LIMITATIONS ON INPATIENT HOSPITALIZATION FOR THE AGENCY'S HEALTH PLAN

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP87M00539R002504160013-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 24, 2009
Sequence Number: 
13
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
October 15, 1985
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP87M00539R002504160013-7.pdf104.73 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2009/08/24: CIA-RDP87M00539R002504160013-7 CONFIDENTIAL 1.5 cc1 FROM: Harry E. Fitzwater Deputy Director for Administration SUBJECT: Limitations on Inpatient Hospitalization For the Agency's Health Plan REFERENCE: Note to DDA frm ExDir, dtd 3 Oct 85, Same Subject (DD/A 85-3422) 1. This is written in response to your note of 3 October 1985 concerning your discussion with Stan Sporkin on health insurance coverage. I asked the Office of Personnel (OP) to look into the questions you raised and they have provided me with the following information: "The Agency Association Benefit Plan (ABP) provides 365 days of continuous inpatient hospital coverage for each illness or injury, as do most Federal Employee Health Benefits Program plans. Claims. are paid based on the reasonable and customary rates which have been established by the health insurance industry for the specific geographic area and the medical necessity of the hospitalization. For unusually long hospital stays, ABP periodically requests doctor and hospital reports to support the medical necessity for the continued confinement. If the reports support continued hospitalization, approval for confinement beyond the 365 days may be approved by the OP/ Insurance Operations Division. If these reports do not support the medical necessity for the confinement, ABP will advise the policyholder that benefits will be discontinued on a specific future date." Approved For Release 2009/08/24: CIA-RDP87M00539R002504160013-7 r ? Approved For Release 2009/08/24: CIA-RDP87M00539R002504160013-7 l:uNrluJ NTIaI, SUBJECT: Limitations on Inpatient Hospitalization For the Agency's Health Plan 2. The Director of Personnel adds that cost control has been a pressing necessity in all insurance plans not only our own. Requirement for a second opinion, specified number of days of hospitalization for a given illness, etc. are examples of measures introduced universally to control costs. These controls, plus the sharply reduced inflation rate, produced the surplus Stan is talking about. The Director of Personnel believes it would be quite unwise to reverse our field and liberalize benefits because of the temporary surplus situation. The medical industry can best be controlled if insurance plans place limits on reasonable costs. Our plan like others is trying to do that. The education of plan participants that is now going on subliminally (but apparently liminally in Stan's case) is a very beneficial thing and should be continued. 3. FYI, there have been new Medicare provisions put into effect which strictly adhere to length of stay guidelines and require all confinements be approved by a peer review organization. Possibly this is what Stan had in mind. ABP has no such requirement. ~? L(u'4L 6I Addressee Executive Registry DDA D/Pers DD/Pers/EBS C/IOD/EBS/OP Approved For Release 2009/08/24: CIA-RDP87M00539R002504160013-7 Approved For Release 2009/08/24: CIA-RDP87M00539R002504160013-7 CONFIDENTIAL IDD A Registry Central Intelligence Agency Washington, D.C. 20505 3 October 1985 doing to deal with it what kinds of things we might think about Stan Sporkin has made the point to me that as OPM pressures the health insurance carriers to help control insurance costs, the de facto benefits to our employees are declining. I believe his point is that while the specific terms of the policies that we examine may not be changing all that much, that often the definition of how much an insurance company will actually spend to compensate an individual for a specific problem is being reduced, sometimes by arbitrary judgments that X number of days will be required to recover from an operation in a hospital when in fact X plus days are needed. I'd like to know if there is real substance to this concern and if there is, Approved For Release 2009/08/24: CIA-RDP87M00539R002504160013-7