DEMOCRACY UNDERMINES DEMOCRACY

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00806R000200740002-6
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
June 18, 2010
Sequence Number: 
2
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
December 30, 1985
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00806R000200740002-6.pdf43.72 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/06/18: CIA-RDP90-00806R000200740002-6 NEW YORK TIMES ARTICLE APPEAREn 30 December 1985 ON PAGE Democracy Undermines Democracy The new National Endowment for Democracy is a useful agency that has strayed from its mission, strtilrgthening free institutions in third-world coun- tries. Could anyone who favored its creation in 1983 have expected that it would siphon off funds to an ,opposition group in France? Yet a grant of $,000 flowed to a right-wing student group. Another 9830,000 went to Force Ouvriare, a reputable anti- Communist trade union. Both tried to conceal the &,+w=when the story blowup in the French press. This amounts to a double betrayal of the endow- it '1t's purpose. France is a stable democracy with a !,tcongly anti-Soviet Socialist Government; it is in- suiting and gratuitous for American taxpayers to subsidize an opposition group there. And all endow- ment grants are supposed to be open, precisely to avoid the embarrassing disclosures about funding made covertly by the C.I.A. over the years. Endowment officials contend the grants were for nonpartisan purposes and were not meant to be secret. They offer an explanation: Of the $31 million originally voted by Congress, $13 million was chan- neled through autonomous labor and business insti- tutes. The money sent to France went through the Free Trade Union Institute without adequate over- sight by the endowment's board. Congress has now eliminated the channeling, requiring the endow- ment to supervise all grants directly and openly. Carl Gershman, the chastened executive direc- tor, cites the endowment's good wont -in funding, democratic programs in Chile, Poland, Panama and Guatemala. Nonetheless, it is remarkable that the French press had to alert the endowment to the dubious history of a major recipient with non-demo- cratic origins, the Union Nationale Inter-Universi- taire. Imagine the outrage in America if President Mitterrand's Government were found to be covertly funding socialist opponents of the Reagen Adminis- tration. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/06/18: CIA-RDP90-00806R000200740002-6