary of conducting n any a full to order. or as may be otherwise necessary to enforce ti and complete sary in order Gel (c) For purposes of this subsection, the the provisions of this Act; and shall have full e Attorney General to utilize civil n cal term 'joint resolution" means only- (B) conduct investigations, hold hearings, shall have demand (A) in the case of section 311(b), a joint administer oaths, examine witnesses, receive vestigative procedures, including resolution which is introduced in a House of evidence, take depositions, and require by but not limited to the issuance of civil sub- Congress within 3 legislative days after the subpena the attendance and testimony of penal. Congress receives the report described in sec- witnesses and the production of all books, TITLE VI-ENFORCEMENT AND Lion 311(b) and for which the matter after papers, and documents relating to any ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS the resolving clause reads as follows: "That matter under investigation. REGULATORY AUTHORITY the Congress, having received on (b) Except as provided in subsection (d)- SEC. 601. The President shall issue such the report of the President containing the (1) any person that violates the provisions rules, regulations, licenses, and orders as are determination required by section 311(b) of of this Act, or any regulation, license, or necessary to carry out the provisions of this the Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid Act of order issued to carry out this Act shall be Act, including taking such steps as may be 1986, disapproves of such determination.", subject to a civil penalty of $50,000; necessary to continue in effect the measures with the date of the receipt of the report in- (2) any Person, other than an individual, imposed by Executive Order 12532 of Sep- serted in the blank, that willfully violates the provisions of this tember 9, 1985, and Executive Order 12535 (B) in the case of section 401(d)(3), a joint Act, or any regulation, license, or order of October 1, 1985, and by any rule, regula- resolution which is introduced in a House of issued to carry out this Act shall be fined Lion, license, or order issued thereunder (to Congress within 3 legislative days after the not more than $1,000,000; the extent such measures are not inconsist- Congress receives the document described in (3) any individual who willfully violates ent with this Act). section 401(d)(2) and for which the matter the provisions of this Act or any regulation, CONGRESSIONAL PRIORITY PROCEDURES after the resolving clause reads as follows: license, or order issued to carry out this Act SEC. 602. (a/11/ The provisions PROCEDURES the Congress, having received on shall be fined not more than $50,000, or im- SEC. a to the provisions of this consideration in the sub- the text of the international agree- prisoned not more than 10 years, or both; House of apply t the ment described in section 401(d)(3) of the and Lion of Representatives under sections 311of a joint oint resolu- the and Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid Act of 1986, (4) any individual who violates section Lion . approves of such agreement"; with the date 301(a) or any regulations issued to carry out (2) A joint resolution shallal4 upon introduc- of the receipt of the text of the agreement in- that section shall, instead of the penalty set ti (2) be joint recd t the upon e on For- serted in the blank; and forth in paragraph (2), be fined not more lion Afeare rr the House o(C) in the case of section 501(d), a joint than 5 times the value of the krugerrands or of Representatives. resolution which is introduced in a House of gold coins involved. (3)(A) At any time after the joint resolu. Congress within 3 legislative days after the (c)(I) Whenever a person commits a viola- tion placed on the appropriate calendar has Congress receives the determination of the Lion under subsection (b)- been on that calendar for a period of 5 legis- President pursuant to section 501(c) and for (A) any officer, director, or employee of lative days, it is in order for any Member of which the matter after the resolving clause such person, or any natural person in con- the House (after consultation with the reads as follows: "That the Congress, having trol of such person who knowingly and will- Speaker as to the most appropriate time for received on a determination of fully ordered, authorized, acquiesced in, or the consideration of that joint resolution) to the President under section 501(c) of the carried out the act or practice constituting move that the House resolve itself into the Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid Act of 1986, the violation, and Committee of the Whole House on the State approves the President's determination.", (B) any agent of such person who know- of the Union for the consideration of that with the date of the receipt of the determina. ingly and willfully carried out such act or joint resolution. The motion is highly privi- tion inserted in the blank. practice, leged and is in order even though a previous (d) As used in this section, the term 'Zegis- shall be fined not more than $10,000, or im- motion to the same effect has been disagreed lative day" means a day on which the House prisoned not more than 5 years, or both. to. All points of order against the joint reso- of Representatives or the Senate is in ses- (2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply in the lution under clauses 2 and 6 of Rule XXI of sion, as the case may be case of a violation by an individual of sec- the Rules of the House are waived. If the (e) This section is enacted- tion 301(a) of this Act or of any regulation motion is agreed to, the resolution shall (1) as' an exercise of the rulemaking issued to carry out that section. remain the unfinished business of the House Powers of the House of Representatives and (3) A fine imposed under paragraph "(1) on until disposed of. A motion to reconsider the the Senate, and as such it is deemed a part an individual for an act or practice consti- vote by which the motion is disagreed to of the Rules of the House and the Rules of tuting a violation may not be paid, directly shall not be in order. the Senate, respectively, but applicable only or indirectly, by the person committing the (B) Debate on the joint resolution shall with respect to the procedure to be followed violation itself. not exceed ten hours, which shall be divided in the House and the Senate in the case of (d)(1) Any person who violates any regula- equally between a Member favoring and a joint resolutions under this section, and it tion issued under section 208(d) or who, in a Member opposing the joint resolution. A supersedes other rules only to the extent that registration statement or report required by motion to limit debate is in order at any it is inconsistent with such rules; and the Secretary of State, makes any untrue time in the House or in the Committee of the (2) with full recognition of the constitu- statement of a material fact or omits to Whole and is not debatable. tional right of the House and the Senate to state a material fact required to be stated . (C) An amendment to the joint resolution change their rules at any time, in the same therein or necessary to make the statements is not in order, manner, and to the same extent as in the therein not misleading, shall be'subject to a Approved For Release 2011/04/25: CIA-RDP87B00858R000600890005-8 Approved For Release 2011/04/25: CIA-RDP87B00858R000600890005-8 September 12, 1986 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - HOUSE civil penalty of not more than $10,000 im- posed by the Secretary of State. The provi- sions of subsections (d), le), and (f) of sec- tion 11 of the Export Administration Act of 1979 shall apply with respect to any such civil penalty. (2) Any person who commits a willful vio- lation under paragraph f1) shall upon con- viction be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both. (3) Nothing in this section may be con- strued to authorize the imposition of any penalty for failure to implement the Code of Conduct. APPLICABILITY TO EVASIONS OF ACT SEC. 604. This Act and the regulations issued to carry out this Act shall apply to any person who undertakes or causes to be undertaken any transaction or activity with the intent to evade this Act or such regula- tions. CONSTRUCTION OF ACT SEC. 605. Nothing in this Act shall be con- strued as constituting any recognition by the United States of the homelands referred to in this Act. STATE OR LOCAL ANTI-APARTHEID LAWS, ENFORCE SEC. 606. Notwithstanding section 210 of Public Law 99-349 or any other provision of law- (1) no reduction in the amount of funds for which a State or local government is eli- gible or entitled under any Federal law may be made, and (2) no other penalty may be imposed by the Federal Government, by reason of the application of any State or local law concerning apartheid to any con- tract entered into by a State or local govern- ment for 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from Florida [Mr. FASCELL] will be recognized for 30 minutes and the gentleman from Michigan [Mr. BROOMFIELD] will be recognized for 30 minutes. Before the gentleman from Florida is recognized, would the gentleman from California [Mr. DIXON] take the chair. The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. DIXON). The Chair recognizes the gen- tleman from Florida [Mr. FASCELL]. Mr. FASCELL. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself 2Y2 minutes. Mr. Speaker, the matter which I bring before the House today is in- tended to assist in the formulation of a bipartisan United States policy toward South Africa, encouraging that Government to dismantle its system of apartheid. During the 99th Congress, the House has passed several bills impos- ing sanctions on South Africa-none have been enacted into law. By ap- proving the motion which I offer today, we have a real opportunity to have United States policy toward South Africa enacted into law. Both Houses of Congress have recognized the need for a change in U.S. policy. The motion I offer today is intended H 6777 I know many Members would like to In addition, it does not require disin- strengthen the bill. It is important for vestment, but requires U.S. companies the Congress to send a strong message to comply with a rigorous set of fair South Africa but it is equally impor- employment principles. tant to send a message which has the These are positive actions that pro- support of both Houses. In light of the vide assistance to nonwhite South Af- shortness of time remaining in this ricans while maintaining numerous session and in light of the need to ex- benefits to the black majority associat- pedite sending this important legisla- ed with the presence of the American tive policy initiative to the President, business community in that country. H.R. 4868, as amended by the Senate, In other titles, the bill clearly sets is the most appropriate vehicle at this forth U.S. policy toward South Africa. time. It calls for negotiations to reach inter- Let me briefly discuss the resolution national agreements Incorporating contained in the rule, House Resolu- sanctions against South Africa. Lastly, tion 548. During the debate on this it prohibits after 90 days, the enforce- matter statements were made that ment of State and local anti-apartheid this legislation preempts State and laws with respect to contracts funded local anti-apartheid laws. The resolu- in whole or in part by the Federal tion House Resolution 548 simply Government. states that it is not the intent of the Mr. Speaker, it seems to me in re- House of Representatives that this bill sponse to this latter point that our limit or preempt State of local finan- Democrat colleagues included in the cial or commerical activity respecting rule we just adopted a most unusual South Africa. and probably unconstitutional provi- Mr. Speaker, I urge adoption of the sion. Section 2 of the rule provides motion. that upon adoption of H.R. 4868, the Mr. BROOMFIELD. Mr. Speaker, I House shall be considered to have yield myself such time as I may con- adopted a House resolution containing sume. a statement of intent of the House re- (Mr. BROOMFIELD asked and was garding the issue of preemption. Mr. given permission to revise and extend Speaker, this is a highly unusual and his remarks, and to include extraneous alarming procedural twist which ap- materials.) pears to attempt to reshape the bill Mr. BROOMFIELD. Mr. Speaker, in passed by the other body without the face of a steadily deteriorating sit- going to conference. The language of uation at home, and an increasingly the rule appears to try to rewrite our united opposition abroad, the South Constitution to allow States and local- African Government continues to ities to independently conduct their cling to the debilitating system of own foreign policies. apartheid. Let no one claim that there I want to conclude by saying it is un- is confusion on this point: The Con- fortunate that this unusual procedural gress, the administration, and the situation has developed. It can only American people deplore the system of jeopardize the bill's acceptance by the apartheid and the human toll that lies President. The White House has noti- in its wake. fied me this morning that the Presi- Today, the House considers whether dent is strongly opposed to enactment or not to accept the Senate amend- of this legislation in its present form. ment to H.R. 4868, the Anti-Apartheid Mr. WOLPE. Mr. Speaker, I yield Act of 1986. This amendment, of such time as he may consume to the course, is substantially different from gentleman from Texas [Mr. LELANDI. the bill passed by the House in late June. I believe it is a better bill than (Mr. LELAND asked and was given the more extreme legislation passed permission to revise and extend his re- by the House. However, in my judg- marks.) ment, the House should have appoint- Mr. LELAND. Mr. Speaker, today we are ed conferees to work out the differ- considering legislation that will put the United ences in the respective bills with our States on the legislative record against the Senate colleagues. I believe that many continuation of South Africa's brutal and op- constructive changes could have pressive policy of racism. emerged from a conference. Unfortunately, the legislation before us today is not as comprehensive as the legisla- 0 1105 tion passed earlier by this body on June 18, However, the Democrat leadership 1986, which would have put an end to all in the House has apparently chosen to United States investment in and trade with accept in its entirety the Senate bill. South Africa. I want to say, Mr. Speaker, in fair- South Africa is the only country in the world ness, there are a number of aspects of that judges how much freedom, justice, or this bill before us that will, if enacted, property a person is entitled to strictly on the to bring about a change in that policy. title II contains provisions earmarking On June 18, the House passed a funds for scholarships for the victims strong sanctions bill, H.R. 4868. The of apartheid. It sets forth guidelines Senate amendment to that bill, while for assistance to disadvantaged South not as strong as the House bill, is a Africans. It earmarks funds for the good bill. It will send a strong biparti- promotion of human rights and takes san message to the Government and steps to encourage blacks to use people of South Africa. Export Import Bank facilities. basis of his or her color. After decades of this racial oppression by the minority government in Pretoria the American public-and many in the world community-has now developed a clear and unequivocal abhorrence to the con- tinuation of apartheid and any action, or inac- tion, on the part of the United States that could in any way support the maintenance of this hideous and violent policy. Approved For Release 2011/04/25: CIA-RDP87B00858R000600890005-8 Approved For Release 2011/04/25: CIA-RDP87B00858R000600890005-8 H 6778 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - HOUSE There has been some difference of opinion among Members of Congress on the effect of the implementation of economic sanctions on Pretoria's continuation of apartheid. Yet there are many, and the number is steadily growing, who believe that apartheid has been allowed to exist far too long and the only nonviolent action that will help facilitate the demise of that hideous policy is the implementation of economic sanctions. The bill before us today is an initial step to legislatively demonstrate to South Africa and the world our great Nation's strong disapprov- al of apartheid. Although I would have liked to see this bill strengthened in conference, I rec- ognize the political realities and time con- straints of Congress and the White House. People in South Africa are dying every day. The United States cannot morally and politi- cally afford to support our current political and commercial relationship with South Africa. It is for this reason, that I reluctantly support this legislation which has a strong chance of be- coming law soon rather than fighting now to achieve a definitive anti-apartheid bill that would not pass the other body or be signed by the President. I was very concerned, however, over the other body's statutory silence on the question of Federal preemption over more stringent and comprehensive local and State anti-apart- heid ordinances and laws already approved by about 20 States and 80 cities. Because of my concern not to negate the results achieved by millions of Americans on the local and State levels, I actively worked with other Members of the Congressional Black Caucus to ensure that the rule for consideration of this bill would explicitly state this body's intention not to pre- empt local and State anti-apartheid ordi- nances. The inclusion of this language in the rule already adopted by the House helps us establish a legislative history of our intent not to preempt the advances against apartheid made on the local and State levels. I would like to reiterate the wording of that rule at this point in my statement: Resolved, That in passing the bill, H.R. 4868, as amended by the Senate, it is not the intent of the House of Representatives that the bill limit, preempt, or affect, In any fashion, the authority of any State or local government, or the District of Columbia, or of any commonwealth territory, or posses- sion of the United States, or political subdi- vision thereof to restrict, or otherwise regu- late any financial, or commercial activity re- specting South Africa. Although this does not ensure the retention of the significant gains made by Americans across our great Nation, it does allow us to go on the record stating our intention not to su- persede local and State anti-apartheid ordi- nances and laws. The inclusion of this language in the rule is significant in protecting the strides already made in the struggle to end apartheid. I, therefore, rise in support of the measure before us which I am hopeful will become law soon and help accelerate the collapse of apartheid in South Africa. Thank you. Mr. WOLPE. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself 6 minutes. (Mr. WOLPE asked and was given permission to revise and extend his re- marks.) Mr. WOLPE. Mr. Speaker, the legis- lation that is before us would impose tough, effective sanctions against September 12, 1986 South Africa; sanctions which would [From the Los Angeles Times, Sept. 12, enable American policy to turn away from the failure of so-called construc- tive engagement. The bill is not as strong as the origi- nal House version, and not as strong as many of us had hoped for. While the legislation does not go as far as we would have liked, there is no quarrel that it is effective and that House pas- sage of its original legislation, in the form of the stronger substitute offered by the gentleman from California [Mr. DELLUMS], has played a key role in moving this process forward to where we are today. I want to pay tribute to the gentle- man from California [Mr. DELLUMS], the gentleman from Pennsylvania [Mr. GRAY], the author of the original House version of the legislation, and to so many others such as Mr. SOLARZ, Mr. WHEAT, Mr. LELAND, Mr. FISH, Mr. MILLER, Mr. ROEMER, and Mr. GILMAN, all of whom have had a key role in providing the leadership to the anti- apartheid movement nationally and within this body. H.R. 4868, as amended by the Senate, bans imports of textiles, agri- cultural products, coal, uranium, and steel from South Africa, as well as any products produced, manufactured, marketed, or otherwise exported by South African para-statal agencies. It bans virtually all new investment of U.S. dollars in South Africa, and the overwhelming majority of new loans. It ends landing rights for South Af- rican-owned aircraft in the United States, and vice versa. It contains a number of lesser sanctions, including legislative codification of the sanctions contained in the President's Executive orders of September 9 and October 11 of 1985. Furthermore, the sanctions may not be lifted unless and until South Africa meets four of five stiff conditions aimed at fostering a negotiated politi- cal settlement with the representa- tives of the black majority and the dis- mantling of the apartheid system. Finally, the bill threatens further sanctions within a year if the South African Government has not made substantial progress in ending apart- heid and establishing a nonracial de- mocracy. Mr. Speaker, as chairman of the Subcommittee on Africa, I want to state my own view that there is noth- ing whatever in this bill that seeks to preempt or supersede State and city laws and policies which seek to ensure that the funds of those entities are used and invested in a socially respon- sible manner with respect to apart- heid. In this regard, I would like to insert in the RECORD an excellent edi- torial by Gerald Warburg, foreign policy adviser to Senator ALAN CRAN- STON, which was published in today's Los Angeles Times: 1986] DIVESTITURE WILL SURVIVE (By Gerald Warburg) Will the South Africa sanctions legislation pending in Congress undermine California's new anti-apartheid law? Can federal author- ity require local governments to profit from apartheid against their will? The answer to both vexing questions is yes, according to proponents of a sweeping federal preemption doctrine recently ad- vanced by Sen. Richard G. Lugar (R-Ind.). The specter that enacting the pending congressional measure on anti-apartheid trade sanctions would strike down broader state divestiture legislation has alarmed grass-roots activists. At stake is the fate of as many as 20 state statutes and more than 80 city and county regulations that address the South Africa issue. There is valid reason for concern when one hears the views of Lugar, the respected Foreign Relations Committee chairman: "When we get Into anti-apartheid law, the federal government is speaking for the nation ... we cannot have individual states and cities establishing their own foreign policies." Lugar rests his case on the presumptive constitutional grant of federal supremacy in international affairs, and concludes that any federal legislation on South Africa-no matter how limited its scope-preempts all state legislation on the matter. But before the activists' concern turns to panic, the full record needs to be scruti- nized. There is no reason for California to back away from the strong measures adopt- ed in Sacramento. Lugar's is a minority opinion-one unlikely to prevail if pressed in a legal challenge. "When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean," says the Queen in "Alice In Wonderland." So It often is with lawmak- ers struggling to place their own interpreta- tion on legislation during the drafting proc- ess. Lugar currently is advancing his own preemption thesis as a selling point to per- suade the White House and corporate lead- ers to live with the Senate bill, which Lugar maintains would at least get local authori- ties off their backs on the emotionally charged South Africa Issue. Yet the "Lugar bill" actually is a cut-and- paste Job of legislation drafted by a half- dozen senators. These co-authors utterly re- jected Lugar's interpretation, as the follow- ing statements culled from the long and tor- tured legislative history of the South Africa debate illustrate. William Proxmire of Wisconsin, senior Democrat on the Banking Committee: We have no intention of preempting state di- vestment laws." Alan Cranston of California, Democratic floor manager of the measure: "Courts always recognize the distinction between the state as market participant and the state as a market regulator ... we have no intention of compelling sovereign states to invest in companies that they do not wish to invest in." Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts, senior Democrat on the Judiciary Commit- tee: "The law is clear that this legislation will not preempt the kind of state and local action against apartheid that has occurred throughout this country." Advocates of total preemption make much of a vote last month against an amendment by Sen. Alfonse M. D'Amato (R-N.Y.). But this amendment pertained only to a special contracting issue (whereby federal funds for New York City might be withheld if local authorities, acting against companies still in Approved For Release 2011/04/25: CIA-RDP87B00858R000600890005-8