ASKING CIVIL QUESTIONS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00965R000503830004-2
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
January 13, 2012
Sequence Number: 
4
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 6, 1986
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00965R000503830004-2.pdf89.5 KB
Body: 
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/01/13: CIA-RDP90-00965R000503830004-2 ON PAGE FOREIGN AFFAIRS Flora Lewis Asking Civil Questions DALLAS T here was an hour between planes. A man behind two bro- chure-laden card tables was calling out in a midway voice, "Step up and learn about our space program." So I approached. I had always won- dered about the intense young people who man the Lyndon LaRouche stands, but I'd always been in too much of a hurry to stop and talk to them. The sign said things like "Better beams in space than Soviet missiles here," and "Send Gramm and Rud- man to Siberia," and "Support nuclear energy.,, do you back him?" I asked In a conversational tone. He glowered and replied, "Do you support our space. program?" "I mean, why are you for La- Rouche?" "Do you or don't you want a strong defense?" "Oh, I see, you ask questions but you don't answer them." He was thin, with short, tightly curled hair, and his ferret face was' getting redder and more tense by the moment. His voice, wary from the. start, became hostile. "Do you want to buy some literature?" I said I was more interested in hearing him explain his point of view. Clearly he was annoyed, but he ac- cepted what he took as an unavoid- able challenge. "He's against liberal traitors, and I'm against liberal traitors." "And what do you mean by that?" The pale young woman behind the, adjoining card table came to her com- rade's rescue. He was a hawker, not a NEW YORK TIMES 6 April 1986 talker. "Do you know the word -P&-' triot?" she asked accusingly. An eld- erly man with a cozy smile wandered up, and they turned to him in relief, pointedly ignoring me. Maybe it was my voice, maybe my clothes, I don't know how they decided j so quickly to consider just another air-1 port transient as the enemy. But they! did. I wasn't looking for a fight, I was just curious. The whole conversation lasted less than two minutes and would obviously get nowhere. As it happened, I was on my way to; Austin for a conference at the Univer. sity of Texas entitled "The Future of ! ' U.S.-U.S.S.R. Relations: Lessons from 40 Years Without World War.".Tbe idea, we were told, was that for all tbs., troubles, something must have gone' . right and if we could figure out bow Mi years without world war were achieved, we might be able to keep! peace for at least another 40 years. There were current and former offs- cials from the National Security Coun cil, the State Department, the Ponta gon, the C.I. academics and scien- tists of rand a few important Rue. sians at the conference. There were ar- guments, of course, and keen aware- ness of the fact that hostility between the U.S. and the Soviet Union is the big. gest danger for the world. But compared with the LaRouche' people's reaction to a casual ques- tioner responding to their invitation ' to step up and be informed, the at- mosphere was positively amiable. Among Americans and Russians, there was no trouble agreeing that se- curity and survival were the prime and common needs for everybody. At his summit with Mikhail Gorba- chev, President Reagan indulged in the f' ntasy that if the earth faced an inva- sion by Martians, U.S.-Soviet quarrels would be quickly set aside in. the com- mon defense of our planet. When the reference was made in Austin, Helmut Sonnenfeldt, a former National Security Council member, said whimsically that he objected on I' behalf of Martians, who shouldn't be, presumed to be hostile. It was a good: point, and a reminder of the question about the LaRouche people. Whom are they so. instinctively against, and why? At the time of the industrial summit in Bonn last year, elections were ap- proaching for the important West Ger- man state of Rhineland-Westphalia. Mr. Reagan, and all the rest of us on the trail, came to a town where lamp. post after lamppost was emblazoned with posters carrying snide, thinly die- - guised neo-Nazi messages. On investi-. gation, it turned out they were organ- ized by Mr. LaRouche. His candidates got nowhere in the German elections, but they tinctured the atmosphere. His people made a pitch in Francs. There is no sign that they had any in- volvement with the extreme right wing party of Jean-Marie Le Pen, but they stood on the main streets of Paris shouting the same call to arms that they pitch at Dallas, Dulles, Ken. nedy, etc. They have disappeared from Paris, presumably because of French resistance to such a foreign brand of rabid xenophobia. This is a time when Americans are worried about all kinds of fanatics, for good cause. And free speech and free press require us to tolerate our own fanatics. But we have the right to .question them in a civil way, and if they can't give a civil answer, they reveal themselves incapable of tbs . rational discourse- on which d-%40- racy depends. a Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/01/13: CIA-RDP90-00965R000503830004-2