(SANITIZED)UNCLASSIFIED SOVIET PAPERS ON TAXONOMIC STUDIES OF THE MEMBERS OF THE GENUS SERRATIA(SANITIZED)

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
25
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
December 14, 2011
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
August 16, 1962
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8.pdf809.45 KB
Body: 
Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 Next 1 Page(s) In Document Denied Q Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 .NTERNATIONAL BULLETIN OF BACTERIO~.Of'ICAL NOr4FNCLATURE AND TAXONOMY Volume 11 No. 1 January 15, 1961 pp. 7-12 THE TAXONOMIC STATUS OF SERRATIA MARCESCENS BIZIO (With the technical assistance of Z. Vyalou~lilovd) Department of Microbiology Faculty of Natural Sciences in Brno Czechoslovakia SUMMARY: 1. In our work we have studied mor- phological, cultural and biochemical char- acteristics of 68 strains of Serratia marces- cens. 2. We propose that the genus Serratia may have only one species. 3. We propose to acknowledge strain BS 303 (ATCC 13880)as the neotype culture of Serratia marcescens Bi~zio. The oldest known species of the genus Serratia is Serratia marcescens. It was named as early as 1823 and since this time both its nomenclature and its taxonomy have under- gone many changes. Recognition of this species as the type species of the genus Serratia was proposed by Buchanan (1918). It ie so recognized in all seven editions of the Ber- gey~ s Manual. The taxonomy of Serratia marcescens has been investig- ated by Breed et al. 1924, 1927 , Topley and Wilson (1931) and KrassilnikovT1949). The two latter authors place this species in the genus Chromobacterium as Chromobacterium prodigiosum. But the name Chromobacterium prodigiosum is very little used. Much new information concerning the biochemical and antigenic structure of Serratia marcescens has been published by Davis, Ewing and Reavis 1957). We have studied 68 strains secured from several collec- tions underthe label Serratia marcescens. The list of strains is given in Table 1. The methodauaed were those described in our previous work (Martinet and Kocur, 1960). The staining of flagella was made by Zettnow~ s method (Kabelilc 1925). Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 _ q,,,. ~ _ INTERNATIONAL BULLETIN 301, 302, 303, 304, 813 731, 545, 544 147, 264 151 Institut of Plant Production, Prague Institut of Epidemiology and Microbiology, Prague Prof. E. Steinhaus, Univ. of California, Berkeley 400, 412, 414, 420, 454 455 361 375 376, 377 522 535 548 549, 580 619 620 689 696, 697 761 Culture Coll. of Entomogenous Bacteria, Prague C. B. van Niel, Stanford Univ. Pacific Grove, California Dept. of Agriculture, Ottawa, Canada Epid. and Hygiene Station, Brno Department of Microbiol. Hradec Kr31ov~ E. Eltinge, Mont Holl. Coll. Massachusettes, U. S. A. Dept. of Microbiology, Charles Univ. Prague Inst. of Biology, Czech. Acad. Sci. Prague Inst. of Microbiology, Univ. of Tucuman Dept. of Bact. Indiana Univ. Bloomington B. Hampl. Dept. of Biol. Sciences, Prague Dept. of Bact. Univ. of Queens- land, Australia Inst . of Fermentation, Sao Paulo, Brazil Dept. of Microbiol., Tech. School, Bratislava W.C. Haynes, NRRL, Peoria, Illinois Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 Page 9 BACTERIOLOGICAL NOMENCLATURE AND TAXONOMY Mor bolo The cells of all 68 strains of Serratia mar- cescens studied are small Gram-negative rods occurring individually or in groups. Their size varied from 0.8-1.0 x 1.5-1?. All the strains have motile cells. Cultural characteristics. The colonies on nutrient agar are circu ar, - mm in diameter, with slight undulate mar- gins, slightly convex, smooth. Red pigment was produced by moat strains. In nutrient broth all the strains developed intense turbidity and formed alight sediment. Some strains formed red rings. Cultural and h siolo ical characteristics. The results of the study of biochemical characteristics of 68 strains of Serratia marcescens are given in Table 2. Our study of 68 strains of Serratia marceacens brought many interesting notions. As it can be seen from the tab- ular summary No. 2, some strains showed different bio- chemical features. The moat important variants here were: Strain 780 alone did not hydrolyze casein; strains 548 and 619 did not reduce nitrates; strains 303, 304, 772 and 78T showed positive hemolysis. It ie interesting that ihemajor- ity+of these anomalies was observed in strains isolated from different species of insects (e. g. strains 780, 772, 787). Relatively great variability of some strains was observed during the fermentation of carbohydrates. This problem was not met only by us but also by Davis et al. (1957). Also the differences in pigmentation are not surprising. On nor- mal media and on media for pigmentation only 55 strains pigmented at normal cultivating temperatures. Out of these 55 strains only 15 pigmented at 37'C; 13 strains did not produce pigment at all. The results obtained by us are essentially the same is those given in Bergey's Manual (1957), in Krassilnikov'a Key (1 X49) and agree with the data stated by Davis et al. (1957 ). We do not agree, however, with Krassilnikov~ s ascrip- tion of S. marcescens to the genus Chromobacterium solely on the basis of its ability to produce pigment. We believe that there are insufficient grounds for shifting this species to a very different genus. As we have ascertained, Serratia Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 -- :~ Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for`Release 201~1/12/14~: CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 . , 'Table 2. Results of biochemical tests with 68 strains of Serratia marceecens Test Number positive Number negative Gelatin liquefaction 68 0 Casein hydrolysis 67 1 Nitrate reduction 66 2 Hydrogen sulfide I. 67 1 Hydrogen sulfide II. 0 68 Indole 0 68 Milk 68 0 Hemolysis 4 64 Glucose 68 0 Gas from glucose 43 25 Lactose 2 66 Sucrose 68 0 Maltose 63 5 Galactose 64 4 Fructose 67 1 Rhamno s e 0 68 Mannose 66 2 Inulin 0 68 )[ylose 6 62 Arabinose 0 68 Glycerol 66 2 Adonitol 64 4 Sorbitol 67 1 Mannitol 68 0 Ihilcitol 0 68 Starch 0 68 Eaculin 68 0 Koser~ s citrate 67 1 Simmons s citrate 66 2 Acetylmethylcarbinol 66 2 Methyl red 0 68 KCN 68 0 Phenylalanin 0 68 Catalase 68 0 Urease 0 68 Lipase 67 1 5'Ie NaCI 68 0 7.59E NaCI 47 l l Pigment 55 13 Hydrogen sulfide I. = lead acetate papers Hydrogen sulfide II. = modified Klingeri s agar Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 ~, .. Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 ~~_ ~ .. _ s _, ?Page 11 BACTERIOLOGICAL NOMENCLATURE AND TAXONOMY marcescena differs from the representatives of the genus Chromobacterium not only morphologically, but especially biochemically and in the chemical structure of its pigment. Since 1823 when the species was first described, authors have described and named other new species. These new epeciea were classified unsatisfactorily. In 1957 Davis et al. (1957) concluded that the genus Serratia is monotypic, including only one epeciea. We have devoted much study to this problem and have substantiated the findings of Davis et al. (1957) (Martinet and Kocur, 1960). ? Owing to the fact that there exists no culture of the or- iginal strain of Serratia marcescena, we propose the ap- proval of our strain 303 as a neotype culture. The descrip- tion of proposed neotype of Serratia marcescena: Serratia marcescena Bizio (strain BS 303, ATCC 13880) Small Gram negative rods, occurring individually or in groups. The size ?of cells was 0.8 x 1.S?. Motile by four lateral flagella. Agar colonies (t days): Circular with slight undulate mar- gin, 4-6 mm in diameter, slight convex, smooth, pro- duce red pigment. Gelatin colonies (5 days): Circular, smooth sinking in 2-3 days in gelatin, white. Agar slant (1 day): Smooth, white, taking on an orange-red to carmin red colour in 4-5 days. Broth (1 day): Intense turbid and gray sediment. Potato (2 days): Luxuriant growth, smooth, first white, later red colour. Peptone water with carbohydrates: Acid but no gas formed from glucose, saccharoae, maltose, galactose, mannitol, sorbitol, glycerol, mannoae and adonitol. Not attacked by lactose, dulcitol, arabinose, rhamnose, xylose, in- ulin. Milk (2 days): Alcaline, coagulation sad peptonization. Indole: -; HZS: -; VP: +; MR: -; nitrate +; catalase +; urease -; lipase +; KCN +; phenylalanine -; Siinmons~ citrate +; Koaer~ a citrate +; hydrolysis of gelatin +; casein +; hy- drolysis of starch -; esculin +; hymolysis +. Salt tolerance: Nutrient agar with 5'1e NaCI +; 7.5'16 NaCl +; 10'le NaCI ._. Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 P+sQe 12 Aerobic . Optimum temperature 30?C, minimum 10?C, maximum 37? C. Optimum pH 6.8, minimum 4.4, maximum 9. t. Habitat: Isolated from pond water. Breed, R. S. and M.E. Breed. 1914. The type species of the genus Serratia commonly known as Bacillus prodigio- sus. Jour. Batt. 9:545-557. , 1927. The genus Serratia Bizio. Zentralbl. f. Bakt. II Abt. 71:435-440. . E. G. D. Murray and N. R. Smith. 1957. Bergey s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. 7th ed. 1094 pp. Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore. Maryland. Davis, Betty R.. W.H. Ewing and R.W. Reavis. 1957. The biochemical reactions given by members of the Ser- ratia group. Internl. Bull. Batt. Nomen. and Taxon. 7:151-160. Kabelfk.J. 1915. Bakteriologick? technika drobnohledn?. Praha. Krassilnikov, N. A. 1949. OpredMit~l bakt~rij i aktino- mycetov. Moskva. Martinet, T. and M. Kocur. 1960. The taxonomic status of Serratia plymuthica (Lehmann and Neumann) Bergey et al. and of Serratia indica (Eisenberg) Bergey et al. Internl. Bull. Batt. Nomen. and Taxon. 10(4):147-154. Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14:CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 - INTERNATIONAL BULLETIN OF BACTERIOLOGICAL ` ~ NOMENCLATURE AND TAXONOMY Volume 11 No. 3 July 15, 1961 pp. 87-90 CONTRIBUTION TO THE TAXONOMIC. STUDIES OF SERRATIA KILIENSIS (LEHMANN ET NEUMANN) BERGEY (With the technical assistance of Z. VyslouEilovl) Department of Microbiology Faculty of Natural Sciences in Brno Czechoslovakia SUMMARY: A study of the morphological, cul- tural and biochemical filatures of five strain? of Serratia kil_i_e_n_sis (Lehmann et Neumann) Bergey from different culture collections leads to the conclusion that Serratia kilien- sis ie a variety of Serratia marcescens --- ------- ---------- In 1888 a red pigmentedmicroorganism, which was called only bacterium h, was isolated from drinking water by Bzen- ni~ in Kiel. The name Bacterium kiliense was given to it later by Lehmann and Neumann 1896. Thi? species was placed in the genus Serratia by Bergey (1923) with the name Serratiakeilensis(sic Breed (1957)correctedthetpelling of the specific epithet to kiliensis. Some authors (Lehmann and Neumann 1927, Breed 1957, Davis et al. , 1957) have suggested that Serratia kiliensis is a variety of or identical with 5. marcescens. However, S. kiliensis is etillgivenspe- cific statue by authors (Krasilnikov 1949. Breed 1957). We have therefore undertaken to ascertain whethez S. kiliensis and S. marcescens are synonyms. We have studied 5 strains supplied as Serratia kiliensis by various culture collections. Strain 274 was from the Department of Agriculture, Ottawa, Canada; atrain300 from Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, Indiana; strain 526 from?J. Simpson, Prairie Regional Lab- oratory, Saskatoon, Canada, strains 7462 and 922 from the American Type Culture Collection. The methods usedwere the same as in our previous work (Martinet and Kocur 1960). Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 Page 88 ? INTERNATIONAL BULLETIN Morphology. All five strains formed small Gram nega- tive rods, singly or in groups. 0.8 x 1. 5-2.O?. All strains were motile. Cultural characteristics. Colonies were round with un- dulate margin, slightly convex, smooth. On nutrient agar two strains only were pigmented. In nutrient broth all strains produced turbidity and sediment, two strains formed a fragile pellicle. On potato, gelatin and on medium Dewey and Poe (1943) only 2 strains were pigmented. Biochemical characteristics. The ascertained biochemi- cal characteristics are shown in Table 1. No essential differences in morphological and cultural characters were foundamong the five strains studied. Some minor differences appeared in the biochemical characteris- tics. Strain SZ6 hemolyaed blood and did not form gas from glucose, strains 582, 274 and 581 fermented lactose. The variability in fermenting lactose and producing gas. agrees with the description given by Davis et al. (1957). In other reepecteour results agree with the original des- cription (1888) as well as with the data given by Krasilnikov (1949) and Breed (1957). Breed (as well as some other authors) suggests that S. kiliensie is probably identical with Serratia marcescensbut does not prove thieidentity experi- mentally. He stated that it is uncertain whether the micro- organism isolated by Breunig(1888) was s strain of Serratia marcescens not heavily pigmented. Our results confirm this supposition. Breed also states that one of the features differentiating S. kiliensie from S. marcescens is the fact that S. kiliensie does not produce acethylmethylcarbinol. Out of five strains studied only the strain 526 produced acethylmethylcarbinol. Besides this difference, however, we have ascertained no other difference between S. kiliensie and S. marcescens. Comparison of our results with those of Breed 1957), Davie et al. (1957) and with our earlier work (Martinet and Kocur 1959] leads us to the conclusion that S. kiliensie is only a variety of S. marcescens. This conclusion is reached because no production of acethylmethyl- carbinol is the only single one of the substantial biochemical Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 Table 1. Reault? of biochemical teats with S atsaias of S.rr_atia kilienais. Numbes Positive Gelatin liquefaction 5 Casein hydrolyai? 5 Nitrate reduction 5 Hydrogen sulfide I. 5 Hydrogen sulfide II. 0 Indole 0 Milk 5 Hemolysis 1 Glucose 5 Gas from glucose 4 Lactose 3d Sucrose 5 Maltose 4 Galactose , 5 Fructose 5 Rhamnoee 0 l~fannose 4 Inulin 4 Xylose 4 Arabinose 0 Glycerol 4 Adonitol 0 Sorbitol 5 Mannitol 5 Dulcitol 0 Starch 0 Esculin 5 Koaert s citrate 5 Simmonat citrate 5 Ac ethylmethylca rbinol 1 Methyl red 0 KCN 5 Phenylalanin 0 Catalase 5 Urease 0 Lipase 5 596 NaCl 5 7.5'~i NsCI 4 Pigment 2 Hydrogen sulfide I. lead acetate paper Hydrogen sulfide II. modified Klinger~s d =delayed agar Nnmbez Ne~ati~e Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 _. w~ ~.M....g features which is -suitable in taxonomic differentiation of the Serratia genus. According to our opinion the mentioned bio- chemical test ie amore substantial feature than the strain differences in fermenting of carbohydrates or in pigmenta- tion, etc. ' From our previous work (Martinec and Koeur, 1961) and irompresent study it follows that the genus Serratia include~ only one species - S. marcescene with the variety Serratia marcescens var. kiliensis. Breed, R.S. and M.E. Breed. 1927. The genus Serratia Bizio. 2entralbl. f. Bakt. II. Abt. T1:435-440. E. G. Murray and R. N. Smith. 1957. Bergey s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore, Maryland. Breunig. J. 1888. Bacteriologiache untersuchung des Trinkwasserss des Stadt Kiel. Dlse. Kiel. Davis, B.R. , W.H. Ewing and R.W. Reavis. 1957. The biochemical reactions given by members of Serratia group. Internatl. Bull. Bact. Nomen. and Taxon. 7; 151-~60. Krasilnikov, N. A. 1949. Opr~delit~l bakt8?rij i aktinomy- cetov. Moskva. Lehmann, K. 8. and R.O Neumann 1886. Bakteriologi4che diagnoetik. Munchen. Martinec, T. and M. Kocur. 19b0. The taxonomic status of S. plymuthica (Lehmann and Neumann) Bergey et al. and of S. indica Eisenberg) Bergey et al. Internatl. Bull. Bact. Nomen. and Taxon. ~4~ 247-t54. 1961. The taxonomic status of Serratia marceecens Bizio. Internatl. Bull. Bact. Nomen. and Taxon. 11 1): 7 -12. Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for~Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 + INTERNATIONAL BULLETIN OF BACTERIOLOGICAL ? NOMENCLATURE AND TAXONOMY Volume 11 No. 3 July 15. 1961 pp. 73-7d A TAXONOMIC STUDY OF THE MEMBERS OF THE GENUS SERRATIA (With the technical assistance of Z. VyslouiCilov[) Department of Microbiology Faculty of Natural Science in Brno Czechoslovakia SUMMARY: A study of the morphological, cul- tural, and biochemical characteristics of it strains of different species of the genusSer- rati_a_indicates that most itzains of species thus far recognized are identical with Ser- ratia marcescens. ----- ---------- The names S. Piscatorum (Lehmann and Neumann) Breed, S. YoseEtica (Fortinean) Bergey, S. fu_sch_s_i_n_a ~Boeckhout et de Vries) Bergey, S. anoliu_m_ Duran-Reynals et Clau- sen) are to be regarded as synonyms of S. marcescens Bizio and Serratia msriaorubra ----------- -------- _~~_M___ as a synonym of Serratia marcescens var. -------- ---------- kiliensis. The strains S. sa~onaria I and II Markov should be removed from the genus Serratia and placed provisionally in the genus Aleali- genes_ For our studies of the species of the genus Serratiawe have obtained from various collections cultures of strains without designation of species or with obsolete names. Among these cultures were strains names, e. g. Serratia pyoseptica (Fortineau~ Bergey. Serratia anotium Duran- Reynais and Clausen, Serratia fuchsina Boeckhout and de Vries) Bergey and others. Breed 1948) regards most of these names as synonyms of Serratia marcescens. while Krasilnikov (1949) includes them in his Manual as names of accepted species. In the 1957 edition of Bergey s Manual neither of the two new strains of Serratia, isolated and described by ldaskov (1956) as Serratia sa onaria I and II, is included. Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 Page 74 In ouz present work we have studied whether the several aforesaid "species" have taxonomic significance and whether some of them belong to the genus Serratia at all. In our work we have thoroughly studied 1Z strains of Serratia acquired from various collections. The list of strains is given in Table 1. The methods used were the same as in our previous work (Martinec and Kocur, 1960). Serratia anolium S. anolium B 1700 S. pyoseptica SZ3 S. saponaria I. II. S. fuchsina 150 S. marinorubra 318 S. piscatorum 415 Serratia sP. S 33, S Z6 ATCC 6065 W.C. Haynes, NRRL, Peoria, Illinois Dept. of Appl. Biol. NRC, Ottawa, Canada J. Simpson, Prairie Reg. Lab. , Saskatoon, Canada W. Markov, Sofia, Bulgaria B. Hsmpl, Dept. of Biol. Sci. Prague C. E. Zobell, La Jolla. Calif. Inst. of Plant Product., Prague J. Simpson, Prairie Reg. Lab. Saskatoon, Canada C.B. van Niel, Stanford Univ. , California Inst. of Epidemiology and Microbiol., Prague Morphology. All studied strains were short. gram-nega- tive rods occurring singly and in clumps. Size of individual cells 0.8-1 x 1.5-Z.5?. All strains were motile except Serratia saponaria II. Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 BACTERIOLOGICAL NOMENCLATURE AND TAXONOMY Cultural characteristics. Colonies of most strains were round, with undulate margin, slightly convex, smooth. Eight strains were at first creamy or slightly rose colored, later red, very slightly pigmented was S. saponaria I. and there were three non-pigmented strains S. saponaria II. , no. 6065 and B 1700. In nutrient broth all strains produced turbidity and sediment except S. saponaria I. and II. which grew very poorly. S. ~eaponaria I. and II., however, grew well is nutrient broth at pH 9. 6. The mentioned strains did not grow on potato. On the medium recommended by Dewey and Poe (1943) 6 strains only were pigmented. Biochemical characteristics. The ascertained biochemi- cal characteristics are shown in Table 2. The results indicated that all the strains with the excep- tion of Serratia saponaria I and II agreed with theeharacter- istics of Serratia marcescene Bizio. The differenee? as shown in Table 2 (lactose fermented by strain 318, gas not formed from glucose by strains 523, 318, S 26, maltose not fermented by strain S 4 and adonitolnot fermented by strain 527) are characteristic for Serratia marcescene. Serratia marinorubra BS 318 (acethylmethylearbinol not formed is identical with Serratia marcescene var. kiliensis. We conclude that the aforesaid species S. anolium ~ran- Reynals and Clausen, _S. pyoseptica (Fortineau Bergey, Serratia fuchsina Boeckhout and de Vries) Bergey are to be regarded as synonyms of Serratia marcescen? Bisio and Serratia marinorubra as a synonym of Serratia maresscens var. kiliensis. Serratia marcescens differs significantly from Serratia saponaria I and II. The differences in the biochemical activity of these two'strains in comparison with the strain Serratia marcescen? are so substantial, that we conclude that these two strains should not be placed in the gsmts Serratia. We have compared biochemical characteristics of Serratia saponaria I and II with one strain of Alealigene? taecalis 09 and with the characteristics of this species in Bergey's Manual (1957). We have ascertained that bio- chemical features of Serratia sa onaria I and II and Alcali- ~enea faecalie are very similar liquefaction of gelatin. no fermentation of carbohydrates, growth at pH 9.6). On the Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 - .. ~ -_ ~~. ~ ~ _T . wl c o oI ~I ~I ~~ ~I ~I I ~I vJt yl ~I yil hl hl yil ~I ~i~ t~~ Gelatin liquefaction + + + + + - + + + + + + Casein hydrolysi^ + + + + - - + - + + + + Nitrate reduction + + + + - + + + + + + + Hydrogen sulfide I. + + + + - _ + + ? + + Hydrogen sulfide II. +w +w - - - - - - - - - - Indole - - - - - - - - - - - Milk + + + + - - + + f + + + Hemolysis - - - - - - - - - - - - Gtueose + + + + - _ + - + - - + Gas from glucose + + + - - - + - + - - + Lactose - - - - - - + - - - - Suezose + + + ' + - - + + + + + + Maltose + + - + - - + + + + + + Galactose + + + + - _ + + + + + + Fructose + + + + - - + + + + + + Ithamnose - - - - _ - - _ _ - IYtanilOee + + + + - - + + + + + + lnulin - - - - - - - + - - - - Xylose - - - - - - - - - - - - Azabinose - - - - - - - - - - - Glycerol + + + - - _ + + + + + + Adonitol + + + - - - - + + - - Sorbitol + + + + - - + - + + + + Mannitol + + + + - - + + + + + + Thtlcitol - - - - - - - - - - - - Starch - - - - - - - - - - - - Eseulin + + + + - - + + + + + + Koser~ a citrate + + + + - - + + + + + + Simmons' citrate + + + + - - + + + + + + Aeethylmethylcarbinol + + + + - - + - + + + + Methyl red - - - - - - - - - - - - KCN + + + + + - + + + + + + Phenylalanine - - - - - - - - - - - - Catalase + + + + + + + + + + + + Urease - - - - - + - - - - - - Lipase + + + + - - + + + + + + 5'-s NaCl + + + + + + + + + + + + 7. S'R NaCI + + - + + + + + + + + + Pigment - + + + - + + + - - - w =weak Hydrogen sulfide I. =lead acetate paper Hydrogen sulfide II. =modified Kliger medium Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 BACTERIOLOGICAL NOMENCLATURE AND TAXONOMY basis of this observation we recommend placing Serratia saponaria I and II provisionally in the genus Alcali;eves. The definitive placing of this species will be possible only after having compared it with other species of the genus Alcaligenea. Special attention should be given to the species S. pisca_ torum (Lehmann and Neumann) Breed. This species has been recognized both by Krasilnikov(1949) and Breed (1957). But this species is not deposited in any collection and there- fore it cannot be compared with Serratia marcescens. The only strain assigned to S. piscatorum, which we could com- pare, was isolated several years ago from soil (see Table 1). We have ascertained that this strain is identical with Serratia marcescens. On comparison of the original ehar- acteriatics 1884 as well as the description in Bergey's Manual (1957) with the features of Serratia marcescens, we find only small differences. The faetthatS. piscatorum Caa produce pigment at 37? and that this pigment is soluble in water, cannot be taken for such an essential feature, on the basis of which it would be possible to acknowledge S_. isca- torum a valid apeciea, because this feature can be fonod also in some strains of Serratia marcescens. We have ascertained that out of 68 strains studied at 37 ?C only 15 strains produced pigment (unpublished data).. Also the fact pigment of some heavily pigmenting strains of Serratia mar- cescens is soluble in water, was stated already in 19'18 by Breed and recently it has been experimentally proven by Williams et al. (1958). For these reasons we regard Ser- ratia piscatorum (Lehmann and Neumann) Breed as a syn- onym of S. marcescens. 4: 487-501. Breed, R. S. and M, E. Breed. 1917. The genus Serratia Bizio. Zentralbl. f. Bakt. II. Abt. 71: 435-440. E. G. D. Murray and A. P. Hitchens. 1948. Ber- gey' s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore, Maryland. and R. N. Smith. 1957. Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore, Maryland. Boeckhout, F. W.J. and J.J. Ott de Vries. 1898. tJber einem neuen chromogenen Bacillus. Zentralbl. f. Bakt. Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 ? p:g. Ta Davis. B.R., W.H. Ewing and R.W. Reavis. 1957. The biochemical reaction given by members of the Serratia group. Interaatl. Bull. Bact. Nomen. and Taxon. T: 151-160. Du Bois, Saint Sivrin. 1894. Panaris des pbcheurs et microbe rouge dale sardine. Ann. Inst. Pasteur. 8: 152-160. Duran-Reynals and H.J. Clausen. 1934. A contagious tumor-like condition in the lisard (Anolis equestris) as induced by new bacterial species, Serratia anolium (sp. n. ). Jour. Bact. 33: 369-3T6. Fortinesu, L. 1905. L~ Erythrobacillus pyosepticus et lea bactbries rouges. Bull. Inst. Pasteur. 3: 13-14. Lehmann, K. B. and R.O. Neumann. 1886 Bacteriolog- ische Diagnostik. Munchen. Markov, W. 1956. Serratia saponaria I. and II. Schid- liche Bakterien in der Seife. Zentralbl. f. Bakt. II. Abt. 110. 26-32. Martinee, T. and M. Kocur. 1960. The taxonomic status of Serratia plymuthiea (Lehmann and Neumann) Bergey et sl. and of Serratia indica (Eisenberg) Bergey et al. Internatl. Bull. Bact. Nomen. and Taxon. 10(4): 247-254. 1961. The taxonomic status of Serratia marce cans Bizio. Interriatl. Bull. Bact. Nomen. and Taxon. 11 1): ? -12. Williams, R.P. , W.W. Taylor, D. Hawkins and I. L. Roth. 1958. A water soluble diffusible pigment produced by a strain of Serratia marceacena (Chromobacterium prodig- iosum) Nature. 182: 1028-1019. ZoBell, C.E. and H.C. Upham. 1944. A list of Marine Bacteria including descriptions of sixty new species. Bull. Scripps. Inst. Oceanography, La Jolla. 5: t55. Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 INTERNATIONAL BULLETIN OF BACTERIOLOGICAL ' NOMENCLATURE AND TAXONOMY Volume 10 No. 4 October 15, 1960 pp. 247-Z54 THE TAXONOMIC STATUS OF SERRATIA PLYMUTHICA (LEHMANN AND NEUMANN) BERGEY ET AL. AND OF SERRATIA INDICA (EISENBERG) BERGEY ET AL. (With the technical assistance of Z. Vyslou~ilov~) Department of Microbiology Faculty of Natural Sciences Brno, Czechoslovakia Serratia plymuthica is one of the commonly recognized species of the genus Serratia. This microorganism, first isolated by Fischer (1887), was named Bacterium plymuthi- cum by Lehmann and Neumann (1896) who concernedthem- selvee with its classification. These authors showed that the characteristics of this species allied it closely with Serratia marcescens, perhaps it is quite identical. It has been given species status rather uncritically even in such recent man- uals on taxonomy as that of Krassilnikov 1949 and in Ber- gey' s Manual, ed. 7, 1957. Inasmuch as neither the original description of Serratia 1 muthica or the characterizations given by Krassilnikov 1949) and Breed(1957) are complete on the basi^ of present- day needs, we have studied critically the justification for the recognition of this as a distinct species. Serratia indica (Eisenberg) Bergey et al. was first iso- lated in 1884 by Koch from the alimentary tract of a Java ape. The organism was not named by Koch, thebinomial- Bacillus indicus Eisenberg-was given by Eisenberg(1886). The history of the discovery of this species, the nomen- clature and the justification of its validity was worked out by Breed (1926). Recently there have appeared opinions that this species is identical with Serratia marcescens, e. g., Breed (1957) thinks that it represents the R-form of S. marcescens. Davis et al. (1957), as the result of a study of 50 strains of the genus Serratia, concluded that this genus has only one species, i. e. S. marcescens. In this contribution we are able experimentally to verify the hypothesis of Davie et al. Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 Q., ~ We have studied 6 strains under the name of Serratia plymuthica, secured from several collections: strain 192 from Prof. J. De Ley, Brussels, strains 139 and 162 from Department of Bacteriology, Indiana University, Blooming- ton, Indiana, strain 183 from the American Type Culture Collection, strain 847 from Prof. van Niel, Pacific Grove, California and strain 497 from Dept. of Agric. Ottawa. We have also studied in detail 10 strains acquired from various collections under the name Serratia indica. The origin of these strains is given in Table I. Serratia indica Strain No. Source of Strain 305 Own isolates T72 Research Institute of Plant Produc- tion, Prague 33 and 135 Dept. of Bacteriology, Purdue University, Indiana Bu 209 Biol. Inst. Czech. Acad. Sci. , Prague 341 W.C. Haynes, Northern Regional Res. Lab. , Illinois IZ 358 Institute of Fermentation, Sao Paulo, Brazil 447 Dept. of Agriculture, Ottawa, Canada 4002 and 4003 American Type Culture Collection We have studied the morphological, cultural, and bio- chemical characteristics of strains of both S. plymuthica and S. indica, using the following methods: Grams s stain as modified by Hucker, motility was detected by the Hajna method, gelatin liquefaction was testedby Frazier s method and by ^?ab inoculation on 15^/o gelatin, nitrate reduction by Grier-Illosway~ s agent, hydrogen sulfide by means of lead acetate strips and in modified Klinger agar Davis et al. 1957), indole by Kov~cs~ reagent. The fermentation of sugars was studied in peptone water with 1'lo sugar, starch hydrolysis was tested by Lugol solu- Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 e R > rPage 249 BACTER~0ItiO81C11f`I;'I~OMENCLATURE AND TAXONOMY tion, and the utilisation of citrate determined in Koser' ? and Simmons' medium. Production of acetylmethylcazbinol we ascertained by Voges-Proskauer's medium by Leifson's reagent (Methods for Pure Culture Study of Bacteria (1946)) . Production of phenylpyruvic acid from phenylalanine and growth in presence of KCN were studied by the methods recommended by the Enterobacteriaceae Subcommittee (1958). Urease we ascertained by Christensen'? method (1946) and by Cowan's microtest (1952), lipase by Bulder's method (1955). Pigment production was noted on potato. nutrient agar, gelatin and on the medium recommended by Dewey and Poe (1943). Morphology: All six strains of S. plymuthies formed small Gram-negative rods occurring individually or in .groups. The sire varied from 0.8-1.0 x 1.5-2.O?. All the strains were motile. Cultural characteristics: The colonies on nutrient agar. circular with undulate margins, slightly convex, smooth. Red pigment was produced only by the strains 183 and 847, the other were cream-colored. In nutrient broth all the strains developed intense turbidity and formed a slight sedi- ment. Biochemical characteristics: The results of the study of biochemical characteristics of both S. plymuthiea and S. indica are given in Table 2. Discussion. We wished to determine the taxonomic status of the species S. plymuthica (Lehmann et Neumann) Bergey et al. , by testing Lehmann arid Neumann' s hypothesis that it might well be identical with the species S. marcescens Bisio. In a study of the morphological and cultural charac- teriatics of S. plymuthica we found no significant differences among the six strains. Differences occurred only in pig- ment production (3 strains formed no pigment). The differ- ences in biochemical characteristics were a? follows: One strain did not liquefy gelatin or hydrolyse casein. 5 strains showed delayed fermentation of lactose. t strains fermented inulin, I strainfermented adonitol. We attach no importance to these differences. Other biochemical characteristics Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 _ Table 2. Results of biochemical tests with 6 strains of ? ~ Serratia plymuthica and 10 strains of Serratia indica. S. plymuthica S. indica No. + No. - No. + No. - Gelatin liquefaction 5 1 10 0 Casein hydrolysis 5 1 10 0 Nitrate reduction 6 0 10 0 Hydrogen sulfide I 6 0 10 0 Hydrogen sulfide II 0 6 2w 8 Indole 0 6 0 10 Milk 6 0 -10 0 Hemolysis 0 6 0 10 Glucose 6 0 10 0 Gas from glucose 6 0 5w 5 Lactose 5d 1 0 10 Sucrose 6 0 10 0 Maltose 6 0 10 0 Galactose 6 0 10 0 Fructose 6 0 10 0 Rhamnose 0 6 0 10 Mannoae 6 0 10 0 Inulin 2 4 0 3 0 Xylose 0 6 0 10 Arabinose 0 6 0 10 Glycerol 6 0 30 0 Adonitol 1 5 10 0 Sorbitol 6 0 10 0 Mannitol 6 0 10 0 Dulcitol 0 6 0 l0 Starch 0 6 0 10 Esculin 6 0 10 0 Koser~ s citrate 6 0 10 0 Simmons citrate 6 0 10 0 Acetylmethylcarbinol 6 0 10 0 Methyl red 0 6 0 10 KCN 6 0 10 0 Phenylalanine 0 6 0 10 Catalaee 6 0 10 0 Urease 0 6 0 10 Lipase 6 0 10 0 5'Jo NaCI 6 0 10 0 7. 5'/o NaCl 6 0 10 0 Pigment 3 3 10 0 Hydrogen sulfide I =lead acetate papers. w =weak. Hydrogen ^ulfide II: - modified Klin~er~ s agar. d =delayed. Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 Page Z51 BACTERIOLOGICAL NOMENCLATURE AND TAXONOMY agree with the work of Davie et al. (1957). Our results agree to some extent with Fischer a des- cription (1887)in which the difference between S. plymuthica and S. marcescene is said to lie in the fact that the cells of S. plymuthica are thicker than tl.cse of S. marcescene, and that a crimson pigment is produced only by S. plymuthica. Neither these difference^ or those recognized by Breed seem adequate today. .Breed regarded as the main differ- ence between these species the production of gas from some eugare by S. plymuthica, especially from glucose. This is also true of S. marcescene (Bergey s Manual 1957), as was found also by Davis 1957 and by us. In our opinion it is not advisable to use the ability of the genus Serratia to pro- duce gas from eugare as a taxonomic criterion for distin- guishing species; we regard it as a variable characteristic. Having compared the characteristics of the species Ser- ratia plymuthica with the results of Davis et al. (1957) and with the characteristics of Serratia marcescene (in Bergey e Manual(1957) as well as with the characteristics of 68 strains studied by us, we came to the opinion that Serratia Plv_ muthica is a junior synonym of Serratia marcescene. Morphology: All strains of Serratia indica were mor- phologically identical, small rode, occurring singly and in chains; size of individual cells 0.8-1.0 x l.8?. Cells were motile and Gram-negative. Cultural characteristics: Colonies were roundwith slight undulate margins, smooth, some strains were rough. Most strains at first were creamy or slightly rose-colored, later red. In nutrient broth all strains produced turbidity and white sediment. On potato and in medium recommended by Dewey and Poe (1943) all strains were pigmented. Biochemical characteristics: The ascertained biochem- ical characteristics are shown in Table 2. Discussion. The task of our present work was to secer- tain experimentally whether these strains of Serratia indica were identical with Serratia marcescene. We conclude that there are no substantia erencee between the individual strains of Serratia indica studied. Some differences in re- sults appeared in the production of hydrogen sulfide as de- termined by tw~znet]iods, . ;Sy,use of the first method (lead R ^'? 4" ~x .. e F ~ ,~ a Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved fo~r Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 1 1$s [h )l t`:D Y ~ ~... _ a Sa .C W.F' ~~ `~.J; L ,"; acetate paper strips) we found sulfide produced by all ten strains, with the second method (modified Klinger s agar) we ascertained weak production in 2 strains only. These results agree with those of other authors (Clarke 1953. Davis et al. 1957). Certain differences between individual strains were noted in the production of gas from glucose. Five strains out of the total of 10 produced a small amount of gat. We do not attach great importance to this difference. Similar results were obtained by Davis et al. (1957). Only a small part of our results can be compared with those recorded in the original description by Eisenberg (1886) which included morphological and cultural character- istics only. Our results agree with the characteristics re- corded by Eisenberg.. Breed (1957) described Serratia indica more fully buY emphasized the morphological and cultural characteristics without adequate consideration of the biochemical character- istics. He does not list the kinds of sugar that this species utilizes. On the basis of Reedy swork(1937) Breed suggests that Serratia indica is probably an R-form of Serratia mar- cescens. Our results in part verify this hypothesis. Kraseilnikov (1949) in hie Guide gives no new data a- bout this species, he places it in the genus Chromobac- terium. We attach the greatest importance to the comparison of our work with the results of Davie et al. (1957). On the basis of the study of 50 strains of genus Serratia, these authors formulated the hypothesis that this genus has only one species. We have proved experimentally that this hy- pothesis is correct. We haveaecertainedthatthecharacter- istics of 10 strains of Serratia indica agree not only with the results of the authors mentioned above but alto with the characteristics of 68 strains of Serratia marcescens, which we have also studied in detail. From our study of the .morphological. cultural and bio- chemical character of 68 strains received as Serratia marcescens Bizio. 6 strains as S. plymuthica (lshmann and Neumann) Bergey et al. and 10 strains as S. iadica (Eisenberg) Bergey et,al., we conclude that the species Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 Page 253 BACTERIOLOGICAL NOMENCLATURE AND TAXONOMY names S. plymuthica and S. indica should be regarded as junior synonyms of S. marceacene. Breed, R.S. and M. E. Breed. 1924. The type species of the genus Serratia commonly known as Bacillus rp odig_ ioaus. Jour. Bact. 9: 545-557. 1926. Serratia indica Bergey, the red chromo- genic bacterium originally isolated by Koch in India. Jour. Bact. 11: 76-77. 1927. The genus Serratia Bizio. Zentral. f. Bakt. II. abt. 71: 435-440. E. G. D. Murray and N. R. Smith. 1957. Bergey s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 7th ed. 1094 pp. Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore, Maryland. Bulder, C. J. E.A. 1955. Some observations on the lipo- lytic activity of microorganisms and a new method for its detection. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 21: 433-445. Christensen, W.B. 1946. Urea decomposition as a means of differentiating proteus and paracolon cultures from each other and from Salmonella and Shigella types. Jour. Bact. 52: 461-466. Clarke, P. K. 1953. Hydrogen sulphide production by bacteria. Jour. Gen. Microbiol. S: 397-497. and S.T. Cowan. 1952. Fermentations: Biochemical micromethods for bacteriology. Jour. Gen. Microbiol. 6:784-794. Davis, Betty R., W.H. Ewing and R.W. Reavis. 1957. The biochemical reactions given by members of the Serratia group. Intern. Bull. Bact. Nomen. and Taxon. 7: 151-160 Dewey, B.T. and Ch. F. Poe. 1943. A simple artificial medium for pigment production by members of the genus Serratia. Jour. Bact. 45: 485-498. Eisenberg, J. 1886. Bakteriologieche Diagnoatik. Ham- burg and Leipzig. Enterobacteriaceae Subcommittee. 1958. Report of the Enterobacteriaceae Subcommittee of the Nomenclature Committee of the International Association of Micro- biological Societies. Intern. Bull. Bact. Nomen. and Taxon. 8: 25-70. Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8 Kocur, M. and T. Martinet. 1957. O v~skytu pigment- uj~c~ch bakterif ve vod~ch KnfniLrakc~pi~ehrady. Publ. Fac. Sci. Univ. Masaryk. Bruno, No. 388, 1-12. Krassilnikov, N. A. 1949. OpredLlit2~1 baktl~rij i aktino- mycetov. Moskva. Lehmann, K. B. and R.O. Neumann. 1896. Bakteriologiache Diagnoatik. Munchen. Manual of Methods for Pure Culture Study of Bacteria. 1946. Geneva, New York. Reed, G.B. 1937. Independent variation of several char- acteristics in Serratia marceacens. Jour. Batt. 34: 255-266. Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/12/14 :CIA-RDP80T00246A017600080001-8