LATIN ARMS TRADE DETAILED IN COURT

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP91-00587R000200740040-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
June 25, 2010
Sequence Number: 
40
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
September 17, 1985
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP91-00587R000200740040-7.pdf98.98 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/06/29: CIA-RDP91-00587R000200740040-7 NEW YORK TIMES 17 September 1985 STAT lATIN ARMS TRADE DETAILED IN COURT liL.l A. Aide Challenges U.S. data on Nicaragua Sales --to Salvadoran Rebels By RICHARD BERNSTEIN Special to The Now York Times THE HAGUE, Sept. 18 - A former analyst for the Central Intelligence Agency testified before the World Court today that there was "no credible evidence" that the Nicaraguan Gov- erntgaat had provided significant gave provided weapons to the leftist guerrillas in El Salvador has been a -major reason used by the Reagan Ad- stration to explain its support of 'ebels who are seeking to over- threw the Nicaraguan Government. A $ed today by Abram Chayes, a H t d h h d arva pro essor w r o ea s the Nica- raguan legal team here, If the Nicara- guan Government was involved in arms traffic to El Salvador, the former C.I.A. analyst, David MacMichael, said: "I do not believe that such a traffic goes on now, nor has it gone on for the past tour years at least, and I believe that the representations of the United States Government to the contrary are designed to justify its policies toward 4 the Nicaraguan Government." Evidence Disappears, He Says Mr. MacMichael said that in late 1980 and early 1981 there was credible evi- dence that Nicaragua did supply the Salvadoran guerrillas with arms, but < the evidence disappeared by the early spring of 1981, some six months before the United States began its extensive support for the contras, as the rebels are known. The World Court, which is officially known as the International Court of Justice, is hearing a Nicaraguan charge that the United States is com- mitting aggression against it by sup- porting the contras. The Reagan Ad- ministration is boycotting the proceed- ings, saying the court has no jurisdic- tion in the case. On Friday, the State Department Bawd on Nicaragua 'Menace' issued a long position paper on the that- "The general premise of the plan ter, asserting that there was "a moon- was that Nicaragua was a menace to continuing to ship weapons to rebels in gion," Mr. MacMichael said in his Salvador and terming Nicaraguan testimony, which began last Friday. denials of this "an outright lie." "It was assumed that the Nicaraguan Much of the information in the docu- Government was inherently totalitar- ment was attributed to Salvadoran ian and repressive." guerrillas who have defected or been The C.I.A. strategy, he said, was to captured in the last year. Elliott provoke a violent military response Abrams, Assistant Secretary of State and domestic repression by Nicaragua, for Inter-American Affairs, asserted thus countering the favorable image that this information co!roborated that the Sandinistas had in world public United States intelligence reports that ; opinion. are classified. ' He said that from March 1961 until According to the cofrt's ruleaq Nta- April 1982, when he was a contract em- ragua must prove its accusations ployce of the C.I.A., he had access to against the United States to win a judg- virtually all the information being col- ment. Justification for U.S. Some specialists here have argued that if it was proved that the Mara- guans were involved in an attempt to overthrow the Government of El Salva- dor by providing arms to insurgents, the United States might be justified, in terms of international law, in taking military action against Nicaragua to force it to stop the arms flow. Nicaraguan leaders have acknowl- edged that some arms from Nicaragua have reached the rebels, but they have denied that this was Government poll. cy. In an interview with The New York Times earlier this year, President Dan- iel Ortega Saavedra of Nicaragua said, "There were times when we were find- ing groups of 40 to 50 of our army sol- diers ready with knapsacks and weap- ons on their way to El Salvador," but, he said, "we have had to detain them and to punish them." Mr. Ortega said that at one point, the first United States Ambassador to the Sandinista Government, LawrencePezzullo, presented him with evidencethat an airstrip in the western province of Leon was being used to transport arms to Salvadoran rebels. He said, "We took necessary measures so this airstrip would not continue to be used for this type of activities." In voting to give money to the con- tras, however, Congressional intelli- gence committees have contended that Nicaraguan aid to the Salvadoran in- surgents was significant in 1961 and 1982, but has diminished greatly. thgW of 1981 of a C.I.A. plan, ap- proged by the White House, to create a -cd%rt force" to put military pressure on Nicaragua. Iectgd by the United States Govern- mdnt on Central America. This in- cluded information from aerial photog- raphy, radio interceptions, interroga- tions, of prisoners and defectors, and United States radar installations placed in the Gulf of Fonseca, between Nicaragua and El Salvador. The information showed for a period that there was an arms flow from Nica- ragua to El Salvador, Mr. MacMichael said, adding, "it didn't come in any more after the very beginning of 1981, February or March." Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/06/29: CIA-RDP91-00587R000200740040-7