WHAT YOU DON'T SEE IS WHAT YOU GET

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00806R000100660001-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 5, 2010
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 18, 1986
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00806R000100660001-7.pdf134.5 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/08/05: CIA-RDP90-00806R000100660001-7 What You Don't See Is What You Get I N THE NAME of national security, tens of billions of dollars in defense spending are being hidden from public scrutiny so that we can build war planes that are equally invisible to our enemies. This program is called Stealth. Already concealed from most public accounting are at least 50 Lockheed strike fighters that probably cost about $40-$50 million apiece; a new General Dynamics cruise missile program that is expected to cost about $7 billion; and the most expensive warplane ever built, Nor- throp's Advanced Technology Bomber (ATB), with expected program costs be- tween $35 billion and (according to hostile sources) $80 billion. The Pentagon considers Stealth to be so sensitive that it will not say what the Northrop bomber or the General Dynam- ics cruise missile will look like or when they will enter service. So that nobody can guess these dates from the way mon- ey flows into the program, the Pentagon has classified all the cost figures as well. In the case of the Lockheed fighter, the Pentagon bluntly refuses to acknowledge that the plane exists at all. The Pentagon has classified these weapons because they are based on a rad- ical departure in warplane design. Instead of using height, speed, defensive maneu- vers, weapons or electronic radar jam- mers to protect themselves from attack, Stealth airplanes and missiles are de- signed to avoid detection by radar or oth- er detection devices. Here is why the Pentagon believes we need Stealth. In order for, say, the new BiB bomber to have its best chance of surviving against the Soviet Union's elab- orate air defense system, it would fly Bill Sweetman is technical editor in North America for the Interavia Publishing Group of Geneva, Switzerland, publishers of Interavia and International Defense Review, and the author of "Stealth Aircraft-Secrets of Future Arrpower," published by Motorbooks International. WASHINGTON POST 18 May 1986 barely 250 feet off the ground. But the Stealth is not a single magic trick but a terrain which hides the bomber from the means of designing a warplane so that defenses also hides the targets from the its "signature" or "observables" are bomber. To hunt for a target such as a drastically reduced. A plane's radar reflec- mobile ICBM, the B1B must climb to a tions&e the most important, but emissions better vantage point, exposing itself to 0t li8+, heat or sound are significant, too. attack. In a few years, too, it will be vul- M Mt conventional aircraft are ideal radar targets. They present large flat surfaces, nerable to new Soviet airborne radars that such -as the body sides and vertical fin, at can pick out low-flying targets against the right,.engles to the direction from which "clutter" from the ground below them. mostMadar waves are likely to arrive. Thev These ground-hugging tactics might have:large intakes and exhausts for their not be enough for fighter-bomber pilots in engins, which trap and re-reflect radar Europe if they had to attack targets such f av4i They are festooned with bombs and l as airfields, command bunkers and sur- face-to-air missile sites. The Soviet mil- itary has built up so much firepower around these targets that no strike force could escape without massive losses. Stealth may be the answer to these problems. It aims at making the attacker virtually invisible to radar and other elec- tronic detection devices without which defensive fighters, surface-to-air missiles and guns are impotent. Why does it all have to be so secret? It is partly a matter of tradition. The first truly Stealth aircraft were unmanned spy planes and were developed in secret be- cause their intended missions were co- vert. When a practical manned Stealth fighter became a possibility, its develop- ment was entrusted to a section of Lock- heed called the Skunk Works, where se- crecy is basic to the management doc- trine. By the late 1970s, Stealth was be- ginning to emerge from the shadows, and details of the technology might well have become public knowledge had Jimmy Car- ter been re-elected in 1980. As it was, Stealth became the first test of the Reagan/Weinberger philosophy: If in doubt, classify; if doubt remains, up- grade the classification. It could also be- come the first test of that policy's ability to withstand congressional and public op- position. The Stealth bomber may be able to hide from the Soviet Union's air de- fenses, but it may be too big to hide fro y m to make most conventional aircraft look like Capitol Hill. While the secrecy surrounding Stealth tractors. has precluded most discussion of the sub- Radar is not the only signature to worry ject, reports of progress with Stealth air- about. Stealth aircraft use special exhausts craft have appeared in the aerospace and to mix the hot carbon dioxide from their defense press from time to time and in tech engines with cool outside air; hot carbon nical"papers presented at open industry dioxide has an infrared signature that can meetings, most of which took place before betray an airplane at ranges of almost 100 the Reagan information freeze. While the miles. Chemical additives have been devel- information is fragmentary, it can be pieced oped to discourage the formation of con- together with context gleaned from unclas- trails,, Also, a Stealth aircraft cannot give sified textbooks. The latter also help to find itself away with the electronics it uses to screen the disinformation issued by uniden- targets-they have to be disguised as tifiable sources in the past few years. well. cow ue tanks, which tend to create "corner reflectors." (Sheet-metal devices using the sam4rinciple are attached to small boats to mae them more visible to radar.) TIVe are a few basics to designing a Steab aircraft. Bombs and fuel must he carried internally; the engines must be con- ceals4behind long, curved inlet and exhaust ducts,- and vertical flat surfaces should be eliminated. (The B1 bomber's sinuous shape, reflects some of this thinking, al- thottgb it is not a Stealth design.) This does not sound too complicated, but the snag lies in a formula called the "radar range equa- tion.".This states that cutting the radar im- age of 'a target in half knocks no more than an iugignificant 15 percent off the detection range. The benefits of Stealth are not felt at all until the radar image is cut by at least 90 percent. This calls for the use of special radar-ab- sorbent materials ranging from plastic- based coatings to complex sandwiches of fiber glass and chemically treated foam. Most of them contain an electrically resis- tant "active ingredient" such as carbon or one of a family of iron products called fer- rites: The objective is to draw the energy out of the radar wave as it penetrates the material, just as food in a microwave oven absorbs radar waves and converts them into heat. Another problem is that gaps, sharp cor- ners and sudden changes in the conductivity of the airplane's skin will produce radar echoes. Stealth airplanes must have a smooth and seamless finish; they are likel Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/08/05: CIA-RDP90-00806R000100660001-7