EXCERPTS FROM ADDRESS BY PRESIDENT TO THE SOCIETY OF NEWSPAPER EDITORS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00552R000101020079-3
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
June 28, 2010
Sequence Number: 
79
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 11, 1980
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00552R000101020079-3.pdf803.6 KB
Body: 
? Approved For Release 2010/06/28: CIA-RDP90-00552R000101020079-3 _ _ THE NEW YORK TIMES, FRIDAY, APRIL 11, 1980 Excerpts From Address by President To the Society of Newspaper Editors] WASHINGTON, April 10? Follow- ing are excerpts front today's address by President Carter to the American Society of Newspaper Editors conven- tion, as transcribed by The New York Times though the facilities of ABC News: I would like to discuss with you today some of the most urgent imperatives of American foreign policy, with special emphasis in one particular area of the world. t Its important that we take a hard, clear look together, not at some simple world either of universal good will or of universal hostility, but the complex, changing and sometimes dangerous world that really exists. It's not one world, but many. It's no? longer a world that is structured and controlled by competition among co- lonial powers. It's a more complicated world where national, religious, and ethnit assertions is fragmenting are fragmenting ? old boundaries and old alignments. ? - Nations Ask Us for LeadeAltip It's a world of conflicting ideologies, of unequal wealth and of uneven re- sourced. It's a world in which the ca. petity for destructive' violence is at imca alarmingly dispersed to every sin- gle Small terrorist band and awe- somely concentrated in the nuclear ar- senals of the superpowers. In many languages and out of many unfamiliar cultures, other peoples con- stantly ask America for a response to myriad and often conflicting concerns. Nations ask us for leadership. But at the sante time, they demand their own independence of action. They ask us for aid. But they reject any interference. They ask for understanding. Yet they ' often decline to understand us in re- turn. Some ask for protection, but are wary of the obligations of alliance. A Challenge to U.S. Unity Others ask for firmness and certain- ty. But at the same time, they demand flexibility reqiiired by the pace of change and the subtlety of events. The world asks, with impatience, for all these things at once, but asks kr them today, not tomorrow. . Nowhere do we face the challenges I have just described more directly than we do in Iran. No single situation so ag- gravates the American people, so tests our maturity, So tries our patience, so challenges our unity as d* the contin- ued captivity of American hostages in the Teheran embassy. No, ether single event seems se' clearly to mirror the disorder of our limes. This disregard for diplomatic propriety and for international law is a special threat to the small- nation, the ,weak nation, the nation without eco- nomic or military or political power or influence: And it also comprises a part of the competing pressures on a great and a powerful nation like ours. This crisis calls on us to act with courage and also with wisdom that will both produce results and preserve life. I'm deeply proud of the steady strength that has been demonstrated in America in dealing with the irresponsi- ble Iranian authorities who've been un- willing to act or unable to carry out their frequent, solemn commitments. The leaders of the Iranian Government lack the cohesion and the resolve to ? Carter Declines to Rule Out Force: To Get Hostages' Freedom in Iran Conthmed Rens Page Al , lona claim that Could only damage our oWii nation's prestige." "I have no apology at all to make for our country or for the Administration which I head," he said. ' Mr. Carter, in his talk, took no note of threats by the Iranian Islamic militants in Control of the American hostages to kill them if the United States used military force against Iran. Today, one militant threatened to kill them if Iraq invaded ? - Possibility of Further Steps , , But the President kept 'open the posst- biiitYthet the United States plight go be- Yond the economic and political steps an- noiinced on Monday. "America will con- tinue the careful and considered 'exercise of its power," he said in his speech. "We will pursue every, and I repeat, every legal use of that power to bring our people home, fitV 4..n4 followed, ecific, but he said It would be "ill-advised" spell out any port Of detail: and :exact time schedule, or exactly what options are available to tis." But he added that under international law, "since we are an Aggrieved nation, caused by not Only the action of terrorists but also having thesterrorista' actions Condoned by and even supported by the Government, the breadth of the right that we have to take action to redressthis grievance is quite extensive." Appealing to Iranian authorities' to take action to free the hostages before other measures beyond the, economic sanctions and breaking of relations are taken, Mr. Carter said, "in the interests of the peo- ple Of Iran and of their possible future as a unified and peeCefta nation living in freedom, it is imperative that the Iranian Government resolve this crisis." bring order t. their own chaotic land or to decide on a basis for ending this ille- gal detention of hostages, which has created international crisis. For long months, ours has been a re- straint of strength, despite outrageous provocation. I do not regret that re- straint, which was designed to protect American lives and to explore with Ira- nian Government officials and with United Nations officials and with mediators working with us a way to re- solve this crisis peacefully. But it hes become necessary ? be, cause Iran would not act in accordance with international law and with their own interests ? for us to act again. The steps I've taken this week to end diplo- matic relations and to impose sanc- tions are firm and substantive, and we hope that they will be persuasive. Legal Use of Power Vowed America will continue the careful and considered exercise of its power. We will pursue every and I repeat? every legal use of that power to bring our people home, free and safe. But the hard, sad reality is that a small number of zealots engaged in a power struggle within Iran are using the innocent American hostages for their own advancement, with serious adverse consequences to all Iranian people. In the interests of the people of Iran and of their possible future as a unified and peaceful nation living in freedom, it is imperative that the Iranian Gov- ernment resolve this crisis. With a return of rationality, interna- tional lawlessness need not be Iran's fate. Bankruptcy ? political as well as moral ?need not be Iran's future. , If interference from outside is a threat, the threat does not come from the United States. In a rine?tInn POk. was asked to be more s' Iran is further Isolated from the rest of ' the 'World," he said. "Every day that the American Embassy 'remains a prison pushes Iran further into lawlessness, down and down the spiral of disorder." Powell Warns Militants At the White House, Jody Powell, the spokesman, said today that the militants must have "better sense" than to kill any American hostages. Referring to the militant's linking Iraq to the hostages, Mr. Powell said; "they should well understand if they kill any of our people, a border spat with Iraq will be one of the least of their problems." Mr. Carter, in a comment on the atti- tude of the United States' allies, criticized those nations that "ask us for leaderShrp but at the sante time they demand their own independence of action." He said some nations "ask for protection but are wary of the obligations of He said that up to now, "the support has been on occasion effective', on other occasions, we have been disappointed." Mr.',$4,rter:confirnied that the, ,United 'States had asked its *live to carry eut a -ban On exports, except fbod and:Meill- chie, to Iran, as the United States did on Monday and to withdraw diplomats from ;rah, even including breaking of rela- tions , , - 'I cannot tell you what those allies and other friends of ours might actually do,' he said, "But we are putting as much Proper effort as Possible to induce the antes to act strongly and in a concerted way, hopefully to break the present dead: lock and to resolve the Crisis." = Kissinger also expressed unhappi- ness with the reaction of the allies. "The Administration has been rightly disap- pointed in the conduct of tmany of our allies, in particular the Europeans," he said. It is indeed dismaying that the in- dustrial countries that are more threat- ened than we by, the turmoil in the Per- sian Gulf are reluctant to accept the risks of a, forward policy against the Soviet Every day that the c is cont nues U on. ris President Carter in Washington yesterday as he addressed the American are being wiped out. More than 800,000 vital point in our policy. America and people have fled the country. Terror Americans are not motivated by relent- tactics, including the use of chemical less hostility, by a desire for indis- weapons, are the trademark of the criminate confrontation or a return to ruthless attempt to crush Moslem the cold war. resistance and to install a Soviet form Berlin Olympics Is Recalled of peace ? a peace of brutal, armed suppression. But for America simply to accept Soviet occupation and domination o A Need for Unshitkable Resolution Afg,hanistan as an accomplished fact Earlier this year; 103 other members would be a cynical signal to the world of the United Nations joined us in con- that could only encourage further ag- Intersection of Historic Trends The challenge in that area of the world as in some others ? comes- , from the intersection of two historic ? trends:, One is the rising demand for , development and for self-determina- tion which is felt ? and deeply felt -- throughout. what we call the third world. The United States responds with sympathy to that demand,. , The other trend is Soviet eipansien- ism ? which we are determined to op- pose. The reality of the world today is that Moscow exploits unrest not to ad- dress a discontent that underlies that unrest, not to overcome the inequalities that give rise to unrest, but to expand its own dominion and to satisfy its im- perial objectives. In Afghanistan, the Soviet Union has 'revealed for the world the hypocrisy of its courtship of the third world. It has shown that it will not be deterred by principle or decency, or by interne- tionallaw, or by world public opinion, but by the opposition of freedom-loving and; patriotic Afghanis. And it has made this known in a, region which is at once political 'volatile and economi- cally crucial. An Enormous Military Buildup ? '4--The subjugation of Afghanistan resents the first direct Intrtision of Soviet armed forces beyond the bor- ders of the Warsaw Pact nations since the Second World War. ' The explosiveness of this region, its great natural wealth, and the Soviet willingness to use the armed forces that have been developed during the Kremlin's enormous military buildup in the lest 15 years are what combine to Make the invasion of Afghanistan so unsettling to the future of international peace. ' We Must not forget, and our allies in other nations must not forget, that today at this moment ? everyday the Soviet Union is violating human ' standards of decency and violating human rights in the grossest kind of way. Hundreds of Afghan freedom fighters are dying every week, some in brutal mass executions. Entire villages dernnin the Soviet ghanistan and demanding the immedi- danger to world rieace. It's America's - g e invasion of A!- gression, further tension, and further ate withdrawal of the invading forces. responsibility to register, and register Soviet citizens have never been in- ip,concrete terms, our condemnation of formed of this United Nations action. the Soviet invasion? for as long as that Thie unprecedented condemnation was ?. invasion continues. significant, but? because of the princl- It's extremely important that we not - Pie at stake, because of the nation's Ira- in any way condone Soviet aggression. ' portance to Western security, becauSg We must recall the experience of 1936, of the savagery of the Soviet assault the year of the Berlin Olympic Games. which continues to now, and because of , They were used to inflate the prestige ? the Soviet Union's use of its own troops of an ambitious dictator, Adolf Hitler, directly in such a conflict ? it's imper- ' to show Germany's totalitarian atiVe that we continue to meet the chat- strength to the world in the sports lenge of the invasion with calm and Un- arena as it was being used to cow the shakable resolution. world on the banks of the Rhine. The measures 'that I've ordered are The parallel with the site and timing designed to enhance peace. They in- clude the embargo on further grain of the 1980 Olympics is striking. Let me call your attention to one compelling sales, tightened controls on high tech- similarity between the Nazi view of the nab& trade, limitations of fishing in 1936 Olympics as a propaganda victory United States waters, strengthening of and the official Soviet view of the 1980 our naval presence in the Indian Ocean, intensification of our development of Summer Games. I'd like to read to You passage from this year's edition of rapid-deployment, forces and our ca- the "Handbook for Party Militants" pacity to deploy them and to use them, < iasiled in Moscow for Soviet Commu- and our offer to assist states in the re- nist.Party activists, and I quote: gion to maintain their own security: These are necessary steps on acourse '.' Quotation From Soviet Handbook , . ? -' , with certainty the - ; We Cannot know wi -Certain e the sele"Otiod of the cities where the ; motivations of the'Soviel Moire into At- Olympic Games take place. oTheng thdecie- ghaniatart.-- whether Afghanistan is sion to award honor of idi the purpose or the prelude. Regardless Olympic Games to the capital of the , of its motives, there can be no doubt world's first socialist state is convinc- -that the Soviet invasion poses an in- ing testimony of the general recogni- , creased threat to the independence of tion of the historic importance and cot.- : natiOns to o vita n the rel rce e resources stoanthd o tau e to rEFtness of the foreign policy course of access our country, and of the enormous serv- sea i ice of the Soviet Union in the struggle But r interest in peace and stabil- for peace." ity in the region, goes far beyond eari. Let me repeat a part of that: , nomics. We cannot wish away the fact "The decision to award the honor of that conflict and tension in the region holding the Olympic Games to the capi- could endanger the broader peace. And tal of the world's first socialist state is if the invasion of Afghanistan does in-. convincing testimony of the general deed then ndofwor thapeatcoternminogf years, and recognition of the historic importance be and correctness of the foreign policy ? Americans must accept the truth that course of our country, and of the enor- wmous services of the Soviet Union in the ,cult timea!ocurhactlouenrsg challenging verya bdy iff- re-1 struggle for peace." sponding firmly, we intend to halt ag- A few weeks ago, I met with Ameri gression where it takes place and to - can athleted in the White House. I ex- deter it elsewhere. ' , . ' . , plained the Soviet stake in the Olym- Let me underline for you this most Pics and ' the Morel and political rea- WhiChWe must and we will persist:-au .akiEk ideological struggle between Challenging Times May Be Ahead East and West is directly involved in , Approved For Release 2010/06/28: CIA-RDP90-00552R000101020079-3 The New York Times/ Teresa Male Society of Newspaper Editors sons why the United States will not send a team to the Moscow Games. I understand the sacrifice that has been asked from these men and women for the sake of the security of their country and their world, The Soviet leaders certainly understand it. But for our not sending a team to Moscow ? this is far more than a symbolic ges- ture. It's a direct repudiation ? in the phrase of their propaganda handbook ? of the "correctness" of their foreign policy. The United States does not wish to be represented in a host country that is in- vading and subjugating another nation ? in direct violation of human decency and international law. If legal actions are necessary to enforce the decision not to send a team to Moscow, then I will take those legal actions. All of these decisions do require sac- rifice, and I've acted to assure that the burdens of those sacrifices are shared as equally as possible among all Americans. The American people have demonstrated that they are willing to bear their share of the burden. But it is also vital that the burden of sacrifice be shared among our allies and a/piing other nations. Neither we nor our allies want to de- stroy the framework of East-West rela- tions that has yielded concrete benefits for so many people. But, ultimately, if we continue to seek the benefit of detente while ignoring the necessity for deterrence, we would lose the advan- tages of both. Neutral, Nonaligned Afghanistan It is essential that our intentions be absolutely clear. The measures we have taken against the ?Sovit Union 'since the invasion will remain in effect until there ie total withdrawal of Soviet troops from Afghanistan. Then, and only then, we would be prepared to join with Afghanistan and her neighbors in a guarantee of the true neutrality and noninterference in Afghanistan's inter- nal affairs. We support the restoration of a neutral, nonaligned Afghanistan, with a government that would be re- sponsive to the needs and the wishes of the people of that country. Although the Soviets have talked about the withdrawal -of their troops, they have actually shown no interest in Such proposals. There are no signs at thie time of a Soviet As a matter of fact, 'within this last week, we have proof that the Sovi- ets are moving additional troop units across the border into Afghanistan. We must be prepared to hold our course, and to impose the cost of aggression for as long as this is necessary.,