GENTLEMEN:

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP78-05844A000100080003-0
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: K
• Document Page Count: 1
• Document Creation Date: December 12, 2016
• Document Release Date: June 15, 2001
• Sequence Number: 3
• Publication Date: September 1, 1961
• Content Type: LETTER

GSA-Dec] assi#A im/Pie eIfl ro It ous-QopF
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Region 3
Washington 25, D.C.
September 1, 1961
105844A000100080003-0
Central Intelligence Agency
2430 E Street, N. W.
Washington, D. C.
Chief, Fiscal Division
IN REPLY REFER TO; 3CA
Document Rs,
Review of tats document by CIA US
dotefmia?d t`?at
C. Er, no objection to declass
C~ it ,.a :? :t~s ir;duwtn Lion of CIA
ircY ~'t that tnf.4$: fi2En~in
c: - ,. ; s?d at 1"S S C
KS 13.2
13 /rla.iialn$ othin$ ul CI is e t
bite ! V rdiviewa~f
Pursuant to discussions held between representatives of our respective agencies,
we have made a detailed review of all billings rendered during fiscal year 1961
for security guarding.
Based on the review, we have found that on an overall basis with the exception
of the billings for contract guarding at Langley, the figures developed by your
office and those reflected on our billings for force account guarding, are
substantially in agreement.
With respect to contract guarding, however, a difference of approximately
$25,800.00 exists between the figures shown on the recapitulation furnished by
your office and our billings. Specifically, your recap for the months of May
and June cites the amounts of $24,045.28 and $12,921.91 respectively, as billed
by GSA for contract guarding performed at Langley; whereas, no amounts were
shown as developed by CIA to compare with the GSA billings. In addition, figures
developed by your offices include $11,890.81 for the same services performed
during the month of April whereas April and May services were included in May
billing. Thus, $25,076.38, the amount which we billed for services rendered
for May and June which was not included on your recap sheets, accounts for all
but an insignificant part of the overall difference in question.
Based on the foregoing, it appears that the differences in the figures relating
to force account jobs may result from slight discrepancies between productive
time reports furnished this office and summaries of these reports furnished
your facility by the guard force. Minor discrepancies between our figures for
contract guarding, in addition to the specific exceptions cited above, appear
to stem from overtime work performed by the contractor, the billing period for
which is not always concurrent with the end of a given calendar month.
We trust that the foregoing will serve to settle any question you have regarding
variances on billing during the past year.
Sincerely yours
. Burgess
Acting Chief, Accounting Division
At.
Approved For Release 2002/02/12 : CIA-RDP78-05844A000100080003-0