STOLEN U.S. TECHNOOGOY BOOSTS SOVIET STRENGTH, REPORT SAYS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00806R000200730007-2
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 1, 2010
Sequence Number: 
7
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
November 15, 1982
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00806R000200730007-2.pdf112.04 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/01 : CIA-RDP90-00806R000200730007-2 THE WASHINGTON POST 15 NOVEMBER 1982 Stolen U.S. Technolog______ Soviet Strength, Report says By Dan Morgan W'ashtnpton Post stet! Wttter The Soviet Union. in what appears to be a carefully planned program approved by the Kremlin's top leadership, has used large amounts of stolen and legally acquired U.S. technology to achieve "giant strides in mil- itary strength," according to 'a Senate report released yesterday. The report by the Senate permanent sub- committee on investigations was based on a declassified Central Intelligence Agency study and on testimony' that' disclosed, among other things, how Soviet agents setup a U.S. company that transferred $10 million worth of sensitive microprocessor manufac- turing equipment to the Soviet Union. "The U.S. research and development es- tablishment is viewed by the Soviets as a mother lode .... In fact, they tap into it so frequently that one must wonder if they re- gard U.S. B and D as their own national as= set," Jack Verona of the Defense Intelligence Agency told the subcommittee in a May hearing. Soviet efforts to obtain the technology came at a time when Yuri V. Andropov, the new Soviet leader, headed the KGB, the So- viet security police and intelligence agency. The Senate report culminates an investi- gation of more than two years that was led by Sen. Sam Nunn (D-Ga.), now the sub4 committee's ranking minority member. It charges the Commerce Department with slipshod enforcement of trade controls and calls on the U.S. intelligence community and law enforcement agencies to be more aggressive in stemming the flow of microelec: tronic, laser, radar and precision manufacturing technology to the So- viets. In detailing a pattern of at- tempted theft, bribery and other abuses by the Soviets, it appears to buttress the Reagan administration's ongoing campaign for tough restric- tions on trade involving products and processes with a potential mil- itary application. On Saturday, President Reagan announced that allies, including Ja- pan, had agreed to improve the mon- itoring of high-technology trade with the Soviets, while lifting trade sanc- tions on oil and natural gas equip- ment with no direct military appli- cation. Although there is broad agree- ment that the Soviets are engaged in a massive effort to acquire western technology by any means, the extent of the damage to national security is a subject of debate. A declassified CIA study released in April said the Soviets have been able to obtain aircraft catapult tech- nology, precision ball bearings needed for missile accuracy, and gy- roscopes. The study said western microelec- tronics know-how "has permitted the Soviets to systematically build a modem microelectronics industry which will be the critical basis for enhancing the sophistication of fu- ture Soviet military systems for dec- ades." Soviet Ryad computers, for exam- ple, are patterned after IBM 360 and 370 mainframe computers pur- chased in the West. Nevertheless, some industry rep- resentatives have questioned wheth- er the Soviets, given their difficulties in mastering complex manufacturing techniques, can use effectively infor- mation they have been receiving. Former CIA deputy director Bobby R. Inman acknowledged in his testimony to-the subcommittee that the agency is in the early stages of examining the problem. . As a result, the U.S. government has only piecemeal evidence of what the Soviet military has obtained from this country, the now-retired Navy admiral said. Earlier this year, a special panel of the National Academy of Sciences concluded that there has been a "substantial transfer of U.S. technol- ogy-much of it directly relevant to military systems-to the Soviet Union from diverse sources." But it maintained that very little technology had been transferred through -universities and scientific exchanges. Scientists had expressed fears tT at undue concern about loss of-technol ogy to the Soviets could result in overclassification of government doc- uments and an end to exchanges that in some cases add to U.S. knowledge. While the report dealt only with the Soviet Union, law enforcement officials note that 'U.S. firms have also been victimized by domestic competitors and other nations, such as Japan. Thefts of electronic technology and commodities totaling $100 mil- lion were reported in California's Silicon Valley alone over the last five years. according to Douglas K. Sou- thard, deputy district attorney of Santa Clara County, Calif During five days of hearings in May, witnesses detailed several So- viet intelligence operations. against _ U.S. "high-tech" industries. The boldest known espionage ef- fort involved West German"Werner J. Bruchhausen, who set up a group of companies in West Germany and southern California with the help of a U.S. accomplice known as Tony Metz, a naturalized American born in the Soviet Union. Between 1970 and 1980, Bruch- hausen's companies bought comput- er-aided design equipment, photo-li- thographic devices for making inte- grated circuits and other items needed to make quality microproces- Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/01 : CIA-RDP90-00806R000200730007-2