MEETING ON U-2/TACKLE ANALYSIS PROJECT

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP68B00724R000100080002-1
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 12, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 16, 2002
Sequence Number: 
2
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
August 31, 1966
Content Type: 
MFR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP68B00724R000100080002-1.pdf104.79 KB
Body: 
25X1A TOP ySLECgREm App.6JLRf For Release 2002/08/JeECIAIRC?P68W0724R000100080002-1 0 CONTROL SYSTEM Q2700-66 25X1A Copy 31 August 1966 MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD SUBJECT: Meeting on U-2/TACKLE Analysis Project 1. At 0830 hours on 31 August 1966, a meeting was convened in the OSA Control Center for further discussions on the U-2/TACKLE analysis project. The meeting was chaired by Colonel Bacalis, OSA. Working group members present included the following: 25X1A 2. Colonel Bacalis outlined for the group his concept of the elements and areas which should be covered in the completed study and requested that each of the offices participating (OSA, OSI, OEL) address itself to specific parts of the problem. He noted that his was not an all-inclusive list of considerations and invited all participants to contribute any additional inputs which they thought were relevant and helpful. The general outline described by Colonel Bacalis is as follows: a. The Threat - OSI (1) What is the nature of the threat. (2) Number of SAM sites. (3) New signatures. (4) Movement of sites (5) Time required to move site. (6) Prediction re: location of new sites. HANDLE VIA Approved For Release 2002/08/06r6CIASI R B00724R000100080002-1 25X1A TOP SECRrr" Ap `For Release 2002/08/0dP8M4Pi685W0724R000100080002-1 25X1A HANDLE VIA 0 2700-66 25X1A CONTROL SYSTEM Page 2 (7) CHICOM tactics and techniques. (8) Analysis of significant COMINT. (9) Modification of SAM system and/or new systems. 25X1A (1) Analysis of tapes from a selected series of missions to identify types of radars, new and unusual signals and their description. (2) Compare NSAJ information where available. Also research for any applicable satellite data. (3) Compare USAF and Navy acquired ELINT data. (4) Review of equipment failures and reasons. (5) Fe-evaluate tapes of previous missions for signals possibly missed. (6) Identify deficiencies in present ELINT equipment. (7) Propose modifications to present equip- ment for near future (60-90 days) and longer term (3 to 6 months). c. Operational Aspects - OSA (1) Review and prepare chart of routes flown, timing and tactics employed. (2) Re-evaluate tactical doctrine, i.e., maneuvers, ECM systems, U-2 configurations. (3) Note NPIC research and OEL-OSI parti- cipation in mission planning. 3. All participants were requested to present their conclusions concerning continued employment of currently configured U-2's in the CHICOM SAM environment and re- commendations for enhancing the viability of the program for the future. 4. In concluding, Colonel Bacalis noted the high priority assigned this project by the DD/S&T and requested that participants apply themselves solely to this project I IDEALIST Approved For Release 2002/08Np &A-CWi68B00724R000100080002-1 TOP SECRF App)eveFor Release 2002/08/a6)EUIR 724R000100080002-1 25X1A 25X1A 0 Q2700-66 Page 3 until it is completed. The meeting adjourned at 1000 hours with agreement that the full ad hoc committee would me t at 1400 hours on 1 September to review the presenta- tions of the working group members. Special Assistant Office of Special Activities 25X1A 25X1A 25X1A SA/OSAJ bjg (31 Aug 66) Distribution: Cy 1 - SA/OSA 2 - DD/OEL 5 - C/IDEA/OSA 6 - RB/OSA 3 - C/DSD/OSI 4 - D/OSA 25X1A .25X1A Approved For Release 2002/0 ($ .K-o k68B00724R000100080002-1