SUMMARY REMOTE VIEWING SESSION XCIV

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: STARGATE
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP96-00788R000900780001-8
• Release Decision: RIFPUB
• Original Classification: S
• Document Page Count: 26
• Document Creation Date: November 4, 2016
• Document Release Date: June 17, 1998
• Sequence Number: 1
• Content Type: REPORT

-nrAQ1'T
Approved For Release 2000/08 L P96-OO788ROOO9OO78OOO1-8
ORCON/NOFORN
INSCOM
GRILL FLAME
PROJECT
CLASSIFIED BY: Director, DIA
REVIEW ON: 31 Jul 99
EXTENDED BY: Director, DIA
REASON: 2-301-C (3) (6)
Approved For Release 2000/08J r't1A=RDP96-OO788ROOO9OO78OOO1-8
 Approved For Release 20 - DP96-00788R000900780001-8
1. (S) This report provides documentation of a remote
viewing session conducted for training purposes to enhance
a remote viewer's demonstrated ability.
2. (S) The remote viewer's impressions during this session
appeared to have some correlation with the selected target.
The target for this session was a bluish gray colored water
tower (see TAB B). The viewer described a bluish slate-like
color, standing underneath and looking up at the target, the
outbounder being outdoors, walking down a path, and did not
sense any interaction with other people. The viewer described
the outbounder's surrounding area and activity with a fair
degree of accuracy. The only perception that this viewer had
relating directly to the target was the tower's bluish, slate
gray color. Prior to the beginning of this session the viewer
mentioned that he had a feeling of apprehension. The viewer
appeared relaxed and confident during the session. A reason-
able amount of ambient room noise seldom bothers this viewer.
Several times during this session the noise reached such levels
that it interrupted the viewer temporarily.
3. (S) The protocol used for this session is detailed in the
document, Standard Remote Viewing Protocol (Local Targets) by
Harold E. Puthoff and Russell Targ, November 1978.
4. (S) Following is a transcript of the viewer's impressions
during the remote viewing session. At TAB A are drawings made
by the viewer reference his impressions of the target site.
At TAB B are photographs of the target site.
Approved For Release 2 DP96-00788R000900780001-8
 Approved For Release 2000/0 8R000900780001-8
REMOTE VIEWING (RV) SESSION XCIV
#14: This will be a remote viewing session (edited
for security).
All right #29, its now 10 o'clock, #6.5 is at
his target location. Go out there with #6.5
and tell me what you see.
+01 #29: The first impression I get is of open space
and something in the foreground.
Number 1 is the object that appeared in the
foreground, but it appeared as if the space
beyond is open. . and it didn't . . seemed as
if something like a hilltop on top of a low
rise as if you're able to look straight ahead and
not be encumbered by anything ground level.
Okay, the object drawn at Number 3 has a flat
vertical part and then a series of . . like
spirals. It is . . the perception I got of it
is something that . . as a cartoonist would draw
a perception of a tornado. A series of concen-
tric conical dark lines. Almost cartoon-like.
In looking at the drawing that it produced, it
has the semblence of a basketball backboard and
and net. But that probably is an analytical
overlay. . . guess as to what I would up with.
It has the sense of being somewhat up in the air;
which may be part of the perception and it may
not. It has the sense. . I have the sense that
I'm looking up at it.
Number 4 is a large curved wall. I'm not sure
of that one at all as being part of this thing.
Approved For Release 200QIQR~ - 0788R000900780001-8
 Approved For Release 2000/ 96-00788R000900780001-8
+10 Another tree form. This time an evergreen.
Parametal in shape.
I'm trying to develop a sense of where #6.5
is in terms of what kind of place it is.
I haven't seen a building yet. I haven't seen
anything that seemed like a building. There are
an awful lot of distractive thoughts going on.
Another tree shape. Well, I'm forced to the
conclusion that he's outdoors and not indoors.
But that's (not audible).
Nope, that's too far that way.
I just had an impression of a structure that's
somewhat distant away, thathas gable windows.
Okay, what I got was a large roof that is larger
than I'm drawing it and the clear impression
of one gable window. But that would lead me to
the impression that there are probably; its
position in the roof, would lead me to the
impression that there are probably; its position
in the roof, would lead me to the impression
that there are probably others which I am sort
of shoving in. . . Its tough enough to draw this
stuff, try to draw a dotted line. I get a sense
of blue. About the color of the roof. Might be
slate, but I have the feeling that its bluer than
slate. As I said, its off in the distance; its
not. . I do like to draw trees, but this is
getting ridiculous.
This is an ornamental kind of a tree. Something
in the drippy juniper family. This one's quite
tall. Close order of 20 feet. No. Eighteen
feet. Its a shape I. . . . .
Okay, this is something that is close up. That
as if you were standing looking over the top of
it. And that's not right. That's better. Its
made out of metal. Colored brown. I think its
2
Approved For Release 2000/0 6-00788R000900780001-8
 QVIRE'l
Approved For Release 20 -00788R000900780001-8
colored brown. It looks like a . . okay, the
only part I see is the top section but it
appears to be connected to a cylinder. And
I'm tempted to say that what it looks like is
a trash can, push open type thing that #6.5's
walking past. I'll put an arrow for the direction
for the path that he is walking on. Its just
something that. . I'm bobbing along behind him.
I'm kind of trying to look for real and solid
objects, manmade objects to give more definition
to the place. And I'm. . . it seems to be a
struggle to find something that's hard. If I
have the correct target, it seems to be a garden
or a park. The building that I drew seems to
be off in a distance and not to be really part
of the target. Or, not to be the target.
#14:
This is . . that's all consistent. I got this
one twice from two different distances. As if
#6.5 is walking down or along a path and the
first perception I had as I was looking past him,
was of the thing off in the distance and now he's
walked on down towards it and I get the view from
closer up. Either that or I zoomed in on it.
But what it is, is usual garden, outdoor kind of
park, kind of light. Its on a metal pole. . with
a shield on the top. We're either going to run
out of sessions or this is the last drawing unless
you give me some more paper.
Oh my God.
Thank you.
Okay, I think that this is contributory from
the rest of the . . Oh, this may be analytical.
I got the sense of a rail fence that sort of
(not audible) in this direction and either a
path or a road is on the right hand side of it
. . . right hand side of the fence. I got post
and rail implication of the fence. What I got
. . . Aha! What I got most directly was the
posts themselves and the top rail. They appeared
to be more massive than another kind of sort of
fence might be. So, I'm going to say post and
rail. It doesn't look like it could be a metal
3
Approved For Release 2000/08/0 00900780001-8
 Approved For Release 2000 P96-00788R000900780001-8
chain link kind of fence. It just seems to be
something that's along the side of a path or
road. I have the feeling that #6.5 is walking
back out of the target area and went back. That's
the camera. Ha ha
I don't suppose this is going to count, but
Well, I'll draw you a picture of the camera
since this is what I got a picture of.
#14: We'll mark the time on this one, too.
#29: Yeah. Ha ha ha. I just got the most clear cut
impression of the left hand side of this dumb
polaroid camera. Oh well.
#14: That was 22 minutes into the session. 1022 when
you had that.
PAUSE
#29_: Ha ha ha. . . Oh me.
PAUSE
Why I'm laughing and finding this so amusing is
that this session I've had trouble finding man-
made things and I have sort of been tasking the
mechanism, the spirit, that I'd like to see
manmade things and so it very kindly obliged me
by giving me this picture of this nifty manmade
thing that's right next to #6.5 and its the dumb
camera.
#29: All right. Oops, as far as this one's going to
count. Oh well, little things (not audible) at
times like this.
#29: Okay.
The sensations . . now, I'd like to go back and
review the set of drawings that I did to see if
I can add any particular information to what I've
gotten.
4
Approved For Release 2000/08/07: CVJM 88R000900780001-8
 CTROM.
Approved For Release 2000/ P96-00788R000900780001-8
One, I'm going to redo as 1A because I've
noticed that I've added a lot of things to the
original perception. 1A is a strict outline
drawing of the hard line image that I got.
Hard line. Ha. Beyond saying that I had the
feeling that the shape at the right is, you know,
irregular and, Okay, here we go with the dance
around the words again. It is shrub like in
shape in that it is irregular. There are a
number of other things that it could be. I
don't have a sense of color about it. I don't
have a sense of the angle at the bottom being
particularly wall like. It consists of two
parallel lines that could either be a railing
or a part of a wall. Now, the way that it could
be a railing would be with an angle joint. It
may be made out of pipe or bent pipe. I don't know
what in the world I'm going to label this - lb, I
guess.
But I didn;t see it like that. All I got was
the impression of the bend. And the shrub form.
If I had to guess, I'd guess that its most likely
to be like the drawing that I did at Number 1.
But I'm not positive, so therefore its called
hedging and fence, I guess.
Two, I'm not at all certain of. I had the feel-
ing that I was standing underneath something
looking out from under it. Some kind of a roof
form. Its not terribly consistent with the rest
of the drawing series. Its not consistent with
the rest of the thing. It may have been an
analytical throw-in which is why I've got a
question mark on the top left. . top right hand
corner of the thing. It didn't seem to be of
the same quality or kind of the rest of the
perceptions and therefore, I think it might have
been a non-real image. I'm just putting some
lines on there to indicate that there was a feel-
ing of ceiling or roof. And post that held it up.
OrCUM
Approved For Release 2000/08 P96-00788R000900780001-8
 ocan
Approved For Release 2000/ RDP96-00788R000900780001-8
Three, I've described before on the tape as
well as I can. I just can't say anymore about
it, so I won't.
Four is the same caliber as Number 2. I got the
feeling that there was a large brick wall that
had a curve to it. It didn't seem to have any
purpose to it either. Monument? I don't know.
Five is the first of the . . the second of the
tree form, the shrub form thing. Nice parametal
shrub.
Six was the tree. Probably something like a
red maple. Silver maple. Maple family anyway.
Seven. . Ooops! I'll be damned. Messed up the
numbers. Well, this one sits in position 7 in
the series but it didn't get a number so I'm
calling it Number X.
Was of a large structure, bigger than a house
that sits off in the distance. I had the idea
that its probably multiple storied. Or was it
bigger than a house? I'm of two minds about this.
Because of the shape, it seems to be . . the one
thing that is suggested to my mind is the kind
of brick structure buildings that are on Fort
Meade where you have a roof with a series of
dormers set in it and its three stories, four
stories high made out of brick. The other thought,
I guess, is that it seems to be the kind of a
a fakey kind of a structure. I don't have the
feeling that the dormers are limited. That they're
. . . Oh, like a Rustler Restaurant has a fake
western atmosphere and it has a fake frontier saloon
kind of a construction. In the sense that that is
fake, I get the feeling that these dormers and
this roof which I've described as blue is a fake.
Slate is one interpretation of the roof. Blue
plastic is the other.
Seven is a very interesting ornamental tree.
Something in the jumiper or large family. Blue
green and kind of drippy and kind of cylindrical.
Its all ornamental.
Eight is a trash can. If I have to guess as to
what it is.
Approved For Release 2000/08/
-00788R000900780001-8
limErnm"q
 Approved For Release 2000/q b [A4RDP96-00788R000900780001-8
Nine is a light.
Ten is the fence.
Eleven is the dumb camera. Ha ha
PAUSE
And that's all she wrote. Does the facilitator
have any questions?
#14: No. I think you've done a good job of reviewing
and covering everything. So, at this time. . .
#29: Would you like to ask me anything concerning any
of the notes?
#14: My goodness. Um, perhaps just a few small things.
Did you have a feeling for other people around?
Or, was the outbounder alone?
#29: No. I didn't. I had the feeling that the
outbounder was . . that. . All right, I had the
feeling that it was a kind of a park setting
. . the one of the thoughts that impinged on the
corner of my mind because of the number of different
sizes and kinds of shrubs is that its maybe a . .
something on the order of a garden. I don't get
the sense of it being a formal garden, but maybe
a garden area. It would be the kind of a place
that people would go on a sunny day, but its not
a sunny day and I had the feeling that #6.5 was
out there, you know, in the gray, drippy weather
again. I didn't sense any interaction with people.
#14: Well, that should about cover it. We'll call
this end of the session.
Approved For Release 2000/08/0`, 96-00788R000900780001-8
 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000900780001-8
TAB A
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000900780001-8
 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000900780001-8
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000900780001-8
 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000900780001-8
C
0/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000900780001-8
 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000900780001-8~
 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000900780001-8
3
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000900780001-8
 4
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000900780001-8
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000900780001-8
 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000900780001-8
5-
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000900780001-8
 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000900780001-8
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000900780001-8
 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000900780001-8
X A
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000900780001-8
 4 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 CIA-RDP96-00788R000900780001-8
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000900780001-8
 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000900780001-8
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000900780001-8
 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000900780001-8
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000900780001-8
 r
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000900780001-8
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000900780001-8
 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000900780001-8
,l
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000900780001-8
 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000900780001-8
TAB B
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000900780001-8
 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000900780001-8
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000900780001-8
 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000900780001-8
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000900780001-8