FORD BACKS U.S. INTERVENTION

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP09T00207R001000020095-9
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
U
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 9, 2011
Sequence Number: 
95
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
September 17, 1974
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP09T00207R001000020095-9.pdf107.29 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2011/08/09: CIA-RDP09TOO207RO01000020095-9 1VJ;VV 0I)AI 1 S EP 1974 nerve CIA activities against Allende raise question By RumeU Sackett, Lynn Roseliini and Myron S. Waldman Newsday Washington Bureau Washington-President Ford, al ready enmeshed in one controversy over his pardop of former President Nixon, appeared'to have created another last night by defending U.S. intervention in- the domestic affairs of another country. Ijis comments-angered the chairman of a Senate subcommittee investigating., such intervention. The President got himself into more hot water in the way he answered a;' question concerning Central In telli- gence Agency involvement in the in- tecnal affairs of Chile during the ad- ministration of Salvador Allende, who died a year ago in a bloody military coup. In his press conference last night, Ford gave a genera! confirmation to reports published recently that the i CIA had been authorized to spend a.3, much as $3,000,000 between 1970 and 1973 to promote opposition to Allende, the first Marxist to be elected presi dent in the hemisphere. Rep. Michael Harrington (D-Mass.') recently dis- close-cl that CIA Director William E. Colby had. told a congre,-,sional con mittee that $5,000,0-:1 was spent on efforts to "destabilize" Allender gov- ernment and another $3,000,000 in sup?-ort of anti-Allende political can- di l h bes. "Li it the policy of your admirliistra- tiara to attempt to d?3tabilixe the gov- erranents of other democracies?" Ford was asked last night. The President replied that "our government, like other governments, does take oartain aa:ions to help implement ? foreign! p:)licv and protect national security." He added that "Communist. nations spend vastly more nn-,ney, than we do for ;.lch purposes." He denied that the U.S. had had any- thing to do with the Chilean coup but, admitted that three or four years..ago, there was secret intervention in Chile "to help and assist the preservation of opposition newspapers and electronic; media and to preserve opposition poli, tical parties." He added, "I think thi,l is in the best interests of the people in C'hilie and certainly in our best inter- est-,." It was an answer that drew an angry reaction from Sen. Frank Church (D- Idaho), chairman of tie Senate For- eign Relations subcommittee investi- gatin; secret. U.S. intervention in Chile. "To excuse this activity on the ground that the Communists spend more money doing it than we do is simply to equate the United States with the Soviet Union," Church said in a telephone interview. "To justify our action on the basis that it isn't as extensive as that of the Itusian,-I had thought Ebert was a qualitative difference betwt'en this ccuntrv and the Soviet Union," Church Said. :~i ill= new.- conference, in a follow- up question, Ford was asked under v.l:.tt international law the U.S. had tut. right to intervene in the constitu- tiuu ili_; elected government of another coon rv :Ind whether the Soviet Union, for er:unltll?, had a sinlilm? right to try to destabilize the government of Can- ada or of the U.S. Ford replied, "I'm not going, to pads judgement on whether it's permitted or authorized under international law. It's a recognized fact that, historically as well as presently, that such action; are taken in the best interest of the coun- tries involved." The Senate Foreign Relation., Corn- mittee was to meet in closed session today, reportedly to consider a staff report recommending that a perjury investigation be made concerning the testimony of former C'IA Director Richard Helms and others about U.S. involvement in Chile. Last night, how- ever, Ford insi.;tl,d that "111e appro- priate congressional COlllntlltl't';" '11.' kept informed of "every covert opera- tion undertaken by our go~e-o t nt." S la0 Rep. Lucian Nedzi i D-3%-lich. r, uh tir- nlan of the House Arnuod Services sub- committee that supervises the ('IA, said last night, that see+nod to he case ; now. "We have been fully apprise-d,' lie said. "Thins are dilferel-t al the pet ;- ent tittle. 11'P are getting cottlpl:t', ill- formation." Although be declined to comment on the situation in Chile, Nedzi said, "lit the abstract, I can't de- fend meddling in the internal affairs of constitutionally elected governments." Nevertheless, Ford was - blunt last night about continuing that policy of covert operations. "It seems to inc that the 40 Committee [a panel set up in 1948 to review all U.S. covert opera- tions] should continue in existence, and and I am going to meet with the re- sponsible congressional committee to see whether or not they want any changes in the review process." According to one White House staffer, Secretary of State Kissinger's staff had been worried about how Ford would handle foreign policy questions at his last press conference. But at that time he answered theist well. last night was a different story. "how'd you like his answer on the Chile question?" one secretary was overheard to ask her White House bass. "'t'hat was neat-Everybody doe.{ it, but they spews neon' money on it than wk- do."' They bath laughed. 00776 Approved For Release 2011/08/09: CIA-RDP09TOO207RO01000020095-9