RUSSIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH IN ARGENTINA

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP82-00457R005000600009-5
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
November 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
March 5, 1999
Sequence Number: 
9
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
June 20, 1950
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP82-00457R005000600009-5.pdf122.55 KB
Body: 
SAiJ tl~. ?~w~IM ySS!F I AA$ ION I ~ k J e EllSf Approved For ReleaS, 1'AL 1N gL~J,~-LS?AR0050006a NO. M),( p [INFORMATION R EPO R ` CD NO. I % 25X1A COUNTRY Argentina/US3:R DATE DISTR. 20 JUN 50 SUBJECT Russian Orthodox Church in Argentina NO. OF PAGES 2 PLACE NO, OF ENCLS. ACQUIRED (LISTED BELOW) DATE OF T SUPPLEMENT INFO. Prior to 18 April 1950 REPORT NO. Bishop FanteleiIon, who was designated by the Russian Orthodox Church to reorganize the activities of that church in Argentina and who arrived in Buenos Aires in September 19148, was expelled from Argentina on 5 April 1950 and transferred to Teheran, Iran,, When he arrived in Argentina instead of one centralized Orthodox Church, he found ten separate groups operating without direction? The reason for the split was apparently caused by the action of 1sgr. Konstantin Izrastzovi who had obtained personal possession of all the properties of the Russian Orthodox Church in Arc-entinaF, by form- ing a separate society of his family Panteleimon ? s efforts to regain possession of the chuff .h? s properties caused numerous differences with the Izrastzov family, who are. influential within Argentine goverment circles, The Bishop believes that this friction with the Izrastzo'v family was the main reason for his expulsion, According to Pantele3mon, the person who was responsible for suggesting to the Izrastzc'vs that they take possession of the church properties was one Dry, Lukaso hevi*h, who at present is trying to acquire possession of all the property of the Rumanian Church in Buenos Aires., 2. Bishop Fan tealeimon gave other possible reasons for his expulsion from Argentina. Prior to the time when Pantoleimon received the Buenos Aires assignment from the Russian Orthodox Church, the Argentine government recommended one Father Michail Dickey as a logical person for his position. The government considered it an affront that their recommendation of Dickiy was not followed-, As a result, Dickiy had been active in a campaign to discredit the Bishop, hoping to succeed in replacing Pantealeimon,, Another r anon that then6a was ill feel- ing toward the Bishop was that he had refused to enter into an anti-Communist campaign. After he refused to participate in any. political activities he received a warning stating that he would suffer dire consequences, The actual charges made by the Argent .os government were trtmiped up charges of homosexuality, according to the Bishop, DISTRt S P ARh1I Y AIR Document No. __--- No Change In Mass. Peclaassmf d class. Chew, 1 To: TS S 0_1 Autha Ili 70.2 g Date' dO Q 6 T _ ny: V CLASSIFICATION SECAT Approved For Release 1999/09/09 : CIA-RDP82-00457R005000600009-5 SI C.; t."M A 25X1A Approved For Release 1999/09/09: IA-RDP82 V 00009-5 C:~NTI?AL IW[:h:LLI(TFNCE; AGENCY _ 3,, As of 21 April tae Bishop was residing illegally in Uruguay. Panteleinori professed to be antid>Corranirriist and was the first signer of a petition to outlaw the Cor.imu nisi-dominated Union Eslava in Buenos Aires. The Bishop would not or could not discuss the existence and status of Communist activities in Argentina, 25X1A COWIpSMIAL. Approved For Release 1999/09/09 : CIA-RDP82-00457R005000600009-5