(UNTITLED)

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020021-6
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: K
• Document Page Count: 29
• Document Creation Date: December 9, 2016
• Document Release Date: March 8, 2000
• Sequence Number: 21
• Content Type: MISC

TDENTf IFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 :
of Secy component responsible
j%mentation for
ACTIVITY CODE: II, E,
EVALUATION:
COMPONENT: OS/P&Ai/A$TD/Personnel Branc:
. DATE :
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
At-the direction of the.Director of Security.
} "Tthe refeiez~ce s
are ( } st1l z
or--ce
n
Who is (are) the beneficiary, a es) of this activity;
Do you feel.the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No X
If so, how?
AD0 y vu 11: ~i.ut 14-y yr -1ie u\-`
-. - -- t t
1 1~..
~ 11 LrJ~LVUIU V 41tA11J1 t%1 i::\i
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes X
If so, where and why? ---
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes. No X If so, which component and why?
Does . the- activity include anything questionable in the
Ilia tergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes NO X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is lore
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
P ro~ei $r--Reieas ? OQ83$ /9 I RDR- 3B0-08:_2 R0,00.7000200 1--f
 I DENT 'CW1w" rc leA@i' (yQgJO2rhCeeACT i 08?2 J QWQ 0eg4onent that
serves as secretary to the Professional
Security Career Service Board and is
responsible for preparation of agenda
and minutes of meetings.
ACTIVITY CODE: II, E, (b), 1
COMPONENT: OS/P$M/AMTD/Personnel Branch
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
At the direction of the Director of Security.
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No*
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel the activity is still necessary? Yes X No__
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes Nom--
If so, how?
Do you feel that responsibility for the activity should be transferred
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes .
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more. efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the. light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes _ No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020021-6
 IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Security.component that
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 is]RDP81B00 2SROf iOA=02c.isommended by the
Security Career Service Boards.
ACTIVITY CODE: II, E, (b), 2 COMPONENT: OS/P&M/AMTD/Personnel Branc:`
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
As directed by-the Director of Security..
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No'
Who is (are) the bene:ficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel.the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No X
If so, how?
nn -1: y H _ .. ..~ .. hat s r pons ty for t1 i_ucv YT y
1 1 4 /! V u 1 U L4 1 till l 1 l:1 rV \ L
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, where and why? -
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes____ No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020021-6
 IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: e Q ,g,, ~ ponent responsible
Approved For Release 2000/09/02:R'C'f"~&nn~of2t Annual Personnel
Plan.
ACTIVITY CODE: II, E, (b), 3 COMPONENT: OS/P&M/A$TD/Personnel Braac:
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference (s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Personnel Advisory Study Group and CIA Management Committee, 1974
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No*
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel.the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X' No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes NoX
If so, how?
To - yo, ?r o1 th ,
J:,
L t _ lnsponsi bili- or _ ... ,. ,.y the acti ty sho l d 1-
----r .., ~.-~,., JllV laa UV tl ^11 .J Jr. \.1l1.
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes .~o X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes _ No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this on-e? Yes _ No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020021-6
 IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Securit component responsible
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 fGIA-FRIDE84QQ*2,-1RWQfiQO 091& Personnel
Development Program.
.EVALUATION: DATE:
ACTIVITY CODE: II, E_j_ (b), 4 COMPONENT: OS/PGM/A&TD/Personnel Branc'
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Personnel Advisory Study Group and CIA Management Committee., 1974.
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No'
Who is (are) the bene'ficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel.the activity is still necessary? Yes X No _
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes
If so, how?
NT o
No X
Do f o t a resp o s:} lit fo tho `' ' ` i
e ui1 ..y i v 1 a, u~..11`. 1v y /11 V U
lu U~: L 1 u11J1 L:1 i ~LL
to another CS component or. to another 0-dice? Yes No X
If so, where and why? - -`~
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything quest onable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X_ If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how? ~- !V
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? YesNo X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020021-6
 IDENTIFICATION OF A~~TT11 e
Approved For Release ZOD~/~~~02 : -rR vl 18n2 SR 9Q2O02T4nponent responsible
supervisors and employees and
on obenefits, to
processing, grievances, disciplinary actions*
and preparation of Fitness Reports, etc.
ACTIVITY CODE: II E fi
'
b
5
---~ _ COMPONENT: OS/ P&M/A&TD/Personnel Branc:
EVALUATION:
DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
25X1A
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the bene:ficiary(ies) of this activity?--
Do you feel.the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X i
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly' . Yes No
If
If so, how? N- -X-
} oil
YVia U.1J 1V f 1V1 l 11 aCL14 4 . _ ALU..1 l ~... U f
t'
L/C
to another OS component or to u nol.l r- 5, X
laLr ~~_1~.~.L ~~ ` !'LsX
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X }
If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything
Watergate? Yes Nr b questionable in the light of
NO X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced '
significant effect on overall 1lncy i c or discontinued without
If so, how? ~ec} security? yes No X
Is there any activity not now being OS important than this on-e? Yes pursud by 0that you feel is more
_ No X If so, iv}zat?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020021-6
 IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Security component responsible
Approved For Release 20001091Q ZrC1 lagRi~,IL A82390- 7991121Q0RI-6data base to
provide projections regarding positions,
personnel ceiling, attrition and promotiOnal
headroom.
ACTIVITY CODE: II, E, (b), 6 COMPONENT: OS/P&M/AMTD/Personnel Branc:,
EVALUATION:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No"
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel.the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes io T
If so, how?
I),-) you tee that respons 1r, i ~. LET +} e act :'it sti I 1 l .e r , c
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X
If so, -where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued. without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this on-e? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020021-6
 IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Security. component responsible
Approved For Release 2000/09/Q:rC gE[$I 08?,IB%Oi P(iQ29opt-6files, date of
grade roster, etc. for Office of Security
management use.
ACTIVITY CODE: II, E, (b), 7 COMPONENT: OS/P&M/A$TD/Per.sonnel Eranc_
.EVALUATION: DATE:
our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
125 April 1965 and at the direction of the Director of Security.
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No'
Who is (are) the bene'ficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel.the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes NoX
If so, how?
/ r f~ the 1. L~ ~~\L
Do you feel that responsibilit` for tt'`it,'' /u1 `'hc,,:11L ~ -L W 1. \. : be tr"ns.lfe
-to another OS component or to another Office? Yes No X*_
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No_X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this on-e? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02.: CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020021-6
 IDENTIFICATIO, OF ACTIVITY: TY: r Offfice o'
f Security-component cprofessional
Approve For Release 2000/09/ C 0 @ shin rofofessional
and contract personnel..
ACTIVITY CODE: III E, (b),
EVALUATION:
CO)MPONENT: OS/PF,M/A&TD/Personnel Branc'-
our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No'
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel.the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes` No
If so, how?
feel h~t r~~Y obi
to another OS component or to
If so, where and why.?
r
f vy t h^, u.V 41 1 \. J'r .a110c L c L.1 a;liLJl e1 U
another Office? Y05
Can another component do the activity more, efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is core
important than this one? Yes _ No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02: CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020021-6
 IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: f A onent res onsible
Approved For Release 2000/09/02fo P 2 an'2dan~courrseling to
supervisors and employees on personnel
matters and employee benefits, such as
insurance, Credit Union, Federal Employee
Compensation Act, and leave'-.entitlements.
ACTIVITY - I E COMPONENT: OS/P&M/A&TD/Personnel Brand
EVALUATION: DATE:
25X1A
What is (are) our reference (s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel.the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No X---
If so, how?
f V1 a.~ t a VJ \?-L. .Lbll..lt f11 ~1
fc-r the a?.,. .1 1 /l I-,--V-
to another OS component or to another Office?y Yes
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No ?X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X_ If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020021-6
be t?^?" "- f "'` "1
 IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Q~B,itnent that provides
Approved For Release 2000/09/ I (0 Q l - pport on
disciplinary and placement problems. to senior
management of the Office of Security.
ACTIVITY CODE: II, E, (b), 10 COMPONENT: OS/P&M/A&TD/Personnel Lranc:
.EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No'
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity--?--
Do you feel.the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No X
Pc `'ou feel that res- onsibil ity f r t e ac it ho l '
`-/ ~?' 1 ~~' 1 i ice.. a. .,a.ii ~to another OS component or to another Office? Yes :`o x
If so,-where and why? --`-
Can another component do the activity more,effici.ently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this on-e? Yes NoX If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020021-6
 IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Security component that provides
Approved For Release 2000/09/g YCWn@ll?PI OO p 8Q( 70D8200 } i s s ion of
Honor and Merit awards.
ACTIVITY CODE: II, E, (h), 11_ COMPONENT: OS/P&M/A&TD/Personnel Branc?
.EVALUATION: DATE:
What is are our reference s} for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No'_
Who is (are) the bene"ficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel.the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the heneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No-
If so, how? --
Do you peel that responsibility F te -i+..- 1 1 t C a
to another OS component or to another Of ice? es oiX
If so,-where and why? ---
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this on-e? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B.00823R000700020021-6
 I DENT I F (Approved For Release, 2000/09/
ACTIVITY CODE: II, E, (b),
e Office of Security-component that
n~IRsDPa($~$iOg70~@004~sentation of
certificate awards by the Director of Security.
COMPONENT: OS/P&M/A&TD/Personnel Branc_
EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
At'the direction of the Director of Security.
Is (are) the reference (s) still in force? Yes X_ No'
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel.the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No X
If so, how?
n;. ou foe? that rospc gib Ate' ~~ tiv +,. i ~.
.. .. ~. , ...~ ~
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes _ X If so,-where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No x If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020021-6
 IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Securit component provides
Approved For Release 2000/09/? # Rf8g@@Q OiF rA_ with retire-
ment projections by system and maintains
statistics of Office. of Security retirees.
and arrange appropriate appointments and processes
retiring employees.
ACTIVITY CODE: II, E, (b), 13 COMPONENT: OS/P&M/AMTD/Personnel Brand
EVALUATION: DATE:
25X1A
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No*
Who is (are) the bene-ficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel.the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No X
If so, how?
110 you feel t! at respo s'bilit' for tho aot ,'i+? `l'ou tr sf^'
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes A~ o Xf
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
j;latergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes ~o x
-
I f so, how?
Is
there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020021-6
 IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Security component responsible
Approved For Release 2000/09/QZrCI gplRa3~E 082BRQOQT?Dg2QQ &-6r 61ocation
travel orders on Office of Security employees.
ACTIVITY CODE: II, E, b),_
14
COMPONENT: OS/P$M/A&TD/Personnel Br.anci
.EVALUATION: DATE:
-- 25X1A
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Is (are) the reference (s) still in force? Yes X No'
Who is (are) the bene-ficiary(ies) of this activity?-
Do you feel.the activity is still necessary? Yes X No--
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X' No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? Yes No X
If so, how?
1) 0 y -O u f y- 1 + ~ C +v +, , - ~ r i 1, ; .7 4 4- i . -( - f ?, - 4 1- : - 1. .. 1 a 7-, ~ ~vi1 a J4 a vi ..11a1; u.C to ui.a J t i an 1 ;1 is
to another OS component or to another Office? Yep :eo X
If so, where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes_ No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020021-6
 IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Offi4404W4
f S Approved For Release 2000/09/0~i 1Programs.
ACTIVITY CODE: 26 COMPONENT: OS/Pf,Mi/AMTD/Personnel Brarnc
EVALUATION:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
and at
the direction of the Director of Security.
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No'
Who is (are) the bene-ficiary(ies) of this activity?--
zvi y e `one more efficiently or less costly? Yes No
If so, how?
Do you feel.the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the act' t b 1
Do ,"ou f" el thafi respon c j -~? l i t.,
I -- - ..~ for t?;?
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes
If so, where and why?
Rent that
d -mobility
1 u11 J 1 \? 1 i L,-
o X
Can another component do the activity more. efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how?
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this on-e? Yes_- No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 :. CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020021-6
 IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITY: The Office of Security component that
Approved For Release 2000/09/QlklClIIJPB$RZR@079 @Z,p10ZI-fi involvement in
the NPIC/Directors Opportunity Program, and
the Physically Handicapped Program .
ACTIVITY CODE: II, E, (b), 27 COMPONENT: OS/P&M/A&TD/Personnel Eranc'
.EVALUATION: DATE:
What is (are) our reference(s) for this activity? Date(s)?
Career Board and Director of Security direction.
Is (are) the reference(s) still in force? Yes X No'
Who is (are) the beneficiary(ies) of this activity?
Do you feel.the activity is still necessary? Yes X No
Do(es) the beneficiary(ies) feel it is still necessary? Yes X No
Can the activity be done more efficiently or less costly? YesNX
o
I f so, how?
)n -I'nl, fnnl +hot rc~C 11C!~}~~ - N , -P vr +hn ?+
to another OS component or to another Office? Yes
t r r-: 1" 5f
.;o X
If so,-where and why?
Can another component do the activity more.efficiently? Less costly?
More properly? Yes No X If so, which component and why?
Does the activity include anything questionable in the light of
Watergate? Yes No X If so, what?
Can this activity be reduced in scope/size or discontinued without
significant effect on overall Agency security? Yes No X
If so, how? --"
Is there any activity not now being pursued by OS that you feel is more
important than this one? Yes No X If so, what?
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B.00823R000700020021-6
 Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020021-6
TRAMSMITTAL SLIP
DATE
TO:
ROOM NO.
BUILDING
REMARKS:
OS/EAB handles this activity.
FROM:
ROOM NO.
BUILDING
EXTENSION
1 FFEB ORM 55 241 REPLACES FORM 36-8
WHICH MAY BE USED.
Approved For Release 2000/09/02 : CIA-RDP83B00823R000700020021-6