NIS COMMITTEE MEETING NO. 9

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP78-05597A000400020094-8
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
November 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 26, 1998
Sequence Number: 
94
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
September 16, 1948
Content Type: 
MIN
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP78-05597A000400020094-8.pdf120.16 KB
Body: 
Approved For Re 'asVI)9/0 DP78-05597AO00100020094-8 NIS COMMITTEE MI TINE NO. 9 16 September 194 1. The following members were present: 25X1A9a Dr. Dunn. State DOCUMENT NO. Dr. Appleton State NO CHANCE uN GLASS. ^ Lt. Col. Hansen Army QECLAESIFIED Lt. Col. DeHority Navy LAS: c VKC~r TO, TS S 0 NEXT Cmdr* Howell Navy AUTH: HR 10.2 Lt. Col. Gould Air Force DA? yL..1; VY1EWERM_018'645f Maj. Gamber Air Force CIA (Chairman) CIA 2. Copies of a Map Branch, CIA, memorandum showing the tentative production schedule for base. maps were distributed to the members. 3. Copies of a revised list of members of coordination staffs of the various Agencies were distributed to the members of the Committee. 4. The State member distributed copies of the revised OIR production schedule. 5. The nature and purpose of base maps were explained. It was pointed out that the Agencies were best qualified,to produce any special maps required in addition to the base maps and.that such special maps should be kept to a minimum. The Navy member stated that Navy had not received the base maps listed as "issued". Capt. Knowles said that he would look into the matter. (Note: Upon investigation it was determined that sufficient copies of the preliminary base maps for all Chapter II contributors had been supplied to ID who is responsible for distributing them.) 6. It was explained that the maintenance of any given NIS begins when any original portion of the NIS has been finished - not according to any specific beginning date. 7. Regarding State-Army collaboration on Chapter IV (Army is responsible for Section 45), it was decided that, if State'does not work areas concurrently being worked on by Army in sufficient numbers to absorb Army's capabilities to produce Sections 45, Army should arbitrarily choose the areas on which it desired to work, and that Section 45 might then be published as produced. 8. In response to a question by the State member, it was explained that only the biographic data pertaining to key personnel should be included in Chapter V and that these should be included in the text and not compiled in separate lists. Approved For Release 1999/09/01: CIA-RDP78-05597A000400020094-8 Approved For Reate?X19)9/0fRDP78-05?970100020094-8 9. It was explained that the obtaining of data 25X1 X7 and the uses to'which such data are put are Departmental responsibilities. 10. The Army member stated that no meetings to coordinate the production of Chapter IX had been held. After the Committee meeting, a meeting on Chapter IX was arranged for 20 September. 11. It was agreed that final tentative production schedules would be compiled in BIG and distributed to the Agencies for concurrence, 12. It was explained that some Agencies, such as the Far Eastern Command and U.S. Forces in Austria, had requested copies of the preliminary gazetteer for NIS #26, which is to be published shortly in the following parts: I - Western USSR (populated places) II - Eastern USSR (populated places) III - USSR (physical features) Each Agency was asked to survey its Departmental requirements and notify BIG by 15 October 194S. It was also explained why a provisional list of USSR place names could not be provided to Aeronautical Chart Service as requested. 13. Major Gamber said that Supplements No. II would be produced on a schedule to conform to that of Chapter 1 fiA9a Approved For Release 1999/09/01 : CI, RDP78-05597A000400020094-8