INTRODUCTION OF BILL RELATING TO RETIREMENT OF EMPLOYEES UNDER THE CIVIL SERVICE RETIREMENT ACT

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP71B00364R000500120007-3
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
10
Document Creation Date: 
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 29, 2000
Sequence Number: 
7
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 29, 1968
Content Type: 
OPEN
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP71B00364R000500120007-3.pdf1.77 MB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2001/08/28 ? CIA-RDP71600364R000500120007-3 A it 29, 1968 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD ? SENATE S 4571 forms of service. The report also calls for a greater national commitment to preventive health care, including screen- ing for disease before illness can take hold. An emerging "retirement revolution": As more Americans retire earlier and live longer, they are contibuting to a "retirement revolution of such magni- tude and significance that it deserves national attention and probably new di- rections in national policy." The com- mittee calls for passage of a bill requir- ing preretirement training in Federal agencies. It also asks for experimenta- tion by the Administration on Aging in establshing new kinds of work-life pat- terns including phased retirement plans and new kinds of part-time work. Edu- cational television is described as having great potential usefulness to the retire- ment and preretirement community. Employment opportunities: Anticipat- ing that the Age Discrimination in Em- ployment Act of 1967 will "speed other changes necessary for full and effective uge of older workers," the committee also welcomes the establishment by the De- partment of Labor of a major pilot pro- gram intended to fulfill several objec- tives of a proposed older Americans com- munity service program. Housing and a livable environment: The rent supplement program "should be extended to serve additional numbers of Americans who, in any of several ways, stand in special need of its assistance." In addition, the model cities program should pay sufficient heed to the elderly and "their unique problems and special needs?as well as the contributions they can make to the citizen participation aspects of individual projects." Long-term care: The report commends legislation enacted last year to raise standards in nursing homes, but also ob- serves: Meaningful and comprehensive progress will not be achieved until the resources of the total health community are utilized to provide the quality and degree of care de- sired for the elderly in a truly comprehensive spectrum of services. Role of Administration on Aging: Created by the Older Americans Act of 1965, the AOA was absorbed by a new agency in a reorganization plan adopted by the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare in August. Today's Senate committee report says that the reorga- nization raises serious questions about the possible downgrading of the AOA. War on poverty and the elderly: The report asks for "full implementation of 1967 amendments that directed estab- lishment of more adequate programs on behalf of the .elderly by the Office of Eco- nomic Opportunity." Social services: Project FIND, an out- reach program for the elderly poor, has already demonstrated that a great need exists for additional FIND-type projects. The report also discusses long-range needs likely "in the face of foreseeable Increased demands for service." Consumer interests: The report de- scribes new educational programs begun by Federal agencies in 1967 to help older Americans get the most for their dollars in today's complex marketplace. The re- port also comments: ? There is much room for experimentation and discussion about the design of apart- ments and fixtures used in federally assisted housing accommodations for the elderly. The receptive attitude at the Department of Housing and Urban Development to sugges- tions already received leads to the conclusion that further exploration will be productive. I would also like to thank the subcom- mittee chairmen for their productive work during the year: FRANK E. Moss, chairman, Housing for the Elderly and Long-Term Care; JENNINGS RANDOLPH, chairman, Employment and Retirement Incomes; EDWARD M. KENNEDY, chair- man, Federal, State, and Community Services; GEORGE A. SMATHERS, chairman, Health of the Elderly; WALTER F. MON- DALE, chairman, Retirement and the In- dividual. Finally, some mention should be made of the excellent and very helpful reports made by Federal Departments and Agen- cies at the request of the committee. The reports are reproduced in the appendix to the report. Mr. President, I ask unanimous con- sent that the report be printed, together with minority views. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The re- port will be received; and, without objec- tion, the report will be printed, as re- quested by the Senator from New Jersey. EXECUTIVE REPORT OF A COMMITTEE As in executive session, The following favorable report of a committee was submitted: By Mr. FULBRIGHT, from the Committee on Foreign Relations, without reservation: Executive P. 90th Congress, first session, Convention on International Exhibitions (Ex. Rept. No. 2) . BILLS INTRODUCED Bills were introduced, read the first time, and, by unanimous consent, the second time, and referred as follows: By Mr. BROOKE: S. 3397. A bill for the relief of Foo Ting Yee; and S. 3398. A bill for the relief of Cheng-huai Li; to the Committee on the Judiciary. By Mr. CASE: S. 3399. A bill to amend the Federal Avia- tion Act of 1958 in order to provide for regu- lation of public exposure to sonic booms by certain aircraft over the United States; to the Committee on Commerce. (See the remarks of Mr. CASE when he in- troduced the above bill, which appear under a separate heading.) By Mr. MORSE: S. 3400. A bill to provide Federal assistance to States for improving elementary and sec- ondary teachers' salaries, for meeting the urgent needs of elementary and secondary education, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Labor and Public Welfare, (See the remarks of Mr. MORSE when he introduced the above bill, which appear under a separate heading.) By Mr. SMATHERS: S. 3401. A bill for the relief of James L. Shull; and S. 3402. A bill for the relief of Lt. (junior grade) Richard A. Jackson, U.S. Naval Re- serve; to the Committee on the Judiciary. By Mr. JACKSON (by request) : S. 3403. A bill to designate the Flat Tops Wilderness, Routt'and White River National Forests, in the State of Colorado; to the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs. (See the remarks of Mr. JACKSON when he introduced the above bill, which appear under a separate heading.) By Mr, BREWSTER: S. 3404. A bill to amend the Civil Service .13atirement Act to authorize the retirement of employees after 25 years of service with- out reduction in annuity; to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service. (See the remarks of Mr. BREWSTER when he introduced the above bill, which appear under a separate heading.) S. 3399?INTRODUCTION OF BILL TO DEAL WITH QUESTION OF OVER- LAND SST FLIGHTS Mr. CASE, Mr. President, I introduce, for appropriate reference, a bill to help resolve the question of whether super- sonic transports should be permitted to fly over the United States in such a man- ner as to create sonic booms. Possibly in less than 3 years supersonic transports?SST's--capable of flying twice the speed of sound, or about 1,200 miles an hour, will begin rolling off Eu- ropean production lines and into com- mercial service throughout the world. Already six major U.S. airlines have or- derd a total of 38 of these Concordes, and 10 foreign airlines, most of which fly to the United States, have ordered 36 more. While some delays have occurred in developing the 1,800 miles per hour American version of the SST, it is ex- pected to be in commercial serivce by 1974 or 1975. The U.S. SST fleet will range anywhere from 200 to 1,200 planes. It is clear that we must begin now to prepare for the advent of the commercial supersonic age. We are fortunate that time for action remains before the first commercial Concordes appear in Amer- ican skies. It is the purpose of my bill to ban overland flights at supersonic speeds until all aspects of the sonic boom have been investigated and Congress has de- cided whether such flights should be per- mitted. Specifically, my bill will (first) ban nonmilitary supersonic flights over the United States and its territories and pos- sessions for an indefinite period; second, provide for a 2-year program of inten- sive scientific investigation into all as- pects of the boom; and, third, put the decision on overland flights at more than the speed of sound in the hands of the Congress. The rapid approach of the commercial supersonic age confronts us with some difficult choices. On the one hand we are naturally eager to take advantage of the faster means of travel that the super- sonics will provide. But on the other we should be aware of the penalties we may have to pay for permitting supersonic airliners, trailed by their thunderous sonic booms, to fly over land, particularly over heavily populated areas. Contrary to what many may believe, the boom follows continuously in the track of a plane moving faster than the speed of sound, and may be as much as 50 to 80 miles wide throughout a super- sonic flight. On a single flight across the United States, the experts believe, as many as 10 to 20 million persons may be boomed by a supersonically operated SST. Far more is involved than the shatter- ing affront to the ears. Already initial Approved For Release 2001/08/28 : CIA-RDP711300364R0,00500120007-3 S 4572 Approved For Release 2001/08/28 : CIA-RDP71600364R000500120007-3 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD ? SENATE April 29, 1968 tests have resulted in cracked plaster, broken windows, and tumbling bric-a- brac though studies on structural dam- age are so far inconclusive. More impor- tantly yet to be answered are such ques- tions as the effect of the boom on per- sons with heart ailments, on surgeons in the midst of delicate operations, on sleeping people, on weak buildings, on mountains laden with snow or loose rocks and on ancient geological formations, a few areas of deep concern. Hn short, is the boom tolerable? The tests conducted in Oklahoma City in 1964, for example, showed that 2'7 per- cent of the residents of that community could not tolerate eight booms a day. No tests were made at night. The American taxpayer, who is pay- ing?on a reimbursable basis, he hopes? f o 90 percent of the cost of developing the U.S. SST prototype, is clearly entitled to ask whether the SST project amounts to progress. Prompted by growing con- cern over the destructive potential of the sonic boom, people at all levels of gov- ernment and industry, as well as the pub- lic at large, are asking some pointed ques- tions about the program: For example, are the convenience of the few who will use the plane and the competitive ad- vantage it will bring to the airline and aircraft industries worth the billions it may cost to develop the SST and the pos- si ale deterioration to the environment that may be caused? One of the more im- portant aspects of that question is whether supersonic flights over the United States should be permitted if the boom, a product of physical laws, can- not be reduced to tolerable levels, assum- irg such levels exist. As matters presently stand the Fed- eral Aviation Administration apparently has sufficient authority to give the an- swer to this question. Unfortunately, the FAA is not only in charge of SST devel- opment in the United States, but un- ci pubtedly is the country's leading advo- cate of the project and its commercial and economic potential. Further, its position on the question o supersonic overflights has been ambiv- alent. On the one hand it states that fur- ther testing is needed before the question cm be answered. But on another, the head of the SST project for FAA has been quoted as saying that "the public will have to learn to accept sonic boom to a degree." Even were the FAA not in this awk- ward position, a decision on multiple cverland supersonic flights is too im- portant to be left in the hands of a single Government agency. Clearly the people themselves must be permitted to decide through their elected representa- tives in the Congress. But what criteria will Congress use in arriving at such a decision? I, and I think most Americans, believe that the health and welfare of our people and the quality of the environment we live in should be the central consideration. My bill is designed to assure that Con- gress can make up its mind about super- sonic overland flights on the basis of the broadest criteria possible. It will do this ay directing the FAA to conduct a com- prehensive, 2-year research effort into all aspects Of the sonic boom. In carrying out its study, the FAA also is directed by My bill to consult with seven departments and agencies with either expertise in the sonic boom field or concerns about the boom's effects on various facets of Ameri- can life. A number of studies have been made or are underway and the National Academy of Sciences has recommended additional research. An interim as well as a final report to the Congress is re- quired by my bill. The other part of my bill is the in- definite ban on supersonic flights. The purpose of this ban is to give Congress an opportunity to deliberate the super- sonic overflight question in an atmos- phere of calm. Such an atmosphere might not prevail if, at the time of congressional consideration, the Concorde is filling our skies with sonic booms. The threat of the sonic boom is fur- ther illustration of the conflict between man's drive for technological progress and his desire for a livable environment. But as a nation I believe we are moving from blind idolization of technology to recognition that we must also be con- cerned with its effect on the quality of life and the livability of the environment. In short, I believe we want technolog- ical and physical progress, but we want it on acceptable terms. Insofar as this is possible with the sonic boom, my bill would help in achiev- ing it. I hope, therefore, that hearings can be held on my bill in this session of Congress. Mr. President, I ask unanimous con- sent that the text of my bill be printed in the RECORD at the conclusion of my re- marks. The PRESIDING OteraCER. The bill will be received and appropriately re- ferred; and, without objection, the bill will be printed in the RECORD. The bill (S. 3399) to amend the Fed- eral Aviation Act of 1958 in order to pro- vide for regulation of public exposure to sonic booms by certain aircraft over the United States, introduced by Mr. CASE, was received, read twice by its title, referred to the Committee on Commerce, and ordered to be printed in the RECORD, as follows: National Aeronautics and Space Administra- tion, and the President of the National Aca- demy of Sciences, and (13) such research as may be necessary, which shall include, but not be limited to, the startle effect and physiological or psychological problems that result from sonic booms and the possible de- trimental effects on preservation of natural beauty and historic shrines; (3) within one year from the date of enactment of this sub- section make a report to the Congress on his findings as of that time, together with the written comments of the above-mentioned officials; and (4) no later than two years from the date of enactment of this subsec- tion, report to Congress on the final results of his findings, together with the final writ- ten comments of such Federal officials." S. 3399 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 307 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 is amended by inserting at the end thereof a new subsection as follows: "REGULATION OF SONIC BOOMS "(g) The Administrator shall (1) prohibit nonmilitary aircraft, singly or in any com- bination thereof, from being operated over the United States (including territories and possessions thereof) in such a way as to pro- duce sonic booms, but such prohibition shall not apply to aircraft used in the investiga- tion and study herein authorized; (2) con- duct a full and complete investigation and study for the purpose of determining what exposures to sonic booms (amount and fre- quency) are detrimental to the health and welfare of any persons, and such investiga- tion and study shall include (A) consulta- tion with the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Develop- ment, the Secretary of the Interior, the Sec- retary of Commerce, the Administrator of the S. 3400?INTRODUCTION OF BILL ENTITLED "GENERAL EDUCATION ASSISTANCE ACT OF 1968" Mr. MORSE. Mr. President, I intro- duce a bill which has the short title, "General Education Assistance Act of 1968." I am greatly indebted to the Na- tional Education Association for having given me the opportunity to present to the Senate and to the Committee on La- bor and Public Welfare the language of the proposal which was drafted by their Legislative Commission. This measure incorporates the view of the organization with respect to the next forward step which they determine to be in the public interest to have en- acted. The bill reflects the hopes and aspirations of school teachers in every State, for it is a general Federal aid to education measure. We have made great strides since 1930 in the enactment of educational legisla- tion, but this legislation has necessarily until now consisted of measures which were relatively narrowly drawn to meet specific problems?in short, there has been categorical aid. But the men and women of the National Education Association Legislative Commission have come to the judgment that excellent as these programs are and have been, they do not strike to the root of the problems. These are the problems which beset our school systems. These are the prob- lems which are of major concern to the dedicated men and women who serve our children in the schools of our country. These are the problems which loom large in every community. What are they? Essentially, as with most problems, they are caused by unmet needs. They are caused by inadequate or unavailable financial resources for edu- cation. Many of our citizens feel that the special aids that have been given, valua- ble though they have been and are, nevertheless suffer from one drawback and that is that they necessarily import into our system of school support finan- cial rigidities, and to an extent, cause a distortion in the pattern of financing. Because of this, it has been suggested that over and above, and in addition to, existing financial aids to schools and schoolchildren, there is needed a flexible and massive program of general school aid. This, the bill that-I introduce today seeks to accomplish. It would provide beginning in fiscal year 1970 and extending through fiscal year 1974 two types of grants. The basic Approved For Release 2001/08/28 : CIA-RDP71600364R000500120007-3 94?pproved-For j R p gqtsga(18038 abli1E711KIM000500120007-3 A il 29, 1 S 4575 Remainder: current expenditures, includ- ing expenditures for employing additional teachers and teacher aids, pretchool and summer programs, State educational ex- penditures. Iv. APPLICATIONS State agency is applicant "at such time or times, in such manner and containing or accompanied by such information as the Commissioner deems necessary"; fundt to supplement, not supplant. State and local funds; no comingling with State funds; "to the extent consistent with law," programs and services to meet current expenditures to be provided on equitable basit to children in nonpublic schools; 1% or $150,000, which- ATTACHMENT B STATE ALLOCATIONS UNDER $6 BILLION NEA PROGRAM ever is greater, for State administrative ex- penses ($25,000 for outlying areas). V. JUDICIAL REVIEW State may seek judicial review in U.S. Court of Appeals of Commissioner's deci- sion; local educational agency may seek Ju- dicial review of State decision. State Basic grant (millions) ? Equalization grant (millions) 3 Total.grant (millions) 4 Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware $96.1 FL 4 46.3 50.8 487.0 54.0 73.0 14.4 $19.6 1.0 7.6 10.8 52.9 7.5 7.4 1.6 $115.7 9.4 53.9 60. 8 539.9 61.5 80.4 16. 0 District of Columbia 18.4 1.9 20. 3 Florida 149. 4 21. 4 170. 8 Georgia 122. 4 21. 6 144. 0 Hawaii 20.6 2.8 23. 4 Idaho 20.0 3.5 23. 5 Illinois 276.4 30.0 306. 4 Indiana 134.5 17.8 152.3 Iowa 72.5 10.0 82. 5 Kansas 60.0 8.2 68. 2 Kentucky 94.5 15.4 99. 9 Louisiana Maine 106. 0 26.0 20. 5 4.2 126. 5 30. 2 Maryland 99. 0 12. 3 III. 3 Massachusetts 135.0 15.0 150.0 Michigan 238.0 30.9 268. 9 Minnesota 100.5 14.6 115.1 Mississippi 67. 4 17. 1 84. 5 Missouri 118.0 15.7 133.7 Montana Nebraska 20.0 37. 7 3.3 5. 2 23. 3 42. 9 Nevada 11.5 1.3 12. 8 Total amount per child (5-17 years) 5 State $120.40 New Hampshire 111.90 New Jersey 116.41 New Mexico 119.69 New York 110.86 North Carolina 113.89 North Dakota 110. 14 Ohio 111. 11 Oklahoma 110.33 Oregon 114.32 Pennsylvania 117.65 Rhode Island 113.59 South Carolina 117.58 South Dakota 110.85 Tennessee 113.23 Texas 113.79 Utah 113.67 Vermont 118.22 Virginia 119.34 Washington 116.15 West Virginia 112.42 Wisconsin III. 11 Wyoming 112.98 American Samoa 114.53 Guam 125. 37 Puerto Rico 113.31 Virgin Islands 116.50 Trust territories 113. 79 111. 30 U.S. total Basic grant (millions) 2 Equalization grant (millions) 3 Total grant (millions) Total amount per child (5-17 years) 5 $17.6 $2.4 $20.8 $113.64 172.5 18.3 190.8 110.61 31.5 6.1 37.6 119.37 432.5 43.6 476.1 110.08 134.4 24.7 159.1 118.38 18.0 3.2 21.2 117.78 280.5 37.2 317.7 113.26 60, 9 9. 4 70. 3 115. 44 51. 5 6.8 58. 3 113. 20 289. 0 36. 4 325. 4 112. 60 22.2 2.7 24.9 112.16 73. 6 16. 1 89. 7 121. 88 18.8 3.4 22.2 118.09 99. 8 18. 0 117. 8 118. 04 294.4 47.6 342.0 116.17 31.3 5.6 36.9 117.89 11.1 1.8 12.9 116.22 118.3 18.0 136.3 115.22 82.3 18.4 92.7 112.64 46.5 8.5 55.0 118.28 115. 0 15. 8 130. 8 113. 74 8. 9 1. 3 10. 2 114. 61 1.1 .3 1.4 125.37 2.6 8.7 3.3 125.37 90. 7 22. 9 113. 6 125. 37 1.3 .3 1.6 3.3 .8 4.1 125.37 5,257. 4 742. 6 6,000. 0 114. 12 S. 3403-INTRODUCTION OF BILL TO DESIGNATE THE FLAT TOPS WIL- DERNESS, ROUTT AND WHITE RIVER NATIONAL FORESTS, IN THE STATE OF COLORADO Mr. JACKSON. Mr. President, as you know, the President has transmitted to the Congress proposals for the addition of 26 new areas to the national wilder- ness preservation system. Several of these proposals have already been in- troduced and referred to the Senate In- terior and Insular Affairs Committee, of which I am chairman. By request, I now introduce, for ap- propriate reference, a bill to designate the Flat Tops Wilderness Area in the Routt and White River National Forests of Colorado. The total wilderness acreage would be 142,230, including 99,489 acres of the existing Flat Tops Primitive Area, plus 42,741 acres of adjacent lands. The area is located on the White River Plateau in northwestern Colorado, ap- proximataely 20 miles north of the town of Glenwood Springs and 30 miles southwest of the town of Steamboat Springs. The proposed wilderness lies within 250 miles of approximately 2 million people. A variety of wilderness characteristics Is offered by this high-elevation plateau and its rugged river canyons. There are sheer volcanic escarpments, alpine peaks and open grass parks. The area features an abundance of mountain scenery, solitude, tranquil lakes, rushing streams, abundant wildlife, and virtu- ally no evidence of man's intrusion. A hearing on the wilderness proposal was held in Glenwood Springs by the Forest Service on October 10, 1966. Eighty-nine oral presentations were made, and more than 350 letters were received. At the hearing, there was dis- agreement over the size and boundary of the proposed area, but there was over- whelming sentiment in favor of adding the Flat Tops area to the national wil- derness preservation system. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The bill will be received and appropriately re- ferred. The bill (S. 3403) to designate the Flat Tops Wilderness, Routt and White River National Forests, in the State of Colo- rado, introduced by Mr. JACKSON (by re- quest), was received, read twice by its title, and referred to the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs. S. 344-INTRODUCTION OF BILL RELATING TO RETIREMENT OF EMPLOYEES UNDER THE CIVIL SERVICE RETIREMENT ACT Mr. BREWSTER. Mr. President, I am today introducing, for appropriate ref- erence, a bill to amend the Civil Service Retirement Act to authorize the re- tirement of employees after 25 years of service without reduction in annuity. Such a bill, allowing retirement at 25 years, will naturally be most attractive to those workers who have reached this point in their careers. It will allow them to serve their professions to their fullest capacity and yet to leave Government service at an age when they are still able to pursue other profitable endeavors. It will also allow them to enjoy richer, more meaningful retired years which their families can share. Second. With the emphasis on the excellence of youth that is so prevalent in our Nation today, we have a wealth of young people eager for employment and advancement. My bill will obviously make Federal service more attractive as their chosen profession. It will give us a chance to employ people in the prime of their working years, to promote readily in order to derive maximum benefit from their potentials, and to streamline our civil service functions. Mr. President, I believe that this legis- lation will be beneficial to everyone con- cerned. It will appeal to the Federal em- ployee about to retire, to the young em- ployee anticipating a profitable Federal career, and to the Federal Government, which can look forward to a more effi- cient, viable, and eager labor force. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The bill will be received and appropriately re- ferred. The bill (S. 3404) to amend the Civil Service Retirement Act to authorize the retirement of employees after 25 years of service without reduction in annuity, introduced by Mr. BREWSTER, was re- ceived, read twice by its title, and re- ferred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service. ADDITIONAL COSPONSORS OF BILLS AND JOINT RESOLUTION Mr. HARTKE. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that, at its next ? Approved For Release 2001/08/28 : CIA-RDP71600364R000500120007-3 Approved For Release 2001/08/28 : CIA-RDP71600364R000500120007-3 S 4576 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD ? SENATE April 29, 1968 printing, the name of the Senator from Ceorgia [Mr. TALMADGE] be added as a cosponsor of the bill (S. 2429) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 to al- low an income tax credit to employers for the expenses of providing training to their employees and prospective em- POyees under approved programs. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered. Mrs. SMITH. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that, at its next printing, the name of the Senator from Minnesota [Mr. Mommta] be added as a cosponsor of the bill (S. 2862) to enable potato growers to finance a nationally coordinated research and promotion pro- gram to improve their competitive posi- tion and expand their markets for po- tatoes by increasing consumer accept- ance of such potatoes and potato prod- nets and by improving the quality of potatoes and potato products that are made available to the consumer. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordeted. Mr. WILLIAMS of New Jersey. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that, at its next printing, the name of the senior Senator from New York [Mr. etsvITS] be added as a cosponsor of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 117) to pro- vile that it be the sense of Congress that a White House Conference on Aging be called by the President. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered. SENATE RESOLUTION 282?RESOLU- TION TO PRINT AS A SENATE DOC- UMENT A REPORT BY SENATOR ?TENDER ENTITLED "REVIEW OF UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS IN SOUTH ASIA" Mr. ELLENDER submitted the follow- ing resolution (S. Res. 282) ; which was re [erred to the Committee on Rules and Administration: S. RES. 282 Resolved, That a report entitled "Review of United States Government Operations in South Asia", submitted by Senator ALLEN J. ELLENDER to the Senate Committee on Ap- propriations on April 2, 1968, be printed as a Senate document; and that two thousand two hundred additional copies of such docu- ment be printed for the use of that commit- tee. SENATE RESOLU LION 283---RESOLU- TION TO PRINT ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THE SENATE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY S. ,917, THE SAFE STREETS AND CRIME CONTROL ACT McCLELLAN submitted a resolu- tion (S. Res. 283) authorizing the print- ing of additional copies of the Senate Re- port to accompany S. 917, the Safe Streets and Crime Control Act, which was considered and agreed to. ;See the above resolution printed in full when submitted by Mr. McCLELLAN, which appears under a separate head- ing.) OMNIBUS CRIME CONTROL AND SAFE STREETS ACT OF 1967? AMENDMENT AMENDMENT NO. 708 Mr. HRUSKA. Mr. President, earlier today there has been reported to the Senate, out of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, S. 917 together with a re- port thereon, including minority, indi- vidual, and additional views. In due and proper time, this Senator, on behalf of himself and several of his colleagues, will call up an amendment in the nature of a substitute to title IV of said bill. At this time I submit the amendment, and ask that it be printed. Mr. President, I ask unanimous con- sent that a sectional analysis of the pro- visions of this amendment be printed in the RECORD at this point. I ask further unanimous consent that the text of that amendment itself be printed in the REC- ORD following the analysis referred to. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The amendment will be received, printed, and will lie on the table; and, without objec- tion, the analysis and amendment will be printed in the RECORD. The analysis, presented by Mr. HRUSKA, is as follows: SECTIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE PROVISIONS OF AMENDMENT PART A? FEDERAL FIREARMS ACT AMENDMENTS Section 901 Section 901 of amendment?amends sec-. tion 1 of the Federal Firearms Act (52 Stat. 1250) by restating and clarifying existing definitions contained in the act and adding several new definitions. The definition of "person" is unchanged. The terms "interstate or foreign commerce," "firearm," "manufacturer," "dealer," and "fugitive from justice," have been restated and clarified. The term "ammunition" has been deleted. The terms "State," "pawn- broker," "Secretary," "indictment," and "published ordinance" are new. Paragraph (1) The definition of the term "person" in paragraph (1) of amendment--is unchanged from the existing law (15 U.S.C. 901(1) ). Paragraph (2) Paragraph (2) of section 901 of amend- ment?adds a new definition "State" to sim- plify and clarify later provisions of the bill and the existing law. The Canal Zone is in- cluded in the definition. Previously it was excluded. Also included are the Common- wealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands, and American Samoa, the principal Commonwealth and possessions of the United States, Paragraph (3) Paragraph (3) restates the existing defini- tion of "interstate or foreign commerce" (15 U.S.C. 901(2) ). However, language has been removed that has been defined in para- graph (2) above. Paragraph (4) Paragraph (4) restates the definition of "firearm" and revises it to exclude from the act antique firearms made in 1898 or earlier. Also mufflers and silencers for firearms are removed from the definiiton. The year 1898 was selected as the "cutoff" date on the basis of testimony presented to Congress by several gun collectors organize- ? tions and to be conssistent with the regula- tions on importation of firearms issued by the Department of State pursuant to section 414 of the Mutual Security Act of 1954. Mufflers and silencers for firearms are ex- cluded from coverage since these items are included presently in the National Firearms Act (Ch. 53 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954). This act provides for heavy transfer taxes and registration of all such items. Also excluded from the present definition of the term "firearm" Is "any part or parts" of a firearm. Experience in the administration of the Federal Firearms Act has indicated that it is impractical to treat each small part as if it were a firearm. The revised definition substitutes the words "frame or receiver" for the words "any part or parts," Added to the term "firearm" are weapons which "may be readily converted to" a fire- arm. The purpose of this addition is to in- clude specifically any starter gun designed for use with blank ammunition which will or which may be readily converted to expel a projectile or projectiles by the action of an explosive. Starter pistols have been found to be a matter of serious concern to law enforcement officers. Paragraph (5) The definition of the term "handgun" in paragraph (5) is a new provision. This defini- tion is necessary because of later provisions of the bill which have application solely to these firearms. There is no intention that handguns be exempted from any of the other provision of amendment since a handgun is a firearm within the meaning of paragraph (4) above. The term includes "pistols," "revolvers" and "any other weapons originally designed to be fired by the use of a single hand" which are made to be fired by the use of a single hand and which are designed to fire or are capable of firing fixed cartridge ammunition. Paragraph (6) The definition of the term "manufacturer" is a restatement of existing law (15 U.S.C. 901(4) ) except that references to ammuni- tion, cartridge cases, primers, bullets, or pro- pellant powder" have been striken. This deletion was made because experience in the administration of the Federal Firearms Act has showed that it is extremely difficult to control interstate and foreign commerce in ammunition. The requirement that the manufacturer be "in the business of" manufacturing or im- porting firearms has been added to the defini- tion to conform with a similar provision in the definition of "dealer." Paragraph (7) The definition of the term "dealer" is a restatement of existing law (15 U.S.C. 901(5) ) except that references to "ammunition, Car- tridge cases, primers, bullets, or propellant powder" have been stricken as in the defini- tion of "manufacturer" above. The word ."special" has been stricken from the definition since a gunsmith or other per- son in the business of repairing firearms should be required to comply with the pro- visions of the Federal Firearms Act if he fits only barrels which do not fall into "special" category. The words "or breech mechanism" have been stricken because they are unnecessary to a complete description of the functions performed by a person in the business of repairing firearms. Other minor rephrasing of the language in the definition has been made to clarify the existing language. Paragraph (8) The definition of the term "pawnbroker" is a new provision. Pawnbroker dealers are Approved For Release 2001/08/28 : CIA-RDP71600364R000500120007-3 Approved For Release 2001/08/28 : CIA-RDP71600364R000500120007-3 April 25, .1968 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD -- Extensions of Remarks E 3383 if they are to continue their present pace of economic development while avoiding an intolerable debt burden. A replenishment of IDA's resources will assure the continued flow of capital re- sources to developing nations on terms they can afford. And it will be money wisely and soundly spent, for the Asso- ciation has achieved a high reputation for efficient management of its resources. IDA must not be permitted to go out of business for want of adequate funds. Pronipt action by the United States is essential in order to bring this second replenishment promptly. Like the 17 other nations that have pledged addi- tional resources, the United States must show that it is still resolved to help the developing nations build better lives-for their people. Lawrence F. O'Brien HON. SILVIO 0. CONTE Or MASSACHUSETTS IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Wednesday,. April 24, 1968 Mr. CONTE. Mr. Speaker, Lawrence F. O'Brien has served his country as Post- master General with effectiveness and efficiency, and he has established a rec- ord as head of his Department which will be difficult to surpass. During his term of service there has been a great forward movement in the Post Office. There has been greater pro- ductivity through better utilization of employees. There has been moderniza- tion, mechanization, stepped-up research programs, expansion of data-processing systems, and construction of facilities. All this has been done in the face of an ever-increasing volume of mail, and It has been done with a consistent effort to keep the cost to the American tax- payer down. As ranking Republican member of the House Appropriations' Treasury-Post Of- fice Subcommittee, I have had an oppor- tunity to see the tremendous job he has done in this difficult position. Larry ' O'Brien has been the innovator of many new ideas, and he has given the employ- ees of the Department the necessary mo- tivation to get the job done. In a recent letter to me, Larry recalled our work together during which time many difficult and politically sensitive subjects have been considered. He wrote: During all of my many contacts with you end the Committee, I have never detected -the slightest partisan element that might have diverted attention from what you con- eidered to be in the best interests of the Post Office Department and the American people. Throughout all of our years of work together' Larry O'Brien has consistently proven that the best interests of his Department have been uppermost in his ? own mind, and I am deeply grateful to him for the recognition he has accorded me, His clear, concise, and bold approach to the problems of the Department have given a new dimension to the Post Office, and this Department is doing a better job today than it has ever done before in its history. Larry O'Brien has been a valued friend of mine for many years, and our personal and working relationship has been a close and a fruitful one. He deserves the congratulations of the House of Repre- sentatives for accepting the challenge of the Post Office, and for the vigorous steps he has taken from his very first day in office. I firmly believe that if there was ever a man in this country who has had the ability to resolve the vexing problems confronting his Department?and any problems he may face in the future? that man is Larry O'Brien. His record of service here in Washing- ton is an illustrious one, and one of which he and all his family can be justly proud. All of his years have been character- ized by loyal and dedicated public service. I am certain that I do not stand alone?either among the members of my committee or among my colleagues in the House?in offering Larry O'Brien our best wishes on a job well done. The whole Nation owes him a debt of gratitude. Conquest of Inner Space HON. JAMES H. (JIMMY) QUILLEN OF TENNESSEE IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, April 25, 1968 Mr. QUILLEN. Mr. Speaker, at the re- cent National School Boards Associa- tion's 28th annual convention in Detroit, one of the highlights of the convention was a presentation of a paper on "New Ideas in School Building." It was presented by Dr. Homer Mincy, who is Superintendent of Schools of Greene- ville, Tenn. For the interest of our col- leagues and other readers of the RECORD, I insert Dr. Mincy's presentation at this point: CONQUEST OF INNER SPACE Horace Mann wrote in 1838: "When it is considered that more than five-sixths of all the children in the state spend a consider- able portion of their lives in the schoolhouse, the general condition of those buildings and their influence on the young stand forth at once as topics of prominence and magnitude. The construction of schoolhouse connects it- self closely with the love of study, with proficiency, health, anatomical formation, and length of life." The only change to be made in Mann's observations as applied to 1968 would be that all of the children spend a considerable portion of their lives in the classroom. In some instances, one might also compare some of our present conditions with Mann's charge of 130 years ago that "from the had construction of our schoolhouses there is more physical suffering endured by our children in them than by prisoners in our jails and prisons." Any school building must realize one major purpose?the facilitation of the educational program and the architect's primary respon- sibility becomes the creation of a physical environment which will contribute to and facilitate the performance of the many edu- cational tasks and functions defined. That the need for flexibility and adoptability to be built into every building is essential is ob- vious when one considers that educational theory is iii such a constant state of growth and we live in an unsurpassed era of tech- nological advancement. In assessing existing or projected school buildings one must observe that school con- struction is moving away from puritan aus- terity?the guilt complex about comfort is no longer prevalent. Children are winning a new right: the right to be comfortable. Com- fort, according to some who have worked in the field of establishing a satisfatcory physi- cal environment, can make as much as 15 per cent difference in the productivity of children and teachers. Within the framework I have indicated, it would seem appropriate to entitle my re- marks, "Conquest of Inner Space." It is within the interiors of school buildings that new ideas in school buildings are being effected. Nearly ten years ago, Educational Facilities Laboratory in The Cost of a Schoolhouse projected nine concepts of school buildings of the future, prime considerations for school planners in 1968. Four concepts drawn from the original nine tell how inner space of school facilities is being conquered. (The remaining portion of the presenta- tion will involve the showing of approxi- mately sixty (60) slides which are descrip- tive of the concepts: (1) new forms and sur- faces; (2) flexibility; (3) children learn from teachers and machines; and (4) the learning environment. The concepts to be established could be summarized as follows: 1. New Forms and Surfaces?The slides will explore the thesis that new exterior forms and materials are being utilized today that enable the architect to spend less money on the exterior of the building in order that interior space may more adequately enhance the learning situation. 2. Flexibility?These slides will show how open or divisible spaces can provide for a more functional program. 3. Children Learn from Teachers and Ma- chines?Slides will indicate changes that are taking place through provision for a more highly integrated use of all teaching media. 4. The Learning Environment?Accent will be on the visual environment, the thermal environment, the acoustical environment, and furniture and equipment.) Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. HON. SPARK M. MATSUNAGA OF HAWAII IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thur,sday, April 25, 1968 Mr. MATSUNAGA, Mr. Speaker, a very, moving poem which underscores the sad- ness felt throughout the Nation over the loss of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., has been written by a former Hawaii circuit court judge, the Honorable Maurice Sapienza, now a distinguished Milwaukee attorney. In the confidence that it will be ap- preciated by my eolleagues and readers of the CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, I insert Mr. Sapienza's poem at this point in the RECORD: DR. MARTIN LUTHER KI/VG, JR. (By Maurice Sapienza) I had a dream . . . And though I shall dream no more, Will you dream Of racism gone, of war no more? I had a dream . . . Of dying before life should have ended; Of falling before I had finished standing; Of silence before I had finished talking. Approved For Release 2-001/08/28 : CIA-RDP71p00364R000500120007-3 E13384 Approved For Release 2001/08/28 : CIA-RDP71600364R000500120007-3 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD? Extensions of Remarks April 25, 190) Will you dream Of hying where rights could be ended? Of shorating where voices have not been heard? Of moving where no one had yet been stirred? I had a dreain That you will dream What I no longer dream. IE Civil Service Retirement An/glides N. FRED SCHIATENGEL 021' IOWA IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES rhursday, April 25, 1968 Mr. SCHWENGm,? me, speaker, / am Introducing a bill to establish the prin- ciple Of parity in civil service retirement annuities. It is introduced to correct the present inequities in such annuities as the.reselit of different retirement for- IOW& over the past years which have in no Ineans been compensated by ,small aeresS-the-board percentage increases and iteent adjustments in line with per- tentage Increases in the Consumer Price inse.administration and the respective emoMittees concerned have been unques- , tionably influenced by the joint report of the Annan of the Budget, the Civil Serv- ice Cebunission, and the Cabinet Coin- Mitts* on Federal Staff Retirement Sys- teMS CH.. Doc, 42,, 88th Cong.), which, while admitting that "it is the respon- sibility of the Government to maintain the annuities of its retirees and survivors at a living comparable to what. they had, and rightfully expected to have at the tithe of retirement,' maintains that "the prenent method of making adjustments based cm increases in the Consumer Price Index aerves this purpose well and should be maintained." This contention is re- futed ter stateinents by the U.S. Depart- Ment of Labor in its recent publication entitled ``'The Consumer Price Index?A Short Description 1967," which asserts that the Index applies to wage earners with annual pay of $8,000 or more and is "not,dlffctlY applicable to any other oc- groltp" sueh as the civil re- include professional, tech- rs, managera and salary employees in general whose annuities to- day average the pitiful sum of $224 per month?less than the U.S. Government- established poverty level. Yet the Con- gress has not hesitated to grant funds and increases to various antipoverty pro- grams and social security recipients and Federal employees, which has further increased living costs and turned the screw harder on the retirees. Full comparability or parity which the Commission agrees is the retirees due, has in turn owed these civil retirees ever since they retired from the loyal service they gave their Government. One of their number has submitted a report dated October 2, 1967, and another on March 21, 1968, which conclusively shows that parity is owed there now by their former employer, the U.S. Govern- merit. The bill being introduced is in line With the proposed draft furnished all members of both committees and certain other Members of the Congress. It is a fair compromise in not, requiring parity immediately but providing that parity for annuities of less than $675 per month would be attained in four successive steps at 6-month intervals, with lesser adjust- ments to none receiving hi-excess of that amount. This bill will not only give these civil retirees the annuities owed them by the Government and long overdue, but greatly enhance civil service itself and attract the desirable employees neces- sary in normal times and emergencies. The initial cost would be approxi- mately $250 to $290 million, small in comparison to the benefits other Federal employees have received. Come Let Us Reason Together HON. JOHN R. RARICK OW tomerasta IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, April 25, 1968 Mr. RARICK. Mr. Speaker, Rhodesia's Prime Minister, Ian D. Smith, finds that neither the British nor we in the United States are susceptible to reason so long as his country can be used as a political checker on the international board. All facts, decency, and settlement are irrele- vant so long as the U.N. and its con- trolling minority need a whipping boy. Inthe United States, our presidential aspirants plead to sit at a peace table with Communists, but as to Rhodesia, oppose even letting Prime Minister Smith enter the United States to defend his position under the Anglo-Saxon con- cept of free speech and fairness. By de facto Executive order, admitting our subservience to the U.N. tribal chief- tains, we boycott Rhodesian chrome mines owned by Americans so we can buy from the Russian Bolsheviks. The American people wonder just who is controlling the direction of our Gov- ernment because the gobbledygook does not represent the wishes of the majority of our people. Have we become a puppet of the U.N. or a satellite of Russia? What is the difference? I include Prime Minister I. D. Smith's speech before Rhodesian Parliament February 1, 1968, following my remarks. Some of our press, quick to quote the Communists every word, cannot find space for leaders of responsible govern- ment. SETTLEMENT OF CONSTITUTIONAL Issue (Report of a statement in the Rhodesian Par- liament on February 1, 1966, by Prime Min- ister I. D. Smith) The Palate MINISTER: It IS my intention this afternoon to deal with the main issue which is before this House and that is the suggestion that it is the Rhodesian Govern- ment which is responsible for the break which has taken place in talks between ourselves and the British Government, THE CHIEFS In order to support his case the mover put forward various arguments. The first one concerned the chiefs and here the hon. member's argument, I believe, was based on a facile legal argument in which he suggested that chiefs could not be.equated to members of Parliament but with civil servants because as he asserted, they were appointed and dis- missed in terms of the African Affairs Act. This Act, as hon. members know, gives effec!, to the recognition of the appointment of tiw chiefs according to customary law and this. of course, is nothing new in Rhodesia. He says that members of Parliament are paid by the state; I wonder then who pays the chiefs and the judges, who makes the finance available? It Is only through the au- thority of this House. There can be no dis- tinction between the source from which these various funds ore derived. The chiefs derive their position not from election nor from appointment. but from hereditary rights in accordance with the laws and cus- toms of each tribe which determines the rule of succession. There are various complicated procedures that have in be followed and spir- itual approval secured before selection and before appointment. These are the factors that are involved in the formal confirmation of approval: exem- plifying the fact that there is no questionof arbitrary appointment by Government?but only in accordance with the customs and habits of the people-- is the situation that obtained recently in the Darwin district. where it was 15 years before a chief was se- lected, simply and solely because the spirits had not spoken. It should be known that the chiefs are spokesmen for, and representatives of, their people and they are as conscious of their duty towards their people as hon. mem- bers opposite, many of whom have the sup- port of no more than a couple of dozen voters on the voters' roll. The votes in elections have no mystic qualities to make this particular system superior to any other. I would like to quote from the report of Dr. Paterson, 1962, and here was an unbiased gentleman who came from Britain to carry out an investigation in our country, and he said this at one stage in his report: "A chief cannot be fitted into any European political or administrative arrangement without great difficulty because he is a figure unknown to European conception. He is a compound of father in a widespread kinship system of re- markable endurance, of priest in a focus on occasions of deep feeling of ritual or mystical nature, of judge responsible for articulating the norms and standards of the tribe, as well as holding its members together in harmoni- ous relations, a figurehead personifying the tribe, its sense of well-being. unity and se- curity, and the emblem of the ancient past. Yet no chief is all of this and each is differ- ent from the other." I would like to refer air a moment to the Blue Book which was preduced by this Gov- ernment after the Tiger talks, which indi- cates very clearly, I would say, how the British Government knew the position. Per- haps before dealing with that I should spend a moment or two dealing with the contribu- tion on chiefs by the Leader of the Opposi- tion, because I think the two go together. He said: "I would like to say this, that the chiefs, much as we respect them as Africans, we have more than once, in fact we have always, said that their role is not that of a politician, their role is in the Tribal Trust Lands". He claims their role is to look after their tribesmen. That is indeed correct and, in fact, it confirms two points which I have made, the first of which I made to the Prime Minister of Britain when I pointed out to him that chiefs were Africans. He did not seem to believe this. It seems to be quite clear from the statement of the Leader of the Opposition that they are. It also supports the stand that we have consistently taken as far as chiefs are concerned, because we believe they are not politicians and that they should be aloof from the hurly-burly of politics and we believe that their place should be in the Senate. We have consistently Approved For Release 2001/08/28 : CIA-RDP71600364R000500120007-3 Approved For Release 2001/08/28 : CIA-RDP71600364R000500120007-3 April 3, 1968 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD ? SENATE filled the letter and spirit of these new provisions. Congress directed that the Food for Freedom program should encourage in- ternational trade. ?In 1967 world trade in agricultural products reached an all-time high of $33.9 billion, nearly 20 percent higher than in 1966. Congress directed that the Food for Freedom program should encourage an expansion of export markets for our own agricultural commodities. J.?In the past two years, this nation has enjoyed unparalleled prosperity in agricultural exports. Since 1960 our agricultural exports have grown from $3.2 billion to $5.2 billion?a gain of 62 percent. Congress directed that we should con- tinue to use our abundance to wage an unrelenting war on hunger and malnu- trition. --During 1967 we dispatched more than 15 million metric tons of food to wage the war on hunger?the equivalent of 10 pounds of food for every member of the human race. Congress determined that our Food for Freedom program should encourage gen- eral economic progress in the developing countries. ?Our food aid has helped Israel, Tai- wan, the Philippines, and Korea build a solid record of economic achievement. With our help, these nations 'have now, moved into the coMmercial market, just as Japan, Italy, Spain and others before them. Congress determined that our food aid should help first and foremost those countries that help themselves. ?Every one of our 39 food aid agree- ments in 1967 committed the receiv- ing country to a far-reaching pro- gram of agricultural self-help. Many of these programs are already bringing record results. Congress directed that we should move as rapidly as possible from sales for foreign currency to sales for dollars. ?Of the 22 countries participating in the Food for Freedom program in 1967, only four had no dollar pay- ment provision. Last year, six coun- tries moved to payments in dollars or convertible local currencies. Congress directed that we should use Food for Freedom to promote the foreign pblicy of the United States. Statistics alone cannot measure how Food for Freedom has furthered Amer- ica's goals in the world. Its real victories lie in the minds of millions who now know that America, cares. Hope is alive. Food for Freedom gives men an alterna- tive to despair. Last year was a record year in world farm output. With reasonable weather, 1968 can be even better. New agricultural technology is spreading rapidly in the developed countries. New ceretal varie- ties are bringing unexpectedly high yields in the developing lands. An agri- cultural revolution is in the making. This,rekaort shows clearly how much we haVe. contributed o th ,fevolUtion In the past year. But the breakthrough Is only beginning'. 'The pride in accom- plishments today will seem small beside the progress we can make tomorrow. LYNDON B. JOHNSON. THE WHITE HOUSE, April 3, 1968. MESSAGE FROM THE HOUSE A message from the House of Repre- sentatives by Mr. Bartlett, one of its reading clerks, announced that the House had disagreed to the amendments of the Senate to the bill (HR. 15414) to continue the existing excise tax rates on communication services and on auto- mobiles, and to apply more generally the provisions relating to payments of estimated tax by corporations, agreed to the conference asked by the Senate on the disagreeing votes of the two Houses thereon, and that Mr. MILLS, Mr. KING of California, Mr. BOGGS, Mr. BYRNES of Wisconsin, and Mr. CURTIS were ap- pointed managers on the part of the House at the conference. The message also announced that the House had passed the following bills, in which it requested the concurrence of the Senate: H.R. 12119. An act for the relief of Joseph M. Hepworth; H.R. 15591. An act for the relief of Pfc. John Patrick Collopy, US51615166; and HM. 15979. An act to amend the act of August 1, 1958, in order to prevent or mini- mize injury to fish and wildlife from the use of insecticides, herbicides, fungicides, and pesticides, and for other purposes. ENROLLED BILLS SIGNED The message further announced that the Speaker had affixed his signature to the following enrolled bills, and they were signed by the Vice President: S. 109. An Set to prohibit unfair trade practices affecting producers of agricultural products, and for other purposes; S. 172. An act for the relief of Mrs. Daisy G. Merritt; S. 1580. An act for the relief of John W. Rogers; H.R. 7325. An act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to exchange certain Federal lands for certain lands owned by Mr. Robert S. Latham, Albany, Oreg.; H.R. 10599. An act relating to the Tiwa Indians of Texas; and H.R. 11254. An act for the relief of Jack L. Good. HOUSE BILLS REFERRED The following bills were severally read twice by their titles and referred as Indicated: H.R. 12119. An act for the relief of Joseph M. Hepworth; and H.R. 15591. An act for the relief of Pfc. John Patrick Collopy, US51615166; to the Committee on the Judiciary. H.R. 15979. An act -to amend the act of August 1, 1958, in order to prevent or mini- mize injury to fish and wildlife from the use of insecticides, herbicides, fungicides, and pesticides, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Commerce. REPORTS OF COMMI EES The following reports of committees were submitted; By Mr. ANDERSON, from the Joint Com- mittee on Atomic Energy, without amend- ment. S 3803 S. 3262. A bill -to authorize appropriations to the Atomic Energy Commission in accord- ance with section 261 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and for other pur- poses (Rept. No. 1074) . By Mr. BIBLE, from the Committee on the District of Columbia, without amendment: HR. 5799. An act to amend the District of Columbia Uniform Gifts to Minors Act to provide that gifts to minors made under such act may be deposited in savings and loan associations and related institutions, and for other purposes (Rept. No. 1075) . By Mr. BIBLE, from the Committee on the District of Columbia, with an amendment: S. 2015. A bill to amend section 11-1902, District of Columbia Code, relating to the duties of the coroner of the District of Columbia (Rept. No. 1076) . By Mr. BIBLE, from the Committee on the District of Columbia, with amendments: S. 2496. A bill to authorize the Commis- sioner of the District of Columbia to enter into and renew reciprocal agreements for police mutual aid on behalf of the District of Columbia with the local governments in the Washington metropolitan area (Rept. No. 1077). EXECUTIVE REPORTS OF COMMITTEES As in executive session, The following favorable reports of nominations were submitted: By Mr. EASTLAND, from the Committee on the Judiciary: William C. Keady, of Mississippi, to be U.S. district judge for the northern district of Mississippi. By Mr. MONRONEY, from the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service: John H. Johnson, of Illinois, to be a mem- ber of the Advisory Board for the Post Office Department; and Two hundred and twenty-nine postmaster nominations. BILLS INTRODUCED Bills were introduced, read the first time, and, by unanimous consent, the second time, and referred as follows: By Mr. JACKSON (by request) : S. 3275. A bill to amend the act of Febru- ary 14, 1931, relating to the acceptance of gifts for the benefit of Indians; to the Com- mittee on Interior and Insular Affairs. (See the remarks of Mr. JACKSON when he' kintroduced the above bill, which appear under a separate hearing.) By Mr. BREWSTER: S. 3276. A bill to modernize certain provi- sions of the Civil Service Retirement Act, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service. S. 3277. A bill to strengthen the criminal penalties for the mailing, importing, or transpdrting of obscene matter, and for other purposes; to the Committee on the Judiciary. (See the remarks of Mr. BREWSTER when he Introduced the above bills, which appear under separate headings.) By Mr. MAGNUSON (by request) : S. 3278. A bill to provide for the authority for passenger vessels to operate as trade-fair exhibition ships; to the Committee on Com- merce. (See the remarks of Mr. MAPNUSON when he introduced the above bill, which appear under a separate heading.) By Mr. RIBICOFF: S. 3279. A bill for the relief of Col. Heinz Eisenberg, U.S. Army Reserve (retired) ; to the Committee on the Judiciary. Approved For Release 2001/08/28 : CIA-RDP71600364R000500120007-3 S3804 Approved For Release 2001/08/28 : CIA-RDP71600364R000500120007-3 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD ? SENATE April 3, 1968 S. 3275?,INTRODUCTION OF BILL RE- LATING TO THE ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS FOR THE BENEFIT OF INDIANS Mr. JACKSON. Mr. President, I intro- duce, for appropriate reference, a bill to amend the act of February 14, 1931, re- lating to the acceptance orgifts for the benefit of Indians. The Department of the Interior, by Letter of December 11, 1967, requested the introduction of this legislation. I ask unanimous consent that the letter from Assistant Secretary Harry R. Anderson explaining the need for the legislation oe printed in the RECORD following my remarks. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The bill will be received and appropriately re- ferred; and, without objection, the letter will be printed in the RECORD. The bill (S. 3275) to amend the act of February 14, 1931, relating to the ac- ceptance of gifts for the benefit of Indians, introduced by Mr. JACKSON, by request, was received, read twice by its title, and referred to the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs. The letter, presented by Mr. jscicsoN, is as follows: MS. DEPARTMENT 01' THE INTERIOR, OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY, Washington, DO., December 11, 1967. Ron. Husnar H. HUMPHREY, President of the Senate, Washington, D.C. DEAR Itfa. PRESIDENT: unclosed is a draft of 1, proposed bill "To amend the Act of Febru- ary 14, 1931, relating to the acceptance of 3ifts for the benefit of Indians." We recommend that the bill be referred to the appropriate committee for considera- don, and we recommend that it be enacted. The 1931 Act reads as follows: "The Secretary of the Interior be, and he ,s hereby authorized in his discretion to ac- eept contributions or donations of funds or other property, real, personal, or mixed, which nay be tendered to, or for the benefit of, :Federal Indian schools, hospitals, or other nstitutions conducted for the benefit of In- dians, or for the advancement of the Indian 'ace, and to apply or dispose of such done- dons for the use and benefit of such school, Aospital, or other institution or for the bene- .1t at individual Indians." The Act permits the acceptance of done- dons for the benefit of Indian institutions or for the advancement of the Indian race. :It permits the donations to be used only for ;he benefit of an Indian institution or for the 13enefit of individual Indians. The requirement that the donations be used for the benefit of an Indian institution or individual Indians raises doubts about ;he use of the donations for such things as research on educational curriculum to meet the special needs of Indian children; research on the special social adjustment problems of 'Indian families and individuals; projects to develop Indian communities and community leadership; museums to preserve Indian cul- ture and promote understanding of Indian people; and cooperative projects for housing improvement or resource development. In order to clarify the Act and to permit she use of donations for any purpose that will contribute to the advancement of the :ndian people within the framework of pro- grams otherwise authorized by law, the Act should be rephrased. Our proposed bill would accomplish this result. At the present time about 635,000 of do- nated funds- is on -hand. It should be noted that the Department has in the past encouraged donations to be that annuities will be anti6mlicalldr in- a decision as to its acceptability. If the Approved For Release 2001/08/28 : CIA-R P 1B 0364R000500120007-3 made to charitable organizations or to tribal governments when they were best able to administer the gift, and that practice will be continued. When the gift needs to be ad- ministered by the Secretary, however, he should have broader authority than is now contained in the 1931 Act. The Bureau of the Budget has advised that there is no objection to the presenta- tion of this draft bill from the standpoint of the Administration's program. Sincerely yours, HARRY R. ANDERSON, Assistant Secrelary of the Into ior. S. 32'75 A bill to amend the Act of February 14, 1931, relating to the acceptance of gifts for the benefit of Indians Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Act of February 14, 1931 (46 Stat. 1106, 25 11.5.0. 451), is amended to read as follows: "The Secretary of the Interior may accept, donations of funds or other property for the advancement of the Indian race, and he may use the donated property in accordance with the terms of the donation in furtherance of any program authorized by other previ- sion of law for the benefit of Indians." S. 32 ODUCTION OF BILL TO MODERNIZE CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE CIVIL SERVICE REAIRE- MENT ACT BRE'WSTe.a. Mr. President, each year various laws are enacted which benefit our Federal employees either through direct pay increases, or in im- proved and extended fringe benefits. Over the years, too, there have been a variety of bills introduced which would make liberal changes in the benefits af- fecting our Federal employees when they retire. However, these individual bills have stayed in committee iiithout action and have been reintroduced session after session. I think our retirees, after serv- ing their Government for nearly a life- time, deserve better than this. Individually, these bills affect only a small part of the retirement system. To- gether, they form the basis for a signifi- cant overhaul and modernization of the regulations governing retirees. First, the bill I introduce today will caange the computation formula on annuities by providing that after an em- ployee completes 10 years of service, all past and future service will be creditable at a 2-percent rate. Presently it is 11/2 percent for the first 5 years and 1% per- cent for the next 5. These figures would apply only to service of fewer than 10 years. Second, a surviving spouse would re- ceive 60 percent of the employee's earned annuity rather than the 55 per- cent provided for under today's regula- tions. This percentage has not been in- creased since 1962 and would, I feel, be completely justified in view of the rise in the cost oT lying in the past 6 years. It would also tend to equalize annuity pay- ments with the adjustments made last year in the Social Security Act. The automatic cost-of-living formula for the adjustment of annuities has been most recently attacked by retirees who claim that they do not receive as regular or as- high an -increase as the Federal creased whenever the cost of living goes up as much as 3 percent and stays up for 3 months in a row. Such annuity in- creases equal the percentage rise in the cost of living. My bill would cut down on the time a retiree has to wait to re- ceive an increase in annuities by making the 'automatic adjustment formula go in- to effect after the price index has risen by 2 percent for 2 consecutive months. The definition of basic pay is changed by this bill to include in the computation of annuities overtime or premium pay earned by an employee. The employee certainly works for this extra pay, and I believe should have it credited to his account when he retiree. The present penalty for survivorship annuities works much too hard a burden on the retiree. I prop se that the 2'/2- percent reduction now applied only up to $3,600 be changed to apply up to $4,- 800. Then the 10-percent reduction would apply to annuities over $4,800 rather than all amounts over $3,600 as it now does. My bill further raises survivorship benefits for children and provides for increased contributions by covered em- ployees, with matching agency contribu- tions, to guarantee the necessary funding for this liberalized pre'erion. This bill has already been introduced In the House of Representatives by the Honorable THADDEUS J. DULSKI, Chair- man of the House Post Office and Civil Service Committee. I feel that with his able leadership and with support in the Senate committee for this long overdue legislation, we can soon realize a new, workable and certainly beneficial pro- gram for our retired Federal employees. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The bill will be received and appropriately re- ferred. The bill (S. 3276) to modernize cer- tain provisions of the Civil Service Re- tirement, Act, and for other purposes, in- troduced by Mr. BREWSTER, VMS received, read twice by its title, and referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service. S. 3277?INTRODUCTION OF BILL RELATING TO CRIMINAL PENAL- TIES FOR MAILING, IMPORTING, OR TRANSPORTING OF OBSCENE MATTER Mr. BREWSTER. Mr. President, I am sure that everyone of our distinguished colleagues has had the problem of por- nography in the mails brought to his at- tention at one time or another by angered constitutents, demanding that something be done by the Federal Government to have their names removed from the mail- ing lists of these peddlers of of filth. I know that the residents of Maryland find the receipt of unsolicited pornographic publications and similar smut an in- vasion of the privacy of their homes. Personally, I find the situation deplor- able and was proud to have had a part in support title III of last year's Postal Revenue and Federal Salary Act. In that measure, the President wisely enacted in- to law provisions which would make it possible for an addressee to judge a piece worker do. The present formula provides of mail and, in his sole discretion, render 112356 Approved For Release 2001/08/28 : CIA-RDP71600364R000500120007-3 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD ? HOUSE March 28, 1968 grams. The data canndt ,be an accurate ac- counting, because in many cases the research which leads to pollution control has other objectives?the pollution control conse- quences are in those cases examples of seren- dipity. From this survey, however, will come more than a simple accounting. The sub- committee will assist the decisionmaking groups in government?Congress, Office of Science and Technology, for example?to de- termine the extent, direction, and speed ap- propriate for the Federal Government's pol- lution control efforts. But what is appropriate? A variety of an- swers were provided in recent testimony on the subject at hearings conducted by the House Committee on Science and Astro- nautics' Subcommittee on Science, Research, and Development (the Daddario committee). Yet all the testimony had one answer in common: technology already in existence can be used to give some measure of control now. Dr. Leon W. Weinberger (FWPCA) , while emphasizing the important role of research and development in solving the nation's water pollution problems, noted that many of these problems "can be alleviated by ap- plication of existing technology. In fact," he said, "in the immediate future, the most significant progress will be made in this way." On the subject of air pollution, Dr. R. E. Eckardt, speaking for the American Pe- troleum Institute, observed: "We recognize that in some cases tentative judgments must be made, in spite of gaps in our knowledge. We recognize that society cannot afford to wait until every last shred of evidence is in before taking reasonable action." Yet, he cautioned, "As new evidence is developed, a reassement, and possibly new judgments, will have to be made." And in, the area of solid waste disposal, the nation can improve its practices?"and it can do it now said Dr. Richard D. Vaughan, Chief of PHS's Solid Wastes Pro- gram. "We have the technology to do it now," he continued, "and we are working to im- prove this technology and develop tech- niques which are not only more effective but more economical." In his opening remarks, Subcommittee Chairman Emilio Q. Daddario noted: "We should not, need not, and will not wait upon research to act where we recognise the problem and have a feasible solution. On the other hand, it would be wasteful of time and resources to pursue a crash pro- gram where quality deterioration is only vaguely established or where abatement costs probably outweigh benefits." Still one other kind of answer demands attention. Responding to subcommittee questions, Dr. Eckardt said that he believed that air pollution Will be controlled?should be controlled?but that it will probably not be controlled solely on the basis of health. Rather, he noted, we'll clear the air simply because people are sick and tired of the stench. The pressures for environmental improve- ment are mounting rapidly. Thus, reasonable men must accelerate their participation in reasonable and coordinated action to im- prove the environment if we are to avoid the wastefulness of over-reaction. OUR DISTINGUISHED COLLEAGUE PROM PATMAN'S SWITCH (Mr. CASEY asked and was given per- ? mission to address the House for 1 min- ute to revise and extend his remarks and to include extraneous matter.) Mr. CASEY. Mr. Speaker, no man in this great botly has more loyal friends, or is held In higher esteem, than our dis- tinguished colleague, the gentleman from Texas, WRIGHT PATMAN. He has served honorably and well for 40 years, and is outranked in seniority by only two other great Members, Speak- er McCoRmAcx and Representative EMANUEL CELLER. We, in the Texas dele- gation, are especially proud of the dean of our delegation and his great career in this body. It was particularly gratifying to me to read in the Houston Chronicle's Texas magazine last Sunday a warm and pene- trating story about WRIGHT PATMAN. Be- cause I know that his friends and col- leagues will appreciate having the op- portunity to read the article, I place it at this point in the RECORD: THAT MAN FROM PATIVIAN'S SWITCH (By Lucille Uyttsrlinde) Young Wright Patman spotted three men sitting under a tree. "Ah ha," he thought, "three potential voters." The trio watched him idly as he ambled up. "Howdy," Patman said. "I'm running for Congress. You all heard of it around here?" They fixed him with a steady gaze, then one replied, "Yeah, we heard about it. We heard 'em laughin' about it." It happened on a sleepy morning 40 years ago, in the tiny community of Weaver near Sulphur Springs. And it contributed nothing to the confidence of the neophyte cam- paigner; he'd already vowed that if he lost this first race for Congress he'd quit poli- tics. But he didn't lose, and today U.S. Rep. Wright Patman of Texarkana is outranked in seniority by only two men, Speaker Mc- Cormack and Rep. Celler of New York. He is unopposed for re-election to his 21st term, which is not surprising. According to newspaper editor J. Q. Mahaffey of Texar- kana, folks in the First Congressional Dis- trict say that "if Wright Patman can't get it done, it can't be done in Washington." The Texas congressman has built up con- siderable seniority, and with that seniority, influence. He is variously known as the second most important Texan in Washington, close friend of Lyndon Johnson, scourge of the banking industry and the Federal Reserve Board, and the last of the great populists. Patman is chairman of the prestigious House Banking and Currency Committee, and is so frequently in the financial news that the New York Times once said that he often is the financial news. He also is ranking member of the House Select Committee on Small Business, chair- man of the joint House-Senate Committee on Defense Production, and vice chairman of the joint House-Senate Economic Com- mittee. Most committee chairmen and the indus- tries their committees oversee have amica- ble relationships. Not so Wright Patman and the banking industry. He is an embattled committee chairman, and when he and Wil- liam McChesney Martin, chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, meet in the awe- some House Banking and Currency Commit- tee's hearing room, there is a packed house to hear their verbal exchanges. Their opinion as to what is best for the country on money and credit matters are irreconcilable, and acrimonious statements sometimes electrify the atmosphere. Even so, Chairman Martin in 1965 said: "Chairman Patman and I have been friends for years. We disagree frequently but never with personal animosity. He has asked for my resignation four times this year but I bear no ill will. I have told him that if I decide to resign I will let him know prompt- ly." The "Fed," as Patmem calls the Federal Reserve System, is out'of bias reach, and it is probably the biggest frustration of his long life as a legislator. Patman says he is trying to "make the Federal Reserve System responsive to the best interests of the people of the United States." He wants to shorten terms of mem- bers of the board, require audits of the sys- tem's books, and require that the system go to Congress for appropriations. He also wants the board chairman to go out of office with the president who appoints him. His plan would give the Congress and the administration more control over Monetary matters. The "hard money" proponents say that is just what the Federal Reserve Board was set up to prevent. Patman's unrelenting fight against the "hard money" forces has brought forth from him many statements such as this: "If we allow the bankers, who profit from high interest, to continue to fix the interest rates, they will soon have a high interest mortgage on all the usable property in the country. They do not want to own it, as that would require them to pay taxes on it. They much prefer to have a tax-exempt lien on it." Consistent and persistent are two words which describe Wright Patman. He makes decisions only after considerable study and documentation, then firmly adheres to them. The thread that runs through the entire fabric of his legislative career is his deter- mination to work in behalf of the "little people." Fortune magazine once referred to him as the "Warrior From Patman Switch." (He was born at Patman Switch, in Morris County, named for his family and a Katy Railroad switch.) Patman has become a folk hero to a tre- mendous majority of the people in his 17- county district, and also to many people throughout the country. ' He has been a consistent champion of rural electrification, legislation in behalf of the family farmer, soil conservation and water resource measures, of rural area de- velopment and legislation providing aid to the development of small towns and small business. He has opposed concentration of economic power, monopoly and corporate mergers which, in his opinion, diminish effec- tive competition. He has conducted major in- vestigations into tax-exempt private founda- tions looking for abuses of the tax laws. Most of his mail from home relates to personal or community problems, not mat- ters of national or international significance. The biggest volume of letters concerning his legislative activities is written, by non- Texans. They run to comments something like this, from a Spokane, Wash., locomo- tive engineer: "Just a line to let you know that way out here in Washington there is support for you. Keep slugging away. How I wish I could vote for you." Patman holds to his convictions?stub- bornly, some say?no matter the opposition he meets, and, in the terms of the locomo- tive engineer, keeps slugging away. His first major congressional fight was for the World War I veterans bonus payment. Five vetoes by four Presidents, beginning in 1922, failed to deter him. The measure was passed over Roosevelt's veto in 1.936. It was the start of his fight with bankers and the Federal Reserve, which sharply tightened the avail- ability of money when the bill was passed. He says he will never introduce a bill sole- ly for political advantage, but he does not object to introducing a bill that he expects to fail if he thinks it will serve as a gathering point for a cause he favors. Big banking, big business and the interest of the "little fella" are his recurring themes. He has not been able to alter the structure of affect the action of the Federal Reserve, but the vice chairman 3. L. Robertson, corn- Approved For Release 2001/08/28 : CIA-RDP71600364R000500120007-3 Approved For Release 2001/08/28 : CIA-RDP71600364R000500120007-3 March 28, 1968 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD ? HOUSE 112355 which began in 1945 when we permitted the First, premium pay: Many Federal em- lapse of time after living costs h-ave in- French to go back into Indochina, thus re- ployees, such as agents in the customs, creased before the retiree gets any re- versing the view held by President Roosevelt. which continued through years of increased immigration, narcotics, and alcohol tax lief. My bill reduces the timelag by ap- American involvement, particularly after services, as well as law enforcement em- proximately two-fifths by making the 1954, and which culminated with the deci- ployees, consistently are required to work automatic adjustment effective at the sions of 1965 when the United States started overtime as part of their jobs. Their start of the second Month after the Price sending its own forces into combat both in premium pay fc) this overtime work is Index has risen by 2 percent for 2 con- South Vietnam and in bombing and shelling not now considered in computing their secutive months. att %aka on North Vietnam. These last deci- retirement benefits. My bill corrects this Seventh, financing: The financial con- was taken to be congressional authorization, situation by providing for calculation of dition of the civil service retirement sys- sions. for which the Tonkin Gulf resolution made the conflict an American war with retirement benefits on the basis of both tem is, of course, a matter of first con- South Vietnamese support, instead of a South regular and premium pay earned by an cern to me as chairman of the Commit- Vietnamese war with American support. employee, tee on Post Office and Civil Service. My in the present mood of the Congress, I Second, annuity computation formula: bill will cause no increase whatever in the financial obligations of the retire- ment system. The bill specifically pro- vides for increased contributions by cov- ered employees-7 percent instead of the present 61/2: with matching agency con- tributions and . regular appropriation procedures, will guarantee the necessary funding. The changes in the civil service retire- ment system which I am proposing will be referred to our Retirement Subcom- mittee and I am asking the subcommit- tee to give them thorough consideration. am under no illusion that the concurrent Under present law, the formula for corn- resolution introduced today may be adopted. PUting an employee's earned annuity is Its introduction, therefor, is more in the his average salary multiplied by 11/2 per- nature of a protest against the present po:Icies which have led us deeper and deeper cent for each of his first 5 years of serv- ile? the morass of an unwinnable war. ice; by 1% percent for each of his next If circumstances were to change so that 5 years of service; and by 2 percent for serious consideration might be given to the each year of service in .excess of 10. concurrent resolution, its present abbreviated Under my bill, once an employee has form would no doubt have to be substantially reached the 10-year mark his compute- amended and amplified. As a practical mat- tion formula will be changed to 2 per- ter, the simple repeal of the Tonkin Gulf cent for each year of his total service. resolution, without additional statements of policy as to the course which should be The lower percentages will apply only to tairen, would produce confusion. Many ques- annuities based on less than 10 years of tions would remain unanswered as to the in- service. This change is in keeping with tent of the Congress With regard to the dis- the underlying principle that the civil position and future role of the American service retirement plan is a career ENVIRONMENTAL EQUALITY forces now deployed in the area, program. (venture to say that many more Members (Mr. DADDARIO asked and was given would have joined in cosponsoring this Third, penalty for survivorship provi- permission to address the House for resolution if it were not for this practical sions: A retiring employee today must 1 minute, to revise and extend his re- problem of how we go about undoing what take reductions of 21/e percent on the marks, and to include ex (raneous mate - has long since been done. It is safe to say, first $3,600, and 10 percent on all over rial.) I scelieve, that the vote on the original Ton- $3,600, of his earned annuity to provide Mr. DADDARIO. Mr. Speaker, en- di fferent one If the then membership of the $3,600 point, kin Gulf resolution would have been a very benefits for a surviving spouse. The vironmental quality is an issue which House had been able to foresee the situation at which the 10 percent polarizes viewpoints between the ex- we would be in today, 3 years later. charge begins, was set years ago when tremes of conservationists and recalci- The resolution offered by our colleagues living costs were far lower than they trent vested interests. In the hearings of Messrs. UDALL and FINDLEY a few weeks ago are today. It works an undue hardship the Subcommittee on, Science, Research, and Development of the Committee on the policy questions regarding Southeast annuities. My bill would apply the much chew wide support because it sought to open on employees who retire on small Science and Technology we have been Asia. I view Mr. WoLsir's resolution as another method of achieving the goal of securing a seeking objective testimony to separate fairer 21/2 percent reduction to the first reevAuation of our policy. $4,800 of earned annuity, so that the 10 out the high priority action programs in -- k-e.., percent would affect only annuities in Pollution abatement. There is much more excess of that amount. The net annuity to be done than annual budgets and IfiTRODUCTION OF LEGISLATION gain for a lower paid employee would be manpower limitations will afford. Thus, TO IMPROVE CIVIL SERVICE RE- $90 a year. a strategy of waste management is nee- TIREMENT PROGRAM Fourth, surviving children: Survivor- essary which will concentrate action on (Mr. DULSKI asked and was given ship benefits for a child were fixed nearly well defined problems where feasible Permission to address the House for 1 12 years ago at $600 a year if there is one solutions exist. minute and to revise and extend his re- surviving parent and $720 per year if A recent editorial by Mr. Melvin J. marks.) there is no surviving parent. My bill in- Josephs in Environmental Science and Mr. DITLSKI. Mr. Speaker, I have in- creases each of those benefits by $120 a Technology states: troduced today a comprehensive bill de- Year. Benefits for the child with one The pressures for environmental improve- signed to modernize the civil service re- surviving parent will be $720 a year and ment are mounting rapidly. Thus, reasonable eirement system. the child with no surviving parents will men must accelerate their participation 3. n The bill brings together in one meas- receive $840 a year. reasonable and coordinated action to ini- ure an array of changes and improve- Fifth, surviving spouse benefits: To- prove the environment if we are to avoid the ments in benefits which previously have day, when an employee dies, his surviv- wastefulness of over-reaction. been proposed individually and already ing spouse, with certain exceptions, re- Under unanimous consent, I insert the are before our Retirement Subeornmit- ceives 55 percent of the employee's editorial referred to, as follows: tee in various forms. earned annuity. This percentage rela- EXISTING TECHNOLOGY CAN ALLEVIATE POLLII- There is support for updating our civil tionship was last adjusted in 1962. My 1 ION IN UNITED STATES service retirement system so as to bring bill would raise the figure to 60 percent. Like projects anywhere, projects in tic it closer to a par wtih retirement pro- This is justified not only on the basis of Federal Government relating to environ- grams in progressive private industry., increased living costs but in order to mental management have proliferated. So, My bill deals with the shortcomings maintain near parity with the adjust- to keep track of what its various agencies are and inequities which have been of the ments made last year in the Social up to, the Federal Council for Science and Technology's Committee on. Environmental most concern to postal and other rank- Security Act. Quality established, about six months ago. and-file Federal employees. There also is Sixth, automatic cost-of-living ad- a Subcommittee on Research, Development, provision for financing the benefits. .iustment formula: In substance, present and Demonstration. This subcommittee has Any changes in the retirement system, law grants automatic annuity adjust- already come up with what may be the best however, must be studied carefully and ments effective on the first day of the estimate of the Federal Government's spend- ii is my feeling that if we are going to third month that begins after the Con- ing for pollution research, development, and make any changes at all we should look sinner Price Index has risen at least 3 1968 (see page 90). demonstration?$251 million in fiscal year et the overall picture and act accord- percent for 3 consecutive months above ' The estimate is derived largely from a ingly, rather than proceeding piecemeal. its level when the last previous annuity 'survey of about 30 departments and agencies Following is an explanation of the fea- increase writs e eeted. Tens.. i a es a sub- that at least in some measure have been fund- ,. tures of my bill: Approved For Releastult0011013YZetfrCIPPRi3P/IER3V364ROOtiftilMM or extramural pro-