FORD, HILL CLASH ON SECRETS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP91-00561R000100090053-4
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
February 24, 2012
Sequence Number: 
53
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
January 27, 1976
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP91-00561R000100090053-4.pdf141 KB
Body: 
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/02/24: CIA-RDP91-00561 R000100090053-4 Pird;.Hilt Clash (on Secrets By Laurence Stern Was.-%r.;'on Post Stall Writer The Ford administration i and Congress came close to open political warfare yesterday over future control of the nation's intelligence secrets - a confrontation triggered by the leak of portions of the House in- telligence committee's final report. - Angry accusations were traded by outgoing Central Intelligence Agency Director William E. Colby, the White House, congressional in- telligence critics and the Ford administration's defenders on Capitol Hill. It was in this setting that the staff of the House committee recommended the extension of criminal penalties for in- telligence leaks to staff members of a reconstituted House intelligence ove.rig: committee. The staff report also calle'i for prompt congressional notification of covert foreign actions by- all intelligence agencies, abolition of the Defense Intelligence Agency, unilateral authority by the committee to release any information or documents in its possession, and fixed six- year terms for members. The staff proposals were unveiled at a meeting of the House committee enlivene.i by partisan accusations fixing blame for leakage of the House report to The New York Times. Staff director A. Searle Field of the House committe hinted that - the leaks originated with the executive branch and said he was "as certain as I can he" that they did not come from the com- mittee staff. "The executive branch has been putting on a tremendous campaign to insure that oversight doesn't work," Field told the committee. He said the State Department, P, ? tagon and other executive! agencies had "dozens of copies" of the report-and WASHINGTON POST. testified that it would be committee leak covered a! !'incredible" if the executive range of matters from the branch had been able to donation, of Oriental rugs to maintain-secrecy. Secretary of State Henry A. Colby, in what was expected Kissinger by the leader of the fo be his last day in office, now?-defunct Kurdish revolt to fisued an angry counterattack a critique of intelligence cost to the House committee, figures attributed to the CIA. denouncing its report as Here are some cf those fin- "totally biased and a disservice to our nation, giving a thoroughly wrong impression of American in- telligence." White House press secretary Ron Nessen joined in the - fray with the declaration that "this unauthorized release raises serious questions about how classified material can be handled by Congress when the national security is at stake." In a letter, a. copy of which was obtained by The Washington Post, CIA special counsel Mitchell Rogovin wrote-_Homse intelligence committee Chairman Otis G. Pike (D-N.Y-) last week that the committee's first draft report was "an unrelenting indictment couched in Lsased, pejorative and far tually erroneous terms." The significance o' the leak seemed to lie more %'n its role as a catalyst o' political reactions than as a sub- stantive additi.in to public knowledge of Cf.-a excesses. The administration and the national security bureaucracy, while paying homage to the concept of more rigorous congresssional o* ersight, are opposed to some of the reforms being pushed by advoca.es t,f oversight legislation. Chief o`;ections _ tre__tn r?^..;n- mendations that Congress be permitted to declassify in- telligence information on its own initiative and that the new oversight committee be in- formed immediately of covert actions. A significant number of lawmakers, reacting to the revelations of the Senate in- telligence committee report on assassination plots, have come to the conclusion that covert actions sh .,uld he subjected to ?zringent congressional co-rtrol or outlawed, with limited qualification. The findings that emerged from the House irreiligence -Kurdish rebels in Iraq suffered more than 100,00') casualities in their rebellicr.- Kissinger received three ,valuable le rugs as a gift :nom rebel leader'Ius_tafa Parzani and his wife, Nancy, was given a necklace. A State Department srokesman ack-. oO%vler'>ed yesterday that Kissinger received one rug and turned it over to the White House in compliance with a law prohibiting government officials from keeping guts from foreign officials. The spokesman denied that Mrs. Kissinger had received a necklace from Barzani. -U.S. intelligence failed to predict the 1968 Soviet in- vasion of Czechoslovakia largely because it lost track of an ' entire Soviet division in Poland. It also failed to an- ticipate India's explosion of a nuclear device. - -A 1973 CIA memorandum said that Sen. Henry M. Jackson CD-Wash.) sought to "protect" the agency from an inquiry by the Senate Multinational Corporations Subcommittee headed by Frank Church (D-Idaho). The object was to prevent CIA official William Broe from testifying on covert operations in Chile. Broe, as it turned out, did testify. Jackson denied that he interceded im- properly. Co'by commented that it was "perfectly ap- propr iate" for the agency to discuss the matter with Jackson, a member of the CIA's congressional oversight committee. -The report put a S10 billion price tag on the combined r.oeration of all L.S. in- telligence agencies, several of which substantially outspend the CIA. This has been an outside figure previously used in literature on the agency . Colby, in an interview with the Associated Press, acknowledged that despite his condemnation c.f leaks, he was the anonymous source of an earlier story eescribi-ng CIA 27 January 1G76 contacts with journalists. "I did tell them, es," Colby said of The ',Washington Star, which revealed in November, 1973, that journalists were serving as CIA information conduits. As reported by AP, when asked if he was the "authoritative source" quoted in the Star story, Colby said, "I don't want to confirm it, but you're not far off." He said he acknowledged the relationship between the CIA and the journalists during a meeting with the Star's editorial board. More recently, the director has proposed legislation that would stiffen criminal san- ctions against any gover a- ment employee revealing intelligence secrets. In another development yesterday, FBI Director' Clarence M. Ke!!ev testified that expanded congressional oversight of his agency could jeoparidize its investigative work. Speaking to 1 .he Senate Government Operations Committee, which is drawing up new oversight legislation, Kelley said that increasing congressional requests for information and testimony by high FBI officials. as well as new civil lib er ties laws, are hampering the bureau's 'ability to carry out its duties. At the the end of the day it was announced that Colby, who was fired by the President in November, had been awarded the National Security 'Medal by Mr. Ford. 'o. v- as e the CIA and American intelligence community through the most troubled period initshistory," the President said during a brief White House ceremony. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/02/24: CIA-RDP91-00561 R000100090053-4 fi