WHAT'S BUSH'S VISION?

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP99-00418R000100310015-2
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
May 10, 2012
Sequence Number: 
15
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 11, 1989
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP99-00418R000100310015-2.pdf59.61 KB
Body: 
L Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/05/10: CIA-RDP99-00418R000100310015-2 STAT STAT What's Bush's Vision? G EORGE BUSH's inclina- tion to be cautious and de- liberate has generally served him well over the years. For the most part, it's been what the country needed as it moved beyond the Reagan era in foreign and do- mestic policy. The President has put together a solid Cabinet of ex- perienced veterans and begun in a few areas to make his mark. But there's a feeling now - six months after the election - that events are beginning to control Mr. Bush rather than the other way round. Looking at public opinion and the pronouncements of many ana- lysts and former government offi- cials - even those close to Ronald Reagan - one senses caution be- coming hesitancy. It's too soon to call it lack of leadership or drift (and certainly not "malaise"). But Americans, and the country's allies and adversaries, have yet to get a clear picture of Bush's world view and how he'll proceed now that he heads the world's richest, most pow- erful nation. He may be uncomfortable with "the vision thing," as he unfortu- nately once called it. But that's ex- act) what's needed now, and no- where is this more important than in relations with the Soviet Union. It affects how the US conducts itself in other parts of the world. And it's essential to building the domestic political support necessary to move ahead in a time of new relation- ships. There can be little doubt that things have changed remarkably under Mikhail Gorbachev. Soviet troops start pulling out of East Ger- many today. Americans are in Rus- sia (and Russians in Utah) checking out the dismantling of nuclear mis- siles. Soviet voters are chucking out party hacks. Political reform is com- ing to Poland, and some of the barbed wire between Hungary and Austria has been torn down. These are largely symbols, its true. But they are symbols with considerable substance behind them as well, and they require a substantial response. The Bush administration reac- tion has been to tut-tut over West Germans wanting to get rid of nu- clear weapons designed only to land on German soil (not an unrea- sonable concern). Defense Secre- tars Richard Cheney suggests, un- helpfully, that Gorbachev is likely to fail. And Secretarv of State James Baker III brings nothing new to Moscow. The Soviet leader could fail (al- though it's increasingly unlikel that would mean a return to the old days of Soviet bulling). NATO should remain strong (and that prob- T e Washington Post The New York Times The Washington Timee The Wail Street Journal The Chrinian Science Monitor Now York Dally News USA Today The Chicago Tribune Oats JMM4 y J ably will have to include some bat- tlefield nuclear weapons for at least a while). And caution in dis- mantling the remnants of the cold war still is called for. But as former CIA director James Schlesinger caid th-e tither day, "For [the USI to appear both passive and impassive to Gorbachev is a problem. One needs to strike a balance between caution ... and re- sponsiveness to the changes going on in the Soviet Union." So it's time for George Bush to demonstrate a little more boldness, a little more vision in hip approach to the way the world is changing. He could start with the speeches he's planned for this week and next. We haven't heard one of any particular note since Republicans nominated him last summer. We need to now. Page 31. 1, Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/05/10 _ CIA-RDP99-00418R000100310015-2 . ~~ ,,,