THE DENIAL OF RELIGIOUS FREEDOM OF JEWS BEHIND THE IRON CURTAIN

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP65B00383R000200190007-5
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
April 27, 2010
Sequence Number: 
7
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
January 1, 2000
Content Type: 
OPEN
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP65B00383R000200190007-5.pdf355.45 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2010/04/27: CIA-RDP65B00383R000200190007-5 1963 Here are a few comments typical of those opposing the wheat sale: Farmer from Greene County: Just helping Russia to bury us at our ex- pense. Farmer from Sangamon County : One year ago this country was alerted to the prospects of a third world war, avoided by promises to get soldiers out of Cuba, mis- siles, etc. No proof by inspection as pledged. Why do we reward the unfaithful? Farmer from Calhoun County: When you have a club, don't give It to your enemy and expect him not to use it. Farmer S from Cass County: Let's wipe out hunger in the free countries first. Farmer from Hancock County : I do not have a bit of confidence in any- thing they do or say, slid I wouldn't trust them any further than I could throw a ton bull by the tail. Farmer from Greene County: How does it happen that Freeman did not know of a shortage of wheat when he was In Russia? Is it possible Russia is storing food to carry through some crises? Farmer from Morgan County: Nor the $43 a bushel corn. Farmer from Sangamon County: I Flo not believe we 'should deal with a bunch of crooks and murderers of Khru- shchev or any of the satellite countries. I think we will lose if we do. Farmer from Cass County: I do not approve, but I feel that I am in the minority because the majority will put the dollar ahead of principle. Farmer from Jersey County: This goes for Tito, too. Farmer from Macoupin County: Remember the scrap iron we sold Japan. Farmer from Morgan County: The New Frontier is taking us back to where Roosevelt took us and left us, If I gave you my honest opinion this paper would be scorched. Farmer from Adams County: Farm votes should not be for sale. Farmer from grown County: This is one of the most stupid decisions the present administration has made yet. Why (many whys) should we be cooperative with our most dangerous enemy? Why should we? Farm wife from Sangamon County: I am a farmer's wife and to h- with Russia. They don't care if their own people starve. Farmer from Jersey County: Why feed our'worst enemy? Here are comments ' typical of those who said yes to the wheat sale but added their own stipulations: Farmer from Brown County: But let's have those troops removed from Cuba in the deal. Farmer from Schuyler County: I do think it would have been a good time to Insist that Russia withdraw from Cuba. Farmer from Jersey County: Provided we get a full cash payment on delivery and provided Russian troops are withdrawn from Cuba. CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - HOUSE Farmer from Jersey County: it is a mystery to me as to why the United States is selling wheat to Russia and Russia is not paying the United States for past debts.. They just as well sell them wheat. They turned Cuba over to them. Broke the Mon- roe Doctrine without a struggle. Farmer from Schuyler County: If [it] would get rid of some surplus on a Cash basis paid in gold at our port, and they agreed to get out of Cuba and stay out. I think we should get some settlement on Germany. And do they need wheat or are they trying to trick us? We should have market price at our port. Farmer from Greene County: We had just as well sell wheat to Russia, because we trade with other countries that will trade with them. But let's don't give it to them. Looks to me like a good time to use a little leverage. ,Farmer from Adams County: I approve selling wheat to Russia for what they need, but do not think we should sell them enough to dole out to their satellites. I think we should get credit for helping feed those people. If Russia objects, those satel- lites will know who kept them from getting our wheat. Farmer from McDonough County: I would approve only if Russia used it for their own use and they pay their debt due the United States first. Farmer from McDonough County: "I feel that if we don't sell it direct some other country will buy and divert to Russia. However, I have these reservations. In ex- change for the deal we should have some consideration such as: Russians out of Cuba a" relief In Berlin, or some other concession of importance. AD HOC COMMITTEES CIRCULARIZE CONGRESS ON BRACERO PRO- GRAM (Mr. TALCOTT (at the request of Mr. HARSHA) was granted permission to ex- tend his remarks at this point in the RECORD and to include extraneous mat- ter.) I Mr. TALCOTT. Mr. Speaker, there are a number of ad hoc committees with religious sounding names who are cir- cularizing Congress with statements and resolutions in opposition to an extension of the bracero program, Seldom do these committees or relig- ious associations give their credentials or the basis of their views or valid rea- sons for their resolutions. A little in- 'vestigation will reveal that they have made little or no objective study of the problems, many have never been near a -farm-some only recently, after their commitment to oppose the bracero pro- gram-some did not and do not know the difference between a "wetback," a "green carder" or a bracero. Most have never lived near a migrant farm family or in a rural community. None has ever been a local governmental official. ,None has presented any alternative pro- posal. The simple fact is that they do not know or understand the problem of the 'farmer or the bracero or the domestic. If you want a religious answer to the bracero issue, consult your personal pas- 19227 tor, priest, or rabbi. The clergy in areas where the bracero works and lives do not oppose the program. They have facts, experience, and knowledge, as well as compassion, theological training, and morality. Naturally, all of us, proponents and opponents of the bracero bill, should be concerned with the pathetic plight of the migrant farmworker's family. The bra- cero program is an effective adjunct to a better life for domestic workers. It is the most satisfactory, humanitarian program yet devised to solve the social- economic supplemental farm labor prob- lem. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR RE- TARDED CHILDREN (Mr. FARBSTEIN (at the request of Mr. FUQUA) was given permission to ex- tend his remarks at this point in the RECORD and to include extraneous mat- ter.) Mr. FARBSTEIN. Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to call to the attention of this body the meeting presently being held in Washington of more than 1,000 members of the National Association for Retarded Children. I am happy to say that my district in New York, the 19th Congres- sional District, is well represented at this distinguished convention. The National Association for Retarded Children is a voluntary organization of national stature. It was founded in 1950 by a group of parents who were anxious to take action to improve life for their retarded children. From this small. nucleus, the organization has grown con- stantly, until now more than 1,000 local associations exist across the 50 United States. We have recently seen In this Congress enlightened legislation being passed to benefit the mentally retarded, legislation outlining plans for national action far beyond the dreams these people of NARC could even Imagine when they formed their organization. Our country is fin- ally taking positive action to help the children and adults who are retarded today, and to prevent mental retarda- tion and ameliorate its tragic effects on the lives of children of coming genera- tions. The members of the National Associa- tion for Retarded Children are to be commended on the role they have played in leading action at the community level to help all of America's 51/2 million re- tarded citizens. I should like to record a welcome to them to the Nation's Cap- ital and wish them continued success in their endeavors. THE DENIAL OF RELIGIO S FREE- DOM OF JEWS BEHIND THE IRON CURTAIN (Mr. FARBSTEIN (at the request of Mr. FUQUA) was given permission to ex- tend his remarks at this point in the RECORD and to include extraneous matter.) Mr. FARBSTEIN. Mr. Speaker, total annihilation threatens Soviet Judaism. All the resources of the state are di- rected toward this purpose. Approved For Release 2010/04/27: CIA-RDP65B00383R000200190007-5 19228 Approved For Release 2010/04/27: CIA-RDP65B00383R000200190007-5 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - HOUSE . October 24 Alone and isolated, unprotected by law, cut off from their religious confreres abroad, victimized by a ruthless and unmitigating propaganda assault, de- prived of the sacred accoutrements of religious practice, the devout Soviet Jew- ish believer faces the greatest danger to his religious life, his sacred beliefs and traditions. Discrimination against Soviet Jewry in general and the practice of the Jewish religion is a matter of official Soviet pol- icy. A virulent press campaign, designed to distort the image of the Jew by resur- recting time-worn anti-Semitic stereo- types, is a grotesque manifestation of this policy. In the metropolitan and provin- cial press, especially in areas where most Soviet Jews reside and where anti-Semi- tism is still widespread and endemic, the Jews are portrayed as worshippers of money. Rabbis and lay leaders are always depicted as extortionists of money from devout Jews ostensibly for religious purposes, but in reality for their own selfish gain. Drunkenness is cited as a frequent problem in synagogue life. In general, Judaism is ridiculed; its religious rites mocked; and its tenets portrayed as potentially or actually subversive. In addition to the propaganda assault on Judaism, the Soviet state employs even more direct methods of circumscribe the influence and effectiveness of Juda- ism. No central organization is per- mitted to unite congregations, facilitate communications, and in general to serve the spiritual needs of the Jewish religious community as a whole. The state prohibits printing facilities for the Jewish community. Thus, there are no Jewish religious publications. No Hebrew Bible has been published for Jews since 1917. A Russian translation of the Jewish version of the Old Testament has never been permitted. Nor has a Jewish religious book of any kind been published since the early 1920's, except for the recent publication of a siddur; that is, a Sabbath prayerbook. In 1958, an edi- tion of only 3,000 copies of a prerevolu- tionary siddur was made available to the many thousands of practicing religious Jews. No prayerbooks for use on special religious occasions have been published, and Jews must rely on photographed copies of their religious calendars sur- Jewish religious leaders have suffered out our position toward such a move in direct personal attacks by Soviet au- clear and concise terms: thorities in a campaign of attrition and pressure on the Jewish community which has systematically increased since the middle of 1961. In June and July of 1961, synagogue presidents in six major pro- vincial cities were deposed. Six lay reli- gious leaders in Moscow and Leningrad were secretly arrested. In October 1961, the Moscow and Leningrad leaders were secretly tried on charges of alleged es- pionage and sentenced to long terms of imprisonment. Soviet Jews are made to feel disloyal no matter how innocent their relations may be with Israel or nations of the West. In this regard it is important to note that the religious Soviet Jew is cut off completely from his confreres beyond the U.S.S.R. No Jewish religious delegation from the Soviet Un- ion has ever been permitted to visit reli- gious institutions abroad, and Soviet synagogues are not permitted to have any official contacts, permanent ties, or institutional relations with Jewish reli- gious, congregational, or rabbinic bodies outside the Soviet Union. All these acts against religious Soviet Jews and their practices add up to a systematic policy of attrition, designed to intimidate and atomize Soviet Jewry. This policy seeks to cut the bonds that link the Jew to his historic religious past, to isolate him within Soviet society and isolate him from the world community of Jewry, and in the end to destroy his Jewish spirit; for this policy aims not only at the Jewish religion but also at the whole of Jewish consciousness. This policy is, therefore, not another program in the real sense-it has none of its spasmodic emotionalism; nor is it Hitlerian in its mode; it is rather a policy of gradualism, attrition, and atomization calculated to seek the same end: destruc- tion of all those essential qualities and characteristics, both interior and exteri- or, that make the Jew a Jew. I trust the world will take cognizance of the foregoing and that appropriate and necessary representations will be made to the Soviet Union to the end that recognition will be given to the plaint of the Jewish people of the repressions practiced against their coreligionists in STATEMENT BY AMBASSADOR ADLAI E. STEVEN- SON, U.S. REPRESENTATIVE TO THE UNITED NATIONS, IN PLENARY, ON CHINESE REPRE- SENTATION, OCTOBER 16, 1963 Nothing has happened in the world in the past year to justify the General Assembly seriously redebating the item which we now have before us; indeed quite the opposite is the case. For many years this issue has been dealt with in decisive fashion by the United Nations; in 1961 proposals to seat the Com- munist Chinese and expel the Representa- tives of the Republic of China were defeated by a vote of 36 to 48; last year they were defeated by 42 to 56. In 1961 also the As- sembly decided by a vote of 61 to 34 that any proposals to change the representation of China would come under the provisions of article 18(3) of the charter and this requires a two-thirds vote. Since then the leaders of Communist China have further demon- strated both in words and deed that they do not accept the most basic principles of the charter. The Albanian proposal is con- sequently totally inappropriate and should be decisively rejected. Given the behavior of the Communist Chinese in the past year, it is even more un- fortunate that the constructive mood of this 18th session of the General Assembly, a mood in which all, or almost all, of us have taken such satisfaction, should be inter- rupted in the strident and discordant rhet- oric of the cold war. As President Kennedy said in his address at the outset of this ses- sion, the whole world is now looking to the United Nations to see if the current pause in the cold war can be stretched into a period of cooperation during which both sides can gain "new confidence and experi- ence in concrete collaboration for peace." The Albanian proposal to expel one of our founding members and to replace its repre- sentatives with those of the world's most warlike regime is in essence a proposal to install the chilliest advocate of both cold and hot wars in our halls. Two years ago on the eve of our debate on this subject Communist China had subjected Tibet to its domination. Last year it was engaged in aggressive warfare against India, and by its own admission was using its influ- ence during the crisis over Soviet missiles in Cuba to try to prevent the solution which the rest of the world welcomed. And now this year we find Communist China not only embroiled in both old and new disputes, on all of its peripheries, but also being the unique and aggressive advocate, alone in the councils of the world, of the inevitability and desirability of war as a means of solving th P S i t e Unnion. ov e erhaps the Soviet, international disputes. reptitiously circulated among themselves. Many other forms of religious discrim- Government will pay heed. I Mr. President, in the past 2 years 19 rat- tiJ plenary meetings have been devoted to sub-+ ination obstruct the Soviet Jew in p tieing his faith. A ban still exists on RECENT ACTION BY THE UNITED . So- Hebrew so that Jews educated in the NATIONS ON ADMISSION OF RED viet Period cannot participate fully in in CHINA INTO THE U.N. the liturgy of Jewish religious observ- ances. Indispensable accoutrements for (Mr. MORRIS (at the request of Mr. the religious service such as the tallies FUQUA) was given permission to extend and tefillin are prohibited. The public his remarks at this point in the RECORD baking and sale of matzoth has been for- and to include extraneous matter.) bidden. Restrictions on building syna- Mr. MORRIS. Mr. Speaker, I think gogues has reduced the number to some. that it is worth noting the recent action 60 or 70, and those few are expected to by the United Nations on the admission serve 1 million believers. Prior to 1957, of Red China into the U.N. This was Jews had no institutions to train rabbis, the 14th time that the proposal has been and the yeshiva established in 1957 as decisively rejected by the General As- an adjunct of the great synagogue in sembly. Again the United States took Moscow has operated under great re- the lead in opposing such a move and I strictions. In general, it could not hope should like to call special attention to to meet the demands that the service of the statement made by Ambassador a million practicing Jews would ordi- Adlai E. Stevenson, the U.S. representa narily require. tive to the United Nations, which points stantive debate on the representation of China. Nearly all members have expressed their views. In both 1961 and 1962, proposals to expel the representatives of the Govern- ment of the Republic of China and to admit Chinese Communist representatives were de- cisively rejected, not by less and less support, as claimed by the representative of Albania in his statement of September 27, but by a no vote of 48 in 1961 and by an absolute majority of 56 in 1962. One of the preced- ing speakers, furthermore, has based his case in part on the erroneous assumption that a majority of member states recognize Com- munist China. The fact is, of course, that an absolute majority of member states- namely 59-recognize the Government of the Republic of China. The Albanian request that this Assembly reverse itself, that we throw out a loyal charter member and make room for repre- sentatives of a regime which is not a peace- loving state will not bear scrutiny. Approved For Release 2010/04/27: CIA-RDP65B00383R000200190007-5