SUSPECTED SPY COULD RECEIVE DEATH PENALTY

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00552R000302530025-3
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 20, 2010
Sequence Number: 
25
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
January 13, 1984
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00552R000302530025-3.pdf70.83 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/20: CIA-RDP90-00552R000302530025-3 APTI'cLE APPEARED. LOS ANGELES TIMES G:: PAGE ,3 13 January 1984 Suspected Spy Could Receive Death Penalty By MARK A. STEIN, Times Staff Writer Turning aside the arguments of both prosecutors and defense law- yers, a federal judge in San Francis- co ruled Thursday that a suspected Silicon Valley spy could be sen- tenced to death if he is found guilty of selling sensitive ballistic missile defense secrets to the Soviet bloc. The defense attorney in the case, however, said he- will appeal the decision to the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco. Prosecutors would not say whether they will ask for the death penalty when the case goes to trial, sched- uled for April 3 in San Francisco. "Given the potential consequenc- es of ... espionage, which may threaten the lives of all citizens of the United States, this court finds that capital punishment for espio- nage is not uniformly disproportion - ate to the severity of the offense " , U.S. District Judge Samuel Conti require lower courts to -consider said, such things as the defendant's state of mind, malice and. quality of character. The ruling did not apply directly to federal espionage laws, but the lawyers argued that those laws lack the clauses mandated by the Su- preme Court's decision. Conti rejected that thinking, say- ing that no federal court has ever "squarely confronted" the specific issue of whether the 1972 decision rendered the death penalty for Terms It Lawful "Accordingly, the punishment of death for espionage is not unconsti- tutional." Conti's ruling was made in the case of James D. Harper, 49, a Mountain View engineer accused of photocopying 67 classified reports and later selling 31 of them to Polish agents in Europe and Mexico for about $250,000. FBI agents said the reports were shared with the Soviet Union. The reports, which detailed how- the United States plans to survive a surprise nuclear attack by the Sovi- ets, were allegedly provided to Harper by his second wife, Ruby Louise Schuler, who died last sum- mer at 39 of cirrhosis of the liver. Basis of Ruling Only two people-Julius and Eth- el Rosenberg, in 1953-have been executed for peacetime spying in the United States, and lawyers for both sides in the Harper case had told Conti that a 1972 'Supreme Court decision held that capital punishment in espionage cases is unconstitutional. That ruling, they said, was based on the -opinion that death penalty provisions of federal laws were inapplicable because they -did not STAT espionage invalid. He added that he believes putting convicted spies to death "corfor:ns to contemporary societal standards of decency." Assistant U.S. Atty. John C. Gibbons would not say whether Conti's decision will change his mind and cause him to seek the death penalty. Defense attorney Jerrold Ladar of San Francisco said, "the Department of Justice has determined they can't (seek a death sentence), and if the judge imposes it, it would be an illegal act." Ladar said be does not expect his planned appeal to postpone the trial. Harper remains in custody without bail at an undisclosed location, where'he has been held since his arrest last October. Meanwhile, government prosecutors continue build- ing their case against Harper, and plan a t::p to Europe to gather further .evidence, sources close to the investigation said. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/20: CIA-RDP90-00552R000302530025-3