FINAL REPORT FINDS CASEY 'INATTENTIVE'

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00552R000303570135-6
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
January 12, 2011
Sequence Number: 
135
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
December 3, 1981
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00552R000303570135-6.pdf159.55 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/01/12 : CIA-RDP90-00552R000303570135-6 ARTIC.T.LE r`A_FF"r..4.: D I EW YORK LIMES ON PAGE 3 DECD R 1981 inal epo F?i asey I ' n ByJUDITH MILLER Syectal toTbeNe+Yoft`n .. WASHINGTON, Dec. Z- The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence re- leased a final report today finding that William J. Casey had been "at mini. mum inattentive to detail" in comply. ing with Government financial disclo- sure requirements but concluding that he was not "unfit" to be Director of Cen- tral Intelligence. Several Democrats on the 15-member committee expressed a lack of confi- dence in Mr. Casey's candor witlr the I panel, but only Senators Joseph R. conclusion that a review of the facts in the four-month examination had produced "no basis for concluding that Mr. Casey is unfit to hold office as Direc- tor of Central Intelligence." Mr. Leahy, emphasizing that he sup. Casey as "damning him with faint praise .$* Catalo uyofOmIssi^"~. ,l g The six-page, single-spaced report catalogued Mr. Casey's omissions on financial disclcsure statements re- quired after his appointment as chief of the intelligence agency.- The- report noted, for example, that before his confirmation hearings last January the 68-year-old Mr. Casey had failed to report to the Senate panel "nine investments valued at more than a quarter of a million dollars, personal debts and contingent liabilities of nearly $500,000, a number of corporations or foundations on whose board Mr. Casey served, four civil lawsuits and more than 70 clients he had represented in pri- vate practice in the last five years." Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan. .7 .1 Inquiry Mr. Casey h an uxzury int violations ste manship of the -Committee. Federal Electi the allegation "pending theou tz=eoiuugauvn:.. The committee's wide-ranging inves. ligation began last July after Max C. Hugel, who had been appointed by Mr. Casey to head the C.I.A.'s clandestine operations, resigned in the wake of alle- gations of financial misconduct. Mr. Hugel denied those charges.' But his se- lection by Mr. Casey, who had worked J with Mr. Hugel in the campaign, re. sulted in the inquiry into Mr. Casey's fit- I! ness for his post. The report stated that Mr. Casey had "volunteered" in a hearing July 29 that Mr. Hugel's appointment was a "mis. take" for which he assumed "full re- sponsibility." "The committee concurs," the report said. Need for Improvement Cited At a news conference, Mr. Moynihan declined comment on whether he and othercommittee members believed that Democrat of New York, acting chair- man, said' the issue of whether Mr. Casey should have registered as a for- eign agent while representing the Gov- ernment of Indonesia in 1976 was "unre- solved" and would be referred to the Justice Department. In addition to Indonesia, Mr. Casey also failed to disclose among his former foreign clients Pertamina of Indonesia, ! Mr. Hugel, who had had little experi- an oil company controlled by the Indo. ence in intelligence, was selected for the nesian Government, and the Govern- sensitive post for political reasons. ment of South Korea. i. However, Mr. Moynihan and Senator I Revenue Service for two tax years, 1976 and 1977. He received a refund after the 1976 audit, the report noted, and the 1977 audit is being conducted now. In addi= tion, the LR.S. is conducting "a routine examination" of a limited partnership that Mr. Casey helped structure, the re- port states Committee officials de clined to identify the partnership. The committee also reviewed Mr. Casey's testimony in the 1974 trial of for- mer Attorney General John N. Mitchell, who ultimately was. acquitted of trying to impede an investigation. There had been a suspicion of discrepancies be- tween Mr. Casey's trial testimony and his testimony before the grand jury that indicted Mr. Mitchell. But "no major discrepancies were found which would indicate that.Mr. Casey committed per- this pattern suggests an insufficient ap- preciation of the obligation to provide complete and accurate information to the oversight committees of the Cori. ereas." the retort said. The document also disclosed that Mr. Island, acting vice chairman, said the Hugel affair indicated that bactgrourd checks by the C.I.A. and other Govern- ment agencies needed improvement. Mr. Casey said in a brief statement late this afternoon that he was "pleased" that the committee, after an `.exhaustive investigation," had re- ported "nothing which reflects on the in- tegrity, the business practices and ethi- cal standards in which I have -always taken pride." "I look forward to continuing to work together with the committee to improve the nation's intelligence capabilities," Mr. Casey said. Some Democrats, however, expressed doubts about the wisdom of permitting Mr. Casey to retain his post. Senator WalterD. Huddleston, of Kentucky, said that while only President Reagan c ould ask Mr. Casey to resign, there were sue ficient reasons to prompt such a re- quest. Senator Biden praised Mr. Casey for his"decisive, imaginative leadership at the C.LA.'s helm." But, citing "a con, sistent pattern of omissions misstate. wants and contradictions in his dealings with this and other committees of Con. grass." Mr. Bidet said: "Mr. Caseyhas last net eonfidnYp in hi% ahilirv tn.,...t Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/01/12 : CIA-RDP90-00552R000303570135-6