ATTACHED MEMORADUM FROM THE DIRECTOR OF SECURITY DEALING WITH R&D SECURITY PROCEDURES

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP69B00596R000100160025-2
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
November 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
February 22, 2000
Sequence Number: 
25
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
July 18, 1966
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP69B00596R000100160025-2.pdf138.41 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2000/05/04: CIA-RDP69B00596R00010016.902572 _ 25X1A 25X1A 5X1A 25X1A 25X1A 25X1A 7 0162/66 18 July 1966 MEMORANDUM FOR: Executive Officer/DDS&T SUBJECT : Attached Memorandum from the ector of Security Dealing with R&D Security Procedures 1. Historically the referenced memorax2dum was caused by several cables from the Director of the Air Force Project on the West Coast 25X1A e to Agency attempts to sign up his staff for and access. As a result the DNRO sent over the attached request (marked basic)asd a survey of the security practices of both the Air Force and this Agency in the R & D field was conducted by representatives of the Special Security Center last February. 2. Paragraph Za represents a change from present procedures in that all contractor clearances will be recorded in the CIA Central Index. The permissible language "It would save time and money if. . one could build an clearability previously established. . . is obviously designed to permit this Agency to continue (without coming right out and saying it) to take a fresh look at an individual's clearability despite the fact that he may currently possess an Air Force M=Iclearance. . Paragraph 2b represents no change from the current practice. 4. Paragraph ac appears to be intentionally ambiguous compared with the language of 2b. This ambiguity is undoubtedly designed to encompass those Projects where joint Air Force/CIA access approval authority has been agreed upon while at the same time countenance the sole authority of a Program Director managing an activity where such agreements have not been reached. Approved For 6eLaSe?2C101) /04 : CIA-RDP69800596ROG0 0014325,2 25X1A 25X1A Approved For Release 2000/05/04 P69600596R000100160025-2 -2- 0162/66 Copy..4:_of_de_ SUBJECT: Attached M.rroranduin fromthe D/OS dealing with R&D Security Procedures 25X1A 5. Paragraph Zd app.ar. to be directly responsive to Dr. MOM request. The NRO will be the repository for the Registry. 6. The language in paragraph Ze "placed under control" gives no guidance concerning whether an R&D effort would be associated with an existing operational project, or whether access would be permitted 25X1A for anyone holding any clearance. I believe from * security clearability standpoint that the latter interpretation is intended. 25X1A 25X1A 25X1A 25X1A 7. Paragraph f approaches,but does not quite come to gripe with, one of the underlying issues where it says that R&D activities should be formally entered into the System "where a complete system is deemed to be feasible:" Undoubtedly the memorandum intends that the Program Director will be the one who determines feasibility. In the past this has beenPdebatable point with the Air Force instating that the DNR.0 must make this decision. Also the words 'formally entered into the System" does not define how this is accomplished. am sure it is intended that the present procedures under which. the Da makes this formal determination will be retained. c t Cys 1,2,3 544/6. Cys 1,2 52080/6 Cy 2c 0/DD/S&T:mlf:4006(18 July 1966) Distribution: Cy 1 & 2 - Addressee Cy 3 & 4 - AC/SMS/DDS&T Cy 5 & 6 - DD/S&T Reg. AC/SM1/DDS&T 25X1A 25X1A Approved For Release 2000/05/04: CIA-RDP69600596R0001001600