SOVIET DISINFORMATION

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00552R000201700005-8
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 6, 2010
Sequence Number: 
5
Case Number: 
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00552R000201700005-8.pdf145.26 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/06: CIA-RDP90-00552R000201700005-8 STRATEaIC R VI Dl Viinter 1961 SOVIET DISINFORMAT THE AUTHOR: Dr. Douglass has been engaged in national security studies over the past two decades, concentrating on Soviet security policy and plans and U.S., NATO and Soviet military strategies and options. He is the author, among other works, of The Soviet Theater Nuclear Offensive (1976), co-author of Soviet Strategy for Nuclear War (1979), and author of Soviet Military Strategy in Europe (1980). IN BRIEF strategic intentions must operate. There -is urgent need of a concertec a c p the more so in unticrpation of a. burst of disinformation activities that is likely to attend anew lead- story and of the treacherous terrain of fact and fiction in w cc any J r 2 tta h .. the oblem--alt tlrsnz f or ma on. . , by Moscow into a major irrstrument of policy. Yet, the documented cases tell only the tip of the h h conclusive anal sic of Soviet On the shadowy U.S-Soviet battleground of intelligence and reciprocal strategic analysis, the Soviet Union. has been able to magnify the advantages of systemic secrecy with a sustained campaign of ti I-deeci according to U.S. intelligence testimony, disinformation has been elevated ership succession in the-Kremlin. fter more than three-decades of accumu- -lated experience,-?the study of Soviet plans, striate an& simply stated, So- intentions.. A former Director of Central Intelli- gence put it as follows: The adver'sary's intention is not necessarily viet intentions, remains one of the more diffi- cult, controversial.; and- frustrating realms of strategic anaivsis in the United States. It is dif- - ficult and controversial because of the nature and credibility of the intelligence sources on which such analysis must be based--defectors, in-place agents and Soviet writings, from the unclassified to t1he most highly classified-and the susceptibiiirv of this intelligence data to manipulation icy the opponent. It is frustrating not only because Soviet intentions behind the haze of Soviet secrecy are inherently a slippery phenomenon, but also because of a seemingly chronic propensity in the Nest to downgrade, in effect,.the real importance of the study of the key to determining his future action. His intention can change, his intention may not yet be formed, his intention may be-rather a hope than a commitment to action- Another former Director, who served subse- quently as Secretary of Defense, went so far as to question the relevance of intentions to actual behavior: Doctrines control the minds of men only in periods of nonemergency. They do not neces- sarily control the minds of men during pe- riods of emergency.. In the moment of truth, Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/06: CIA-RDP90-00552R000201700005-8 JOSEPH D. DOUGLASS, JR.