SOME BRIEF NOTES ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF RESEARCH INTO HUMAN PARANORMAL CAPABILITIES IN GUANGDONG

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: STARGATE
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
• Release Decision: RIFPUB
• Original Classification: K
• Document Page Count: 64
• Document Creation Date: November 4, 2016
• Document Release Date: December 7, 1998
• Sequence Number: 2
• Content Type: NOTES

Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
SOME BRIEF NOTES ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF RESEARCH INTO HUMAN
PARANORMAL CAPABILITIES IN GUANGDONG
GUANGDONG KAIZHAN RENTI TEYIGONGNENG YANJIU JIANJJI
BY: The Guangdong Somatic Sciences Research Committee
In March of 1979, after the "Sichuan Daily" published the news that
Tang Yu could recognize characters with his ears, research into somatic
sciences was launched successively in Beijing, Shanghai, Chengdu and
Kunming.
In the Spring of 1981, the Editor-in-Chief He Zongyan and editor Zhu
Runlong of "Nature Magazine" came to Guangdong for a conference. Taking
advantage of this excellent opportunity, the Guangzhou Academy of Chinese
Medicine first invited Editor-in-chief He to make a report on the
situation of research into paranormal abilities in all of China. Then the
Provincial Department of Health Scientific Research Office also invited
him to make a similar report at the provincial science hall. In May of
the same year, with the support of "Nature Magazine", Guangdong sent Liu
Ruchen, Deng Suhua, Chen Jingruan, and Li Kunhua to go to Chongqing to
attend the second discussion conference on human paranormal abilities.
Director of the Guangdong Academy of Chinese Medicine, Liu Ruchen, was
also selected to be the Guangdong member of the all-China Somatic Sciences
Research Commission (preparatory). After they returned to Guangdong, they
made a report at the provincial peoples committee hall. After that, the
Guangzhou Academy of Chinese Medicine, the South China Engineering
College, the Guangzhou Academy of Medicine, and the Guangzhou Municipal
Bureau of Public Health all established human paranormal capability
research groups. Doctor Li Kunhua of the Yuexiu District Zhenggu Hospital
and the Guangzhou Academy of Chinese Medicine Digong Office all organized
personnel to go to local elementary schools to make a survey of any
abilities of children there to recognize characters with their ears.
Comrade Deng Suhua went to the Zhongda attached elementary school to
survey there. With the assistance of principal Zhang Yanlan, he surveyed
the entire school, discovering over 100 people with paranormal abilities.
He organized three demonstrations. The teachers and employees of the
Guangzhou College Guangzhou Medical College attached School, the
"Guangzhou Sanitation" Press and the Sun Yatsen University observed the
demonstrations. The South China Engineering College established a
research team with assistant director Shi Dan as its advisor and Peng Hua
as the team leader. Through surveys of local elementary schools, they
came up with eight elementary schools whose abilities were relatively
strong. They were put through two years of training, and not only could
all of them recognize characters through non visual means, some were even
able to move objects, move the hands on watches and cause flowers to open.
Chen Jingruan, Guo Zuorao and Tan Xiqi of the Guangzhou Municipal
Sanitation Bureau organized a Guangzhou Municipal Cooperation Group the
Xinqiao Elementary School on Haizhu Road to train the seven member team of
persons with fairly strong capabilities. They could recognize characters
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
through non visual means, see through solid objects, make flowers open up
by will, move the hands of watches, and could move objects over short
distances. The performed demonstrations before a number of units and
instructors who came to Guangzhou, having a fairly great effect on them.
At that time, the "Yangcheng Evening News" reported on the situation
developing in Guangzhou City.
There are always setbacks in any sort of development. In September
of 1981, the "Wenhuibao" published the speech by Comrade Yu Guangyuan,
thus beginning the controversy stage in the development of research into
human paranormal abilities. At this time, there were a number of people
who labeled research into human paranormal capabilities as being "contrary
to Marxism", "idealism", "feudal superstition", and "all kinds of people
doing research". They felt that human paranormal capabilities was "magic"
and "trickery". Because the human paranormal capability teams of several
units in Guangzhou City had difficulties meeting expenses or had other
difficulties, they were dissolved. However, because of the objective
existence of the truth of human paranormal capabilities, a number of
scientific research workers persisted with their research. The Chinese
research committee (preparatory) for somatic science held their second
plenum meeting in Shanghai from 09 to 12 September of 1981 during the
heated controversy. From Guangdong, Comrade Liu Ruchen sent Comrade Li
Zequan to attend. After he returned, he immediately made a report on the
conference to all those engaged or interested in this research in
Guangzhou. He steadfastly maintained that human paranormal capabilities
existed objectively. He also maintained that research should be launched
into the mechanisms of these capabilities. He requested that the State
Science Commission arrange for both sides of the controversy conduct
scientific demonstrations and continue to publish their articles in
"Nature Magazine" and "Human Paranormal Capabilities Bulletin" to report
the results of their scientific research.
From 16 to 20 October of 1982, the Chinese Somatic Science Research
Committee held its third plenum (enlarged) in Beijing. Comrade Liu Ruchen
again sent Comrade Li Zequan as a representative for Guangdong. After he
returned to Guangdong, he passed on the directives of the Leading Comrades
of the Party Central Committee and the notification from the Central
Committee Propaganda Department as well as the spirit of the conference.
He also told of how happy the people at the meeting were over the talk by
Comrade Oian Xuelin.
In the Spring of 1983 an all China human paranormal abilities
conference was held in Kunming in Yunnan. In September of 1983, the
fourth plenum of the Chinese Somatic Sciences Research Committee was held
in Huhehaote in Neimengu. Guangdong was represented by Comrades Liu
Ruchen and Li Zequan. After they returned to Guangdong, they reported on
the conference and told about the exciting test where Comrade Zhang
Yusheng moved objects with his mind.
On 11 March of 1984, the fifth anniversary of somatic science research
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
in China, the researchers in somatic sciences in Guangzhou and those
interested assembled at the Guangzhou College of Chinese Medicine where
they convened a symposium. At the symposium it was advocated that
Guangdong establish a Somatic Sciences Research Committee and it selected
Li Zequan, Guo Zuorao, Xie Fan, Lai Sanghong, Fang'Naili and He Zhuoyuan
to form the preparatory team. After a number of meetings to draw up the
plans, a charter was drafted, outstanding personnel were selected,
contacts were made with the appropriate government agencies, and the first
compilation of research papers of somatic science research in Guangdong
was printed. Also, after a thorough investigation, it was discovered that
Comrade Professor Liang Ronglin of Jinan University's Physics Department
had conducted research on somatic science for many years. Because of
this, he was nominated to be committee chairman. With the support of the
Provincial Natural Sciences Dialectics Research Committee and the Province
Gigong Sciences Research Association, on 20 October of 1984 the "Guangdong
Somatic Science Research Committee" was formally established at Guangzhou
Medical College.
After the Provincial Research Committee was established, it carried
out numerous operations. For example, in early 1985 it went to Huidong
County to investigate the ability of incantations to make a knife cut and
fire burn. The Guangzhou Medical College went to Panfu Road elementary
schools for six different surveys. The association organized testing
activities. Non visual sight occurred at a rate of 30 percent. Professor
Liang of Jinan University and teacher Zhang Zuqi organized close to ten
tests. In October of 1985 they participated in organizing the first all-
Guangdong Digong and Somatic Science Research Paper Exchange Conference.
In October of 1985 they sent Li Zequan, Lai Sanghong and He Zhuoyuan to
the ancient testing of paranormal abilities discussion conference held in
Wuhan. After the conference they invited Wang Weisheng and her daughter
to come to Guangdong for testing of seeing through objects and non visual
sight activities. They invited old teacher Huang Minggao from Guangxi to
come to the committee to take part in a study conference on the "Book of
Changes".
In November of 1985, Comrade Liu Ruchen resigned because of his
advancing age and recommended that Professor Liang Ronglin be made the
Guangdong delegate to the All-China Somatic Sciences Research Conference
(preparatory).
The Guangzhou College of Chinese Medicine Gigong Research Lab and the
Guangzhou University Gigong Research Lab took part in the Beijing
Aerospace Medicine Institute's Somatic Science Research Group.
At the present time, our committee is in contact with the dean of the
Institute of Applied Sciences at Princeton University, Robert B. Jabn, and
is making preparations to engage in a protocol for international exchange.
March 03, 1986
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
THE MECHANISMS OF HUMAN PARANORMAL ABILITIES AND QIGONG
QIGONG JI RENTI TEYIGONGNENGDE JILI
BY: Liang Ronglin of the Guangdong Somatic Sciences Research Committee
ABSTRACT: This article uses the principle of "the theory of
incompleteness" proposed by the author to explore Oigong and human
paranormal abilities.
The phenomenon of Qigong and human paranormal abilities has been
around since ancient times in China and in other countries. It is only
that no one has yet been able to explain these phenomena. The author of
this article has researched the mechanics of these phenomena and has
reached the end of one stage. He reports his findings to the readers and
hopes that this article will encourage more and better research and
articles.
I. THE SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF OIGDNG AND HUMAN PARANORMAL
ABILITIES.
Qigong, human paranormal abilities and other paranormal phenomena
have common special characteristics. These are that these phenomena
seldom occur and they have poor repeatability. Although there are
somewhat greater opportunities for the occurrence of the Qigong phenomenon
than for the human paranormal ability phenomenon, and the repeatability is
also somewhat better, but for the vast majority of people, the phenomenon
can still be considered as very rare, and the repeatability is still
considered as poor.
It is just these special characteristics that lead many people to
either ignore these phenomena or to believe "they are just not real".
Actually, many people still have not seen the miracles of Qigong and even
more have not seen the unbelievable demonstrations of the so-called "human
paranormal abilities". Further, people have been taught in metaphysics
for a along time, and doubt that one divides into two, denying the
dialectical principle that "if there is a normal, there must be a
paranormal". Some people even believe that "since the normal abilities of
the human body have not yet been completely defined, it is ridiculous to
talk about paranormal abilities." There are many confused view points.
On another hand, it is just because these phenomena are so rare and
have poor repeatability that many people relate them to ghosts and demons.
There are quite a few superstitious ideas such as "demonic possession".
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
The two types of views on Qigong and human paranormal abilities above
are both metaphysical, they are counter to dialectics. However, how
should we view Qigong and human paranormal abilities from the dialectical
point of view? In other words, how should we proves Qigpn and human
paranormal ability phenomena are the an fEheses to the law of uniformity?
Below is our proof of this topic. The method of proof is to start from
the "science" of the West which is so popular today because in today's
China, most people know what science is and many people have studied the
rudimentary contents of science.
II. THE PRINCIPLE OF "THE THEORY OF INCOMPLETENESS" AND SOME EXAMPLES
China has a population of more than one billion. A great many of
these are science and technology workers. Anyone who has enjoyed training
in science and technology should know the statements that "science is
strict" and "you can't trick anyone with science". Therefore, in their
science and technological operations, the theoretical portions have to be
strict and the practice must be conscientious.
However, in theoretical thought, can we be completely strict in our
theoretical train of thought? The answer to this question iss "This
theoretical idea not only is not strict, furthermore, it might be
considered by some to be a tremendous mistake!" This is the so-called
"principle of the theory of incompleteness" proposed to use to study
paranormal phenomena. This principle can be proven by the readers. The
proof is as easy as pie. Furthermore, the person proving it need not have
any fancy degree. However, let ds first make a demonstration. For
example:
(I). FAILURE OF NEWTONS'S LAW OF UNIVERSAL GRAVITATION
World famous scientist Newton came up with a law called the law of
""universal gravitation" which states that the mutual attraction between
two "mass points" of two bodies m,, and mm is directly proportional to the
mass of these two "mass points" and inversely proportional to the square
of the distance between these two "mass points", or:
m 1 m2
f = k------
rI
However, this law is invalidated by the "mass points" he
hypothesizes. Because everyone knows that the "point" of the "mass
points" comes from the point concept of geometry which is a hypothetical
object, or in other words, no one has yet been able to pick up a
""geometric point" and show it to anyone. To insist that "geometric points
actually exist" is a type of sophistry because "geometric points" cannot
be picked up and shown to someone, other people have the right to believe
that "geometric points" do not exist!", and they cannot be said to be
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
wrong, and no matter how much they fight over it, the question cannot be
decided. The only way the sophist could succeed would be to kill off
everyone but himself, and that type of demonstration would be stupid.
Let us return to the question of Newton's law'of gravity. We take
Newton's law of gravity as a very serious theory and call it a "complete
theory". However, as we have stated above, this type of "complete theory"
is opposed by one type of reasoning which makes it fail completely. This
type of reasoning is the "geometric points do not exist" we described
above. Since the "mass points" do not exist, therefore this leads to the
m,. and mm in the law of universal gravitation to be meaningless.
Furthermore, the distance (r) in the formula becomes completely
meaningless, and the entire universal law of gravity thus becomes
nonsense. Therefore, this reasoning that "geometric points do not exist!"
is called "the theory of incompleteness". The term "incompleteness" comes
from its meaning which is the opposite of "complete" or "incomplete" (not
strict). Therefore, if there are "complete theories" there naturally must
be the opposite "theory of incompleteness". These two must both exist or
neither exist. This is the principle of the "theory of incompleteness"
which he have proposed. It is a principle which is universally
applicable.
Because of the extremes of thought, people either stress the
"complete theory" part and ignore the "theory of incompleteness"
part or stress the "theory of incompleteness" part and ignore the
"complete theory part". Obviously, Newton raised the "complete theory"
part of the law of universal gravitation to occupy the absolute superior
position and pushed the "theory of incompleteness" part (which is that
""geometric points do not exist") to an inferior position. This is what
made Newton famous. He was good at taking advantage of this tendency of
extreme thought. Actually, it was like this. Man long ago accepted many
"complete theories". These theories became link after link in an
"extremely hard chain of ideas" which restricted our thoughts.
There are no absolutely accurate measurements in this world.
Everyone knows this. However, at first there must have been people who
believed that "there are absolutely accurate measurements in this world",
other wise why would we have refuted this statement? If we call this
theory a "complete theory" (that is "that there are absolutely precise
values in this world"), then there must be a "theory of incompleteness" in
opposition to it. This "theory of incompleteness" is "absolute only has
meaning in comparison to relative". Therefore, "absolute" is also
relative. Actually, any measurement must have some error, this is a
reflection of the "theory of incompleteness".
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
THE IDEA THAT "EVERY MEASURED VALUE IS OBJECTIVE"
(III). FAILURE OF measured value
length that every
easuring that it is an objective value.
Everyone knows that when objectively, there must be a
be taken as existing complete theory "P "c
to it which states that for every
may this theory as a
However, when taking in opposition and "estimates" must be
"theory of incompleteness" and
the smallest unit is awouldinot abs called,"estimates",
measured value, otherwise they incompleteness" to the "theory of
ideas or conceptions, ?theory of this is the apposition of the
completeness it. to raise of the
endless examples in science not seioe any
In summary, there are and we the
principles of the # ,theory of incompleteness" ~ nledof reducing
more examples- It would be better to raise an exam
principle to its basics and look at the result
the ?theory of
basics, then appear
If a principle is reduced to its
that principle woul, d immedithteepY
in opposition to When principle
incompleteness" "theory of completeness. "theory of
causing the failure of that fails, then it is no hthat"theory of
of the 'theory of incompleteness in opposition to t leteness" which stands "theory of incompletene dssemonbutstrate
only completeness ", and since there then we are dreaming- Facts
the "theory of completeness",
that this is the case. applicable principle of "the theory of
Actually, this universally the law of the unity of
the manifestation of ht is not really
incompleteness" is et cal reality ht. This theoretical thersonn but also 31 opposites in theoretical thong and technical p hts, then they
he ideas of scientists If a person has thong
or concepts consist
limited to t people- ideas
includes the thought Of all . thoughts, that this this rinciple Also, it is, better to say
must conform to of the world. Therefore, to say that this
of knowledge of a of the world than
principle allows us to have knowledge
principle exists in all knowledge- to
of
to explain that the world we know 5eetheo l y
how are we ompleteness" and not the lain
However.)
contain the "theory c
incompleteness ideas are often used to ex
a h metaphysical
and that me Y
look at the proof oof in the next section-
things? Please
TY AND INSTABILITY
THE EXTREMES OF THOUGHT, STABILI
III. the "theory of completeness"
the "theory of incompleteness", it
In order to explain why we often take ht and the
i human thous
in the world and ignore to extremes of
for everything
is necessary to discuss the tendency
reasons for this.
ht easily runs to extremes is because as
he reason human thous "individual" "people"- This
urselves as
peoplppx@v@drF5oPft1&A 2UU /1`d : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
7
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
is a "reality" that exists because of the unity of opposites in the
conceptual idea of real and unreal. Therefore, as a person, ones thoughts
very early ran to extremes, and later thoughts habitually ran to extremes
and had a tendency to extremes.
It is only by ideas going to extremes that there is stability in the
thinking of problems. For example, a person is stable about the view of
being an "individual" person and of doing what a person should be doing.
Through the application of the "principle of the 'theory of
incompleteness'" to this stability of thought we can immediately learn
that there is a "theory of incompleteness" which stands in opposition to
the "theory of completeness", that is in opposition to this "stability of
thought", which is that thought is not stable.
Now let us look at something important, which is when "the theory of
completeness" is viewed as "existing objectively", then the "theory of
incompleteness" is something conceptual. For example, the "geometric
points" and the "estimated" final units described in the previous section.
We should take note that "thought is not stable" is also a conceptual
idea, because as explained before, it is "theory of incompleteness". That
is to say, any manifestation of "the theory of incompleteness" is
conceptual, and that it rarely occurs and it has poor repeatability.
This explains that when "the theory of completeness" is taken as
"objective reality" and as "normal", then "the theory of incompleteness"
is taken to be "conceptual ideas" and ,as "abnormal" phenomena which occur
rarely and have poor repeatability.
Now let us apply "The principle of 'the theory of incompleteness'" in
explaining Digong and human paranormal abilities.
"Recognizing characters with the ears" is also called "recognizing
characters with the mind" because it cannot only be done with the ears,
but also with the nose, armpits, etc. Furthermore, after the characters
are written, if the paper is folded up or torn into shreds, the characters
can still be recognized in this manner. Obviously, this type of character
recognition cannot be taken to be a "visual" ability.
Using the principle of "the theory of incompleteness," it is very
easy to come up with an explanation of this "recognizing characters with
the ears", because the mechanism of visual character recognition is a type
of theoretical concept, and if it is taken to be a "complete theory", then
there must be a "theory of incompleteness" standing in opposition to it
causing this "complete theory" to fail. Actually this is just the case.
There are a number of people who have attempted to criticize the
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
phenomenon of "recognizing characters with the ears" by using many
principles of Western medicine and physiology concerning how people
recognize characters, feeling that this can prove that characters cannot
be recognized without using the eyes. However, they are a long way from
being able to convince everyone because to properly explain the function
of character recognition it is not only necessary to explain about
"people", but is also necessary to explain the world, and for a complete
explanation it is necessary to use the concept of unity of opposites to
explain it. Obviously, they are a long way away from a proper
explanation.
When the "theory of incompleteness" appears in opposition to the
"theory of completeness", the "theory of completeness" fails. Then, if a
certain character recognition capability theory taken to be "a complete
theory" fails, then other character recognition abilities appear.
However, as we have said before, this is tied in with the mind, and since
it is a conceptual idea, this sort of mental character recognition
phenomenon should seldom occur and have poor repeatability. This is
exactly as it is.
"Long distance vision" can actually also be called mental long
distance vision. With normal abilities, it is impossible to see over long
distances such as several thousand kilometers or over ten thousand
kilometers. This is not only because the distance is too great to make
out the objects, but there also buildings, trees and mountains in the way.
However, with the "mental long distance vision" capability this type of
unimaginable phenomenon actually exists and has attracted the attention of
people in China and other countries.
(III). "MENTALLY REMOVING OBJECTS FROM A SOLID CONTAINER"
Using the mind to remove solid objects from a sealed container is
what this ability refers to. However, why should such a phenomenon which
is in violation of common knowledge occur? Objects "passing through
spacial barriers" without damaging the sealed container or damaging its
seal is impossible with normal abilities. However, this type of "mental
removal" can be explained using the principle of "theory of
incompleteness".
When such theories such as "Newton's law of motion" and
"impenetrability of matter" are taken to be "theories of completeness",
then there must be "theories of incompleteness" in opposition to them and
causing them to fail, and objects can move in accordance with the
principles of the "theories of incompleteness".
The reason people find this explanation difficult to accept is mostly
due to the restrictions of the original "theories of completeness" such as
"do you mean to say there are problems with Newton's laws of motion"? "Is
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
there any doubt about the impenetrability of matter"O and so on. There is
another viewpoint that "If you don't recognize Newton's laws of motion
then go ahead, but that object should stay in the container and not move.
Since it was not moving in the first place, it should not move." We ask
the reader to try to find the fault in this statement.
As for the "mentally removing objects from a sealed container"
phenomenon, most of the subjects tested said that the object removed was
like a "ball of fire" or "surrounded by fire".
Just like the other abilities described above, "mentally removing
objects from a sealed container" is mental, and the phenomenon is rare and
has poor repeatability.
This is an example of which no foreign reports have been seen but of
which there have been quite a -few demonstrations in China.
An object is broken by someone, and after it is broken, the pieces
are given to the person being tested. The person being tested uses his
mental will to restore the object to its original state before being
broken. This cannot be explained using any kind of "science". This type
of phenomenon can only be explained using the principle of "the theory of
incompleteness".
When the principle that "when sqmething is broken it can never be
restored perfectly to its original condition" is taken as a "complete
theory", then there must be an opposing "theory of incompleteness" which
makes it fail. Naturally, this is mental, ant the phenomenon occurs
rarely and has poor repeatability.
Take an electronic calculator and allow the subject to learn how to
use it, and then take away the calculator, or even remove the batteries
from the calculator. Let the person conducting the test or anyone present
come up with a problem and allow the subject use his mind to operate the
calculator and come up with the answer.
There may be some people who deny that this is actually happening,
believing that it is a trick and saying that the problem to be calculated
can be done in the mind of the subject. However, we have seen where the
subjects did not have this ability and not even know how to solve the
problems. Also, in the process, the numbers of the answers came out one
at a time, and at times the numbers in the answers would be in reversed
order.
This phenomenon can only be explained using our principle of "the
theory of incompleteness". If we take the ability to use a calculator to
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
solve problems as a "complete theory" that there must be an opposing
"theory of incompleteness" for coming up with the answer without directly
operating the calculator. It was a lot of fun coming up with this "theory
of incompleteness", but due to space limitations we will talk no more
about it here.
To summarize what we have already said, the "principle of 'the theory
of incompleteness'" does a very good job of explaining this type of human
paranormal abilities. On the other hand, if we do not use this principle,
it is impossible to explain this phenomena. This is especially true of
concentrating on using the "theory of completeness" as the only method of
explaining the world; it either fails to provide an answer or a
conclusion which is in direct violation to logic comes up. This is just
the reason why people cannot explain this paranormal phenomena using
science.
V. THE QUESTION OF THE MECHANISM OF OIGONG
The principle of "the theory of incompleteness" not only is the
theory of human paranormal abilities, but is also the theoretical basis of
Qigong. The principle of "the theory of incompleteness" undoubtedly
points out that human abilities can be divided into the two opposing
extremes of "'normal human abilities" (based on "the theory of
completeness") and "human paranormal abilities (based on "the theory of
incompleteness").
However, using the principles described above to form a new "theory of
completeness", we can then immediately come up with the "theory of
incompleteness" standing in opposition to this "theory of completeness"
which explains that abilities which are in opposition to "normal
abilities" and "paranormal abilities" exist. These abilities can be
called "intermediate abilities" or "Gigong". We can see that "Qigong" is
a necessary result of the principle of "the theory of incompleteness". In
other words, Qigong was arranged by the principle of unity of opposition
or Qigong was a necessary result of this dialectical world of ours.
Viewing "Qigong" as something between normal abilities and paranormal
abilities, it is possible to predict the direction in which a practitioner
of Qigong will progress. That is to say that when the practitioner of
Qigong moves toward the direction of "normal abilities", this actual means
that his art is not very deep and it often becomes ordinary exercise.
However, when the practitioner moves in the direction of the "paranormal"",
this practitioner will necessarily have paranormal abilities occur. It is
actually like this in reality. It is passible to use "Gonmethods to
train-"persons with paranormal abilities". The reason for this is just.
that "-gong" is located between normal and paranorma abilities.
The world is different for people with different abilities. In the
"Digong" or "intermediate abilities" described above, there is the world
which corresponds to "intermediate abilities". This world is "suit"
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
("internal Ili" and "external Qi"") . Therefore, "Di" is not a "normal
ability" or a "paranormal ability". However, when the practitioner veers
from the middle course, this "Qi" can become a "normal ability" physical
force such as light or heat. However, the "Gi" can also tend towards the
"paranormal ability" direction and become what those with paranormal
abilities sense as such things as "ball of fire"-or "mist". Therefore,
the "0i" of "Oigong" is often mystifying because people often force it
into metaphysical forms and methods.
By the application of the principle of "theory of incompleteness" we
can also obtain several major phenomena of "Digong" and its "Gi".
However, due to the limitations of the scope of this article, we will not
discuss these here but will address them in detail in another article.
VI. THE BASIC NATURE OF THE PRINCIPLE OF THE "THEORY OF INCOMPLETENESS.
The basic nature of the "theory of incompleteness" is one type of
expression of the law of unity of opposites. It is one avenue for the use
of the law of the unity of opposites to explain paranormal abilities.
Whenever the "theory of completeness" and the "theory of
incompleteness" exist in the minds of men, they exist together through
their mutual opposition to each other. It is only when ideas go to the
extreme that a one-sided "theory" appears. At such a time, the opposite
side of this "theory" is hidden.
The manifestation of the principles of the "theory of incompleteness"
is very obvious in science. We cqn very easily find opposite and
irreconcilable antitheses to the theories, definitions and concepts of
science illustrating the basic metaphysical nature of science.
The "theory of incompleteness" is an expression of the law of the
unity of opposites. Furthermore, the law of the unity of opposites is at
the center of the Western Hege'er (phonetic) philosophy. It is also the
philosophical theory the wise ancient Chinese philosophers came up with to
summarize their knowledge of the world. The Chinese have always paid a
great deal of attention to this important law and freed it from philosophy
and directly applied it to reality. The theory of Yin and Yang, Chinese
Medicine, Qigong and human paranormal abilities are treasures of China.
This article only uses modern terminology to discuss the application
of the law the unity of opposites. If it allow our readers to understand
that "gigong and human paranormal abilities are both manifestations of the
law of the unity of opposites", then the purpose for which this article
was written has been achieved.
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
"HYPER TIME AND SPACE FLIGHT" OF OBJECTS THROUGH
HUMAN PARANORMAL ABILITY
RENTI TEYIGONGNENG SIIIJIANZHONG WUTIDE
"CHAOSHIKONG FEIXING" YANJIU
BY: Liang Ronglin of the Guangdong Provincial
Somatic Sciences Research Committee
ABSTRACT
The human paranormal ability phenomenon of objects making "hyper time
and space -flight" has drawn more and more attention. This article
outlines the basic knowledge concerning this area and recent experiments
by the author.
The " t e r , tlm an a space flight" of objects is not the same as
ordinary -fl..iggh'`t- However it can have similar beginings and endings as
ordinary flights, which is that the object can "fly" from one point to
another.
When objects_ makey"hYeer time and space flight", it is characterized
by this flight necessarily having direct relationship with man thought
(or consciousness) Actually, human thought is of the na_re of -hyper
-.^-
time and space., and wTen ob ecT`s make "hyper time and space flights", .
obje
they are of the nature ofi hyper time atd_space. For example, when c t
__ ~--- solid objects can be placed between
maf~ e ' h,.per time and space ~f 1 fight'
and space flight and the
the point the object occupies prior to hyper time aefli ht.
- e r time ar_t.d__...._. s-p 9
point .the _o_bJ,ect ,occupies fol lowinci theW___byp etratee"
Therefore, the "flight" of "hyper time and space flight" can "penetrate"
spacial obstac.1-p~._withou t damaging the.p,bstac_.
As for hyper-t, me, this type of "flight", filed because actual of Ili-tsgh.t. hyper time
In
"hyper nature, tobi ec is in "fl fight" ha_v._ri
ime -i- and space flight", real flight time has no meaning.
Therefore, it is the same as "breaking through spacial barriers", objects
effectively "break through the time barrier."
Does this type of "hyp___- er time space flight" aet~Y exist? If
this this "flight" is proven to exist, than stories that had been called
fantasies in the past will not be far from the truth. of il i _iresebt dant.
"unidentified flying objects" (UFOs) has provided a type From the 1a-rge -_ n numumb bers of reported materials we can see _q--number of
reports of abnormal circumstances surrounding_UFD flights. For example,
no matter how fact ua t -l -_~he y a -orts such as the a most simultaneous
p-
are, re
occurrence of UFOs over China's Xizang and California in the United States
can easily remind us of the "hyper time and space flight" mentioned above.
Is such "hyper time and space flight" preposterous. The author and
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
his coworkers have seen hundreds of this type of demonstrations of objects
making "hyper time and space
~ -p pace flight" and have personally conducted this
4 e off` ex er invent. FurtheC-mo-"e, we have been forced to conduct research
into how to establish atheory on this phenomenon and to consider its
applications. However, this .._~s_ far from ng-enough to persuade other
people that this is real. Actually, most people who have not seen this
type of "flight" phenomenon must believe that this type of report is
absolutely preposterous. This is the only way to conform with the
dialectical manifestations of this world. Those who agree are in an
extremely small minority, and most people only have specific and abstract
knowledge of normal flight. If they said they were to say that this type
of flight which violated common knowledge was certain to exist, they would
be preposterous, because they only have an abstract acceptance and have
never actually observed it. On the other hand, it can also be believed
that merely having seen the specific phenomenon and not having a conscious
abstract knowledge is similarly insufficient, and is a type of incomplete
knowledge. One can deny under certain conditions that "seeing is
believing" and feel that it is possibly one's own illusion or a trick.
Therefore, in order to prove whether or not "hyper time and space flight"
is a hoax, in addition to specific aspects it is also necessary to have
abstract proofs and the later are difficult. For this type of proof it
would be better and easier to prove that "ordinary flight" is a hoax. The
reason this type of reduction to absurdity can obtain strict proof is
because the world does not have any evidence to the contrary. If we
obtain proof that "ordinary flight" is also absurd, then the absurd "hyper
time and space flight" may also exist. Therefore, the center of our
research should be shifted toward whether or not "normal flight" is
absurd.
Just as we thought, even though "ordinary flight" (just like "hyper
time and space flight") has been specifically determined to exist, but in
abstract thought this type of flight is actually absurd. Therefore, we
cannot use abstract thought to directly prove that this type of flight is
real. Furthermore, the "geometric points", "orbits' and "moments" in the
description of "ordinary flight" do not actually exist in the world of
flight. Here, we are not especially making fun of a number of theoretic
scholars asking them to pick up a "geometric point" or "orbit" and let us
see it, but we want to remind those who do not agree with us not to
stubbornly believe that your own ideas must necessarily be the reality of
this world. "Geometric points", "orbits", "moments" and "speeds" are
merely a certain convenient convention of thought or a type of convenient
idea (imagination) and nothing more. If we do not bring forward such
conventions, it would be impossible to describe ordinary flight in
theoretical ideas. That is to say that "ordinary flight" has its own
absurdity. Since this is the case, then the theoretical ideas of "hyper
time and space flight" may use another set of "geometric points", "orbits"
"moments" and "times".
Research into the "hyper time and space flight" of objects not only
is research of the physical studies of flight, but is also a philosophical
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
topic. Because only those people who acknowledge the world is of a
dialectical nature can understand why in addition to the "normal flight"
of objects of the world there also exists an opposing "hyper space and
time flight".
After we have clarified the necessity of the existence of "hyper time
and space flight", the next thing is research into human thought (or
consciousness), which is the question of why "hyper time and space flight"
i5 always closely related to human thought or consciousness.
In observing the "hyper time and space flight" of objects we alw _s
s to carryit out. Therefore,. the
have someone u"e his will or thought _
and space f l i g h t " se to come from thought.
ss_
-T-- ime
drive of _~t ..~ -hYp knowledge is
NEO Li Fa -tTiia is ---a,6 so u e y absurfy as mar as ordinary
concerned. Because as far as ordinary knowledge is concerned, thought (or
consciousness) is only a "mirror" with which man reflects the objective
world. Even if thought had a dynamic role, this type of dynamic role
could not move objects, even an extremely small grain of dust. Therefore,
for thought or consciousness to move objects is very absurd. Now, "hyper
space and time -flight" being able to "penetrate solid walls" is even more
the
absurd than thought being able to move objects. When
enstweiacknowledge the
reality of "hyper time and space flight", we
thoughts (or consciousness) concerned are or must find out "just what is
thought" and "why does henomenon ono tone Thas lbeeomeableg to
should look
satisfactorily explain it.
When scholars who are accustomedtophysical methods are faced with n9n
this type of phenomenon, they very naturally mention mits _phenomen
brasn e
, _
of moving objects by thought may be because the..
of particle group or field, and often call tis "thought particles" .or
"thou ht field". They feel that these particles or field causes the
== ---- = -
"thought movement" breaks
C) to move and that the reason that.... the
through spacial barriers is that these articles or field first
passed through the spaces between
disassemble the object and then ity ss P led object _is once more
the atoms of the ob5tac l es and then the disass~ 'I
reassemblednto,i original str!uc ure T- constitut time a
e..,. hYpeor
space flight which "breaks through spacial barriers". These particles
field are naturally not normal particles or fields. They have the special The characteristics of transmitting ofothese.particdlesaorefield. Otherwise/
are totally the conscious
science becomes a children's fantasy tale.
Truthfurl_ly, we _, wcgld . be very happy if the explanation above fp'
"thought particles" or"thought field"for.,..., "moving objects b thought"
pr-.ove-5 ~.to be .true, because this type of explanation is i.mple.
Furthermore, it could retain physics and would not require a revolution in
physics. If one proposes the new particles "thought particles", then its
field "thought field" and its mesons exist. However,, this type of easy
way out does not work because for an object to be affected by thought
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
("thought particles" or "thought field"), the object mg~__._.have_its._-own
consciousn. We know that in order for higher classes can control lower
classes, and for lower classes can obey the orders of higher classes, the
higher and lower classes must have consciousness or thoughts. Therefore,
if one believes that ordinary objects also have conscious thought, then
the special thought "thought particles" or "consciousness" fields actually
become meaningless. In other words, this typeu of explanation actually
believes that the "world is composed of,.thought". Therefore, it would be
impossible to maintain the science of physics which has nothing at all to
do with thought and it would be in direct opposition to the original
purpose.
The reason we do not like to use "thought particles" or "thought
fields` is--because these concepts come from the concepts of the particles
and -Fields of Physic s^ and 'fiat they are objects' of thong ht or conceptually
abstract. Actually, should we discover that "hyper time and space flight"
are related to thought, and that the physics concepts of "particles and
-fields" are actually related to thought, we will feel that it is
unnecessary and a waste of time to use "particles and fields" to tour the
world. In other words, when we,_try to find the reasonsfpr_,"hyper time
and space flight", we must- determine exactly what thought is. However, we
must not, use the limited manifestations (physical) of thought to explain
what thought is. Present day physics is only a type of convention, a
lima ed,.,ranvent~on. It cannot completely explain thought. For examPlea
"A bowl cannot tell the bowl maker what i"t would like to be used to
contain." (This quote was taken from "Ande Book of Martyrs"). Then, why
must we take this winding route in our,research?
Therefore, when we do research into "hyper time and space flight", we
are was x- , ourt me,. and e-1,fort we` emp to use modern science.
Actually, we explored many different directions, for example, modern
electromagnetic theory, quantum mechanics, the theory of relativity and
the theory of gravity all of which were of no use in explaining "hyper
time and space flight". Furthermore, tt-rough this research, we were
deeply convinced _th,_ theworld described by modern science, especially
physics, is far from what the real wor=Ia actually is.
However, there will of necessity be a great deal of difficulties in
ridding oneself of the restrictions of the contents of the book shelves to
try to find out exactly what "hyper time and space flight" actually is.
Most of the difficulties will be those interpersonal difficulties. This
is because on the one hand, people with this type of ability do not think
in the same way or have the same thought habits as normal people. On the
other hand, "the rarer something is the more valuable it is". Certain
people use this as a marketable commodity or simply perpetrate fraud. The
second difficulty will be like we mentioned above, the reason-we--cannot
use today's most advaggpd_,,_p_Jec_t,ronic tf-s:t-r~ments to explain "hyper time
and ace,.,-fiight" .,is because electronic instr-wmen-ts were designed to
measure "ordinary" -flight according to a certain conventions (physics,
etc) of thought. Naturally, all of the difficulties mentioned above are
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
caused by the rejection by our world of "ordinary flight" of that world of
"hyper time and space flight".
Because of this rejection, and because those who have the ability of
"hyper time and space flight" are weak, this ability is very easily lost
or weakened. For example, say there was acer?ain_person with-this
ability who relied on what we consider fantasy thoughts to maintain this
yper'? irme and spac----' flight. However, if we force her to study our
curriculam, especially such subjects }het traiin abstract thoughts such as
r .that her abilities wouldgtquickly become
ma e.matics? we woulcTdiscove _
weaker. Also, there is the adverse affect on this ability of the excess
s rc for ideals by young people during their transitional period. This
is because the vast majority of the time they live among us people of
ordinary abilities. This is the so-called two worlds mutual rejection
effect. The result is that one can have one or the other, but not both.
Because of this, in order to maintain this type or research, we must
contir7ual ly have replacements of new personnel or, do research on how to
_.~.._- W_.. p. ,.4
re~ sure the orig ~naX powers G) these people.
There are also a vet small numbr of _.per'sons who _ have this type
~__
ofi ability ynto mi_ddle age or old age. However, because they are in an
abnormal ideological state,'7E1iey cangonly provide researchers with liand
data. They often seem to be odd when compared to ordinary people
cause our researchers to lose hope because of the difficulties in working
with them.
Even though "hyper time and space flight" may be the guiding light to
the revealing of the secrets of nature of human life, the author is not
very optimistic about the outlook for this research. However if it is
once accepted that this type of flight exists, it will be of great
significance. It will indicate that man's knowledge of the world is still
in a state of ignorance.
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
THE INOBJECTIVITY OF THE THEORY OF ELECTROMAGNETICS
DIANCE LILUNDE FEKEGUANXING
BY: Liang Ronglin of the Jinan University Department of Physics
This article discusses the inobjectivity of the theory of
electromagnetics, pointing out the type of mental acceptance of this
theory and where it came from. It provides materials useful for the
direct demonstration of the mechanism of Oigong and human paranormal
abilities.
I. WHY BRING UP THE INOBJECTIVITY OF THE THEORY OF ELECTROMAGNETICS
Man discovered the phenomenon of electromagnetism a long time ago,
but the theoretical explanation of these phenomena was not begun until the
18th Century from research by Coulomb and others. However, all research
must be related to the world of that researcher. There has never baen a
sc.i xfic theor world view. Orwise~ere would
~~that transcended the
be no way to propose the theory.
Man's knowledge of the world is boundless. Seventeenth century man's
world outlook was not necessarily twentieth century man's world outlook.
One person's world outlook might not be the same as another person's world
outlook. To say that they were necessarily absolutely the same would be
ridiculous.
However-, it should be pointed out that today's more developed
science's theory of electromagnetics is the old 18th century thing. In
other words, this type of electromagnetic theory is almost not even part
of our world view. This is a strange phenomenon we have come into contact
with in science.
Furthermore, for not a few phenomena, especially those which touch
upon the phenomenon of thought or on phenomena of life, to be explained
using today's theory of electromagnetism is actually a monumental task
which often has a negative result. Because of the reasons above, we are
forced to reveal the mysteries within, and the inobjectivity of today's
electromagnetic theory is the primary subject of this article.
IT. THE RELATIONSHIP AMONG ACTUAL FORCE, ELECTROMAGNETIC FORCE AND
GRAVITATIONAL FORCE
Research on the phenomenon of electromagnetism from the 18th to the
19th Century was based on one hypothesis, that was that the phenomenon of
electromagnetism created a kind of force called electromagnetic force
(including the so-called electrostatic force and magnetostatic force in
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN25 -q'
the phenomenon of electrostatic magnetism), that this type of force is
completely different from magnetism. Furthermore, the actual force that
occurs in electromagnetic phenomenon is the result of the superimposition
of electromagnetic force and gravity, that is
___)1 -+ f al force
f actual force = f -3 electromagnetic force gravitation
It should be pointed out that in electromagnetic phenomena, only
gravitational force is
actual force can be detected, and that the 9
estimated, and it seams that it should be determined byhtthe hemdistribution
of the gravitational mass when the electromagnetic p
Thus, the so-called electrommagneticor force should be defined as the
difference between these two ,
-a "4 gravitational force
f electromagnetic force = f actual force - f 9r
We are very disappointed to see that gravitational force is a type of
force which can not be actually measured empirically but is a force which
sgababout
tleddoubts
can only be estimated. This causes us to have some tgreat
t
this so-called "electromagnetic force". B eCa ottrtma n and
force actually cannot be measured, neratesrcanhenotibed?measured. However
"charge" that it theoretically ge
today's electromagnetic theory believes that all the things involved in type electromagnetic force are vereal . must be
getting by under false pretenses
revealed. I
This type of "method" in general is to use the measurement science
term "not noted". How is the term "riot noted" used in magnetic theory to
legitimize electromagnetic force?
Concerning the relationship among the three forces descrribedhabove,
one need only concede that the actual force is much g e
gravitational force, then
f actual force > > f gravitational force
Then we can see that the electromagnetic force is close to that of
the actual force,
f electromagnetic force = f actual force
and the magnetic force would be elevated to
wa e mellurablenf rce.
However, this method has a problem in principle, as
analysis.
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
III. CONCERNING OVERLOOKED PROBLEMS IN THE GRAVITATIONAL FORCE
CATEGORY
It is normally believed that the gravitational force item is smaller
than the actual force by several tens of orders of magnitudes, so it is
completely possible to ignore the gravitational force item, and then
f actual force f electromagnetic force
In this manner, we can believe that the actual measured force (for
example, the force Coulomb used his scale to measure) is the
electromagnetic -force (or the electrostatic force).
However, it must be noted that when we use the term "ignored" in the
problems above, we actually are requiring that the gravitational force
being approximately zero as one of the conditions of the calculations,
then
f gravitational force a 0 (1)
Then an the other hand, if the gravitational force is zero, then we
can believe that the phenomenon being measured does not contain any
gravitational mass, and we have the result
f gravitational force = 0 (2)
The two different definitions of gravitational forces as zero in the two
problems above are that in formula (1) and (2) have "0" on the right side.
This has caused a great deal of trouble.
If the zero on the right side of formula (1) can be felt to be
reasonable from the viewpoint of measurement science, then the zero on the
right side of formula (2) is not reasonable. Because formula (2) takes
the object of research (for example frequently the so-called "charge")
not to contain any mass, and then how could a "charge" which does not
contain any mass demonstrate the effect of its force? Unless there was
really a ghost with his hand in it.
Actually, today's electromagnetic theories all use the number (2
formula) equality symbol and not the formula (1) approximation symbol.
This must be the recognition of the existence of the "spirit world".
Can formula (1) be used to as the basis to establish an
electromagnetic theory? In order to remove any intrusion of the "spirit
world", it is necessary to reduce formula (1) to its original form which
was
f actual force = f electromagnetic force + f universal gravitational force
and not haphazardly use the approximation symbol to establish the theory.
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
Naturally, we should allow other people to hypothesize that the universal
magnetism to be much smaller than the actual force, but we should not
allow the universal magnetism to be set at zero.
If we can use this relationship to establish a theory of
electromagnetism, then we should believe that "electromagnetic force" is
real!
However, the analysis that follows is very disappointing, because
from this original convention of the force we were unable to extract
today's so-called "intensity of electric field", "potential" or "charge".
Please see the analysis of the following section.
IV. PROBLEMS IN DEFINING INTENSITY OF ELECTRIC FIELD E
If we are to keep the intensity of electric field E from becoming
nothing more than object of our imagination, but try to use so-called
objective objects for our definition of the intensity of electric field,
we are wasting our time. This is because the actual force any real object
receives in the electromagnetic phenomenon is not electrical magnetism or
electromagnetic force. Under normal conditions, the actual fore is
limited, and furthermore, even where electromagnetic phenomena have been
arranged, the actual force is not zero, because there is still universal
magnetism. Using static electricity for an example. If this actual force
is divided by qo and qo approaches zero, then this value immediately
becomes infinitely large. That is when qo approaches zero,
F actual force
approaching i?nfinity
Therefore, if we do not ignore this so-called small fractional universal
magnetism item, and try to use the real object of the so-called
experimental charge of the electromagnetism theory to investigate the
intensity of electric field, we are wasting our time.
Therefore, whether or not we ignore the universal magnetism item, it
is impossible to objectively define the intensity of electric field.
Also, when we ignore it, just as we have said before, we introduce the
"spirit world", and when we do not ignore it, the intensity of electric
field it induces is meaningless.
Therefore, because the convention of using zero for the universal
magnetism item, today's theories of electromagnetism is a door between the
"humans" and "the spirit world" and is something on the "spirit world"
side, because it is normally considered that universal magnetism belong's
to the "human world", and belongs to the other side of this door.
Naturally, if accept both universal magnetism and electromagnetic
force. this requires that we accept the "human world" and the "spirit
world". If the former has objectivity, then the latter must not have
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
objectivity, and any electromagnetic force must lack objectivity. This is
the problem this article has tried to point out.
V. THE SOURCE OF THE LACK OF OBJECTIVITY OF THE ELECTROMAGNETIC THEORY
It is better to say that the lack of objectivity of the
electromagnetic theory comes from the Newton convention of universal
gravitational force than to say the electromagnetic force of Coulomb,
Maxwell and Lorentz.
The human world seems to have something like universal gravitational
force which attracts objects. This concept is solidly rooted. It has
lasted for more than three centuries. However, the laws of universal
gravity established by Newton and others in the 17th Century view see this
as a type of force, and it is still viewed as a type of basic force to
this day. The metaphysical nature of this type of force which only
attracts and does not repel baffles people to this day. Furthermore,
today we believe that anything metaphysical represents something
inconceivable and the appearance of "the spirit world". If mankind will
believe that this metaphysics was science, then the "spirit world" would
appear among men.
The exposure of the spirit nature of the theory of electromagnetism
is an extremely good example of this viewpoint.
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
DO NOT ALLOW TODAY'S ELECTROMAGNETIC THEORY TO POLLUTE HUMAN
PARANORMAL ABILITY RESEARCH
BUYAO RANG JINTIANDE DIANCELILUN WURAN RENTI TEYIGONGNENGDE YANJIU
BY: Liang Ronglin of Jinan University Physics Department
This article reminds those conducting research into Qigong and human
paranormal abilities: Do not allow the polluting nature of the theory of
electromagnetism which has lasted up to the present time to be part of or
to exist in research into thought concerned with Qigong and Human
paranormal ability phenomena.
The term "pollution" has recently often been used in industry. Things
which are polluted are either difficult to get clean or are completely
changed. Pollution is directly injurious to human health. If it were
believed that "science" also had a polluting effect on the study of
things, it would have been mentioned long ago.
This article points out that the spiritualistic theory of
electromagnetism which began as a 17th and 18th century concept of force
and has developed and has been passed on to today without its true nature
having been revealed should not be used in research into thought.
Otherwise, knowledge of thought will"continue to be bogged down in the
morass of metaphysics.
In order to demonstrate this problem, let us take the trouble to
describe the nature of spiritual doctrines of today's electromagnetic
theories.
As I pointed out in my previous article, "The Inobjectivity of the
Theory of Electromagnetism", there is no actual definition or "objective"
definition of any of electromagnetic forces in today's theory of
electromagnetism. Because we first accepted universal gravitation and
then proposed electromagnetic force, therefore, we see universal
gravitation as an objective reality and electromagnetic force as not an
objective reality. The reason is very simple. Because we cannot
eliminate this universal gravitation and define electromagnetism. Because
of this, do not believe the descriptions in the electromagnetism texts .
In these it is held that it is possible to use an experimental thing
called "point charge" to find the existence of an electric field.
Actually, this experimental thing called a "point charge" is a part of
what we originally believed was the world of universal gravitation. Its
behavior can also not be divorced from the reality of this world of
universal gravitation. Furthermore, the force acting on this "point
charge" is only actual force and not electromagnetic force.
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
Today's theories of electromagnetism cannot fail to admit that the
force in electromagnetism is actual. force, and they often use the
following relationships which use the principle of superimposition in an
attempt to extract an electromagnetic force.
f actual force = f electromagnetic force + f universal gravitational
force (1)
Today's theory of electromagnetism believes that the actual force is
much greater (several ten of orders of magnitude!) than universal
gravitation, so there is the following omitting method:
-i --~
f actual force = f electromagnetic force
We do not oppose the hypothesis of this approximation, but our
predecessors haphazardly wrote the formula in the following manner,
f actual force = force electromagnetic force (3)
which changes the approximation symbol into an equals symbol. This is an
error of principle, because if formula (2) illustrates an omission in
measurement, then if it is reasonable within certain permissible error
parameters, then this formula takes universal gravitational force to
approximate zero, such as
f universal gravitational force = 0 (4)
But this formula basically still accepts the existence of the universal
gravitational force. However, formula (3) sets universal gravitational
force at zero, such as
f universal gravitational force = 0 (5)
^n the surface, the difference between formulas (4) and (5) is only that
the approximation symbol has been changed to the equal sign. However,
formula (5) which uses the equal sign, denies the existence of the
universal gravitational force, and therefore, using the equal sign denies
the existence of the originally accepted world of universal gravitational
force. Therefore, in today's theories of electromagnetism, Maxwell's
equation doers not contain any universal gravitational force factor. All
the theories developed on electromagnetism including the "narrow sense"
theory of relativity are only applicable when no gravitational field
exists.
This type of results, which are a clear extreme departure from
reality, should have caught people's attention a long time ago, but
science has rid itself of the effects of human social consciousness, and
today's education and intelligence tests still use these traditional
theories, and in addition, these bizarre results form a system with the
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
original structure of science, so it is not possible to take one item at a
time to expose their fallacies or spiritualistic nature. It is only by
making basic checks that we discovered that all electromagnetic forces in
this theory of electromagnetism are baseless, and are only a concept of
thought. If we were to believe that in reality there was such a thing as
"point charge" and "current element" which could actually point out the
existence of electrical fields and magnetic fields, this would be an error
of carelessness.
This is because if we actually hypothesized the actual existence of
electrical fields, and also accepted that electromagnetic force were real,
then the definition of electromagnetic force through the actual force
which occurs in electromagnetic phenomena would necessarily be
(6)
f electromagnetic force = f actual force - f universal gravitational force
Then by dividing the entire formula by the test charge qo, we get
(7)
f electromagnetic force = f actual force - f universal gravitational for e
qo qo qo
When qo approaches zero (just as it does in today's theory of
electromagnetism), then because universal gravitational force is a force
of limited size, therefore
E = F ELECTROMAGNETIC FORCE = F ACTUAL FORCE = infinity
qo qo
and E is the so-called strength of electrical field which is believed to
objectively exist. It is a limited vector, thus
--3P
f actual force = E + infinity = infinity
qo
This is a very absurd result. The omission in the formula above has
retained an unlimited large vector 1 whcih is the actual force acting on
the experimental charge and its proportional value to the charge qo when
qo approaches zero is infinite. This illustrates that it is not what is
described in the theory of electromagnetism. Although they believe that
by using actual force and experimental electric charge it is possible to
define the electrical field. To the contrary, it illustrates that no
electrical (magnetic) force can be measured. This is nothing more than
"first define then ignore", and it has tremendously different results than
the "first ignore then define" methods mentioned earlier. Is this really
science? We often hear certain protectors of "traditional" theories
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
strongly opposing research into Oigong and human paranormal abilities,
believing that they have no scientific basis, that they are refuted by
science. However-, who thought that this science would have such a flaw in
it.
This also illustrates that the "existence" we are aware of, such as
electrons, the electron model atom and extending from this to basic
molecules and physical structure, in actuality have concealed within them
thought factors just like the theory of electromagnetism. There is no
reason for us blindly to only recognize only one convention of thought and
the theory established on this convention and not recognize that since one
convention of thought can be recognized, then also a second, a third, an
infinite number of conventions. Furthermore, the multiplicity and
expansiveness of this convention is characteristic of thought. Therefore,
it is absurd to attempt to use one of an infinite number of conventions on
thought to frame the laws and characteristics of thought.
Actually, there have already been a great many examples which
illustrate that today's theory of electromagnetism are of no use in
explaining the phenomena of Oigong and human paranormal abilities. Here
we would like to quote the famous Psi scholar Joseph Banks Rhine who
stated in his book "The Reach of the Mind" which was published in 1947:
"Certain scientists are interested in strange abilities. It is because
they erroneously believe that these abilities can be ascribed to
electromagnetic theory of the natural world. However, when they discover
that the results transcend the principles of physics that they drop this
research subject like a hot potato."
We feel that this is correct. If that scientist did not drop this
research subject immediately, then he would have been rebuked by the
"protectors" and beneficiaries of traditional theory or that he himself
was a beneficiary and was not willing to take such a social risk.
Rhine accurately reported the fears the scholars of that time had of
Psi. He also reported the problems apparent in the electromagnetic
theory. However as a parapsychologist, he was not able to reveal how
predecessors had been able to use thought to establish their own science
or to reveal the subtle relationship between thought and science. He was
even less able to see how scientists had used zero to achieve magical and
unintentional fallacious result. This is very regrettable. Actually, the
difference between
the two following two
f universal
gravitational
force =
0
f universal
gravitational
force =
0
equations is only a single dot
and it is just because of the problem in principle of equating this
approximation symbol and the equal sign was too hidden that his academic
ideas were not universally noted but were to the contrary was looked down
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
Today, the Chinese are facing and developing research in their own
country on Oigong and human paranormal abilities which have existed since
ancient times in China and in other countries. However, if we continue to
follow the theory of electromagnetism which comes from the metaphysical
Western scientific thought, it will pollute our research. Just as we
pointed out at the beginning of this article, pollution can cause the
original content of things to change and can turn them into something
completely different and unrecognizable.
1. From the viewpoint of universal gravity or mass and matter, all
of the electromagnetic forces in today's theory of electromagnetism are
objective. They can only be taken to be adsorbed in matter, but are
really objects of thought. This is just the same as spiritualistic
suppositions. Therefore, to oppose the existence of a spiritual world is
to oppose the hypothesis of this type of electromagnetic force.
II. The nature of a convention of thought of today's theories of
electromagnetism illustrates that electromagnetic force and universal
gravitational force form a unity of opposites, but have no other "unity".
III. Today's theory of electromagnetism is only one of an infinite
number of conventions of thought. Therefore it cannot be used to explain
the phenomenon of thought. It must not be arbitrarily applied to such
phenomena of thought as Gigong and human paranormal abilities.
IV. If a more reasonable explanation is to be made of real
phenomena, it will be necessary to abandon the metaphysical hypothesis of
universal gravitational force in order to avoid a recurrence of the
spiritualistic theory of electromagnetism.
V. New theories must be dialectic. It is possible to obtain from
their metaphysical aspects today's universal gravitational force and
electromagnetic force forms. Also, because
based on universal gravitational force, it
mass. It will get rid of the laws of mass
necessity of "impenetrability". It will
matter from the restrictions of "mass".
the
new theories will not
be
will
permit new definitions
of
in
the old theories and
the
also
release the definition
of
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10: CIA-RDP96-$W .FMQ0App44QQQ2-6
THE LOGIC OF THE DEFINITION OF FORCE AND
LI DINGYI LUOJI YU SIWEI JIQI
BY: Liang Ronglin of Jinan University Physics Department
ABSTRACT of past
inquiries into the understanding of the
This article makes new s among
shows the impreciseness of the understanding
past defn of force, important logical relationship
force. Finally, it makes a
past defini tionsofiforce and the the mut on betweenrathe newlnunderstanding and modern thinking machine
coonnect
theory.
FOREWORD we
,
It would seem that today, in the eighties of the 20th Century, we
understanding about the past definitions of force,
should not ho n that science and technology has advanced so
this henomena ti--at force us
is due to this have
ttho houghtfipheniera of tor and
pay However, there are a number of
toptdly.
no e a new look at our understanding
Thesedefinitions of farce have
phenomena force
m any attention to whether or these
not
made any contributions in any certain areas.
have psychology, human behavioral abilities
mostly occurred in medicine, e). In addition, the re-
our
examination and thinking machines (artificial intelligenc in advancing
past definitions of force will help important basic
o the Therefore, this topic is an
knowledge o of the world. philosophy, physics and all related
theoretical research related to mechanics and engineering.
of
This article first reveals the impreciseness of the understanding of
of force and then presents a new way of defining force
the meaning and its close relationship with today's
discusses this new understanding or artificial intelligence.
research into electronic comp
1. THE PAST UNDERSTANDING OF THE DEFINITION OF FORCE AND EXISTING
PROBLEMS THEREIN
Force is a very important concept in physics. The result of the
for ""what is force" or "how is force defined" can determine the
search physics and the key links in its development.
path of the development of ordinary
oure at the o
discussion.
lethe velproblem
Here, let us discuss
the beginnings offo
middle school or college
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
Then, what is force?
This is a common answer:
"Force is the effect of interaction between bodies."
Clearly, this answer is not perfect, the question of what this
"effect" is in not addressed.
"Changes occur in the form of bodies" is shortened to "body
distortion" and "changes in the state of motion of bodies" often is used
to supplement the definition of "effect" in the definition of force.
Sometimes it is simply felt that the following express the definitions of
force:
"Force is the cause of changes in bodies."
Or, "force is the cause of bodies being in a state of motion."
In this manner, the effect in the definition seems to be clearly
treated, and the statements that it is the "distortion occurring in
bodies" or "changes occurring in the state of motion of bodies" are very
specific, and the definition of force seems to have a final statement.
However, this way of thinking is worth looking into, because this way
of thinking usually understands force to be something "specific" and not a
"conceptual abstract", and the students often miss the point. Today's
college and middle school students and even graduate students have an
understanding of "definition of force" which stops at this level. It is
worthwhile for educators and experts concerned to study this.
Actually, it is "abstract" is not "specific". Although the
definition of force presents the two phrases "distortion" and "change in
the state of motion", these two phrases are also "conceptual abstracts".
Therefore, the definition of force or "force" remains a conceptual
abstract and not something "specific". The belief that because force
induces "distortion" or "changes in the state of motion", it becomes a
specific object, can meet with insurmountable difficulties. Here, let us
discuss this further.
If one believes that "force is the cause of changes in the shape of
objects" is the definition of force, and that it is the specific
manifestation of force and not a conceptual abstract (also called
conceptual in nature), then there are two inherent basic problems.
The first is that the "cause" in the definition is not precise, and
up to the present day, it is still a type of guess which, of force and the
distortion of objects, is the cause and which is the result. No one has
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
been able to make a determination or proof of this cause and result
problem. If it should be that this cause and effect relationship does not
exist, then "force" and "the distortion of objects" describe the same
thing, and neither could be used to define the other.
The second is the "distortion" in the definition of -force can easily
be confused. Here let us discuss this problem.
It looks like "the distortion of bodies" is a specific thing outside
the definition of force, and it impresses people as being something very
specific. For example, they believe that: if one wants to find if there
has been any distortion of an object, it can be determined by specific
observation. However, the occurrence of object distortion and human
thought or whether or not humans are willing to observe are completely
unrelated.
However, when we realistically and conscientiously explore this
problem, especially when we study the difference between "abstract" and
"specific", we discover that the "distortion occurring in objects" in the
definition of force remains a conceptual abstraction.
This is because since we can propose that "force is the cause of
distortion occurring in objects", then we must permit others to ask "under
what conditions can force act on. objects without distortion?" Or they
might ask "where can objects which are in their original form not having
undergone distortion of having undergone distortion have returned to their
original state prior to distortion be found?" If these questions cannot
be answered, then the statement "force is the cause of distortion in
objects" is not specific or is not real, and is simply a type of
conceptual abstraction.
It is reasonable to raise these questions, because "specific" refers
to something we can attain in practice and "conceptual abstraction" is
something we cannot put our hands on in practice and remains a conceptual
hypothesis, inference or just a guess. Therefore, when it is believed
that the force in the definition of force is something specific, then it
is necessary to be able to find in practice comparative aspects which can
be distinguished. This comparative aspect should be the state where there
is a lack of force in "when no force acts on an object no distortion will
occur".
Unfortunately, in practice in this real world of ours, objects which
"have no force acting on them and do not undergo distortion" cannot be
found. The above problem can only be "solved" by a type of subjective
guess. This would be to imagine a completely empty world an infinite
distance from this real world of ours, and if the object studied could be
isolated there, and' if we also hypothesize that objects an infinite
distance away would not have any effect on this object, then we could
believe that there is no effect of force acting on this object and in this
empty world it would reveal its original and undistorted appearance.
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
I N7!i -92
This cannot be realized in the our objective world, and because of
this this guess in conceptual in nature.
(II). PROBLEMS WITH INDUCING "A STATE OF MOTION"
If we believe that "force is the cause for changes in the state of
motion of an object" is the definition of force and that force is a
specific thing, than there are problems just like those with the (when
inducing "distortion") stated above.
Here we would like to primarily discuss the basic nature of this
conceptual abstraction "state of motion".
Here, let us directly state that because "inertial movement"
basically does not exist in the practical world, the comparative aspect
(or the opposite) of "change occurring in the state of motion of an object
cannot be practically utilized, so "force is the cause of changes in the
state of motion of objects" is a type of conceptual abstraction, or is a
conceptual statement.
We are surprised to see that as of today, physics is still unable to
come up with an answer to this question. Although in the past and today,
physics has always prompted the development of science and technology.
r
In mathematical practice, a confusing explanation to this question
often appears. For example, the belief that this problem can be probed by
using continuous practice. However, people point out: Because nothing in
actual practice can be distinguished by using "inertial motion", this
problem cannot be overcome by increasing the number of times the
experiments are performed. Another example is the belief that it is
possible to use objects at a "relatively far distance" and use
approximation or "extrapolation" to prove the existence of "inertial
motion". However, we feel that these ideas are actually stuck at
inference or guessing and cannot really prove its existence in practice.
Similarly, to assume that there is a "completely void world which is
at an infinite distance from our practical world", and that if objects
could independently move in that world, and hypothesize that objects at an
infinite distance would not have any effect on this object, then one could
image that this object would be in "inertial motion". However,
unfortunately, the "empty world" idea is, after all, a guess and not
actual.
In summary of the arguments above, the introduction of "distortion"
or "change in the state of motion" into the definition of force cannot
make "force" something other than a conceptual abstraction, but actually
it remains a conceptual abstraction. This is the important phenomena we
have noted.
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
II. THE CONNECTION BETWEEN CONCEPTUAL ABSTRACTION AND ACTUAL
PRACTICE, MATTER LINKS
The previous section has already argued that force is still a type of
conceptual abstract and that conceptual abstracts are not specific
reality. However, in practice, this type of conceptual abstract is often
used with predictable practical results. We can see that there is a
certain connection between conceptual thought and actual practice. But
what is this connection? Where is it manifest?
In other words, if we use subjectivity to represent conceptual
abstractions and objectivity to represent actual practice, then how are
this subjective and objective connected? Without this knowledge, there is
really no way to understand force or the definition of force. Now let us
explore this problem.
First, if it is believed that conceptual abstraction is specific in
actual practice, then this idea will not work. For example, on the
problem of the definition of force, we were not able to find a single
"completely void world an infinite distance from our practical world in
actual practice so this idea is clearly unacceptable.
Another idea is the belief that the "distortion" or "change in the
state of motion" in the definition of -force have specific contents in
reality, and thus the definition of force is related to reality. However,
where in between do these specific contents of reality lie? The results
of our analysis is that we believe even though there are real contents of
"distortion" and "change in the state of motion", they do not exist within
"distortion" and "change in the state of motion". so they are both
conceptual abstractions. For example, they come from such conceptual
abstractions as geometric points, lines, planes and spacial points and
orbits. Therefore, the real specific contents of "distortion" and "change
in the state of motion" occur between "change" and "no change". In other
words, they appear between the discernable "real" and "unreal". However,
it must be noted that the specific contents of practice are not "changing"
or "unchanging" or "real" and "unreal" themselves, because they are all
conceptual abstract terms.
Therefore, we can believe that all conceptual abstract terms such as
the definition of force reflect specific contents which can be applied in
actual practice. This content then is a law of objects that can be paired
and set in opposition. This rule is the philosophical "law of the unity
of opposites" or the often made statement that "one divides into two" or
"everything has its opposite.
In actual practice, we can encounter very many of these problems of
"real" and "unreal". Furthermore, we can see that there are actually many
"real" and "unreal" links in the definition of force. We call this
important "link" a "matter link" because whether they are "conceptual
abstractions" or "specific reality", they are produced because of the
Approved For Release 2000/08/10: CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
Therefore, the proper understanding of a definition requires the
acceptance of the conceptual abstraction of this definition. Furthermore,
it requires the acceptance of the specific reality of this definition.
Furthermore, the later is concealed within the definition, and it is
called the law of the unity of opposites.
However, why do we not simply express this objective practical
content of the definition of force?
This cannot be done, because a definition can include a great many of
this type of "matter links", but the important thing is language and
literature always represent concepts.
Therefore, a more complete method of expressing the definition of
force is to only define the mutually demonstrable forms, such as:
"force is the cause of distortion occurring in objects";
"the reason distortion does not occur in objects is because the
object is not subjected to force".
At first glance, it appears that if we only take half of this
definition (such as "force is thew cause of distortion in objects", that
the other half ("the lack of distortion in objects is due to a lack of
force acting upon the object") is also being expressed. Actually, this is
not the case. This is because the first half and the second half are not
equal. This is easily demonstrated:
"We know that_A B. but from known conditions we cannot get the
result that B = A unless A = A or B = B can be applied. Otherwise they
are independent qualities.
There are often people who feel that the above definition can
basically not define what force is. This is because it has a "logic loop"
However, we would like to point out that the above definition is only
mutually demonstrative, and is not a "logic loop". If we were to actually
have a logic link, it would be written:
Because A = B, therefore B = A.
Here it is not necessary to use the "negation of negation".
What is reality like in the basic theories of physics and relevant
mechanics? We are very happy to point out that a practical definition of
force is faced with joist this type of definition problem which seems like
a "logic loop". Furthermore, by not clearly seeing the conceptual
abstraction of force and attempting to directly and practically specify
the equal sign, one encounters unsurmountable problems (because in actual
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
practice there is no way to find objects which "are not distorted" and are
in "inertial motion".)
III. THE CONNECTION BETWEEN THOUGHT LOGIC MACHINES AND THE LOGIC OF
THE DEFINITION OF FORCE
The mutually demonstrative definition of force can be called the
logical relationship of the definitions of force. This relationship
allows the statements of the definition of force to have the following
forms:
"Force is the cause of distortion in objects".
"The reason for no distortion in objects is because there is no force
present".
Or,
"Force is the cause of changes in the state of motion of objects."
"The reason the state of motion of objects does not change is because
there is no force present."
Or this "state of motion" isrchanged to "inertia motion" and we have:
"Force is the reason for the failure of the inertia motion of
objects."
"Inertial motion of objects is motion with no force acting upon it"
and other similar mutually demonstrative forms.
This is expressed symbolically as a unified relationship force as:
A = B;
Because of this simple form of definition of force, we would first
point out that this form of definition of force is the final form unifying
the various definitions of force. It is the source of all force. Also,
this explanation, because the first half and the second half are not
equal, it is very easy to demonstrate this"
We know that A = B, but from known conditions we cannot find the
result B = A. Unless A = 'A "or B = B, they are mutually independent
qualities.
There are often people who feel that the above definitions cannot
define what force is because they have a "logic loop". However, we would
point out here that the above definitions are only mutually demonstrative
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
and are not a "logic loop". To really be a logic loop they would have to
be expressed as:
Because A = B, therefore B = A.
Here the "negation of negation" need not be applied.
Where is the practical in the basic theories of physics and relevant
mechanics? We are very happy to point out that a practical definition of
force is faced with just this type of definition problem which seems like
a "logic loop". Furthermore, by not clearly seeing the conceptual
abstraction of force and attempting to directly and specifically apply the
equal sign, one encounters insurmountable problems (because in actual
practice there is no way to find objects which are "not distorted" or "in
inertial motion".
This definition of force logic directly illustrates the unity of
opposites for objects. We need only use the dialectic viewpoint on force
to be able to properly understand what force is.
We would also point out that at times there have been coincidences in
the development of science. In 1854, Boole established a type of strict
method that replaced Aristotle's which could, under a set of proper
conditions achieve truth. Furthermore, since this Boolean algebra was
first applied to the telephone switching circuits in this century (1938),
it has always been an important basis for research into thinking machines.
In Boolean algebra, with A = B, then from A = A or B = B, then it
necessarily follows that B = A and in thinking machines, it is only
necessary to find the opposites on either side of the equal sign of A = B,
and the logical relationship is established. Therefore, the relationship
is an expression of the unity of opposites and A and B either both exist
or neither exist.
Therefore, one is the logic of the definition of force which comes
from physics and the other comes from logic mathematics (Boolean algebra).
That these two have the same thought logic is a coincidence. It
illustrates that in all the fields of science, there is a commonality of
thought among these fields.
However, awareness of the above phenomenon is not the same as saying
there is a firm grasp of the laws of this phenomenon and that it can be
applied in every field. The situation is just the opposite. Physics is
following another route to learn about the world. Along this route, the
difficulties generated by its previous understanding of the definition of
force has only been briefly described or simply ignored. Furthermore,
research into thinking machines is more realistic, because these machines
must have some contact with the practical world. They must use the law of
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
the unity of opposites even thought current machine theories have not
stressed this.
However, objective laws are inexorable. No matter whether it is the
definition of force or theory of thinking machines or some other fields,
they must unite under the law of the unity of opposites. At the same
time, the development of physics will be promoted by thinking machine
theory, and the development of thinking machines will be promoted by new
developments in physics. In the progress of practice, we stress the role
of thinking machines, because they quickly and accurately provide us with
desired data.
IV. CHANGING THE ACADEMIC OPINIONS TOWARD THE DEFINITION OF FORCE
The previous understandings of the definition of force are reflected
in the physics course materials of various colleges and middle schools.
Among these, not only are they unable to stress the importance of mutual
demonstrability of the definitions of force, but contrarily use extremely
obstinate explanations for the reality of the proof. For example, it was
pointed out in section (I) above that believing there is a "completely
void world which is an infinite distance from our practical world", that
"we can send our objects of research to this void world" and "we can
believe that at this infinite distance, objects will not have any "force"
effect on this object isolated in.this void world." etc.
In this way, it causes students of physics to head toward a
mysterious forum which is established on the basis of a guess. Actually,
objects in the practical world can all be described by a practical
objective law. This law is the "law of the unity of opposites". The
mutual demonstrable phenomenon of the definition of force which has always
been believed to be incomprehensible is a manifestation of this law.
Therefore, the practicality and objectivity or nature of matter of the
definition of force is not revealed in the loop after loop of "matter
loops" or "real or unreal loops. These loops all objectively exist in the
unity of opposites.
It is only through the proper grasping and application of this
important law of the unity of opposites that we can understand the
practical world and need not rely on guessing. Therefore, this problem is
directly involved with knowledge of the world.
It is also only by the proper grasping and application of the
important law that will allow mankind to complete thinking machines
capable of thought and not depend on man to command or program them.
In addition, the effect of force is directly related to the various
abilities of the human body. Therefore, the understanding of the
definition of force is also an understanding of human abilities. We can
see from this that the proper understanding of the definition of force has
an important connection and is an important contribution to the fields of
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
medicine and physiology.
As for psychology, what about academic psychology and parapsychology.
If we use the mutual demonstrability nature of the definition of force in
these fields, because "force" has universal implications which are not
restricted to the definition of force in physics. It will flower and bear
fruit in these areas, and there is no way to predict its future.
CONCLUSION
This article discusses previous understandings of the definition of
force and difficulties they have encountered. It points out that mutual
demonstrability is the only complete method of defining the definition of
force. From this we can discover the relationship between the conceptual
abstraction and specific reality of the definition of force. In addition,
this article also obtains from this a unified form of the definition of
force. It also conforms with the rules of calculations of Boolean algebra
which replaces two value logic. This type of coincidence illustrates the
commonality of man's thought in physics and mathematical research. This
article points out that if physics does not change its previous
understanding of the definition of force, it will affect the knowledge
that physics has of the real world. It will also directly affect research
on thinking machines. It is question which is well worth noting.
Finally, this article generally discusses the important effect which
the understanding of the definition of force might have on various
scientific disciplines and their futures.
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
"UNITY OF MAN AND NATURE" AND ITS UNSCIENTIFIC NATURE
"TIAN REN HEYI" JI (1I FANKEXUE XINGZHI
BY: Liang Ronglin of the Guangdong Provincial
Somatic Sciences Research Committee
The 21st Century is almost upon us, but in china there are still some
people who are studying the culture left to them by their ancestors,
especially a type of ancient Chinese view of the world which is called the
"unity of man and nature" view. This is a far cry from the "information"
wave which Westerners predict is about to arrive. These methods these
Chinese use is really a question worth looking into.
This article attempts to perform a preliminary examination of this
type of "unity of man and nature" view. to see whether or not it is really
worth researching.
In order to provide a description to the reader, this article will
use the language and statements of modern men familiar with this concept
and not the records of ancient texts as the beginning of our discussion.
For the latter method, the reader may avail himself of the works of other
authors.
In ancient China, people used the "unity of man and nature" view of
the world. It was only because of Western influences that after the "May
Fourth" movement that some intellectuals began to propose that the Chinese
should also study foreign things. At that time, democracy and science
were brought into China from abroad. But just what does the term science
mean. But the term "science" which even foreigners are not too sure of
the exact meaning was translated into "kexue" by the Chinese. Although up
to the present time no one has been able to provide an exact description
of this thing called "kexue", but this translation is very good because it
allows all Chinese to understand. Therefore, "kexue" actually represents
"dividing the world into many different fields for study" It is a type of
contraction for a way of thinking, and aside from this it has no other
implications. Actually, if we page through the various dictionaries to
the definitions of "kexue", either the definitions are in error or they
are filled with other terms which cannot be used to define "science".
The Western world has used this type of "science" to achieve a number
of benefits, so China's enlightened persons boldly advanced, and as a
result, China also achieved benefits. For example, the "electronic age",
"nuclear energy age", "electronic computer age" of the Westerners and the
"information age" which they predict is about to arrive has either already
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
arrived in China or is about to arrive, revealing the rapid advancement of
science and technology in China and its beautiful future.
Thus in China, it seems that "science" is much better and provided
greater benefits than the ancient Chinese "unity of man and nature" view.
Naturally, people developed a new concept of "science", which is that
anything that was "scientific" was good. Or any method that was good for
studying problems was "scientific". Furthermore, this concept has
developed to where today it is believed that scientific means correct,
that it means truth. A large number of slogans have also been generated
such as "be scientific, do not be superstitious", and so on. There are
also a number of phrases which adulate science such as "science is exact",
"science cannot be fooled" and "scientists are honest people".
However, we believe that it is wrong to go to such extremes.
present stage of development of "science" should be thoro_ughl.y examined.
First, "science" can only represent one w of thinking. As stated
before, it only represents the method of "dividing the world into many
diffe..ren,t?fields for study". The special characteristic of this is the
".
arm _i d.i-vide
These fields formed from this "division" currently include
philosophy, social science fields, and natural science fields. The natural
science field is further broken down into mathematics, physics, chemistry,
biology and geography.
However, there are many different types of human thought, they are
limitless. There is not just one way of thinking. This type of
"scientific" way of thinking is only one of limitless ways of thinking in
human thought.
Second, today's "science" must pass through the state machinery to be
instilled into the minds of the people. Otherwise, the people will not
naturally independently generate in their minds what is modern day
"science". Furthermore, it requires teaching to attain knowledge of
"science", so there is an obvious subjectivity manifest in "science".
Third, "science" is not truth. Even people who worship "science" do
not dare believe that "science" is truth. but only say that "science" is
"relative" truth. Actually, there are man questions
cann wer. Furthermore, there are many things which are in violation
of common scientific knowledge. Sciegce" mss not thsame~thinc as,.~thg
"true world". The more advanced science becomes, the more challenges the
"true world" presents to "science".
The source ate".e__wroblpms mM above are the result of "science"
"dividing" the world up into f_ielcl_ _sa~_ to y anc tl~ey cannot be resolved
by "science". We must clearly recognize this divisional character.i..s c__ .
science
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
The opposite of "scientific" is "unscientific".
"Unscientific" then represents "not dividing the world up into
different fields for study". Therefore, "unscientific" is a type of
realistic way of thinking in human thought.
Many people, because they do not understand the meaning of "science",
often believe that "scientific" represents being correct and
"unscientific" represents being incorrect. This is a type of
misconception of the meaning of scientific. It is naturally a distortion
of the meaning of "unscientific".
For example, there are people who believe that "science is a creative
method of action, and that its mission is to learn the objective laws of
matter in space and time." Here, the definition of "science" is wrong
because there is no clarification of the "division of the world" which is
a characteristic of "science". Also, it further muddies the situation by
introducing such terms which have not yet been precisely defined such as
"matter", "space and time".and "objective reality", and so on. It should
be pointed out here that this type of so-called "scientific definition"
can easily cause people to miss the point if they are not careful.
People who have this type" of definition of "scientific" will
necessarily and clearly be mistaken in their understanding of
"unscientific". This is because this definition of "scientific" forces
the belief that "unscientific" is a method of action which lacks
creativity." This is obviously hogwash.
Because of this, it is necessary to correct our knowledge of
"unscientific". We cannot believe that "unscientific" represents bad or
erroneous aspects. "Unscientific" refers to a way of thinking which is
the opposite of "scenf c y. "Ihns way of thinking is characterized by
"nat dividing up the wonc~~" and it is a view called "unity of man and
nature."
Now is the time we should re-examine the term "unscientific". In
order to do this, we must discuss what "superstition" is. Whether or not
it is an inherent quality of or synonym for "unscientific".
There is a popular concept in society that holds that "if one does
not believe in science he is superstitious". It seems as if
"superstition" is "unscientific" or "counter scientific".
However, this type of concept is in error because "unscientific"
represents "not dividing the world into different field for study". This
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
"Hypotheses" are "minor principles". Without "hypotheses" no
scientific theory could be established. Therefore, even though "science"
itself does not have any "superstitious" implications, but it introduces
"minor superstitions" from specific methods which make "science" partner
to "minor superstitions".
Many "minor superstitions" by necessity form a "major superstition".
This is the reason why "science" joins with superstition and does not
reject "superstition". The slogan "be scientific, do not be
superstitious", actually calls on people "have minor superstitions, do not
have major superstitions". This will not completely get rid of
"superstitions". A great many social phenomena in this "scientific age"
demonstrate this conclusion.
IV. THE WAY TO COMPLETELY GET RID OF "SUPERSTITION"
To get rid of superstition it seems to be necessary to get rid of the
"law of cause and effect" which is the source of "superstition", and
further to deny the existence of any "arranger of the laws". However,
this cannot be done. We need only mention "arranger" , and people will
think of the opposing sides of "exist" and "not exist", and will only have
"not exist" and not have any concept of "exist".
Therefore, the only feasible method of getting rid of "Superstition"
is to view the world through the use of the law of the unity of opposites
and let them see that the "theory of laws" which produced the "law of
cause and effect" cannot really represent the real world.
However, who was it that arranged the law of the unity of opposites.
Was it the will of "god"? We must note that the theories based on the law
of the unity of opposites serve to oppose (or negate) their functions, and
any dialectics once written down must be a type of metaphysics.
The law of the unity of opposites holds that there are laws in the
world but that there are also no laws, that the world is a world of
"confusion", that among the patterns there are lacks of patterns. Because
of this, there is no so-called unknown world or spirit world, or
"arrangers of laws".
From a detailed analysis of things which are today believed to follow
certain laws, we can see these do not really follow laws. No single
phenomenon can be repeated, at least the time will not be the same. No
two leaves on a tree will be absolutely the same, at least they will
occupy different space. Therefore, where is there any absolute in these
laws? However, there is a pattern in things which do not seem to have a
pattern. The world seems to really be rotating around the sun. When day
is over, night comes. Therefore, with such a perfect unity of opposites,
why must we describe this beautiful world as being a land of demons and
spirits.
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN2F -?"
If one believes this law of the unity of opposites, then he will no
longer be "superstitious". This is because the law of the unity of
opposites is not an ultimate "'general principle", and it also has
functions which oppose itself. Therefore it cannot be an ""ultimate". It
is different from ultimate "general principles".
To use one form of "superstition" to oppose "superstition" will never
work. It would be better never to oppose it in the first place. People
who criticize other people for kneeling before a clay "Buddha" praying for
him to protect them feel they are very smart, but actually, if they do not
have any knowledge of the law of the unity of opposites, then they also
must be "superstitious". People who are not aware that the law of the
unity of opposites always serves to be in opposition to itself easily fall
into the trap of "superstition" because they see the law of the unity of
opposites as the ultimate general principle of "god" or "the will of god".
Therefore, to really get rid of "superstition", it is necessary for
mankind to have a firm grasp of the dialectic nature of the world in which
he lives, and if he only concerns himself with form, he will not be able
to solve the problem.
Is it possible today to have everyone have a firm grasp of the
dialectics, or in other words, to have everyone see things which they "do
not understand" or "cannot imagine" as the proper way of the world? For
example, is it possible for everyone to be able to accept human paranormal
abilities? It looks like we are a long way from getting rid of
""superstition". Most people still do not know that there is such a thing
as human paranormal abilities. Some who have heard such a rumor consider
it to be metaphysical. Without any doubt, the attitude towards these
"mysteries of nature" are the best litmus test for checking whether
someone is "superstitious".
V. WHAT IS THE VIEW OF "UNITY OF MAN AND NATURE"
If we accept that the world is dialectic, then we must hold that the
view of "unity of man and nature" (which is an "unscientific" or "counter
scientific" view) to be realistic, to be reasonable, and believe that this
viewpoint coexists with science in the unity of opposites.
"Scientific" cannot be separated from "unscientific" any more than
"is" can be separated from "is not".
Since the "unity of man and nature" view is the opposite of
"science", therefore, it is not part of what is currently proposed as
"borderline fields" or "transfields" because these fields are based on
"science".
How then, does one see the world through the view of the "unity of
man and nature"? What specific differences does it have with "science".
We should raise an example here as an illustration. For example, when a
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
person with paranormal abilities uses his thoughts to move an object which
had been at rest. From the viewpoint of "science" or physics, they would
do their best to divide the world up to consider this question. As for
"thought" and "object", they could not be united into an indivisible one
and not "divided up". Science cannot admit that "idea is matter" or
""matter is idea" because this concept violates the principle of "division"
in the definition of "science".
While we are here, let us point out that physics was long ago
imbedded with a basic principle. This principle is: No matter what ideas
were generated by the people present, there is no shift in the laws of
physics by these thoughts. If this were the case, the object which had
been at rest would remain at rest under the various different thoughts of
the people present, and absolutely would not break the laws concerning the
motion of objects because a certain thought was produced. Otherwise, the
laws of physics would, since they are changed by thought, become non
objective statements which depended on the individual. And this type of
statement is no longer a "law". Therefore, the laws of "science" (or
physics) (and not "science" itself) cannot accept or explain "moving
objects through thought". Otherwise, physics would become a field of
study with no laws and no longer be today's physics.
In addition, as we stated before, the view of the "unity of man and
nature" does not and cannot (divide) the world into thought and object.
Therefore, it cannot reach the conclusion that thought can move objects or
that it cannot move objects. In other words, as for the view of the
"unity of man and nature", it is not significant whether thought can move
objects is correct or whether thought cannot move objects is correct.
However, when these opposing natures of "scientific" and "unity of
man and nature" are combined, strange things occur right in front of us in
the real world. This is just how it is, where some people are gathered,
thought cannot move objects. However, where some other people are
gathered, thought can move objects.
We can know from this that science cannot be used to explain so-
called "parapsychology" phenomena. "Parapsychology" phenomena demand more
than other phenomena a combination of science and "unity of man and
nature" to explain. Actually, "science" is one of the in-finite ways of
thinking of the minds of man. We cannot put thought into "science" to
study it. If thought questions come to a standstill, and we only use
thought as a mirror to look at, this will only be a simple and
"inflexible" treatment of the problem. The result will not be completely
the same as the real world.
VI. WERE THE ANCIENT CHINESE PRACTICING ""MYSTICISM'"
The ancient Chinese who stressed the view of "unity of man and
nature" were actually also practicing "science", and because these two
ways of thinking are completely opposite, they either both exist or
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 LN2tJ3`1
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
neither exist as unity of opposites.
Certain Westerners believe that ancient China's intellectauatlons
"Oriental Mystics". These Westerners have poor powers their level of knowledge is confused.
Actually, ancient Chinese society was a "superstitious" religious
society. In this society, the intellectuals were unable eliminate this
"superstition". However, during the time of "superstition", the opposing
ways of thinking of the view of the "unity of man and nature" and
"science" were used. It is only that these ways of thinking of studying the world were covered with a layer of because religious
s>acoloring_ thWhatithey
practiced actually was not "mysticism",
"superstition", they were using their natural ways of wthehicwoh
"scientific" and "unscientific" ways of thinking to
And as we stated earlier, "unscientific" ways of thinking whichicare"also
called the view of the "unity of man and nature" are not "my
are the necessary result of thought.
Most Western scholars use metaphysical methods to approach ancient
Chinese civilization. Therefore, they cannot understand Chinese research
and its achievements. It was Einstein who said, "the developments of
Western science are based on the results of two major achievements. Those
were the Greek philosophers developed form logic system (in Euclidean
geometry) and through systematic experimentation, the discovery that it
was possible to find out the cause-effect relationship (during the
Cultural Renaissance). As I see it, China's sages did not take these two
steps, and that should be no surprise. What is surprising is that these
discoveries (in China) were madd in their entirety." (see "The Collected
Works of Einstein" Volume one, page 574."
This statement by Einstein two years before his death is very worthy
of note. In China, many people like the broad mindedness of Einstein.
But many appreciate his narrow sense theory of relativity, his light
quantum hypothesis, his broad sense theory of relativity and his unified
field theory. The unfortunate thing is that they do not study the talk
above which is directly concerned with the Chinese people. Furthermore,
as for this talk, they are guilty of the past bad habit which was once
popular in China of "it is not good unless foreigners say it is good".
This is very regrettable.
Actually, when the ancient Chinese were studying the world through
the view of the "unity of man and nature", it is not possible that they
did not have the "scientific" way of thinking characterized by "dissecting
the world" and long ago completely worked through those things that we
have thought so glorious in the Western world.
Einstein undoubtedly has given the Chinese who have shamed their
ancestors a slap in the face. At the same time, he raised the question of
"why" about his own work. Unfortunately, Einstein raised this question
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
too late. Two years later, he died.
VII. IS IT "SCIENCE" OR "COUNTER SCIENCE" THAT CAN EXPLAIN THE WORLD
Neither "science" or "counter science" can independently explain the
world we live in. This is the nature of the imperfect theories of
"science" and "counter science". Furthermore, the only way to have an
absolutely perfect theory is to use the law of unity of opposites. That
is to say, it is only by using both "science" and "counter science" in
conjunction that we can know the reality of the world.
This is how it is. This is why we study the reasons for the human
paranormal abilities phenomena, UFO phenomena, the Digong phenomena and
all the so-called."mysteries of nature". This type of phenomena has
occurred in ancient times, today, in China and in foreign Countries. As
long as man exists, they will appear.
It is unjust to criticize us for being concerned about those
phenomena which can only be explained using a combination of the "unity of
man and nature" (the counter science viewpoint) view to explain. It is
also wrong to believe that "unscientific" or "counter science" is
"superstition" or "a wild goose chase". As for ourselves, there are some
of us who fly into a rage because they have been criticized as being
"counter scientific". This is also wrong. It is also unnecessary to do
ones best to explain that all of dues actions are "scientific" in order to
gain the sympathy or acceptance of others. All of these muddled
viewpoints all come from the same source, which is the lack of a
conscientious attitude toward things, especially not studying the problems
with people's language and definitions or not studying one's own "thought"
problems when considering problems.
This article discusses the view of "unity of man and nature" and its
counter scientific nature. It points out that this type of view point is
extremely important in studying the world. However, its importance can
only be seen when its counter scientific nature is revealed.
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/' : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
REPORT OF TESTING OF HUMAN PARANORMAL ABILITIES
RENTI TEYIGONGNENG CESHI BAOGAO
Ronglin and Zhang Zuqi of the Guangdong
BY: Liang
Somatic Science Research Committee
Recently (February and March of 1985), we conducted a test of human
paranormal abilities and the results of this test are summarized below.
1. THE OBJECTIVE OF THE TEST
t had a very precise objective whichlvwashtoheobseervetthrlugh
This test four to
the random selection of children aged The
possessed paranormal abilities and ds~nderteertaineconditionsl w
them aranormal capabilities
capable e of showing p possible that the children would not
testing was difficult because it was reset testing period-
demonstrate paranormal abilities at the p
II. SIGNIFICANCE OF THE TEST
The conducting of this test was in linelY withhrourdre5earchfinto tthe he
s are universal during
mechanism of paranormal abilities and dir abilitieped of
practical asp Also of "human paranothermal superstitious cperapstitious belief of most people i chit o only ny "odd Also,
"other people" have these human pa
people" eliminated
that ople" or
abilities or that it is "possession".
III. METHOD OF SELECTION OF THE CHILDREN known
that is that it was not l
five children rtnorowwmae
beforehand whether these children had ever demonstrated p P
abilitiThees, child and en with were selected randomly,
the consent of the parents,
ears old), Little Zhou (12
selected. These children were Little Rai.ttie2 Xiu (girl, six years old),
years old), Little Du (ten years old),
and little Duan (four years old)- These five children were all in a good
state of health.
IV. SITE OF THE TESTING teachers and workers
The testing site was the Jinan University
dormitory.
V. DATES OF THE TESTING 1:th, 14th,
Tests were conducted on a total of nine dates, February
25th, 26th, March 14th, 17th, 21st and 24th.
-7App-r ved For Release 2000/08/10: CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
IV. THE PROCEDURE AND RESULTS OF THE TESTS
The children were tested through recognizing "flash cards" (February
13th to 14th, three days (sic)).
Obvious instances of card recognition were:
Little Ran (accurately recognized that a card was of a spotted
horse).
Little Du (accurately recognized that a card was of a duck).
Little Xiu (accurately recognized red and green cards, and accurately
recognized that a card was of a flower).
Later, we had the children to hold a ball of paper in their hand and
recognize the character on the paper. (February 17th).
The obvious correct calls were:
Little Xiu (the character for "ten").
Little Ran (the characters for ("three" and "six").
At the same time we used a middle aged woman, Mrs Liang, in our
testing, but she did not show any paranormal ability to recognize the
characters on the paper.
Later (March 21st)
Little ?uan (accurately recognized a design and color).
(17 March)
Little Zhou (accurately recognized the character for the surname
"Kuang").
(10 March)
Little Ran (accurately recognized the character for "dirt".
VII. DISCUSSION
From this it is possible to believe that the five children all
separately showed paranormal ability to recognize characters. Many of the
procedures were failures. At times not one of the children would be able
to demonstrate the paranormal ability to recognize a character for an
entire afternoon. Therefore, we cannot believe that these children would
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
never again demonstrate paranormal abilities again because of this. We
must recognize the major characteristic of human paranormal ability that
it is very seldom demonstrated, and that it has poor repeatability.
SOME CASES OVER THE PAST 200 YEARS OF "EYELESS SIGHT"
IN FOREIGN COUNTRIES
JIN ERBAINIANLAI GUOWAI YOUGUAN "FEIYANSI.IIJUE" DI PIXIE SHILI
BY: Zhang Zuqi (of the South China Normal College).
In 1921 the book "Eyeless Sight" was published in France. It was
written by the famous man of letters and scientist, M. Jules Romains
(1885-1972). The book contained descriptions of tests on "eyeless sight"
conducted by Romains. This is a fairly thorough scientific work on
observation and experimentation of "eyeless sight". However, for more
than half a century it did not receive the attention it deserved. The
book was recently republished in the United States. L. Sheppard wrote the
introduction to this new edition. In the introduction, the author
accumulated actual cases of ""eyeless sight" which occurred in various
places over the almost 200 years since the 17th Century. This book is
worth reading. Here I would like to present some of this material.
In the 17th Century, the British Scientist R. Boyle received a report
from a doctor that stated: "there is a blind person called Fengmalin
(phonetic) who can tell colors from touch. He need only place a silk tie
between his thumb and forefinger and he can tell you what color it is.
When I asked him what he felt for the different colors, he said that the
colors were all different. When he touched them, he could feel different
degrees of roughness or smoothness. Black felt like the tip of a needle,
and red felt very smooth."
In 1726, J. Swift reported that there had been a professor at Lujiate
(phonetic) University who had been blind from birth who led a group of
students to mix colors for artists and taught them how to differentiate
colors from touch and smell.
In 1840 Italian Doctor AugonDva reported a 14 year old girl who could
"see" behind her back. She was blindfolded and could "see" the words in a
book. In 1880 three British doctors recorded a bed ridden woman who had
been totally blind for ten years who had "Eiensual transmission" from her
fingers and palms of her hands.
In 1667, British professor Fontan talked about a 22 year old seaman
who had wakened from a coma with the ability of read some letters and
differentiate different colors of thread with his eyes covered.
In 1893, two American doctors S. F. Spear and R. Ormiston reported
that there was a blind woman named Fanqie'er (phonetic) who could use the
top of her head to "see" objects. By feeling printed matter with her
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
fingers, she could read it in the light or in the dark.
In 1899, Russian Scientist Doctor Chowrin reported a female patient
suffering from a nervous breakdown who could seen objects through several
layers of paper.
In 1930, Brazilian M. Chaves tested 400 blind persons and discovered
that 12 of them had skin visual abilities. Three of them could
differentiate red and green.
In 1934, several noted Doctors and a physics instructor in London
conducted "eyeless sight" experiment on K. Bux from kashmir. They Used
balls of raw cotton to completely cover Bux's eyes and then placed metal
discs, bandages and gauze. He was still able to easily read a book the
tester was holding. In 1938 in Montreal, Canada, he made a similar test.
In September of 1937 in Liverpool, he walked along the peak of a 200 foot
high roof with both eyes blindfolded. In 1945 in the United states he
rode a bicycle through the hallways of the New York Times with both eyes
blindfolded, amazing everyone.
In 1963, the Soviet Scientist I. M. Golgberg reported tests on Luosha
Kuliesuowa (phonetic). Between 1960 and 1961, while she was leading a
troupe of blind people, she taught herself to type Braille. Later her
senses in her fingers were enhanced through the differentiating of the
letters and this type of long periods of objective training developed her
sensory abilities at the ends of her fingers. Goldberg demonstrated in
his tests that without using her eyes to see the fingers in her right hand
could read ordinary printed books.
Columbia University psychology professor Pyoutz has discovered a
woman named Sitanne (phonetic) who could differentiate colors with the
tips of her fingers. He also stated that he tested all of the women at
the university, and about ten percent of them would have the beginning
forms of this ability around 20 hours of training.
In 1965, some reported that Doctor Vichit had used hypnosis to cause
blind people to see objects. he discovered that if blind people could
concentrate very strongly in thinking "see with my forehead", the nerves
in this area would have the sense of "sight" before long and would
transmit these impulses to the brain where they would be turned into
visual images. Vichit said in his report that certain blind persons can
use their forehead to "read" newspapers. He opened an agency for training
blind children in Thailand, and discovered instruction of blind children
between the ages of nine and fourteen was most effective. Vichit showed a
photograph which showed a blind seven year old boy "seeing" with his
forehead and also threading a needle.
Beginning in 1966, led by Doctor Dublessis of France, a number of
researchers at the 'illumination technology center began research into
"eyeless sight". They trained blind people to "see" objects from a
Approved For Release 2000/08/10: CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
Six tests were conducted in each lab, and Little Feng was always able
to determine direction and point out south according to the changes in the
brightness or dimness of the point of light in her mind.
II. CHANGING THE STATIC MAGNETIC FIELD IN THE SPACE OCCUPIED BY
LITTLE FENG BY ADDING AN EXTERNAL MAGNETIC FIELD AND HAVING HER DETERMINE
DIRECTIONS
In order to test whether or not this ability of Little Feng's was
related to her own body sensing the earth's magnetism, we used an external
magnetic field to alter the static magnetic field in the space occupied by
Little Feng and conducted the test. At the Beijing University Physics
Building Testing Lab, we used a pair of Helmholtz coils one meter diameter
They can produce a magnetic charge of the same level and opposite
direction as the earth's magnetic field. These coils were facing north
and south, and during the testing Little Feng was placed outside the
coils. A compass and a Gauss instrument were used to determine the
direction and size of the magnetic field at the subject's head and torso.
We ran 80, 160 and 900 milliamps and 14 amp currents through the
coils so that the space occupied by Little Feng had a magnetic field level
from very weak to the level of the earth's magnetism at that place and in
the opposite direction of the earth's magnetic field as well as eight to
100 times the level of the earth's magnetism.
On 08 April and the evening of 13 April of 1980, we conducted 33
experiments under the conditions stated above. Prior to each group of
experiments, we ran one control experiment (no additional magnetic field).
The results were that Little Feng was able to determine south just as
she had before.-'
III. THE AFFECT OF THE HEAD BEING ON DIFFERENT POSITIONS ON
DETERMINING DIRECTION
When Little Feng was determining direction, even if she did not move
her body and only moved her head, her subjective point of light would
change in brightness or dimness. Therefore, we hypothesize it is possible
her head receives certain dynamic factors from the outside world causing
it to be the part of the body causing changed in the subjective point of
light. If she were to lie down, changing the position of the head, what
would happen.
We designed a small revolving bed, and in the afternoon of 2B May
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 teat? i. ttlr Fer,U first smouu positions.
her back
was tested On t.11rr on tht ritjtht side, lyiI}c~ on he her back wt~.i le~.r~ it:,titr~ rai`F fer~~n ~ ,,p
were ly;Atalpr~vr+ec r F eIfeas `JqOwJ pp-6gPAAtRg .
964W792fM0 b~e~ Little
and lying on her stomach. Accor the
was able to determine southtin eacdetermining directions,
Little hen ens she lay on her back and
Fenn, when somewhat higher than it was while
point of light in her mind moved
standing or lying on her side.
IV. AFFECTS OF DIFFERENT LATITUDE REGIONS ON DETERMINING DIRECTION
at Beijing University, from 23 July to
After a great deal of testing to Wuhan and Guangzhou for testing-
16 August of 1980 we took Little Feng The re
nd 1r totes
d ten en tests at three locations at University a esu
as s six different conducte sites at Guangzhou Sun
20 minutes East Longitude and 39 menu
a
were that at Beijing (116 degrees Wuhan (114 degrees 20 minutes East
Latitude), and Guangzhou (113
and 56 seconds North
30 34 degrees 40 minutes North Latitude), rth
Longitudes Longitudes 23 degrees 14 minutes No Latitude)
degrees 20 miwasesable t to ndetermine direction through para
Little Feng
abilities-f.~
DETERMINING DIRECTION IN AN ELECTRIC POWER SWINGING CAPSULE ormal
V.
was in a ~~'
l
changes to ens her physiological
The above tests were all were Cedtainwhile
physiological state. deterne her v if there were errvestibu? On the
` le the
Would e what would it affect certain m oh nismsiOf vestibule
states effect on her ability caps
it have any of 1962, at the electric swing of Little
afternoons of 15 and 21 January we conducted some tests
a certain research institute in Beijing
Feng. with a dark capsule.
Inside the laboratory there was a electric swing
could be ed rotated
Th
he capsule there was a swivel chanratwdiffierentspeotatede p
Inside t swing
dark
clockwise or counter and whensit dwasctstarted it could swing the d
was six meters longg, ,
capsule left and right.
We conducted tests under three different conditions' es blindfolded,
sat in the dark capsule with her ey an arbitrary
1. Little Fongtati and stopped facing
the swivel chair rowasato to controlled, the directions.
direction. Little Feng the chair was turned
the capsule, was to
2. Little Feng was blindfolded in and Little hens
and after it was stopped, the swing was begun,
determine directions during the swinging"
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
3. Little Feng was blindfolded in the capsules, the chair was turned
while the swing was swinging, and the chair was stopped from turning while
the swing was still swinging. Little feng was to determine the directions
while the swing was still swinging.
We conducted nine tests under these conditions. We took a control
test for each test which was a standing test outside the capsule. Little
feng was still able to determine directions and point out south through
paranormal abilities.
People have known for a long time that many animals are capable of
telling directions, and have done a great deal of observation and testing
of the direction telling and navigation of some fishes, sea turtles, bees,
migratory birds, pigeons, and other animals. it is generally held that
this type of direction determining ability in animals is related to the
animal's smell of a familiar odor, observation of the natural environment,
observation of the sun, position of the stars and the ability to sense the
earth's magnetism. We conducted two years of testing on Little Feng, and
Little Feng determined directions during the day time, at night, on clear
days, rainy days and when it was snowing. She did it when an external
magnetic field altered the earth's magnetism in the space she was
occupying. None of this affected her ability to determine directions.
Just was are the similarities between Little Feng's paranormal abilities
and other animal's abilities to determine directions? And what are the
differences? Also, what factors and influences in the external world
cause the subjectively produced point of light to become brighter and
dimmer when Little Feng is determining directions? This is really
something worth researching.
1/.
2/.
Zhang Zuqi etal, "Nature Magazine", Vol 3, (1980), pp 741.
Zhang Zuqi etal, "Nature Magazine", Vol 4, (1980), pp 292.
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
GAFORMALALMOST TWO YEARS OF A YOUNG
TESTING
A REPORT ON SCHEDULED
PERSON WITH ABILIT
DUI YIGE JUYOU TEYIGONGNENGDE SHAONIAN DINGQI
CESHI JINLIANGNIANDE QINGh.UANG BAOGAO
BY; Zhang Zuqi of the South China Normal University
Wang Chu of Beijing University
In the process of conducting tests on young people and children with
paranormal abilities, we discovered that at deater~i~angese5inandheir
different physiological states, there were gr
z ..' In order to clarify certain relationships of
these es b g in February of 1902 we began almost two years of
thesse paranormal
changes, beginning
of a young person. The results of the testing are
scheduled testing
summarized belows
Little Feng, female, was born in 1968. On November of 1979 it was
discovered that she could, without using her eyes, use her hands to
distinguish the color and content of cards. Later, through repeated
it was discovered that her abilities remained fairly stable, and
testing,
that she was correct a relatively high percentage of the time.
Beginning on 07 February of 1982, we conducted regularly scheduled
testing of her abilities (we also recorded her menstrual cycles s during the
same period of time). We performed a total oWe400 allowing tests, Little 31 July
of 1903. The primary methods of testing and then en placing a card
stick both hands into a dark colored cloth sleeve, fact the card
with a colored figure on it into fwas. of four to
and attempted to tell what the figure five cards, and then the results were recorded and analyzed.
Our analysis was to divide the results ffoshe r the
erdiaoramst ao allors.
Using a four card test as an exPIf she were correct on some of
cards, the accuracy would be 100 percent.
the cards, then we would look at thenumberwrightpaendethe number wrong,
and calculate the accuracy rate as 00 percent
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Releas
19821F
95
50
75
4.18 '1 5.2.
82.2.7 2.14
63 33
38.
(D M no
&.1 1m
?5.30 - 6.6
Percentage oright answers ffor colors.
1. Date.
figures.
-too
L
EEF\
7.28 7.31
.100,.. - 50--
75 - 88
9.,19
60--
63
0 1 25
3.21
0
75
6,11
100
100
P6-
50
6.. 20
O~7.92l 0O O}10
83
100 33
8.29
38
100
7
0
17
~'.~------~"' Lli 10.1
7 10:'24' 10. 3 . 24
13
2
1982
January cif . 3.
2. right answers
4. Percentage or
TABLE -Two:
1SS,T MENSTRUATION:
3rd:
5th:
7th:
9th:
11th:
13th:
15th:
CYCLE DURING TESTING 5
MENSTRUAL-
2-10 February, 1902
4/5 -4/10
5/30 - 6/7
9/6 - 9/10
12/3 - 12/9
2/2 - 2/8
4/10 - 4/16
6/290 7/5
2ND2/54th: 427
6th: 6/5 8/10
8th: 11/5 12
14th: 1/6 1/12, 1993
12th3/9 3/16
14th: 5/25 5/30
16th: 0/6 6-12
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-R
9.26
T11E 40 T b' a
ONE
33
..50
8 1
3.20
5.15 1 6.4
50
0
9.12
25
2-6
25 -1 __-83
P96-00792 ROOO2OO44OOO2-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 674-9P96-00792R000200440002-6
ATTACHED CHARTI TESTING FROM FEBRUARY TO NOVEMBER OF 1982
w
so
? L: it' 2J +Il l'J. ld 4~ W ? W 'SS.) AA l:li .,a'4ro ~/?- J 'Q. ~t~ 7l'/ 4, _`AT 4:). 9.6 1G: ~.:: .l p..'n'~:? ~~til.
O = percentage of right answers on figures
+ = percentage or right answers on colors
xxxx = menstruating
We can initially see from these observations and tests:
1. Little Feng's paranormAl abilities remained relatively constant
during the period from 1979 to early 1982. However, after her first
menstruation, there was a drop in her ability, followed by large
fluctuations. However, the overall, trend was a gradual reduction. We
have observed similar situations in other girls.
Childhood and puberty is a major stage of human development. During
this stage, there are many changes in physiological, psychological and
intellectual development. Children with paranormal abilities may
experience certain effects on their ability to use these paranormal
abilities. Thorough and systematic research is required to determine what
these influencing factors are. Our regular continuous testing and
observation of Little Feng during this period merely presents a topic
which is worth researching.
2. During this period, Little Feng's ability to distinguish figures
and colors overall could be called consistent, which was a strong ability
to distinguish figures and her ability to distinguish colors was also
fairly good. However, there was one inconsistency. During the test
conducted on 29 August of 1982, her percentage correct for figures was 38
percent, while her color recognition rate was 100 percent.
3. In addition to the example of Little Feng which we have presented
I-- w: is 4 ,. .
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
above, we have conducted surveys of a great many young people with
paranormal abilities and have discovered that in general when they were
between ten and 13 years old, their abilities were fairly strong and
fairly stable. After the age of 15, there was often a drop in ability.
Naturally, there have been a number of young people who have maintained
this type of ability until they were somewhat older. Why do so many
children with paranormal abilities experience this loss of ability as they
grow older? And why does this ability not decrease in some people? Are
there some methods by which young people can retain this ability? These
questions all require our research and investigation.
1/. Chen Shouliang etal, "Nature Magazine", 3, (1980), pp 334.
2/. He Tianyan etal, "Nature Magazine", 3 (1980), pp 683.
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
A REPORT ON PARANORMAL ABILITY TESTING OF DU PING IN GUANGZHOU
DU PING ZAI GUANGHZHOUDE TEYIGONGNENG CESHI BAOGAO
BY: The Guangdong Somatic Sciences Committee
Lai Sanghong, Liang Ronglin, Zhang Zuqi, Xie Fan, Deng Suhua
Fang Naili, He Zhuoyuan, and Guo Zuorao
ABSTRACT:
This article reports on 17 tests of Du Ping's paranormal ability to
recognize characters and figures with non visual organs conducted between
05 January and 06 February of 1986. The testing methods were to exchange
the cards in a sleeve. Du Ping recognized a total of 232 characters, 14
postage stamps and even figures and foreign languages, all correctly. For
BB characters, the average time she took to recognize it was 37.5 seconds.
Finally, we discuss the question of a genetic relationship to paranormal
abilities.
This type of testing for recognition of characters and figures using
non visual organs has been conduced in many places in China.L,2.3.4?0 ' On
the basis of previous work, we in Guangzhou recently invited Wuhan's Du
Ping to come here fore some testing. The goal was to use the testing to
further demonstrate the reality of paranormal abilities. At the same time
we wanted to know what changes there were in the abilities of children
with paranormal abilities after they became young adults.
Between 05 January and 06 February of 1986, we conducted 12 public
tests and five private tests at the Guangdong Somatic Sciences Research
Committee, the Guangzhou Chinese College of Chinese Medicine Qigong
Instruction and Research Lab, the Guangzhou Medical College, the Jinan
University College of Science and Engineering, the Guangzhou University,
the Guangzhou Physical Education Commission, The Guangzhou Baiyun Radio
Factory, the Baiyun Guest House, the Guangdong Qigong Literature Research
Committee, the Guangdong and Guangzhou Old Cadre Activity Centers.
Attending the tests included the deputy secretary of the Guangdong CPPCC
Yang Yingbin, secretary of the Guangzhou Municipal Party Committee Xu
Shi.iie, Mayor Zhu Senlin, deputy of the Provincial Department of Public
Health Li Meilin and other provincial and municipal leading comrades as
well as teachers and researchers in such fields as physics, biology,
chemistry and medicine. There were also noted personalities from the
fields of sports, news, culture and commerce as well as compatriots from
Hong Kong and Macao and foreign friends. The total number of persons
viewing the tests was more than Boo. The number attending each individual
test varied from 13 to 212. The results of these tests are given below.
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
THE SUBJECT AND METHODS OF THE TESTS
(1). The test subject: Du Ping, female, 17 years old from Wuhan. In
May of 1979 it was discovered that she had paranormal abilities. In a
paranormal abilities test at Wuhan University in September of 1900, she
correctly recognized 43 characters in 18 minutes.--' Her abilities are
relatively strong.
(2). Testing methods: The primary methods were touching
illustrations in a sleeve. Du ping would sit sideways in front of the
person administering the test one meter away. Both hands would be placed
into a 45 by 20 millimeter dark blue sleeve. Prior to each test, the
person administering the test would check the sleeve to make certain that
no light would leak through it. When the test began, the person
administering the test would personally place the test objects (cards
which had characters written on them before hand or secretly written by
those attending or postage stamps). He would then have Duping touch the
objects with her fingers, and after she had recognized them, Du Ping would
leave the test objects in the bag and give them to the person
administering the test. Du Ping would orally say what was on the card or
would write the characters on a black board. Then the person
administering the test would look, check and report the result of the
test.
In the 17 tests in Guangzhou, Du Ping recognized a total of 232
characters, 14 postage stamps as well as a picture torn off a soap box and
foreign words written by foreign friends. She accurately recognized all
of them. The results of the 12 public tests are shown in the table below:
TABLE ONE: 12 PUBLIC TESTS OF DU PING'S PARANORMAL ABILITIES
TEST ONE; PM of 1/11 at the Guangzhou Medical College. Testers: Liu
Zhengyu, Dian Yi, Cai Zhaoming and Liang Ronglin. 15 people present.
Contents of test:
CHARACTERS (STC)
RECOGNITION TIME (SEC)
RESULTS
2052
0501
60
+*
0524
044B
1o0
+
0342
2494
30
+
1420
1627
40
+
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
TEST SEVEN; Evening of 1/23 at Baiyun Guest House. Testers: Lin
Miaozhi, Pan Oiuyan, Li Zequan, Liang Ronglin. 130 people present.
Contents of tests
CHARACTERS (STC) RECOGNITION TIME (SEC) RESULTS
3348 0427 50 +
2651 0035 65 +
DTD 35 +**
DATA BASE 160 +**
TEST EIGHT: Evening of 1/25 at the Guangzhou Medical College. Testers:
Lin Daoping, Deng Suhua, Lai Ronghong and Liang Ronglin. 13 people
present. Contents of tests
CHARACTERS (STC) RECOGNITION TIME (SEC) RESULTS
1639 2639 12 +
3261 6107 32 +
7456 7459 55 +
0001 2588 120 +
TEST NINE: Evening of 1/26 at the Provincial Digong Literary Research
Committee. Testers: Liang Zhanguang, Lai Shaoqi, Liang Ronglin. 150
people present. Contents of test:
CHARACTERS (STC) RECOGNITION TIME (SEC) RESULTS
4282 4486 45 +
2494 2588 120 +
TEST TENS PM of 2/04 at the Guangzhou Municipal Old Cadre Activities
Center. Testers: Ye Xiang, Liang Taocheng and Liang Ronglin. 40 people
present. Contents of tests
CHARACTERS (STC) RECOGNITION TIME (SEC) RESULTS
5071 1626 60 +
7022 1108 56 +
6079 1102 2630 248 +
TEST ELEVEN: Morning of 2/05 at the Guangdong Old Cadre Activity Center.
Testers: Lai Jian, Yao Zhongren and Liang Ronglin. 35 people present.
Contents of test:
CHARACTERS (STC) RECOGNITION TIME (SEC) RESULTS
0917 7185 240 +
0256 1660 60 +
6855 1776 420 +
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 11. thi Ping strenuously opposes taking televisiu-7 or movin pictures
of her P6-rRe46"012000OW10r Mjffd[$P-9-6-0!&Z2R9002004400Qi it will
affect r ability to recognize the characters or figures. Certain
outside interference can affect paranormal abilities. This has already
been reported. Do television cameras (outside information) have a
psychological effect on Du Ping so that she cannot recognize the words or
figures very well? Or does it have a direct effect on certain links in
the recognition process so that her abilities can not be put to normal
use. We are preparing to further observe and research this question.
III. It was discovered that Du Ping had paranormal abilities in May
of 1979. From 1981 to 1963 many tests were performed. From 1984 to 1985
there was no testing or other training. In 1986, we resumed her testing
with these tests of ours. Although there was a hiatus of two years, the
ability was still stable and the recognition accuracy was 100 percent.
Furthermore, it was even more rapid. We have learned that young people
with paranormal abilities often see their abilities decline after 15 to 16
years old. However, Du Ping is already 17 years old and two years after
testing had stopped, her abilities were still stable. Why is this? It
has been said that Du Ping's maternal grandmother has paranormal
abilities, and according to reports by Dong Zhenjun and Wu Xizai3.a", Du
Ping's mother and younger brother both have paranormal abilities and Du
Ping's mother's side of the family has had paranormal abilities for three
generations. Are there genetic factors to paranormal abilities? Is Du
Ping's current abilities related to genetic factors. From this, we can
get some hint that we should conduct some research on paranormal abilities
from the viewpoint of genetics. It seems that this is also one aspect of
paranormal abilities research that has been overlooked.
1. Chen Shouliang etal, Investigative Report on One Human Special
Sensing Ability (1) - The Question of the Reality of Special Sensing
Abilities, "Nature Magazine", 1979, 2 (11), pp 715.
2. Xu Xinglao etal, Report on a Survey of the Ability to Recognize
Characters and Distinguish Colors With the Ears, "Nature Magazine", 1979,
2 (11), pp 716.
3. Xie Hangyu etal, Preliminary Summary of Observing Xie Chaojun
Using His Ears to Recognize Characters and Distinguish Colors, "Nature
Magazine", 1979, 2 (11), pp 779.
4. Chen Shouliang etal, The Question of the Universality of Special
Sensing Mechanisms -- An Investigative Report on a Type of Human Special
Sensing Mechanism (2), "Nature Magazine", 1980, 3 (5), pp 334.
5. Dong Zhenjun, Human Paranormal Ability 'Sports Meet', "Bulletin
of Human Paranormal Abilities", December 20, 1900.
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
6. Wu Xizai etal, Experiments on Human Paranormal Signals on
Microorganisms, Internal Materials of the Wuhan University Human
Paranormal Abilities Research Team.
7. He Tianyan etal, Initial Observations of Blind Children Using
Human Paranormal Sensing Mechanisms to Distinguish Colors, "Nature
Magazine, 1981, 4 (4), pp 294.
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
LN253-92
INITIAL EXPLORATIONS INTO HUMAN PARANORMAL ABILITIES
RENTI TEYIGONGNENG CHUTAN
COMMEMORATING THE FIRST STEP IN EXPANDING WORK IN GUANGZHOU
JI GUANGZHOU KAIZHAN GONGZUODE DEYIBU
BY: Guo Zuorao of the Guangzhou Municipal Public Health Bureau
Chinese Medicine Office.
In the Spring of 1981, when there was a enthusiasm in human
paranormal ability research in Sichuan, Beijing, Yunnan and other areas,
Doctor Li Kunhua of the Guangzhou Honghui Hospital began testing for human
paranormal abilities at an elementary school in the Haizhu District. I
and Chan Xiqi of the Guangzhou Science and Technology Exchange Hall also
began research an this topic. With the support of the Yuexiu District
Education Bureau, we selected the Hongshunan Elementary School (now called
the Xinqiao Elementary School) on Haizhu Road to begin testing of human
paranormal ability to recognize characters with the ears. (Later, the
elementary school on Yide West Road was closed down shortly thereafter)
the office director of the 402 Office, Li Tiejun also joined us through
the support of the leaders at that school. The testing was done on every
Saturday afternoon. At that time we did not have any monies for expenses,
so I and comrade Chan Xiqi took some of our own money to get the work
started. When the testing of recognizing characters with the ears began,
?igong was used to adjust the emotions and the body to get the subjects
into a proper state. As a result, the percentage of the subjects induced
into the proper state was very high. From this class there were 37
subjects taking part in the testing, and from the testing we found 36 who
had the ability to recognize characters with the ears to varying degrees.
Shortly afterwards, the Municipal Public Health Bureau Scientific Research
Office assistant director Chen Jingnuan returned from attending the All-
China Conference on Human Paranormal Ability Research. We then launched
this work together with Chen Jingnuan in an organized fashion. Because of
the support from the leaders of the Guangzhou Municipal Public Health
Bureau we were allocated some scientific research funds as expenses for
research into human paranormal abilities. The bureau also assigned Zhu
Guokai from the Guangzhou Hospital of Chinese Medicine and Ou Peigui of
the Guangzhou Public Health Propaganda and Education Hall to take part in
specific work. At the same time, it established the Guangzhou Somatic
Sciences Research Team composed of Chen Jingnuan, Guo Zuorao, Chan Xiqi,
Li Kunhua, Li Tiejun, Ou Peigui, Zhu Goukai and a section chief from the
Yuexiu District Education Bureau. The research work then proceeded in an
organized fashion. We conducted tests every Saturday and all Summer
vacation at the Hongshunan Elementary School or the Municipal Science and
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
this ability on a number of occasions, with the whole class taking part,
only one student failed to have this ability successively induced. The
difference among the subjects was primarily the time it took to induce
this ability. The length of time it took to induce this ability was
related to the number of occasions the subjects were trained. For
example, this initial inducing of this ability took 45 minutes. On the
sixth time, it only took 14 minutes. On the eighth occasion it was even
faster, taking only two minutes. If the training were discontinued for a
length of time, the abilities also diminished. For example, on the
fourth occasion of inducing these abilities, because it had been more than
ten days since the previous occasion, the students abilities had declined,
and it took a minimum of 55 minutes to induce these abilities.
II. WHERE ON THE BODY THIS ABILITY OCCURS VARIES AMONG INDIVIDUALS
Looking at our testing, many of the subjects used their ears or hands
to recognize characters or figures. Some used their foreheads to
differentiate objects. Some used their armpits to see objects inside
boxes. Later it developed to where they could differentiate objects
through solid matter and move objects. We can postulate from this that
human paranormal abilities are not limited to sensing, but have an
unlimited potential energy.
III. HOW DID THEY SENSE THE OBJECTS? ACCORDING TO THE SUBJECT
RESPONSESs
1. The majority sensed images between their eyebrows, such as a
fluorescent screen. It was from this that the subjects sensed the
character or figure in the test. However, a few had images appear in
front of the forehead.
2. The image appeared gradually like a scan. If they were to
recognize a character, the character would usually appear one stroke at a
time, but for some it would appear one dot at a time like a scan until it
formed a stroke, and then would become a character one stroke at a time.
However, the stroke sequence would not be the same as used in writing the
character. If they were trying to recognize more than one character at a
time, the characters would appear one over top the other, and then would
slowly separate and then the subjects would recognize them in their mind.
Specifically, if a piece of paper with a character on it were rolled up
into a ball for the test, a ball of paper would first appear to the
subjects, and then it would slowly open up, showing the characters to be
recognized. If the characters were torn up into several pieces, one piece
of paper at a time would appear, and then they would merge together and
the character would appear.
3. The images 'appeared in such colors as red, yellow, green and
black. At times each stroke of each character would be a different color.
Just like a color television, after the images appear, they disappeared
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6
to any great extent to a persons intelligence, sex, or constitution. In
our tests, the children with relatively strong abilities included those
with good grades and those with bad, both boys and girls and those with
both strong and weak constitutions. However, the abilities appeared
relatively quickly in quiet children.
VII. In the process of inducing paranormal abilities, it can lead to
certain physical reactions. After the abilities were induced in the
children, there was usually such sympathetic nervous system reaction as a
rise in blood pressure, accelerated pulse, and they would feel hot all
over or their faces would get red, they would sweat and their mouth would
get dry. We checked these reactions on two occasions, and on the first
occasion we checked seven, all of whom had elevated blood pressure and
four who had accelerated heart beats. On the second occasion we checked
16 of them, and nine had elevated blood pressure and seven had accelerated
heart beats. However, the elevated blood pressure was within the normal
range for all the subjects, and it was only elevated from what it had been
prior to inducement. Therefore, after the tests, it was necessary to
provide some nourishment to make up for what had been used up in body
energy.
VIII. Subjective and objective factors have a very great effect on
inducing paranormal abilities.
1. The surrounding environment and whether the individual was still
or active had a strong relationship with the inducement rate. For
example, during the first inducement, there was noise from a nearby
factory, and the children said when the noise occurred the image
disappeared from between their eyebrows. Later we moved to a quieter
environment for inducement, and the inducement rate was markedly
increased. Also, mischievous children who had difficulty being still and
who kept looking all around took a long time to have their abilities
induced. However, while they were settling down, they were not just to
think of nothing, but were to concentrate their energy on trying to
recognize the object or they would fall asleep very easily.
2. Exhaustion, nervousness and irritability had a direct effect on
inducement. For example during one test, the children had been in class
all day, and were tired. Also, there were a lot of people watching. The
combination of exhaustion and nervousness caused the inducement rate to
drop.
3. Changes in the weather also affected the inducement rate,
especially when the weather was hot and oppressive or thundering and
raining, the children were more edgy and there could not settle down and
relax, so the inducement rate went down.
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000200440002-6