U.S. MULLS REPRISAL FOR TERRORISM

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00965R000201010055-1
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
February 21, 2012
Sequence Number: 
55
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
July 12, 1985
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00965R000201010055-1.pdf110.7 KB
Body: 
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/02/21 : CIA-RDP90-00965R000201010055-1 ARTICLE AFPZAFJO ON PAGE U.S. Mulls Reprisal for Terrorism President Is Said To Favor Some Use Of Military Force By Lou Cannon Wasbingtsn Past Staff Writer WASHINGTON POST 12 July 1985 reprisals and Defense Secretary Caspar W. Weinberger and the Joint Chiefs of Staff stressed the risks of retaliation. An official said yesterday that, while the lines of debate remain basically the same, there is now "a crucial difference" in the way the issue is being discussed. "The difference now is that ev- eryone recognizes we're going to have to hit back at the terrorists," the official said. "The questions are how do it at just the right time, with the greatest effectiveness and in a way that has the fullest possible support of world opinion." A senior administration official said that effective use of force against a center of terrorist activity could deter future acts of,terre isrfl ac YDwl- in the Middle EasLlie , A wide-ranging discussion is un- edged that some U *rani* mil- der way in the Reagan administra- itary officials contend that a U.S. tion on the risks, benefits and tam- strike could` encourage reprisals ing of reprisal against international against U.S. military bases but said terrorism, and informed officials that the hijacking of TWA Flight said yesterday that the president 847 last month and the killing of a now believes military force should Navy diver aboard the plane demon- be a component of the response. strate that Americans are already These officials said that many at risk. options are being considered, in- "The possibility of further acts of cluding the bombing of terrorist terrorism exists independently of ht d States mi it U h g n e e training sites. Military officials any action t orists on no- t i were said to have pinpointed pro- spective targets, using up-to-date photographs considered improve- ments over any the administration has possessed in the past. "There can be no effective long- term strategy that doesn't include a willingess to use force," a senior administration official said. "The key requirement for that strategy, f th t h _ a e use o however, is that t force be in keeping with American i terterrorist units. our mon s at- values and that it be effective in ! r or members o one o the achieving what you want to do." units acting without CIA owl- The discussion now occurring in edge or authorization, launched a the administration is reminiscent of car in Beirut that killed 80 the debate late in 1983 after the persons but missed the radical Mos- suicide bombing of a Marine Corps em leader who waste apparent headquarters in Beirut that cost the tar et. lives of 241 U.S. servicemen. The ~n the wake of this incident Pres- bombing and the subsequent with- ident Rea n an the CIA canceled drawal of U.S. forces from Lebanon the program of support or the triggered an inconclusive struggle coup a erroris s. in the administration in which Sec- retary of State George P. Shultz and national security affairs adviser Robert C. McFarlane argued for err ng take, but putt tice that.they face risks will dimin- ish the number of incidents against our citizens over time," the official said. The previous debate on terror- , a ism led to a decision in late 19 year after the withdrawal rom Leb- anon. to approve a covert operation lrectm the entra Intelligence gency to train and support coun- In effect, the debate about now restarting the what to do about terrorism under circumstances in which Syria has become a paramount.. influence in Lebanon. Reagan's speech denouncing in- ternational terrorism Monday omitted mention of Syria, and a sen- ior official reiterated yesterday that the administration is still "hopeful" that the Syrians will bring pressupe to free seven Americans who have been - Iddnsoed in Lebanon during the past 16 months and are believed held by Shiite extremists. .. In his Monday speech Reagan linked Iran, Libya, North Kqrea, Cuba and Nicaragua as members of an internationalist terrorist confed- eration with ties to the Palestine Liberation Organization and other terrorist groups. An official said that Reagan was trying "to develop a base of public support for action and that he would continue to make terrorism a major theme because it "will be on our agenda publicly 1()r -a long time." The words of the speech, pro- posed by McFarlane and written largely by speechwriter Anthony Dolan, were controversial in We administration. Some officials' said the language Reagan used -was "overdone," and they cited in par- ticular the phrase in which the pfes- ident described the terrorist' na- tions as "run by the strangest to?- lection of misfits, looney tunes and squalid criminals since the advent of the Third Reich." - Officials said that what is emerg- ing from the discussion is a crite- rion for antiterrorist action that would require that any U.S. strike be "surgical" and clearly tied to a terrorist act. Ideally, officials would like to take military action on the verge of a strike, against a U.S. tar- get or just after an attack. They also said that the U.S. activity would require an after-the-fact'ius- tification that could be supportg&by aerial photographs. Staff writer George C. Wilson contributed to this report. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/02/21 : CIA-RDP90-00965R000201010055-1