WHO AND WHAT IS LYNDON
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP90-00845R000201140013-6
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
K
Document Page Count:
1
Document Creation Date:
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date:
June 11, 2010
Sequence Number:
13
Case Number:
Publication Date:
February 7, 1981
Content Type:
OPEN SOURCE
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 100.65 KB |
Body:
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/06/11: CIA-RDP90-00845R000201140013-6
Li
QM= A??Mdft
Eli P73_ e.
W11n, - -9-n-
HUMAN EVENTS
7 FEBRUARY 1981
a. is y
nil 4,
L
You'll find them at airports and shopping
centers selling newspapers and magaiines. They're
well-dressed and fast-talking. They plug economic
growth and nuclear power. They denounce drugs,
liberals and Ralph Nader. But appearances are
deceiving. These conservative-looking and talking
political salesmen are not conservatives-they're
pro-Soviet.
They masquerade as representatives of the Na-
tional Democratic Policy Committee, the New
Solidarity International Press Service (NSIPS), the
National Anti-Drug Coalition, the Fusion Enemy
Foundation- and the Executive Intelligence Review.
They used to operate as membes of the National
Caucus of Labor Committees (NCLC) and. the
U.S. Labor Party (USLP). All of these organi-
zations lead to one man-Lyndon H. LaRoucheJr.
LaRouche, a former member of the Trotskyite
Communist Socialist Workers party (SWP),
emerged as the leader of a faction of the Students
for a Democratic Society (SDS) in the late 1960s.
He built his group into a political intelligence net-
work with about one thousand- operatives stationed
in North America, Western Europe and South
America. These operatives tirelessly and mindless-
ly promote the bizarre conspiracy theories of
LaRouche, who ran as the USLP candidate for
President in 1976 and campaigned for the
Democratic nomination in 1980. '
In 1976,
."Carter anc
rorism," wh
links- betwee
the Institute
.connected to
and domestic
The report
"Wall Street
tional terrori:
Another repc
Studies, clair
for 90 per ce
Communists
Western intell
anti-Commu,
Ga.) because
of "alleged"
In 1979 Ex
an article, "Who Are the Environmentalists?"
which claimed that thean ti-nuclear movement was
run by the New York-based Council on Foreign
Relations and a London institute.. But the article
also attacked London. Daily Telegraph columnist
Robert Moss and Rep. McDonald for charging
:-Soviet manipulation of the anti-nuclear movement
in the West. F ecutiveIntelligenceReview labeled
these charges as "wild conspiracy tales.:.' -'.,.-:; .
"A1978 book distributed- by the USLP,'Dope
:Inc., an alleged expose of who controls the world's
In a series of lectures given in 1976, "What Only .narcotics trafficking, curiously ignored the role of
Communists Know," LaRouche described his net- I every-Communist power except Red China in- the
work as a part of the "world's Marxist labor move- dope.trade. This is not surprising; since a Soviet
ment" which together with "allied Communist :commentator is cited as a source for some of the
forces within the capitalist sector generally are allegations made in the book..
working overnight, constantly, to bring into being Also of interest is how the ~ L-
a new Marxist International.:. -I 'reacted to The Spike, 'the best-selling novel about
In that same year, however, LaRouche appeared = Soviet espionage and disinformation operations
to reverse course, ordering his followers to pursue written by Robert Moss and former Newsweek cor-
"tactical alliances" with'conservaiives.. LaRouche respondent Arnaud de Borchgrave. LaRouche said
became critical of the drug lobby, the anti-nuclear the book "promotes belief in a non-existent aspect
movement, and the left-wing Institute for Policy of. the- Soviet KGB.-..." Another. review., of the
Studies.. book in their newspaper, New Solidarity,?rejected
. LaRouche also concocted conspiracy theories
involving the Trilateral Commission, the Council
on Foreign Relations, the Rockefellers, the British
and "Zionist agents."
Yet his supposed attacks on the left always
seemed to result in attacks on responsible con-
servatives and Western intelligence agencies,
diverting attention away from Soviet -
aggression.
the book's claim that the Soviet Union-was a
'primary sponsor.. of international ?terrorism.
`According to New Solidarity, the real'sponsor is
"Angle-American intelligence," of. which Robert-
Moss is supposed to be a' member: -7
Last July New Solidarity published an,: interview
with Gen. Nino Pasti, identified as a retired NATO -
military officer who was `..`to become 'a member of
the Italian Communist parliament on the Com-
cew l3tM
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/06/11: CIA-RDP90-00845R000201140013-6