DEEP THROAT, PHONE HOME

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00806R000201180024-3
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 19, 2010
Sequence Number: 
24
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
November 25, 1984
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00806R000201180024-3.pdf112.25 KB
Body: 
STAT Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/19: CIA-RDP90-00806R000201180024-3 Deep Throat, -Phone eme SECRET AGENDA . Watergate, Deep Throat and the CIA By Jim Hougan Random Hcuse. 347 pp. $19.95 By Anthony Marro 1~1 WASHINGTON POST 25 November 1984 N OTHIN political ` rl in or but of t( ORE THAN 150 books already have been writ- e ten about Watergate, and to understand the new dimension Tim Hou an ho g pes Secret A d a, it is necessary to gen understand the official, or at least th ver- sion of events. Boiled to its essence, it goes something like this: In May and June 1972, a group of men working for the Nixon reelection campaign staged two break-ins at the Democratic National Committee offices at Watergate. The group included G. Gordon Liddy, James McCord, and E. Howard Hunt. Liddy was a former FBI agent. Hunt and McCord were retired CIA officers. With the aid of some hire- lings from ,Miami's Cuban exile community, McCord installed two wiretaps on the night of May 27-28, one of them on the phone of Lawrence O'Brien, the DNC chairman, and a sec- ond on the phone of R. Spencer Oliver, another party official. For about two weeks, in a motel room across the street, yet another former FBI agent, Alfred C. Baldwin III, eaves- dropped on the wiretapped phone conversations, and typed up summaries for McCord. These were passed along to Liddy, who had them retyped under the heading "GEM- STONE," the code name for the operation, and then gave them to Jeb Stuart Magruder and other cam Because of a technical problem, the tap on 0'B teen's pho e never worked. The information from the tap on Oliver's phone proved to be far more personal than political, much of it from women describing sexual escapades, performed or anticipated. Baldwin assumed he was eavesdropping on DNC secretaries, but so many of the conversations were so spicy that they gave rise, as J. Anthony Lukas wrote in Nightmare: The Underside of the Nixon Years, to "unconfirmed reports that the telephone was being used for some sort of call-girl service catering to Congressmen and other prominent Wash- ingtonians." In order to repair the wiretap on O'Brien's telephone, and also to photograph his files, a second break-in was attempted on the night of June 16-17. While inside the DNC office, surgical gloves on their hands, cameras and listening devices in their possession, McCord and the men from Miami were discovered and arrested. The 'trail quickly led from them to Liddy and Hunt and then to the White House. in the office of then - _ ' - - u1 ud1L-ms were planned attorney general with money from the reelection scam John Mitchell, t by the president's men. p? and execute fund d by But this, Houganargues, is only part of the story. His ac- count goes well beyond, to include a prostitution ring, heavy CIA involvement, spying on the White House as well as on the Democrats, and plots within plots, with McCord schem- ing at the end to sabotage his own break-in. What he offers up is not so much a totally revisionist history as a history with a significant new dimension and perspective. It likely will take some time for Hougan's reporting to be absorbed, cross-checked, challenged and test po ed, and whether this proves to be an important book or simply a controversial one will depend on how well it survives the scrutiny that it is sure to receive. For what Hougan is doing here is attacking the version of Watergate that has been constructed and rein- forced by journalists, prosecutors, congressional investiga- tors and academics over more than a decade-a version which he now Iabels a "counterfeit history." At bottom, his contention is this: Hunt and McCord never left the CIA. They remained under the control of the agency, with Hunt spying on the White House as well as on the Democrats. There never was a tap placed on the telephones in the DNC offices. Instead, the conversations that were monitored by Baldwin were from the wiretap of a prostitution ring lo- cated in the nearby Columbia Plaza Apartments, some of whose customers were being steered there by a secretary in the DNC. This tap most likely had been planted by a private detective named Louis Russell, who died of a heart attack in 1973. Russell was a former FBI agent, a friend of one of the prostitutes, an employe of McCord's private security firm,' and, in Hougan's view, a CIA operative tapping the calls for the agency. The connection between the prostitutes and the DNC had been arranged by a Washington attorney, Phillip Bailley,-who had persuaded a secretary at the DNC to steer clients to a prostitute identified only as "Tess." Since he traveled frequently and his office was empty, the secretary and the clients had used Spencer Oliver's phone to arrange meetings with "Tess." This secret CIA operation involving the prostitutes was so sensitive that McCord and Russell set out to sabotage the break-in at Watergate to insure that the other Watergate burglars wouldn't stumble across it. "In effect," Hougan writes, "the snake had swallowed its tail: CIA agents work- ing under cover of Nixon's re-election committee came to be targeted against their own operation. . . . All that the agents could do was to stand tall and, when all else failed, blow their own cover." By doing this, Hougan says, the infor- mation from the wiretaps on the prostitutes would be pre- served for the exclusive use of the CIA, which presumably would use it to blackmail important people, or to create psy- chiatric profiles of them. imam lNixon s apparatus was not to blame for the break- ..,. \t:..__ , - .. ... Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/19: CIA-RDP90-00806R000201180024-3