CAREER SERVICE COMMITTEE WORKING GROUP ON EMPLOYEE RATING MINTUES OF 3RD MEETING, 1 NOVEMBER 1951 1:30 P.M.

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP78-03578A000300050035-4
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 12, 2016
Document Release Date: 
November 8, 2001
Sequence Number: 
35
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
November 7, 1951
Content Type: 
MIN
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP78-03578A000300050035-4.pdf95.79 KB
Body: 
25X1A 25X1A i;o? Approved For Present: e 2002/01/07 : 4DP78-03578.11300050035-4 ? aCtiRi-?'? ? ;?-':7-01RiAtT:17.-? 0 7 November 1951 atPWYEE UWE Minutes of IDA Jieetinio 1 Nov am, IL& 2.0,11. Secretary, Career Service Committee 1. The minutes of the meeting of 23 October were read end approved as corrected. The final sentenee of paragraph 3 was corrected to reads In view of this decision, consideration of job families in connection with Performance Rating was laid aside with the realization that this problem would again arise when the Working Group considered Evaluation of the enpleyee." 2. a. The portion of the proposed minutes of the Career Service Committee meeting of 30 October which pertained to this Parking Group were read and revised. The suggested reVision was incorporated in the minutes of the meeting as published. b. explained that paragraph 2 of the proposed minutes was inserted as a tactical move. It was agreed that it is better to receive prior concurrence formally from the Assistant Directors rather 25X1A than draw up peoposals which nay later prove unacceptable to them. 3. A Performance Rating form was presented by in accordance with instructions at the second meeting. Discussion of the form was limited In view of lack of clear definition of the purpose to be served by the form. 4. The Committee reached the following points of agreement as necessary factors in 4 Performance Rating system if such a system or systems is to be effective. a. A primary requirement for success of Performance Rating lies in proper training of the supervisor making such rating. Approved For Release 2002/01/07 : CIA-RDP78-03578A000300050035-4 Approved For Ore 2002/01/07 : q1A-RDP78-0357111300050035-4 SECU TY ,NEORMA b. There muat b free discis LC between the employee and the supervisor on all elements on aPerformance Rating is base& S. The meeting see adjourn 3:30 p.m. 25X1A Chairman Approved For Release 2002/01/07 : CIA-RDP78-03578A000300050035-4