SPY SUSPECT BALKED IN SLANDER SUIT BY CIA ' PRIVILEGE '

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP75-00001R000400190076-1
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
November 17, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 28, 2000
Sequence Number: 
76
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 29, 1966
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP75-00001R000400190076-1.pdf272.61 KB
Body: 
AND TLMJ3S HERALD APR 29 1966 Approved F;Q' Reieese 2000/d8/26' : CIA-RDP75-0009'IR000400190076-1 epect Balked. ,,in Slander-Suit byCIA"Privile ss~ XS% place In Federal Court to- $110,000,suit. 'The -defense. then sum? Heine, 46, now a/Canadian" anL111v1VISL', April ZU--A ""?` dL U111Un[5. on a iiaus sccurlty Would allow. weird confrontation t o o km?rtion to dismiss Heine's, 11 privileges Claimed 1bl11 i11L11\l1 . principals in yesterday's hearings In a case where an Estonian ominra was tohall.,a .. _.._ . _ _ ...e ,day between an accused So citizem, ariz and Raus, 39 a ed its previous prrvl- Melt spy and an 'admitted Washington highway engi- ~~claims.' It conceded ;operative of the Central In. neer; affected not to notice fhat ;any privileges impair For three hours the sup-,Mast met, Heine told news ` in 1960 posed spy, Estonian emigre I men in the Corridor, when Raus invited him t . o Eerik Heine, dourly watched hi give` h speech on his anti- s two lawyers try to root Communist exploits. intormatlon from the man (The Justice Department. ,who so labeled (him, 'fellow !and FBI refused to comment, ',emigre Yuri Raus. on the question of why But at each probe Raus's Heine is not being arrested, If he is ! accused ? of being a battery of live attorneys spy. One official noted pri-' dropped around (him a pro? vately that Heine's arrest. .tective claim of "privilege" might be construed as gross. based on two contelutlonst Interference In the Baltimore court action.) That In calling Heine a So- , 0 .viet spy he acted in his scope as it CIA agent, a n d that further disclosures' Would ? compromise = Ameri- can Intelligence.. - 'Case Is Continued Heine's larQM~lf I said It was pointless to go on. Chief Judge Roszel C. Robert J. Stanford, Heine looked small and-pinched, al- most furtive. The boyish; looking Raus at warily in - the . witness chair, pausing at each query'.f r ?mrR~ie2lii~e~ by CIA to defend him. t to begin;.'.Judge Thomsen' to an' extent the' Judicial sea;eh for truth" but argued !.that a r(ling against Raus; who Is "prevented by, the nature of his job frown de, fending himself," would.ex? pose "every agent of the CIA throughout the world to the peril" of law suits. Also 'submitted was CIA Director ' ?Adm. William F; Raborn's first statement in the 18-month-old case, lie said he bad t'personally de-1 termined" that further dis-) closures by Raus woufdj compromise intelligence .sources and methods. Raus revealed under ques % boning that his 1965 Arm ` and declined to F.77. res ?t.attended,,:_pn'.: "Intelllgende school." CIA counsel Hous.. ton added that Raus "was "Id_ directly ''or Indirectly for CIA service "during the,' times in question"-that 'is, ' in 1963 and 1964 when he, called Heine a Soviet agent' in order to, discredit him in Estonian emigre circles, 1 The' Judge ruled that, Raus did riot have to an? swer these questions: was Intelligence school part of. reserve duty? Was all his. I3ureau of Public Roads pay' for Bureau work? What was'. his Income beyond, Bureau and reserve pay? What, In- come did he report on Fed?9 eral tax returns? Raus said he had told Es:. tonlan emigres who doubted his charges against Heine to check with the FBI. Asked i If he had conferred with the,. FBI before saying that, Raus