COUPS AND KILLINGS IN KABUL

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00552R000303410007-5
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 6, 2010
Sequence Number: 
7
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
November 22, 1982
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00552R000303410007-5.pdf289.28 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/08/06: CIA-RDP90-00552R000303410007-5 ARTICLE LPiJi,.Tr.D TIME MAGAZINE ON PAGE, 22 NCVEMBER 1982 soups and Killings in Kabt A KGB defector tells how Afghanistan became Brezh~ Vladimir Kuzichkin. 35, a former KGB major whose presence in Britain was announced by the British government last month, has given an ex- traordinary account of Soviet involvement in Afghanistan-perhaps the greatest blot on Brezhnev's career-as seen by the KGB. Kuzichkin, who defected to the British last June, had served under cover in Iran for five years. He was in the ultrasecret "Directorate S "which controls "ille als " , g , Soviet-born agents abroad. In an exclusive interview in London last week with TIME's Frank Melville, Kuzichkin said: 1) Brezhnev himself overruled repeated advice from Yuri Andropov 's KGB not to turn Afghanistan into a Soviet satellite, 2) Afghan President Babrak Karmal is a KGB agent of long standing, 3) Karmal 's predecessor was murdered in his palace by a specially trained, KGB-led Soviet assault group. Kuzichkin's account.- enior KGB officers rarely let their hair down about politics. But Af- ghanistan has exasperated many. As a former boss [a KGB general] put it late one night: "Afghanistan is our Viet Nam. Look at what has happened. We began by simply backing a friendly regime; slowly we got more deeply involved; then we started manipu- lating the regime-sometimes us- ing desperate measures-and now? Now we are bogged down in a war we cannot win and cannot aban- don. It's ridiculous. A mess. And but for Brezhnev and r-mmnanv Tvo ghan Communists were in a desperate po- sition. They consulted the Soviet embassy in Kabul. Moscow quickly confirmed that we would support their proposed coup against Daoud. Just before it was too late, the Communist leaders ordered the Daoud as a legitimate ruler. An openly Communist regime would arouse hostil- ity that would then be directed against the Soviet Union. It was clearly of the utmost impor- tance that Afghanistan should have the right leader. The choice was between Karmal, who headed the Parcham faction in the Afghan Communist party, and [Noor Mohammed] Taraki, who headed the Khalq faction. We knew a lot about both men. In the papers we put to the Politburo, we scrupulously assessed their strengths and weaknesses. Our assess- ment made it clear that Taraki would be a disastrous choice. He was savage by tem- perament, had little feel for handling complex political issues, and would be easily influenced by his cronies, but not by us. Karmal, on the other hand, we said, understood the need for subtle policies. Moreover, he had been a KGB agent for many years. He could be relied upon to what many of us involved with Af- ,.. TT Baia ne T Knew I . ara?la pe_rsonal- and outside-felt but would -n-n.7 r si good job! Things started going off stick our necks out to say. 9" L110 razes almost at once. Taraki not encouraged them to overthrow vau Lu W V1 se. inc anan nao fallen in Iran. Taraki's policies seemed cer- the Kind. Nonetheless the rea rr;nn tam to ensure there would also be a in the Soviet leadership was that massive Muslim insurrection in Af- this change was for the good. Brezhnev welcoming Babrak Karmal to Moscow in 1980 ghanistan. Taraki's response was to Our relations with Daoud were slaughter any opposition within his never very good. He was keen to keep coup-in fact, from their prison cells. reach. Moscow tried to persuade him open his links with the West. He did The coup succeeded, and Afghani- this was a recipe for disaster, he should tnot not wish to become too closely involved stan went Communist. But Mr. Brezh- repeat Stalin's errors. Taraki told Moscow with us. Those of us who knew Afghani- nev and his colleagues brushed aside the to mind its own business. stan were convinced no harm would come vitally important warnings that the KGB One day things began to look of that. The Afghans would slaughter was giving them-and disaster ensued. brighter. A man called [Hafizullah] Amin each other for generations, regardless of At the outset the Politburo felt it now seemingly emerged from nowhere to be whether they claimed to be Communists. had a chance to make some real head- Taraki's deputy. He was a cultivated Ori- It was inconceivable to us that Af- way in Afghanistan. It would pour in ental charmer. Quietly, Amin began to ghanistan could do any credit to the Sovi- money and advisers. Afghanistan's links take control away from Taraki. More im- et Union. let alone "Communism." The with the West would be gradually sev- portant, he persuaded Moscow that he Afghans. we told each other, should be ered. Afghanistan would be not only a would be able to defuse the Muslim left to stew in their own juice. We could neighboring country with whom we had threat. We at the KGB, though, had doubts never control them, but neither could good relations, like Finland, but a new about Amin from the start. Our investiga- anyone else. We had our first taste of member of the "Communist family." tions showed him to be a smooth-talking things to come in 1978. Daoud turned The KGB tried to explain tactfully fascist who was secretly pro-Western (he against the Communists who had helped that a Communist takeover in Afghani- had been educated in the United States) him to power. Not only did he arrest the stan presented hair-raising problems. and had links with the Americans. We leaders of the Afghan Communist party, We pointed out that despite all his also suspected that he had links with the but he planned to execute them. The Af- slaughter, the tribes had accepted CIA. but we had no roof In short tote Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/08/06: CIA-RDP90-00552R000303410007-5 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/08/06: CIA-RDP90-00552R000303410007-5 KGB was pointing to a danger that Amir.-if he could ride the tiger of Mus- 'im insure-cy and come out on top as the leader of an Islamic Afghanistan-not only would turn to the West but would also expel the Soviet Union-lock, stock and barrel-from Afghanistan. On politi- cal grounds, the KGB argued, it would be better, even at this late hour, to put Kar- mal in as President. Despite our warnings. and to our com- plete amazement. Mr. Brezhnev backed Amin. Taraki was invited to Moscow. Secretly. Mr. Brezhnev and his Politburo colleagues had agreed with Amin that Amin would arrange for Taraki to step down as President on his return to Kabul. Amin carried out the agreement in spirit, if not to the letter: Taraki stepped straight from the presidency to his grave. Moscow was willing to turn a Along the road the column was stopped at an Afghan checkpoint. Afghan troops gathered round to find out what was happening. Suddenly the flaps of the front vehicle went up and the Afghans were machine-gunned to the ground. The column rolled on. When it reached the palace, the special troops attacked from three sides, while Colonel Bayerenov (the head of the KGB'S terrorist-training school) led the assault on the palace. The attack got off to a good start. It would have been even better had the leading ar- mored vehicle not got caught up in the palace gates. Moscow wanted no Afghans left to tell the tale of what had happened in the palace. No prisoners were to be tak- en. Anybody leaving the building was to be shot on sight. Amin was found drink- ing in a bar on the top floor of the palace. He was shot without question. So was the blind eye to that. It was only weeks, however. before the smooth-talking Amin made the KGB argument seem cor- rect. Amin did not honor spe- cific promises made to the So- viet Union. he complained about the KGB's activities in Afghanistan. and he wanted Soviet officials who had had the "effrontery" to advise him recalled. Moreover, things in Afghanistan were looking blacker and blacker. Terrible reports were coming in of what Muslim insurgents were doing to any Soviet advisers sions of such a blow to our prestige would be unpredictable. The Soviet Union could not run such a risk. The. Politburo was de- termined to show that the Soviet Union would not be pushed about. Now the military came to the fore. The army had not been happy about the way our military involvement in Afghanistan had been handled. Some had argued that troops. not advisers, should have been sent in in 1978. before things got out of hand. But in December 1979, the general staff felt that 80.000 or so Soviet troops could get the situation under control. There was now a new Afghan leader, a KGB agent at that, and substantial Soviet support. The Afghan army, we believed, would go over to the offensive. The insur- gents themselves would be reluctant to take on such odds. Soviet troops were just supposed to provide the initial stiffener. Well before Amin's murder, two divisions. specially made up of Farsi-speaking troops from neighboring Tadzhiki- stan and Uzbekistan, had been assembled along the frontier. They all had Afghan uniforms. They were sup- posed to make our interven- tion go more smoothly. In ret- rospect, it was an error. In no time at all they were black- 7 marketeering (including sell- ing army equipment). buying Korans and robbing the local population (for which many were executed). They showed little interest in fighting A trio of dead Afghan leaders: Daoud, Taraki and Amin "Now we are bogged down in a war we cannot win and cannot abandon. " they caught. Worse, though the uprising was spreading. Amin seemed to be doing nothing to combat it. The Politburo now really was con- vinced that the KGB argument had been right: Arvin was planning to turn Afghan- istan against the Soviet Union. So the Po- litburo decided Amin had to go. Prefera- bly quietly-but certainly dead. At first, we-that is. the KGB-were given the job. We had an ofcer, an illegal who passed as an Afghan and had for some time been one of Amit;'s personal cooks. He was or- dered to poison Amin. But Amin was as careful as any of the Borgias. He kept switching his food and drink as if he ex- pected to be poisoned. The illegal's nerves began to fray as his attempts. The failures annoyed Moscow. The Politburo accepted a less quiet way of get- ting rid of Amin. This time special Soviet troops were to storm the presidential pal- ace. The day after Christmas 1979, Soviet paratroopers began arriving at the Kabul airport. They strengthened the substan- tial garrison we had quietly been building up there. The next day an armored col- umn moved out of the airport toward the palace. It consisted of a few hundred Sovi- et commandos, plus a specially trained as- sault group of KGB officers-rather like the U.S. Green Berets. They were all in Afghan uniforms, and their vehicles had Afghan markings. exceedingly beautiful young woman with him. The Soviet objective had been achieved. But the plan was not without its weaknesses. No one had expected Amin's bodyguard to put up such ferocious resis- tance within the palace. Resistance was so stiff that Colonel Bayerenov stepped out of the door to call for reinforcements. He had forgotten about the orders to the troops outside and was shot. Anyway, Amin was now dead. Earli- er, Karmal had been located in Europe and brought to Moscow. He agreed to be the President of Afghanistan and to invite Soviet troops in to protect his regime. Even before that announcement was made, tens of thousands of our ground troops were moving into Afghanistan. The Western press attributed several motives to Moscow. Some said we were worried about the impact on Soviet Mus- lims that an upsurge of Islamic funda- mentalism in Iran and Afghanistan could have. Others said that we insisted on hav- ing "our own man" or that we were in- flamed by the terrible deaths that Afghan insurgents were inflicting on Soviet advis- ers. There is something in these interpre- tations. But they miss the real point. What moved the Politburo was the thought that the Muslim revolution in Af- ghanistan could succeed and that, as a re- sult, the Soviet Union would actually be thrown out of Afghanistan. The repercus- "their neighbors," the Afghans. European troops were soon brought to replace the Tadzhiks and Uzbeks. We made two major errors of judg- ment: we overestimated the willingness of the Afghan army to fight and underesti- mated the upsurge of Afghan resistance. As a result we sent in too few troops. The trouble is that Moscow cannot correct this error. When we began to get bogged down, of course, the army argued for more troops. The Soviet general staff wanted at least twice as many-to seal off the fron- tier with Pakistan and get better control along the border with Iran. But the Polit- buro ruled that out. By then, it feared pro- voking a serious Western reaction. Now no one in the U.S.S.R. is happy. Soviet troops are bogged down. Karmal has not established effective leadership. Like his predecessors, Karmal is proving somewhat truculent in his dealings with Moscow. Given the way he was treated. that is hardly surprising. By the spring of this year, the Politburo was already con- sidering having him replaced-but decid- ed to give him a bit more time. Nobody can really see a way out. There is no prospect that the Soviet Union will withdraw from Afghanistan in the foreseeable future. For those of us who know what really happened, it is all a stark reminder of how the Soviet leader- ship deals with foreign policy. ^ Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/08/06: CIA-RDP90-00552R000303410007-5