CAN CIA CRATOLOGY ULTIMATELY OUTSMART KREMLIN'S SHELLOLOGY?

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP91-00587R000100030029-9
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
March 8, 2011
Sequence Number: 
29
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
January 10, 1985
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP91-00587R000100030029-9.pdf131.25 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/08: CIA-RDP91-00587R000100030029-9 "Mi E AP"EAFED Rn}' iJ pp, Can CIA Cratology Ultimately Outsmart Kremlin'sShellology? Study of Crateson Soviet Ships Is a Big Help in Espionage If Shell Game Isn't Played By ROBERT S. GREENBERGER Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL WASHINGTON - Would James Bond study pictures of crates to figure out what the Russians are up to? Not likely. Crates don't do much for the image. But the Central Intelligence Agency has elevated crate espionage to a science. It is called cratology. the tongue-in-cheek name intelligence analysts have given to the study of crates and other containers used by the Soviets or their allies to ship mili- tary hardware around the world. Currently, cratologists are keeping a close watch on some crates that arrived at the Bulgaria Black Sea port of Burgas last July. The analysts believe the crates, shipped from Libya, contain five L-39 Czechoslov akizr. aircraft that may be bound for Nicaragua. Keeping track of these crates on photographs is easy be- cause the Libyans built the crates from two different shades of wood. "They're a piece of cake to pick up." one U.S. Official brags. Original Development Cratologists have been monitoring such shipments ever since Moscow started de- livering arms to Third World nations al- most three decades ago. Experts study pic- tures, usually taken by surveillance satel- lites at different angles, to determine the dimensions and shapes of crates. They then compare the crates with similar pack- ages they have seen earlier whose contents have been identified. Sometimes, cratolog:sts build scale models of the packages and their sus- pected contents to see whether the cargo would fit in the container. Such models were used during the 1962 Cuban missile crisis to help convince President Kennedy that the cratologists' assessments were ac- curate. Cratology has played a largely secret role in several other U.S.-Soviet diplomatic flaps. During a routine examination of sur- veillance photographs in 1978, analysts no- ticed something unusual about crates being loaded aboard ship at a Soviet Black Sea port. Cratologists knew that, most Soviet aircraft are broken down into three sec- WALL STREET JOURNAL 10 January 1985 tions for crating and shipping: a crate for which the early findings were discussed the wings, one for the fuselage and a third somebody said, "Hey, we've invented a for the tail assembly. Some of the crates new science here-cratology!" showed the characteristics of MiG-21 pack- Mr. Cline says that his analysts also ages, yet the crates were larger. discovered that the tents used by Soviet New Model of MiG personnel in Cuba were different from the Intelligence analysts tracked the ship as Cubans' tents, which had a one-foot-wide it traveled south to the Mediterranean Sea gauze ventilation band around the top. U.S. and across the Atlantic to the Cuban port analysts using surveillance photographs, of Cienfuegos. When the crates were un- therefore, could track the movements of packed, intelligence sources on the ground the Russian technicians in the field who confirmed the cratologists' suspicions: The were assembling the missiles. "We began Cubans had received MiG-23 aircraft, a calling it tentology," Mr. Cline quips. more advanced fighter than the MiG-21 Officials don't like to discuss cratology i that hadn't yet been introduced into the for fear of revealing too much information i Western Hemisphere until then. The arri- about their surveillance, photo-analysis amount of flutter in the Carter administra- tion," a former intelligence official says. If cratology has a father, it probably is Arthur Lundahl, who retired in 1973 as di- rector of National Photographic Interpre- tation Center. Mr. Lundahl, who did photo capabilities. To the dismay of the intelli- I gence community, that secrecy was pierced in early November when certain government officials leaked reports that crates containing MiG-21s might be on their way to Nicaragua. interpretation for the Navy in World War The crates had first been photographed II, was recruited by the Central Intelli- by satellite in late September at the Soviet gence Agency in 1953 to organize the port of Nikoloyev, but then a heavy cloud agency's photographic-intelligence activi- cover obscured the satellite's view for ties. He set up shop above a Ford auto three days, according to intelligence offi- dealership in Washington. "It was a flea- cials. When the next pictures were taken, bag place," he recalls. Photographic technology has advanced so far that cameras on today's satellites and spy planes can photograph details as small as the numbers on a license plate the crates were gone and a ship laree i enough to accommodate them below deck, the Bakuriani, also had left port. When the ship headed for the Nicaraguan port of Corinto in early November, stories about Photo reading, at the same time, has its suspected cargo were leaked. However, ' t unloaded in Corinto. evolved into "photo-grammetry. ' or the the crates weren science of discerning exact dimensions from photographs. And analysts who spend part of their time studying photographs of crates and other containers have been dubbed cratologists. In the mid-1950s, the Soviets began ship- ping arms to Egypt, Syria. Ghana and other Third World clients. Most of the ship- ments consisted of the same items: MiG aircraft, T-34 tanks and artillery pieces. Because these items were bulky, they were transported above deck, packed in crates, making them easy targets for the CIA's photographic eyes. Analysts began catalog- ing these items and soon were able to iden- tify them from the crates. In 1962, analysts studying satellite photos of crates being shipped to Cuba by the Soviets gave the Kennedy administra- tion its initial warning that a major arms buildup was under way. Dino Brugioni, a CIA photo analyst at the time, says crato- I logists identified shipments to Cuba of Ko- mar guided-missile patrol boats, MiG-21s and IL-28 "Beagle" bombers. Alerted by these early signs, U.S. intelligence ana- lysts discovered in mid-October that Mos- cow was delivering missiles to Cuba, touching off the Cuban missile crisis. Ray Cline, then deputy director of the CIA, recalls that at a staff meeting during the recent crate crisis" Some analysts speculate that the Soviets, pressured by the publicity, decided the delivery would be too provocative. Other analysts say the crates were never loaded on the ship. Rather, they say, the photograph showed crates of MIGs being returned to the So- viets for repairs, a common practice for Third World nations. A third theory suggests that the Soviets may, at times, turn the science of crato- logy to their advantage. Richard Helms, a former CIA director, speculates that per- haps the Soviets have converted cratology into a giant shell game, in which they move empty crates about in an effort to test U.S. reactions., Even as you read this, the shellologists may be busily at work in the Kremlin. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/08: CIA-RDP91-00587R000100030029-9