SECRETARY OF STATE'S ADVISORY PANEL ON OVERSEAS SECURITY

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP86M00886R000200110006-5
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
13
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
December 1, 2010
Sequence Number: 
6
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
August 3, 1984
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP86M00886R000200110006-5.pdf695.67 KB
Body: 
STAT Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/01/13 :CIA-RDP86M00886R000200110006-5 Next 1 Page(s) In Document Denied Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/01/13 :CIA-RDP86M00886R000200110006-5 ? Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/01/13: CIA-RDP86M00886R000200110006-5 o~in ~. cS~iuir_af~ =tE4U 0- AO>~~~iSTRA7~ON 5. [~=Pa!'2T ti'SN~ O~ ST4TE ~SH~~:?TO~. ^ = 20520 1-`12 In July, the Secretary asked a distinguished group of Americans to form a nonpartisan advisory Panel on Overseas Security to study and ma}:e recor:;~endations concerning the security of our diplomatic personnel and facilities abroad. This Panel will be chaired by P.d,~,iral Bobby Inman, retired, taha is currently President of MCC Co=poration in Austin, Te~;as. Other merrbers includ?: -- Senator Warren Rudman, Republican from I~e:~~ Hampshire; Congressman Daniel Mica, Democrat fron Florida; -- Lawrence r.agleburger, for;.zer Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs and former Ambassador to Yugoslavia; -- Lt. General D'Wayne Gray, Chief of Staff of the United States 2~iarine Corps; -- Ann Armstrong, former Am'~?ssador to the United Kingdom; -- Robert 2~fcGuire, currently Chairman of the Board of Pinkerton's, Incorporat?d and former Police Cotmissior.er of the City of t?ew York; and --- Victor Dikeos, a retired Foreign Service Officer, who will be the Panel's Executives Secretary. The members of the Par.21 will examine a number of security-related questions, sucr as: -- What is the nature of the threat that our overseas personnel and facilitizs fact over the nett ten to fifteen years, and hoZV can we best protect against it? -- How can the U.S. fulfill its obligations to protect foreign missions and their personnel in this country? -- And, what aro the resourcz implications of theca answers? The members of the Panel first ti,et on July 27, and they intend to issue their report on or shortly after January 1, 1935. It is anticipated that t;:e Panel will at that time present a series of recommendations concerning our overseas security activities and relat2~? topics. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/01/13: CIA-RDP86M00886R000200110006-5 ? Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/01/13: CIA-RDP86M00886R000200110006-5 Possible Qs and As: Q. F,'ho is the State Department's ?pint of Contact for the Panel? A. Under Secretary for Management Ronald Spiers, who is responsible for the Department's security and counterrorism policies and programs, through his Assistant Secretary for Administration, Robert Lamb. Q. Where will the staff for the Panel come from? A. In addition to State Department e~ployees who will be detailed to the Panel's working stafL, we expect that the other foreign affairs agencies c-~ill also contribute personnel. What o-they agencies will be involved? A. All of the U.S. Government agencies with a major overseas presence will be assisting thz Panel in its work. Q. Will this Panel pr?-empt the existing decision-making process? A. No. The Panel will not deal with military aspects of the question, and =gill not become involved in managing current security programs or day-to-day operations. Will the Panel members travel overseas to study the issue? A. There ray be the need for a trip by 1 or more members, but at the moment we don't anticipate any. Q. tidill the Panel members be paiG? A. They of course will be reirnbu~sed for their travzl and expenses in the process of carrying out their duties on the Panel, but that is all that is a::ticir~ated_ Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/01/13: CIA-RDP86M00886R000200110006-5 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/01/13: CIA-RDP86M00886R000200110006-5 Q. Will the report be made public? A. There will be parts of this report that will be highly classified and of course they won't be released, but all unclassified information will be put in the public domain. Q. Another Panel to study the iss~:e of security is all well and good, but what has the Depart~ent actually done recently about this problem, especially in light of the 'bombings in Beirut and Kuwait? A. In this f~3sca1 year, the Department will spend over 120 million directly on security-related programs and activities to protect our personnel, facilities and national security information overseas. In addition to the ongoing regular security programs, the Department is also over o_ne-half way through the Security Enhancement Program, which will spend more than X130 pillion over a five-year period to enhance security significan~ly at over 65 of our most threatened posts. We have also added a great deal of additional security protection to our posts in Western Europe, in light of the recent assassination attempts there, through a special supplerental approved by the Congress in 1982. In responses to the vehicle bombings in the Middle East last year, all posts have reveiwed their physical barriers and host-government protection, and remedial measur?s have been taken where needed. Drafted: A/EX/MST: ?-iASafford; mas 8/1/8, 632-5376, Doc. 1680M Cleared: A: JPShumate PA/PRESS: BCarlson Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/01/13: CIA-RDP86M00886R000200110006-5 ? Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/01/13: CIA-RDP86M00886R000200110006-5 has been to protect our facilities and people against specific, identifiable threats. As a cor.seguQnce taken a neW type of threat arises, our eBployees are sub}act to ris'~ until ue have,- had time to institute proper measures. bTe often appear reactive. 5.'e cannot protect every post against every threat. The. costs--human as well as material--are too great. Our policy I, ~ THE PANEL SHOULD EVALUATE THE DEpART?tENT'S RESPO;~SIBILITIES TO PROTECT U.S. F?~CILITIES AFD PERSOJiNEL A$P,OAD AND DETERriINE HObJ BEST THcY CAN $E FULFILLED. The number and size of our diplomatic and consular posts and foreign affairs agencies abroad have grown dramatically since the Second IJorld `ear. The Departaent has sought to accommodate the full range of U.S. Government activities that seek to locate under the uzabrella of our embassies. control determine operational effectiveness and our obli4atzons to protect our people. In acIcno=pledging oux responsibilities to protect emplogees, tae nave differentiated bet:aeen terrorist acts dixected against our buildings and personnel and criminal activities s~hich affect an entire populace. To the pzrson whose life or family is thzeatenzd at a remote 2nd dangerous post, this distinction is li:tely to be academic. -Criainal activity and common crime are, to some extent, a pant of the landscape in Lhe Uaitzd Sta gs; terrorist activity is not. Our present policy takes into account the fact that many actions necessary to protect personnel froze co:vmon cta~e Given the intensified security threat the panel should examine the rixe, composition, location and degree of we can exercise o>>er the 257 Foreign Service posts Lo the prooer balance between re2so*_:ed security ~aeasur2s, protect er~~loyees zgainst common creme. overseas would be the zesponsibility of the employee an the ZT.S. The Panel .should re`-exacin2 our' responsibilities to Our security zneasur2s a~ve been concentrated on chanceries because they ar,~ generall;~ su'oject to t;~e greatest threat. ~Te have dons I?as for residznces. Government-owned housing is often treated di~fferentlq from privately-leased housing. Schools and com;~unity centers represent sn even more razzed pattern. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/01/13: CIA-RDP86M00886R000200110006-5 _ ? Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/01/13: CIA-RDP86M00886R000200110006-5 - ~' ?` Iy,r THE ADEQUr1CY OF PRESENT PROGRAY.5 TO PROTECT FOY.EIC?~ t;ISSIONS AND T:{EIR PERSO2iNEL SITUATED IFS THIS COUNTRY NEED COY.PREHE?:SIVE RETHINKING. THE ti;;ITED STATES 't',A.KES HEAVY Dc?;ANDS Oti FOREIGN GOV.r.RP~?lENTS TO PROTECT ITS p;ISSI.ONS. 5+I{EN THEY?SEEK RECIPROCITY, OUR QESPONSE HaS NOT ALIvAYS BE`cN SATISFACTORY TO THEN. Protection of foreigners in the United Ststea is a quilt wor~C of responsibilities. The Secret Service protects visiting Chiefs of State ar.d Heads of GovernWent. State's Office of Security generally protects their s+ives, husbands and other accotipanying adult family mewbere. Statz Security has responsibility for protecting all other foreign visitors ._ including cabinet members. In ~rashington, the Uniformed Division of the Secret Service protects foreign missions. Elsewhere, responsibility falls on local jurisdictions. For Ness York, the Department is acquiring fron Treasury the authority to reimburse local jurisdictions for extraordinary expenses in connection with protection of foreign missions to hz U.N. ~Ie have legislative authority to establish a similar program for consular facilities and people but as yet no money to fund the progran. Our efxectiveness in meeting these zesponsibilities has r~ direct besrir.g on the willingness oz' foreign governaents to protect our personnel. These are a number of Federal agencies involved in providing this protection. Stale alone cannot rationalize this situation. The Panel should nz'~ce recor~nendations t_o the _Secretarv for xatzonalizing this situ a_tion,._reco?nizirn that s~on~ may xeguire follow-up~h other a~Q~enci_es. - - V. b]HAT ARE THE P.ESOURCE I'riPLIC~1'lTONS Or OUrZ SECUkITY 2ESP0?+SIBILITIES? This Panel is being asked to cone for=.~ard with a program which could lay the foundationp of the Department's security philosophy and practices for t5e next generation. 7cor a progran of this scope resources cannot be t'e deciding factor. But the DepsrtTaent's.m2ans are nodzst sad funding must be taken into account. The Panel show?_d id?nt _ `v in Pnersl Lerms, the ~~ - -- -==y=~= - - - - - ,mss ~ - costs of their recomner_dations to the S Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/01/13: CIA-RDP86M00886R000200110006-5 ~ Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/01/13: CIA-RDP86M00886R000200110006-5 .. ?~.. The Penei ohould ngse6s the actions necessary to.er.sure e securewenvironc+ant for our employees once potential threats are identified or oro~ected. In today's world our foreign national employees in aoae countries risk their lives and yell being by working for uy. ble need outside thinking on U.S. Government responsibility for these loyal .pen and women. The Penel~uld examine our obligations to national employes snd our ability to sstisiy reasonably these expections. lI, IN ADDITION TO CONSIDERING TEE RESPOivSIBILITY OF THE U. S. GOVER2iMENT TO ITS EF~PLO'tEES, THE pA?:EL SHOULD ALSO AEVIELJ THE CONDITIONS OF A?] EMPLOYEE' 5 SERVICE AT A DA?1GE1tOUS OR THREATENED POST. Traditionally the Foreign Service and other foreign affairs agencies have taken pride in their discipline snd willingness to serve at difficult and hazardous posts. fever before havo the dangers been so grave and direct. The Panel should examine whether ['mesa meta and more hazardous conditions have neaninofully altered our psycholocicsl contxact t~xih our ea~loyees2 stud their implications for our xecruzt~en' assignment policy, and the total psychic and financial coWper.sation packas~e? 'vThat sew training may be needed? III. THE PANEL SHOULD 3tEVILW OC? OBLIGATIOIi TO P~2OTECT A2:ERICA2v' $USINESSES AND PRI9aTE IriSTITUTIONS OPr.RATING A5RCt'D AGAINST THREATS TO THEM AS A~i?RZCA.I:S OR SY"ri30LS 0. TiiE.U?iITED STATES . Today the Office of Security offers inforrsal advice to private industry in the t3nited States and responds to inquiries on threats. This service is pxovided unevenly. SY is developing a pronran to strengthen and institutionalize these arrangements. Our security support of American business sill continue to be limited to unclassified, advisory activities unless we change present policy. Abroad this sort df assistance is provided to those firms knos~.ledgeable enough to soak us out or when coadi2?_ons in a particular country lead the post to reach out to ziambers of the private American casmunity. The Panel could help us achieves a clear concensue on our xeanonsibilities for American citizens businesses and other institu[ions abroyd. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/01/13: CIA-RDP86M00886R000200110006-5 ? Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/01/13: CIA-RDP86M00886R000200110006-5 SCHEDULE FOP, THE JULY 27, 1984 MEETING OF THE SECRETARY'S CO:;N:ISSIO:~ Oh OVERSEAS SECURITY 8:45-9:00 a.m. Commission mer::bers asserble in the 9:00-9:30 a.m. 1:10 p.m. 9:40-9:50 a.m. 9:55-10:15 a.m. 10:20-10:40 a.m. 10:45-11:00 a.m. 11:05-11:20 a.m. 11:25-11:~O.a.m. 11:5 a.m.- . 12:00 p.m. 12:05-12:15 p.m. 12:20-12:30 p.m. 12:35-12:50 p.m. 12:55-1:10 p.m. 1:15-2:20 p.m. 2:30-:30 p.r^. Operations Center Conrerence Room r;eeting with Secretary St:ultz Briefing for Commission N,embers Robert E. Lamb, Assistant Secretary for Administration: 'Introduction' David Fields, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Security: 'The Nature of the Threat' Harvey Buffalo, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Foreign Buildings: 'Physical Security and our Overseas Facilities' Ambassador Donald pett~rson, Acting Director ofr;anagemer,t Operations: 'The Nature of Our Overseas Presence' Ambassador Robert Sayre, Director of the Office for Counter-terrorism and Emergency Planning: 'International Terrorism' Robert Ribera, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Communications: 'Co~~.:~unications Security and the Paperless Embassy' James P~olan, Director of the Office of Foreign Missions: 'P.?ciprocity and the Security Context' Alarcia Curran, Director of the Family Liaison Office: 'Family Liaison Office Persp?ctive on Security' Dennis Hays, President of the American Foreign Service Association: `AFSA Perspective on Security' Roger Feldman, Comptrollzr: 'Budgetary Implications of Security' Y~lr. Lamb: 'i7on-23onetary Costs of Security' Lunch, Eienry Clay P.oom, eigh~h floor Commission r~.e,:ibers convent for discussion, Room 6316 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/01/13: CIA-RDP86M00886R000200110006-5 ? Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/01/13: CIA-RDP86M00886R000200110006-5 ? ., ; . In testi^ony before the Congress, Y said we mould convene a high-level advisory panel to loob at the ramifications of embassy security ~:orld~:ide. I briefly described to the Cor~~nittee---just as X did in the letter you received from ne--the nature of the problem we face in conducting our nation's business around the world. I told them that I would be seeking your judqnent on the appropriate balance bet~azen th? risks and benefits of our presence abroad. What I hope to see is a map that will guide us into t:he future. You are all vQry busy and I an pleased that you have agreed to participate in this wor;;. I can think of no Wore distingui:>hed and appropriate panel than this one, and I want to express my thanks that you have carved out a day to devote to this topic. In my opinion, there are few issues which impack fnore seriously on how tae ray carry out our foreign policies. Business is best conducted ir, a stable work environment. And yet, we cannot give up and come Nome every time stability is threatened. I?do not have to tell you that our Foreign Ser~~ice is not a timid or frightened group. For two hundred fears, they have served in every corner of the world under the Host adverse conditions. In recent ki es, ho~:eveT~e conditions have chanced to a re~arkabl2 extent. number o? games on the olaqucs in the Di plo,~~atic Lobby of those I~i112d t.~hiie serving this country .ys graphic testimony.~ko z:hak change. ,fie havz seen our abilaty to conduct business tested too of tzn and in :.oo sang daces. :T2 have taken slops to cope with the increasing and shifting threats. ry'2 have prone?red new security systeris, . products, dev~:ces, and tactacs. Ere l:av2 been successful with our security programs. But perhaps in some instances we have not acted qu? ckly enough. ~Te think our record can be improved. 3~e have 'gone to Congress again and again ~.it.n requests for monies fort n2%~ progTars. The ?resources available to fund and ,~ar_a~ye our ovzr~das -security progra;~ have -~een P inadequate to m?e~c the :noupti~~g threat znd the growing f`' requests for additional security measures. ale have been sbreadi.:!g our resources too thinly--which is but one of two a.nterrelated problems. The second is t~aak ~a2 ba~,?e lac~;ed a r?cognized conceptual frame;~or~ for dQfwning, consistently and realistica33y, what ~e mean by security overseas. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/01/13: CIA-RDP86M00886R000200110006-5 ? Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/01/13: CIA-RDP86M00886R000200110006-5 2 Unfortunately, there is no ua}? to provide 'security' for a?ll or even most of the staf f and dep=nder.ts at embassies and consulates every~:h?re in the world. ~e recognize that :~e start from a discou=acing prer:ise: __ 8ny er~Y?assy can be overrun, especially wh?n we do not ha`~~e the support of the host govern~~,ent; __ any A,;~~erican official or family ,:?er~b2r can be Dcidnap;ped or a~illed if the opposition is willing to take the necessary risks and invest the necessary resources in the operation; -- no residence can be mad ? entirely secure, here or overseas; and -- no total security guarantee can b2 given by the U.S. government to its erployees, career or noncare2r, overseas. There are, ho~~ever, four areas where ~e have taken concerted, syst:e:natic action to i~:prove our security posture overseas. inese are: (1) the security enhancement prograr.: to strengthen our _ embassy bui?dings to avoid infiltration and ~- cap~ur_e, (2} public access control, {3) prot?ction of our officials, and (~l) Counter-terroris;n. In a fifth area--residential secur'iiy--tee have been much less systematic, because of the ?~^erasity of the probl?3. In mounting th?se programs, ~e havz faced the fact that the specific security rquirem`nts of each xndividua 1 post nay vary greatl~.~, depending on the size of th? ~.mericzr_ comrunity; the nunbzr, size, ag?, condition, and, especially, location of our buildings and facilities; the local social, po?=tlcal, and econo~~.c conditions; the responszvenys:~ of rile hose go~,?ernm??~t to secuzit~ . requirements; the status of existing sQcur~ty Thus the arrangements; and a numb?r of other sac~or.~. , specific security improvements at each host must be measured and :implemented on a case-by-case basis. No two are the sanz. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/01/13: CIA-RDP86M00886R000200110006-5 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/01/13: CIA-RDP86M00886R000200110006-5 In approaching these pr obI e:~~ , we havz been guide-d by a nur^ber of assumptions and objectives: -- U.S. missions must continue to do business abtoad.~ U.S. personnel will continue to live and cork at overseas locations with normal social, recreational, and . educational n?eds in nll but the highest temporary threat situations. Host country nation>ls will continue to meet with our people and to enter our facilities o:~ business. Host govern,~,ent protection will continue to bb the cornerstone of our security overseas as specified by the Vienna Convention. -- Our facilities can and ~,aill be made resistant to mob action, entry of vehicle-borne bombs, attack by small groups of terrorists, and surreptitious entry. They cannot be made i?.fiune to sustained siege or military action conducted or condoned by host governments, to very powerful explosions outside our premises, to aerial or artillery bombardment, or to hostile action initiated or supported by some of our o~rn employees. --- Piost oi` our systLmatic efrorts to date have been devoted to poi>ts an the highest threat areas. fl~1r objective, ho~.ever, is to address the security of all locations xorl.dtaide. --- Armoring of ;vehicles can and axll be used to provide protection to our talking personnel in foreign locations. --- ~ntell~i.gence analysis, local and long-3istancz secure couu-nunication, and prevision of temporary assistance at overseas locations in response to. specific threats or incidents are essential ele^2nts in lessening the incidence and impact of terrorism. -- The ho?nbs of our overseas personn23 can and till be provided with measures co make kidnapping less li?~eiy to succeed and t.o reduce the incidence of cri::e_ Residential structures, ho~ev2r, can be sec:gyred to a lesser dAgre2 than our official bui?~3ings. lie also have irportant crL?estior_s of our ob?igations to our foreign patio, al Qr~ployees and to private ~'lmericans rho are 2~tposed to threat si~p?y because they are Americans. A:nd finally, -~e have the question of s~h2ther we are providing adequate protection to soreign missions and their people in our country. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/01/13: CIA-RDP86M00886R000200110006-5 - Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/01/13: CIA-RDP86M00886R000200110006-5 .? bye cannot acceF?t tragic losses that r;.igr:[ have been prevented by takir,c defensive steps. 'X recognize that there are no sure solutions to all these problem . ~Th2re are questions that denand the Host careful scrutiny and enalysis and the best answers possible. X can pledge to you that my personal support and the resources of this Department and our sister foreign z~ffairs agencies will be made available to you. h'hile I recognize the magnitude of this undertaking and the limitations on your time, T hope you can agree to have your report to me by the first of newt year. Bor the r2rnainder of the morning, we ~,~ill present to you a series of short briefings on a t2chn:cal level designed to cover an array of factual, as opposed to subjective, considerations that enter into the various problems I have outlined. Bob Lamb mill describe the agenda, and I mill Look forward to meeting with you again when it way be he3pful. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/01/13: CIA-RDP86M00886R000200110006-5 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/01/13 :CIA-RDP86M00886R000200110006-5 -U iu~ii?iii iWrc ' .-~~_~ _ , _ _ ~. _. _. _ _ _~_~_?+_ i _ % _ i _ _ _~s_~ uuC. ire i ~ : _~_.w?_.u_~s_ i _6 n _ r irC.,~:i'v%~u .l.JF1 i ~: _~s_~?_u_~_i_i ,,._1 l,LF~i`~a: _,U 1..UUC.WUhfU: _, _ _, ~dJUI, t ~Y J : _ IuU? Ut~ h`Hly~~: _,,, _, _ ilI^(luL 1 I ~I"i t ~Y f I~ / : _, -.'~'~ L.. ~ : _ U _ ~ _ 1 _ _ _ ._ _ ._ _ ._ ._ ._ _ _ _ ._.. _ ._ _ ._ _ _. __ _ ~.J 1=1= .L is t : _ ._ _ _. _ _ l..lti .1.4~ 11VF~ I l.lh(:....5_ I _~_ I _~_.. _ _. _ _ ._ _. _... .._. _ _. ._ _ _ _. __ _. _ ._ _... Uf=i~ 11, C.: _~_.r"i_.V_~-_ I _... L- - - - - - - - - - ?- - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~slJlitiJt.l. 1- _L_t._ 1 _. I _t_h(_ _H_iJ_V_ 1 _...~_ 1 _IV_ls._ __ I _r"I_H+_ 1 .... _.F'i.... ...Il_.U_.lu_.p".._.H_...~_ I _ 1 _~"~--ly` _F1_U_v_1_~_U_K_Y_ _P'_fi_IV_t_!__ _U_IV_ _U_V_t_Yt._-.... ._ _b_~?_~_5_ _b_~?.....L_V....K_...1_...I _Y_, ,_..p"I_~_~_ __~_t_~?_IV_ __r _.U_I-{_I'I_.t_U_. ._ __ .... .... _ IA t::. Y W U I't1J~ _~ _ h _ U.... L _. 1 _ ~' _. _. _ _. _. _ _ ... _ _ ._ _... _. _ __ _. _ _. .... _ _...U _ V _. C? _.tt __ ~ _... t _. H-~;_ _,b,_t_l._U_M_1_ I _Y_ _I"'_1'1_IV_iv_U_ _ _ trl.Jl?II'It.ly I ~ _.I-...1_lU_~..._I-_ ....~_.~_h'_U_I"t- I _ _. I _.U_. _li_t?_ .._.J?....b_~_1J_.r?_.U_. _.U_IV_ _.U_.K_ _.~+_.~_...U _tJ_I_ _.L_ _~J fi_iV_tJ_F~_h4_Y_ _i_'Y_Cf,_~_ ._ _ _ ._ ._ _ _ ~ _~_~_L_i_o_n_ -~-?O- _?_s_ _a_n_q_T.. _~--e_c_o-m_ _-P_e_r_ _e_x_?_i_r_ -?0-~~ ._'~_i_c_e_ =o_~_ ._i._i_ _~_~.._~_ _~ ._.J._P ?k?srar~tr?z?~irsr?se?~??~?fr?sr?~?ir?st?~r?stsr?~?sr?~??sr l.Ui?.>?Y % ~t.h(LC.~ Llyt=iJh{I?If'r 1.1lJIW l.h''?Y::~1t't: _V_V_1_ .... .._ _ _ ... _ _ _ h1i.J1Jl~1w.'~':~t.~: _iJ_L_1_ _ _ _ _ ?- _. _. _. _ r 11-.r r 1J1...tJ~%tt : _li_-'_c:_U_U_ _ _ Ptt4..F11"' I l~lttl: _ '?~UUt{lUht i'dtl.tlt'' I IuUI'11iL-hC: ,_ hC U l1 1 ~ 11V lr : _~ _.'i' _U _.. CS _. l ._. ! ! _. ~. _... b -- --. _. _. ._ -? _ _. t~ __ ~F _. U.?. ti _ 1 _.! % _ U _.l. _ 1 _. _. _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ _ `{' I4C.x I~ 1'Iti4l.1: _ _ _ _ l.tJl'll''1_t ~I t.iJ bU~c~U. UUUM _ -- -? -. L?~I 11'It= t.J~i: ~lJ ? u i % i?it-u~ : 3~s ~ i HTiiS ~?, ~:, i , i STAT Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/01/13 :CIA-RDP86M00886R000200110006-5