IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY:

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020017-1
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: K
• Document Page Count: 42
• Document Creation Date: December 9, 2016
• Document Release Date: March 8, 2000
• Sequence Number: 17
• Content Type: MISC

IDENAPIPTceT.Flf9:0R81"ACqCISPR9e):2:9NRETS)8gIRTPIR9A_2891Nmponent respon-
sible for exit interview briefings of
staff and contract internal personnel.
ACTIVITY CODE: I, B, (b), 1
COMPONENT: OS/PSI/EAB
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? ADate(s)?
25X1A
30 May 72
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
-Agency employees, Office of Personnel, and Office of Security
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do (as) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes . NoX
so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component. do the activity more efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
_
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by Os that you feel is more
ilqportant than this one? Yes No X If so, whrit?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020017-1
IDENT FtekrPrliFIVRVf-is.f3V21aPc/P9Mi'fiPl%FPregBR8VPAIRctoP2R17p13nent
responsible for official foreign
travel briefings of staff and
contract internal personnel.-
ACTIVITY CODE: 1, B, (b), 2 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/EAB
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
25X1A
26 Oct 72
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
The Agency and its employees.
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes -X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes , No X
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without .
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
. important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020017-1
IDENTIFIT&FT-FReikeris999g1?9/
ACTIVITY CODE:
I, B, (b), 3
25X1A ?
COMPONENT: OS/PSI/EAB
EVALUATION: DATE:
? What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? . Date(s)?
2 5X1 A
21 Oct 68
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
The Agency and its employees.
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No X
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of.
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020017-1
IDENTIAMiliWifi-ReArMq1M9/GhiP16-FRPN 13(9?1WMPW1291;11-1
mTonent
responsible for personal foreign
travel briefings.
ACTIVITY CODE: 1, B, (b), 4 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/EAB
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
25X1A
13 April 66
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
The Agency and the employees
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes r
No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes..?.. NoX
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more,efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what? ?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020017-1
.25X1A ?
IDENTIFPommM FerRRITITN0101.09
ACTIVITY CODE: I, B, (b), 5 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/EAB
EVALUATION: DATE:
?What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? .Date(s)?
25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Office of Security
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No X
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity- should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
dAportant than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020017-1
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 ?:,,CIA-SIPf8i3c13e0008i3lVeOginG2OLy On-Ap
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: ine onent
responsible for making the Office
of Security decision concerning
the separation in absentia of an
Agency employee.
ACTIVITY CODE: 1, B, (b), 6
COMPONENT: OS/PSI/EAB
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
None. This is an administrative procedure to Insure that
Absentia separation employees return all Agency property and sign
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes No Secrecy
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity? Agreements.
OS and Office of Personnel
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes NoX
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X.
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?.
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more -
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020017-1
IDENTM3RrVcr IFfecPPIW!?2iRktiTI.WW3HTOWV2i!x(3* onent
responsible for making the Office
of Security decision concerning an.
employee's intent to take outside
employment while still an Agency
employee.
ACTIVITY CODE: 1, B, (b), 7 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/EAB
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is
25X1A
are
our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
5 Feb 70
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
25X1A
Employees component
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes ' No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes a No
Ic so, how?
By having the employees administrativecomponent adhere to the
.intent of the regulation.
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes X No
If so, where and why?
The employees administrative component who should determine
if such employment will effect his performance.
Can another component do the activity more efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes x No If so, which component and why?
Same as above.
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity he reduced in scope/size or discontinued
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes X
If so, how?
By rewriting the regualtion
only it tnete is security si
Is there any activity not now Dein
important than this one? Yes
without
No
- indicating that approval is required
niticancp-
pursueu oy OS that you feel is more
No x If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020017-1
Approved For Release 2000/09/02: CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020017-1
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Security component
responsible for making the Office
of Security decision concerning i
an employee's intent to engage n
a non-Agency training program.
ACTIVITY CODE: T, B, (b), 8 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/FAB
EVALUATION:
25X1A
DATE:
? What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
2 April 1964
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes x No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Employees component
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes ' No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes ?X No
If so, how?
By having the employees administrative
the intent of the regulation.
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes X No
If so, where and why?
The employees administrative component. If the employee is
taking too many courses it could interfere with his Agency
iob
Can anothe'r component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes x No If so, which component and why?
As indicated above, the employee's administrative component has
the vested interest in this type of activity. If there is no
security. significance, -the employee component should approve the
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light_ ot request.
Watergate? Yes No x If so, what?
component adhere to
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes X No
If so, how?
By rewriting the regulation - indicating approval is required
only if there is security significance.
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020017-1
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP831300823R000700020017 1 _
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office ot 5ecurity coMponent
responsible for making the Office
of Security decision relative to
an employee's intent to make public
appearances.
ACTIVITY CODE: I, B, (b), 9 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/EAB
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? .Date(s)?
25X1A 5 Feb 70
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
OS and Assistant to the Director
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes Nox
I37 so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does- the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more -
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02: CIA-RDP83600823R000700020017-1
Approved For Release 2000/09/02: CIA-RDP831300823R000700020017,1
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office (lit security component
responsible for making the Office
of Security decision relative to
an employee's intent to present a ?
manuscript to a publisher for publi-
cation.
ACTIVITY CODE: 1, B, (b), 10
COMPONENT: OS/PSI/EAB
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
5X1A
5 Feb 70
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
OS and Assistant to the Director
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes NoX
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reducedin scope/size or discontinued without.
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes NoX
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020017-1
IDAPPTVeCifiolliWe@PeAR*1,3fgair::C141WPIRRK2WVeMM.1)7-1component
responsible for making the Office
of Security decision relative to
an employee's intent to visit a
foreign embassy.
ACTIVITY CODE: I, B, (b), 11 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/EAB
EVALUATION: DATE:
25)0A
, What is (are) our reference (s) for this activity? .,Date(s)?
?
1 April 61
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
The Office of Security? Cover and Commercial Staff, and
the employee component, and employees.
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes x No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? les X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No
L- so, how?
X
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size, or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
iinportant than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020017-1
IDEAPPrDivefifP6PseARTP194Y-.:CMDF;93
j!:T2g7ITTiprT7
component
responsible for counseling Agency
employees relative to foreign
social contacts.
ACTIVITY CODE: 1, B, (b), 12
COMPONENT: OS/PST/EAB
EVALUATION: DATE:
25X1A
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
1 April 61
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneTiciary(ies) of this activity?
OS, CCS and Agency employees
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? YesX ? No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes NoX
? If so, where and why?.
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reducedin scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No x If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020017-1
IDF:#13PrionckfTrAelgItseAPP9kPiqq::CIPt-g)PCPP2R23gTqaq9MF-tomponent
responsible for counseling Agency
employees relative to court
appearances.
ACTIVITY CODE: 1, B, (h),13 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/EAB
EVALUATION: DATE:
25X1A
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? .Date(s)?
2 April 64
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
CCS, OS and Agency employees
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes . No X
I a: so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?.
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes Mox
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more -
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020017-1
IDE#PPTITqfnelerein9iITTN:
: CIARDP83B00823R000700020017-1
The Office of Security component
responsible for counseling Agency
employees relative to jury duty.
ACTIVITY CODE: I, B, (b), 14
COMPONENT: OS/PSI/EAB
EVALUATION: DATE:
25X1A
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
2 April 64
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
CCS,OS,OGC and Agency employees
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No X
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No x
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020017-1
L02 : CIA-RDP83130082313000700020017-1
I DEhlITM41138sTlii?011- Y : The Office of Security component that
counsels Agency -employees relative to
questions they may have to answer on
applications (school, community organi-
zations) concerning their employment.
ACTIVITY CODE: I, B, (b), 15 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/EAB
EVALUATION: DATE:
25X1A
What is (are) our reference (s) for thisactivity? Date(s)?
7 June 71
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes x No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
CCS and Agency employees
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes , NoX
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020017-1
IDENTIAPTivikckroOPeeiMM9/(11iCifriRPFSQ1319q8233M991(10P2Wiltnent that
counsels Agency employees concerning
their Summaries of Agency Employment.
ACTIVITY CODE: 1, B, (b), 16 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/EAB
EVALUATION:
25X1A
DATE:
,What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
30 May 72
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Agency employees and Office of Security
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes , No X
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes Mox
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020017-1
IDENT 1 AppkoiviedNF of) IRet!eTq V:1010/0:9/02TRATFRPIR308FWM.R190Wilonent that
reviews all retirement actions and
documents the security file relative
to Agency decisions on each individual
case.
ACTIVITY CODE: 1, B, (b), 17 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/EAB
EVALUATION: DATE:
25X1A
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
30 May 72
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Office of Personnel
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still
necessary? Yes X
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes
If so, how?
No
No X
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred .
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020017-1
IDENTIPpemov0FoRelies2AGR09/02tRA-131:Tfag?9)8f23WRIPPF:Si) onent that
prepares respons-es to correspondence
received by the Agency or the DCI,
relative to matters under purview of
the Office of Security.
ACTIVITY CODE: 1, B, (b), 18 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/EAB
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
UNKNOWN
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
0/DCI and other Agency components
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes x. No
II: so, how? Index name of correspondent and provide brief .
description as to type of correspondence. Destroy actual
correspondence rather than filing in SRD.
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of,
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes X No
If so, how? Review correspondence for threat only.
Index as noted above, and destroy.
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
. important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020017-1
IDENTIAMMOF19tQsPAPP9/9?/?2`1W-189MErn3MUP9CIPTLIp onent
responsible for making the Office
of Security decision relative to
an employee's intent to join a
club or organization.
ACTIVITY CODE: 1, B, (b), 19
COMPONENT: OS/PSI/EAB
EVALUATION:
25X1A
DATE:
.What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? .Date(s)?
2 Mar 65
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
OS and Agency employees
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes x No
Can the activity be done more efficiently br less costly? Yes No X
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes X No
If so, how?
By having the employee submit requests for approval only
for those organizations which they feel may be questionable.
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020017-1
I DENT I FARFMTA\Fct51RekaPT \MEVIPM419.PW-FPF@Pgq82?PqFP@PAPQM
nent that
counsels Agency employees relative to
public media contacts.
ACTIVITY CODE: 1, B, (b), 20 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/EAB
EVALUATION: DATE:
25X1A
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
13 July 65
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes x No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Assistant to the Director
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes "X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes., No X
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
The responsibility for this activity belongs to the Assistant,
to the DCI, not the Office of Security. EAB acts, as a channel
for such requests.
Can another component do the activity more efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in .the light of
Watergate? Yes No K If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes ? No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020017-1
I DENT/M/1MM EQ'r lea?s,e-2,0Pg/09/92'SIA-ROP83B00823R000700020017-1
1Y.
Te Office of Security component that
makes the Office of Security decision
relative to an Agency employee's
application for Federal Employee
Compensation.
ACTIVITY CODE; 1, B, (b), 21
COMPONENT: OS/PSI/EAB
EVALUATION: DATE:
25X1A
.What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? :Date(s)?
18 Jan 73
?
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
AXXIXXXXWaXXXX Cover and Commercial Staff
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes )( No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes , No
If so, how?
X
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity. include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?,
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020017-1
I DENT I4PlinviefiCrT rAp I eRes notomp 2 :,Filieek-ISPi8i3pgogvilo:Fuoroio.?yooi7-1.
component that
makes the Office of Security decision
relative to bestowing an Honor or Merit
Award on an employee.
ACTIVITY CODE: 1, B, (b), 22
COMPONENT: OS/PSI/EAB
EVALUATION: DATE:
25X1A
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
10 Dec 73
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Honor and Merit Awards Board
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No X
DT so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes NoX
If so, how?
? Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020017-1
le/MT RGI?f?P?2'tRATljtPfPg?ge123AVPFPPP:qtT4 onent that
IDENTIWVAvielAtree
makes the Office-of Security decision
relative to Agency employees hospitali-
zation insurance applications:
ACTIVITY CODE: 1, B, (b), 23 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/EAB
EVALUATION: DATE:
25X1A
? What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? ..Date(s)?
22 Nov 65
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
All Agency personnel
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes x No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes_X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes , No X
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more efficiently? ? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
siudficant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more ?
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020017-1
IDENTPLIVInTqfPr 130eA21419111P/92 WeIRRNPM-PR8EPPM?1161ip onent that
makes the Office-of Security decision
concerning an Agency employee's intent
to sponsor an alien.
ACTIVITY CODE: 1, B, (b), 24 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/EAB
EVALUATION: DATE:
25X1A
25X1A
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
?
5 Feb 70
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes x No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
OS and Agency employees
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No X
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No x If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No x
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what? 0 .
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020017-1
IDENTPfPTATISC:Rr t3leAteriCtap/i029/:02.:9&-R6MBRO8R11807u0191W01oc7-tp
m onent that
nx-441cmc x44-KenckttjxcxxxxfoaEgmxixtiaxcloatakixix
carneaniagoaxixeuaapermarix xocfocsagawalconac
Atm xixbRoatxxonctxtmx xiktiamcck Agoartarinixx
ADVISES the Suggestion Award Committee
relative to Security aspects of Committee
activities.
ACTIVITY CODE: 1, B, (b), 25 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/EAB
EVALUATION:
25X1A
DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
4 Feb 75
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Suggestion Awards Committee
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes
If so, how?
No
No X-
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include an thing questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No A If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020017-1
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 ? CIA-RDP831300823R000700020017ini
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The ()trice or becurrry co ponent that
assigns and processes covert site
investigations.
ACTIVITY CODE: I, B, (b), 26 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/FAB
EVALUATION: DATE:
25X1A
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
1 April 61
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
OL/Safehouse Branch
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes NoX
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes NoX
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020017-1
IDENTAPPMATIleOr ffPleAMNPFIC1191?2:91RPPRW8nRgra-719PRCIPV614 onent
responsible for-giving the Office
of Security coordination on use
of cover.
ACTIVITY CODE: 1, B, (b), 27 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/EAB
EVALUATION: DATE:
25X1A
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
22 Nov 65
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Cover and Commercial Staff
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes x No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No
If so, how?
X
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No. X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No x If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not how being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020017-1
IDENT APPUIVP0 glQr Rglemcaripp/10NO2 :
ACTIVITY CODE: 1, B, (b), 28 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/EAB
EVALUATION: DATE:
25X1A
25X1A
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
22 Nov 65
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
The Agency
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes , No X
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No x If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020017-1
IDENTIVPTATqffRr130eWTIROPIP19/92:f-A-FtPP18?ROVORSPRUPPROFoliponent that
makes the Office-of Security decision
relative to the approval and issuance
of CIA Investigator Credentials, True/
Alias.
ACTIVITY CODE: 1, B, (b), 29 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/EAB
EVALUATION: DATE:
25X1A
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? _Date(s)?
Hq Manual Sect 22 Nov 65
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the.beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Office of Security
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes 5( No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No
If so, how?
X
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes_ No x
If so, where and why?
Can another component ? do the activity more efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity, include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If co, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020017-1
25X1C .
IDENTAPPMPOS-ifor liPlent4RAP4?19?
ACTIVITY CODE: 1, B, (b), 30 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/EAB
EVALUATION:
25X1A DATE;
What is are our for this activity? Date(s)?
22 Nov 65
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes x No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Office of Security
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes NoX
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No x If so what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more -
. important than this one? Yes No X If co, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020017-1
IDF\Tfkppinrcigr ee[2P94IPPIP2
ACTIVITY CODE: 1, B, (b), 31 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/EAB
What is (are) our reference (s) for this activity? .Date (s)?
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force?
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No X
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No x If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020017-1
25X1C ?
I DENT f`IltcWil f?1- tWeAter.4{kPINIG19/P
ACTIVITY CODE: 1, B, (b), 32 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/EAB
EVALUATION: DATE:
25X1A
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
7 April 71
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes x No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
DCl/Security Staff
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes , NoX
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No x
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020017-1
IDEyffffrnTIRrFa-RETNRow-PRIAgfvamovoinponent that
makes the Office- of Security decision
relative to the certification and
issuances of CIA Firearms Permit.
ACTIVITY CODE: 1, B, (b), 33
COMPONENT: OS/PSI/EAB
EVALUATION: DATE:
25X1A
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
7 April 71
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
The Agency
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes , No
If so, how?
X
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
. If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more,efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?.
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reducedin scope/size or discontinued without.
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If co', how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If co, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020017-1
25X1A-
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIViii
. Approved For Release 200.0/09/02*:
?
ACTIVITY CODE: 1, B, (b), 34 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/EAB
EVALUATION: DATE:
25X1A
'What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
?
22 Nov 65
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Cover and Commercial Staff
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No X
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable .in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS, that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020017-1
IDENT ERr tWerg[R091P19/921:`IcclAtFiErie@P?14234109147-CRO)200374-onent
responsible for the processing of
OS personnel cover requirements.
ACTIVITY CODE: 1, B, (b), 35 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/EAB
EVALUATION: DATE:
25X1A
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? :Date(s)?
30 Nov 59
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Covert OS Personnel
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes , No X
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No x
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No x If so, what?
Can this activity be ?reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020017-1
IDENARIVEYOIWISaileW19940/14192: 1114-RSIFIVLBOOR3FIMPNOPt290Voliponent
responsible for giving personnel
briefings on Office of Security cover.
ACTIVITY CODE: 1, B, (b), 36 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/EAB
EVALUATION: DATE:
25X1A
? What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
30 Nov 59
?
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Covert OS Personnel
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes , NoX
IT so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? - Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020017-1
25X1C
I DENT#P1IreXEI4 5ckr iWegfceri2P9Q/PW92
ACTIVITY CODE: 1, B, (b),.37 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/EAB
EVALUATION.:
25X1A
DATE:
,What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
1 Apr 67
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Operating components of the Agency.
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes NoX
I= so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No x
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No x If so, what?
Can this activity be ?reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If co, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020017-1
25X1C ?
IDENT ffTreXtq 8Rr Veef4(399/P9/:?
ACTIVITY CODE: 1, B, (b), 38 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/EAB
EVALUATION: DATE:
25X1A
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
1 Apr 61
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Operating components of the Agency.
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes , No X
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No x
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020017-1
IDENT4TRITXTqW00, 1:199/91192 Wk6RBFfl.31Bc0e08giRg0e0j8r3.t20)5)17-1
component
1-2
responsible for the procurement of
federal personnel records.
ACTIVITY CODE: 1, B, (b), 39
COMPONENT: OS/PSI/EAB
EVALUATION:
25X1A
DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
22 Nov 65
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Office of Personnel
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No X
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If co, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020017-1
DE.NTIMirRyirgorol?..elnsieAppM/02 ?
25X1A
ACTIVITY CODE: 1, B, (b), 40
COMPONENT: OS/PSI/EAB
EVALUATION: DATE:
25X1A
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
1 Apr 61
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Operating components of the Agency.
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes NoX
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?'
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of ?
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reducedin scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020017-1
Approved For Release 2000/09/8A-RDP831300823R000700020017-1
IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY:
ACTIVITY CODE: 1, B, (b), 41 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/EAB
EVALUATION: DATE:
25X1A
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
22 Nov 65
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Operating components of the Agency
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes .X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes , No X
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? .Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020017-1
25X1A
I DENT I F144:01101Mist FOFIRPMMTVPPA.09/0
ACTIVITY CODE: 1, B, (b),42 COMPONENT: OS/PSI/EAB
EVALUATION: DATE:
25X1A
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
22 Nov 65
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? YesNo
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?X
Operating components of the Agency
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes x No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes _ No x
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No x
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83600823R000700020017-1