Special Security Inspection(Classified)

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP78-04007A001000050013-2
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
6
Document Creation Date: 
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 18, 2000
Sequence Number: 
13
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
September 8, 1949
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP78-04007A001000050013-2.pdf314.3 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2000/09/08 : CIA-RDP78-04007AO01000050013-2 Approved For Release 2000/09/08 : CIA-RDP78-04007AO01000050013-2 Approved For Release 2000/99/08 : CIA-yRyDP78-04MO A001000050013-2 :ROM ",';ie assistant Director, USU CYLef, :Jlispect*on and security Chief, Inspection Branch DATE: Stv S 1949 WBJECT: Special security Inspection of the 25X1A5a1 25X1A 1. t1i]'1't10tWi'1 tt:d1J I'aS'S:LUN 1. r'ursuant to oral instructions from the Chief, Inspection and Security a'special security inspection was matte by 25X1A9a 25X1 A9a~ut on AuLust 2j, 24 and 2>, 1iu'J, of tree security con- 25X1 A5a1 t f thm s s connected with the class1 L eu contra, o now being 25X1 A 25X1A peri"onaed for CIA (OSO/Commo under nine ers 25X1 A Uir'V. 2. inWpectiou included the checking or observation of the con- trac i,or ' s offices :u-Id, plant with particular reference to physical aspects arai controls related to security and protection; the procedures for ;site selection and control of personiiei.; Laid the safeguarding of ci.assiiied information, documents anu material. 25X1A5a1 main Dilice wiu p.L ft :L-,, hou:,c.ci in i. l ilo ILL tei Uto area 25X1A iwucarrl ;aarluiLactur114 typo luitl?s covei~!.ng approrii of a city clock in a suburban cos merciLJ: aistiict of entr aces from tine street to the buildings and grounds are guarded by uni creed guards. Satisiactoi-y security procedures &na contro:J.,s are in effect to retvlate aunlittance ana egress of visitors ana eia- ployees. 2. ijiovriedge of the evasterlce of contracts with Clti is the sensitive iea-cure of the subject contracts. This knowledge is restrictea to appro-xinlal?ely thirty-five persons in tiie company. The names of '-?nose persons to 'rmow of or are in a position to learn of these contracts are listed in Tab A. This inspection aisclosea that the names of ei?;iiteen persons uj the categories iii itiored above had not beers con- ;;iucveu Lor uubmiLii-al to LIA for security clearance. O'A:iicial:; (mil tca iiz+t ouch L;UUIni tta1 wol.i.}_o b ;i,;AIe tde (:Cirpor~, 't o 1 u"! ` U"1st:ioseU lout procedure Vr,LtXJ:Ln CIA do not lrl.iurc. triE ti- of all nww.s concerned, vith classified contracts for security c1.6c" I ante; personnel security clearances are performed by I ,- b on a name chock basis; USJ is not fi.ed of the results of name checks which take ce Memorandum ? UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Approved For Release 2000/09/08 : CIA-RDP78-04007A001000050013-2 Approved For Reise 2000/09/08 : CIA-RDI?78-04 07AO01000050013-2 appro:cimately from three to six weeks to perform; contractors are not notified it the checks are negative; employees are engaged in, clus::i.tied work oefore security clearcu,cP checks aro ,;,a,ue, auu continue oil such e:'g;loyme.,t unless the coritr,.:ctor is notified that derogatory information teas. been developed; a record of tiic: status of security clearances on nsaies F;ut,LZitted by contractors is i:rai.iitained by Coi aunications Division uSU , . 25X1A94`" (CSO/Cor ao) woes not consiaer the function of iaintaiiing security clearance records as properly belonp.ng to his office. i 3. T1ie actual aevelopment y;ork on performed by four persons, is in a physically restricted and rigidly con- trolleci area of ' the plait. Clas si ti ed Army siui Davy contracts are also beijif~- performed in this area unuer security regulations of 25X1A5a$hese Services. - of'f'iciai_s stated that the Depart ants of Array 4L Navy are interested in. the equipment being developed for Cud and ini' r atjo n ri o n concel irit; it has been supplied them with 25X1A9a. perrlisl;ion of izr (USG/Coi.~rrmo). 25X1A 4. Coi'cra.l t is for a standarc item of equipment, out tiie identi y of Cliff with the contract ana the quantity of tue order is considered as classified information. Officials of the company .;e~?e cognizant of the need i'or safeguaruing the identity of C.iA and had planned to ao so in shipping anc. billing, but t;iey were con:ubed by the apparent lack of instructions or conflicting or unexplained instructions in that connection. it was noted that the on j; iral purchase order (s'o3:.i i c - i Oj ), issued preliirdnan to t.ie executed contract, instructs that shipment will be made to "Central Iiitelligehce :Lgeucy." the company officials were acivisea "supply Ulficer," using the i'arylanu, as set for Lei in tiI , Contract. .iiie ufi'iciai.s e. z r d p essc concern re Z~I and iiit; the iu