APPOINTMENT OF NEW DIRECTOR FOR CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP70-00058R000200120130-2
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
January 31, 2001
Sequence Number: 
130
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
September 21, 1961
Content Type: 
OPEN
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP70-00058R000200120130-2.pdf365.18 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release *2001/03/02 : CIA-RDP70-00058R000200120130-2 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - SENATE 19439 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Washington, D.C., September 14, 1961. Hon. MIKE MANSFIELD, U.S. Senate, Washington, D.C. DEAR SENATOR MANSFIELD: This letter is in response to your request that we give further consideration to the need for a northern Great Plains regional center for soil and wa- ter conservation research proposed for loca- tion at Sidney, Mont. Senate Document No. 59, 86th Congress, 1st session, the working group report on facility needs for soil and water conservation research, recommends Sidney, Mont., as a suitable location for the establishment of a regional center for research on problems of moisture conservation, and water and wind erosion. Moisture availability is always a limiting factor in the northern Great Plains, both for dryland farming and range forage production. This year's disastrous drought has made research to develop more effective methods for productive use of the limited moisture available for crop or forage pro- duction urgent. Dryland farming in the area has been limited by climate, chiefly to wheat fallow. Recently, safflower, an oil seed crop, has come into use in the area on lands diverted from wheat production. Production of safflower has aggravated erosion problems. We are assured by many years' experience of excellent Cooperation at Sidney with the Montana Agricultural Experiment Station through its Eastern Branch Experiment Sta- tion. We have been informally offered a site for the headquarters building of the proposed regional center on the lands of the branch experiment station. Close association and cooperation with the personnel of the Mon- tana Branch Experiment Station would greatly facilitate research at the proposed center. The work of the proposed regional re- search center would be expedited by use of a tract of land which would be made avail- able near Culbertson by a group of soil conservation districts for field studies. Other areas could be obtained for use as needed. The proposed northern Great Plains re- gional center would directly serve eastern Montana and adjacent areas of the Dakotas and Wyoming. Results of research on mois- ture conservation would be applicable gen- erally on wheat-fallow and hard range lands in other areas. Sincerely yours, ORVILLE L. FREEMAN, Secretary. SEPTEMBER 15, 1961. Hon. ORVILLE FREEMAN, Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. DEAR MR. SECRETARY: Senator METCALF and I are today sending the attached letter to the President and we will appreciate your con- tinued interest in the proposed Soil and Water Research Center at Sidney, Mont. Wilth best personal wishes, I am, Sincerely yours, SEPTEMBER 15, 1961. Hon. DAVID E. BELL, Director, Bureau of the Budget, Washington, D.C. DEAR MR. BELL: Senator METCALF and I are today sending the attached letter to the President and we would appreciate your co- operation in getting this project started. As you know, the Department of Agriculture's program for the current fiscal year includes two similar facilities in Alabama and Missouri. Wilth best personal wishes, I am, Sincerely yours, MIKE MANSFIELD. FACTS FAVORING THE LOCATION OF A NORTHERN GREAT PLAINS SOIL AND WATER CONSERVA- TION RESEARCH CENTER AT SIDNEY, MONT. 1. A study committee of Federal and State scientists recommended the establishment of a soil and water conservation research center in the general area of eastern Montana and the western Dakotas. Sidney is the most central location available to serve the area in question. 2. The study committee also recommended that the proposed Soil and Water Conserva- tion Research Center should be associated with a land-grant college of agriculture. There is no land-grant college campus sit- uated in the immediate area to be served but an extension of the Montana State College campus is available in the form of the east- ern branch of the Montana Agricultural Ex- periment Station. The recommended land- grant college affiliation can be achieved through this relationship. Furthermore, a site for the headquarters building of the research center can be provided on the lands of the branch experiment station. 3. The proposed location at Sidney can reach out easily to the important soil and water situations characteristic of the north- ern Great Plains. Important problem situa- tions are present in the area on dry crop- lands, irrigated lands, and rangelands. Most important, perhaps, is the fact that the Sidney location is near the dividing line between the glaciated and the unglaciated soils of the northern Great Plains and the problems of both of these important soil situations can be studied readily from Sidney. 4. The farm and ranch people of north- eastern Montana have a long record of sup- port for soil and water conservation research, including the expenditure of locally pro- vided funds for the support of soil and water research carried on cooperatively with the Agricultural Research Service and earlier with the Soil Conservation Service over a period of more than 20 years. The continu- ing nature of this local support is unique and should be encouraged and supplemented. It is doubtful if this degree of local support and leadership in the field of soil and water conservation research can be duplicated at any other place in the Nation. 5. The local supporters of soil and water conservation research have extended them- selves to the limit to provide permanence for such a research effort in the area. For approximately 20 years, the soil conserva- tion districts in the area leased a farm which was made available without charge as a site for soil and water conservation research. These same soil conservation districts pur- chased a farm of 80 acres near Culbertson on April 1, 1958. This tract of land is available without charge as a site for soil and water conservation research. The farm now owned by the soil conservation districts cost $7,200. It is operated through a group of citizens organized as the Northeast Montana Research Committee. 6. The area to be served by the proposed Soil and Water Conservation Research Center at Sidney is facing major adjustments in its agriculture. One important phase of adjust- ment is already underway with the develop- ment of safflower production on lands di- verted from wheat production in northeast- ern Montana and northwestern North Da- kota. Safflower production has developed in the area to the extent that a processing plant was opened at Culbertson during 1959. This new crop holds great promise for increasing the agricultural income of the area but has brought with it several problems requiring additional research. Among them is the problem of erosion of the land after the safflower crop has been harvested. Soil and water research related to this problem will aid in the adjusting of the agriculture of the area away from grain crops which are now in surplus. 7. The city of Sidney is among the most pleasant and progressive in the Northern Great Plains area. It is located in the Yel- lowstone River Valley in a setting of produc- tive irrigated agriculture. The valley is bor- dered by dry crop and range lands. Sidney is a growing city with modern facilities. It has an outstanding school system and con- struction will begin on a new high school this spring. A new hotel completed within the past 10 years is among the finest in Mon- tana. Sidney is served by railroad, bus line, and Frontier Airlines. INCOME TAX TREATMENT OF CER- TAIN LOSSES SUSTAINED IN CON- VERTING FROM STREET RAILWAY TO BUS OPERATIONS Mr. HUMPHREY. Mr. President, I understand that the bill to which I re- ferred a moment ago is at the desk. If it is, I move that the Senate proceed to the consideration of the bill. The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- pore. The clerk will state the bill by title for the information of the Senate. The LEGISLATIVE CLERK. A bill (H.R. 8652), relating to the income tax treat- ment of certain losses sustained in con- verting from street railway to bus opera- tions. The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- pore. The question is on agreeing to the motion of the Senator from Mon- tana. The motion was agreed to; and the Senate proceeded to consider the bill. Mr. HUMPHREY. Mr. President, the bill was passed unanimously by the House, and it was reported favorably by the Committee on Finance. It relates to a public utility; therefore, there can be no private gain involved. It will af- fect only the rate structure, to the inter- est of the consumer. I am hopeful that the Senate may see fit to pass the bill. Mr. PROXMIRE. Mr. President, will the Senator yield? Mr. HUMPHREY. I yield. Mr. PROXMIRE. I should like to ask the Senator from Minnesota whether this will affect the Treasury of the United States in any way. Will it reduce the revenue of the Treasury? Mr. HUMPHREY. Not in the long run. Mr. PROXMIRE. Not in the long run? Mr. HUMPHREY. No. Mr. PROXMIRE. Is the bill printed? Mr. HUMPHREY. Yes, it is printed. It was reported favorably to the Senate by the Committee on Finance. It was reported favorably to the Senate a year ago, but the Senate did not act on it because we did not have time to do so. It had been passed by the House a year ago. It had full hearings in both the Senate and the House. Mr. PROXMIRE. No objection was raised in the Committee on Finance, and it was passed unanimously by the House? Mr. HUMPHREY. Yes. The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- pore. The question is on the third read- ing of the bill. The bill (H.R. 5751) was ordered to a third reading, was read the third time, and passed. Approved For Release 2001/03/02 : CIA-RDP70-00058R000200120130-2 SEP 2 2 19G1 P70-0 Approved For Release 20 03 1-tlCIA-R d 19 CONGRESSIONAL RE ORD - SENAT Mr. HUMPHREY. I move that the Senate reconsider the vote by which the bill was passed. Mr. MANSFIELD. I move to lay that motion on the table. The motion to lay on the table was agreed to. YOKO TAKAYASHIKI Mr. MANSFIELD. Mr. President, I move that the Senate proceed to the consideration of Calendar No. 1070, H.R. 2640. The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- pore. The bill will be stated by title for the information of the Senate. The CHIEF CLERx. A bill (H.R. 2640) for the relief of Yoko Takayashiki. The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- pore. The question is on agreeing to the motion of the Senator from Montana. The motion was agreed to; and the Senate proceeded to consider the bill. Mr. MANSFIELD. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent to have printed in the RECORD an excerpt from the report (No. 1089), explaining the purposes of the bill. There being no objection, the excerp The purpose of the bill is to grant t he minor child to be adopted by citizens the United States the status of a nonqu im- migrant, which is the status norm en- joyed by the alien minor childre f U.S. The beneficiary of the bill ix a -year-old native and citizen of Japan, w presently resides in that country with and Mrs. Daniel Iwai Also, U.S. citizens,. .ho adopted the beneficiary on September- 1961. Mr. Also is a chief warrant offi in the U.S. Army. Mrs. Also was lawf admitted to the United States for per ent residence and was thereafter natural a U.S. citizen on November 3, 1953. . and Mrs. Also are scheduled to return ? United States within the near future, d desire to bring their adopted daughter, th them. The ACTING PR IDENT pro tem- pore. The questio on the third read- The bill was or ed to a third read- ing, was read the ird time, and passed. the relief The AC tana. The Senate which mittee Senate proceed to the Calendar No. 881, S. 521. PRESIDENT pro tem- Charles J. Utterback. NG PRESIDENT pro tem- question is on agreeing to of the Senator from Mon- the Judiciary with an amend- page 1, line 9, after the word e out ,the cite oe se ration veot$ r o etire- t v Service Retirement. Act on September 30,' 1,959, through October 31, 1959, the date on which he would have been separated for such pur- pose except for the erroneous computa- tion of his term of service by the Corps of Engineers" and Insert "September 30, 1959, the date of i'is separation from service for the p Trpose of retirement under the Civil rvice Retirement Act (in accordance ith an erroneous com- putation of hi erm of service made by the Corps of 4figineers) through October 12, 1959, th date on which he became eligible for etirement."; so as to make Be it a ted by the Senate and House of Represen tives of the United States of America,n Congress assembled, That the Secret of the Treasury is authorized and direc to pay, out of any money in the Tress y not otherwise appropriated, to Cha S J. Utterback, of Alea, Hawaii, a sum eq to the amount he would have received as Ompensation had he continued in his e loyment with the Corps of Engineers, ment Act (in accordance with an erroneous computation of his term of service made by the Corps of Engineers) through October 12, 1959, the date on which he became eligible for retirement. Mr. MANSFIELD. Mr. Presiders ask unanimous consent to have p ed in the RECORD an excerpt from port (No. 898), explaining the pu ses of was ordered to be printed in the RECORD, as follows: PURPOSE The purpose of the bill, as amended, is to authorize the Secretary of the Treasury to pay to Mr. Charles J. Utterback, of Aiea, Hawaii, a sum equal to the amount he would have received as compensation had he con- tinued his employment in the Corps of Engi- neers of the U.S. Army, Honolulu district, from September 30, 1959, the date of his separation from service for the purpose of retirement under the Civil Service Retire- ment Act, in accordance with an erroneous computation of his term of service made by the Corps of Engineers, through October 12, 1959, the date on which he became eligible for retirement. STATEMENT The unfavorable report of the Depart- ment of the Army on this bill shows that Mr. Charles Utterback was born August 5, 1898, in Landes, Ill., and entered the U.S. Army on December 3, 1917, and remained on active duty until he was honorably dis- charged at Camp Zachary Taylor, Ky., on January 17, 1919. Mr. Utterback reentered the Army on July 1, 1928, and remained on active duty until receipt of hi second honorable discharge on July 1, 19 Mr. Utterback received a civil service ap t- was erroneously retired from the rolls of the U.S. Army Engineer district, Honolulu, Hawaii, on September 30, 1959. Mr. Utter- back would not have completed his 30 years of service required for optional retirement until October 12, 1959. Since Mr. Utterback's separation had be- come effective and he could not be restored to the rolls, the district engineer, U.S. Army Engineer district, Honolulu, took corrective action making the effective date of retire- ment October 31, 1959. Mr. Utterback w 60V granted length of service credit for October 1959 without actually having performed any duties, so that he could meet the minimum eligibility requirements for optional retire- ment. This was accomplishe dministra- tively by granting Mr. Utterbk leave nunc pro tune. This committee is min length of service for tee purpose of retire- ment under the Civil Service Retirement Act. There is no doubt that Mr. Utterback would have gladly worked through the month of October so that he would have been eligible not only to draw his retirement but also to have drawn his salary for each day up to the day when he would receive his retirement check, which would have been November 1, 1959. However, since Mr. Utterback became eligible to retire on October 12, 1959, this committee feels that he should be paid com- pensation for only those days which it was actually necessary for him to have worked for purposes of drawing his retirement and, therefore, recommends that the bill, as amended, be favorably considered. The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- pore. The question is on agreeing to the amendment. Thendment was agreed to. APPOINTMENT OF NEW DIRECTOR FOR CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY ;,,~, r. President, the Whi a ,use announced several weeks ago that Allen W. Dulles would retire as Director -'entral Intelligence Agency before the end of this year. Yet Congress is only hours away from adjournment and the President has left the legislative branch in the dark with respect to whom he will nominate to succeed Mr. Dulles. I am deeply disturbed about this sit- uation. Unlike other Government agency heads the Director of CIA has been per- sonally vested by Congress with sweep- ing autonomous authority. The next 90-day_ period, from the standpoint of peace or war, may be one of the most crucial in our Nation's his- tory. The success of the United States in these most critical days ahead requires the finest coordination of intelligence and the most reliable foreign intelligence operations. Tk> ell -will be making a grave mistake if he does not us ever effort to persuade Mr. Dulles to x Ms1 the competence Of'hls=p"r,posed successor can be, thoroughly, scrutinized by the U.S. Congress. GOODBYE "PORKY" M BOGGS. Mr. President, on Wednesday, September 20, one of the truly fine gentleman in th sports world, Golfer Ed "Porky" Ol' passed away. "Old Pork Cho as he was known to his fellow essionals, succumbed to the drea ease, cancer. the Corps of En- determining his Approved For Release 2001/03/02 : CIA-RDP70-00058R000200120130-2